Ed Hard Stephen Farnsworth David Pearson Methods for Conducting O-D Travel Surveys on High Volume (HV) Facilities 11 th Conference on Transportation Planning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beltline Highway ITS – Ramp Metering Project ODOT Planners Meeting April 25, 2012.
Advertisements

Managed Lanes Development Strategy Phase I District Four October 17, 2012.
Capacity, Level of Service, Intersection Design (1)
Surveying and Modeling Long Distance Trips Stacey Bricka, TTI Erik Sabina, DRCOG Catherine Durso, University of Denver Julie Paasche, PTV NuStats Presented.
COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE SIZE ENFORCEMENT. CURRENT CHALLENGES Significant Growth in CMV Traffic Increased congestion and delay Demand for larger and heavier.
I-15 Managed Lanes: Building on Success And Lessons Learned I-15 Managed Lanes: Building on Success And Lessons Learned.
Commercial Vehicles and Freight Mobility Mark Newland Deputy Commissioner of Traffic Management Indiana Department of Transportation.
Subarea Model Development – Integration of Travel Demand across Geographical, Temporal and Modeling Frameworks Naveen Juvva AECOM.
ROUNDABOUTS. What Is A Roundabout? A specific type of traffic circle Not all traffic circles are roundabouts.
Case Study 4 New York State Alternate Route 7. Key Issues to Explore: Capacity of the mainline sections of NYS-7 Adequacy of the weaving sections Performance.
February 9, 2006TransNow Student Conference Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems Freeway Travel Time Messages.
Archived Data User Services (ADUS). ITS Produce Data The (sensor) data are used for to help take transportation management actions –Traffic control systems.
Chapter 3. Highway Design for Performance
Incorporating Safety into the Highway Design Process.
Opportunities & Challenges Using Passively Collected Data In Travel Demand Modeling 15 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic.
NATMEC JUNE 5, 2012 DALLAS, TEXAS Improving MPO Decisions With Better Data: Examples in Dallas-Fort Worth Michael Morris, P.E. Director of Transportation.
Comparison of Cell, GPS, and Bluetooth Derived External Data Results from the 2014 Tyler, Texas Study 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Conference.
Utilizing Big Data Methods for a Long-Distance Automobile Origin-Destination Study May 19, 2015 Presented by Polly Ramsey 15 th TRB National Transportation.
KY 4/22 Module 1b Chapter 3 in the TS Manual Main Survey Types.
Phoenix International Raceway (PIR) Presented By: Nicolaas Swart Traffic Engineering & ITS Program Manager Maricopa County DOT April 26, 2006 Presented.
The Use of IPASS to Improve Mobility and Safety Through Traveler Information April 2004.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Development of a Hybrid Freight Model from Truck Travel.
REDUCE TRAFFIC CONGESTION Automated Toll Collection Solution Proposal
Impacts of Sample Sizes in the American Community Survey Northwestern University Transportation Center.
Talking Freight: Establishment Surveys State and Local Experience Johanna Zmud Mia Zmud Chris Simek.
TBWG Data Workshop June 3 rd, 2008 New Technologies for Data Collection Automated License Plate Recognition.
Talking Freight Seminars FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations and FHWA Office of Planning Freight Studies Joel Falter O-D Truck Studies in.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Mark Burris, Texas Transportation Institute Jessie Yung, Federal Highway Administration.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Talking Freight Seminar presented by Richard Margiotta Cambridge Systematics, Inc. September 21,
Arizona 511 Model Deployment Matt Burt – Battelle Talking Operations Webcast Rural Issues: 511 and Traveler Information July 27, 2005.
Simpson County Travel Demand Model Mobility Analysis November 7, 2003.
Incident Management in Central Arkansas: Current Settings and Proposed Extensions Weihua Xiao Yupo Chan University of Arkansas at Little Rock.
Freeway Capacity Analysis
Center on Tolling Research Technology for Managed Lanes Christopher Poe, Ph.D., P.E. Assistant Agency Director Director, Center on Tolling Research Texas.
Benefit-Cost Analysis of the SMART SunGuide Operations in Fort Lauderdale, Florida June 2006 Steve Corbin District ITS Operations Manager FDOT District.
Hcm 2010: work zones.
I-394 MnPASS Technical Evaluation Preliminary Findings March 23, 2006 Doug Sallman – Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
I-394 MnPASS Technical Evaluation Doug Sallman – Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Southeast Florida Model Users Group presented by Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
TRB Planning Applications Identifying the Long-Range Transportation Improvement and Funding Needs for Urban Areas in Texas By Kevin M. Hall, Texas Transportation.
B2. Vehicle-Based Surveys ISCTSC 2008 – Annecy, France.
Access Management: South Carolina’s Experience Rick Werts Director of Traffic Engineering South Carolina Department of Transportation.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
January 23, 2006Transportation Research Board 85 th Annual Meeting Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems.
University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research - Results of Crash Analysis University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research.
Bharath Paladugu TRPC Clyde Scott Independent Consultant
Design Criteria CTC 440. Objectives Know what “design criteria” means Determine design criteria for various types of facilities.
The Fargo/Moorhead Area Interstate Operations Study Opportunities and Planned Activities Presentation for the Mn/DOT Travel Demand Modeling Coordinating.
11 th National Planning Applications Conference Topic: Statewide Modeling Validation Measures and Issues Authors: Dave Powers, Anne Reyner, Tom Williams,
Jack is currently performing travel demand model forecasting for Florida’s Turnpike. Specifically he works on toll road project forecasting to produce.
Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference, May 2007 Given by: Ronald T. Milam, AICP Contributing Analysts: David Stanek, PE Chris.
Topics Survey data comparisons to “old” model Bluetooth OD data findings Freight model design Q & A.
Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of a System-wide Adaptive Ramp Metering (SWARM) System Data Collection Plan / Experimental Design May.
CE Urban Transportation Planning and Management Iowa State University Calibration and Adjustment Techniques, Part 1 Source: Calibration and Adjustment.
Term Paper Presentation Course: CVEN 632 Presented by: Shailendra Matoria Evaluating Electronic Toll Collection System against Conventional Toll Plaza.
1 Assessing Travel Demand for Exclusive Truck Facilities Matthew Roorda, University of Toronto Michael Hain, University of Toronto Glareh Amirjamshidi,
HSIS Annual Meeting, 10/2006 NCHRP 17-30: Traffic Safety Evaluation of Nighttime and Daytime Work Zones Raghavan Srinivasan Forrest Council.
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
Estimating Travel Patterns on I ‐ 95 with Automated Technology NCAMPO Conference - Asheville, NC May 3, 2012 Taruna Tayal (M/A/B) Brian Wert (M/A/B) Bill.
1 Forecasting Traffic for a Start-Up Toll Road 12 th TRB National Transportation Planning Application Conference May 18, 2009 David Schellinger, P.E. Vice.
INTEGRATING ASSESSMENT OF THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS IN PROJECT-LEVEL ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS Meiwu An, Pikes Peak Area Council.
Solving the SR-520 Problem © 2005 Chaisy, Hurvitz, Jiang, Jun, ShinnersSlide 1 (of 37) Solving the SR-520 Problem prepared for UTRAN prepared by INSTEP.
Solving the SR-520 Problem © 2005 Chaisy, Hurvitz, Jiang, Jun, ShinnersSlide 1 (of 31) Solving the SR-520 Problem prepared for UTRAN prepared by INSTEP.
Applications in Mobile Technology for Travel Data Collection 2012 Border to Border Transportation Conference South Padre Island, Texas November, 13, 2012.
I-84 Baker Valley Variable Speed Limit System
Fort Worth to Houston Corridor Expressway Concept
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting, Ch. 8 (152054A)
Chattanooga Transportation Data Collection Review
School of Civil Engineering
Presentation transcript:

Ed Hard Stephen Farnsworth David Pearson Methods for Conducting O-D Travel Surveys on High Volume (HV) Facilities 11 th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications May 7, 2007

The inability to conduct ‘intercept’ travel surveys on high volume facilities means loss of key data needed for local planning and travel models. Problem: Collecting Survey Data on High Volume Facilities

External Surveys and HV Sites Conducted around periphery of urban areas Conducted around periphery of urban areas HV sites carry majority of traffic into/out of area HV sites carry majority of traffic into/out of area Example: 2005 Dallas Survey Example: 2005 Dallas Survey 93 external stations 93 external stations 9 of 93 were HV 9 of 93 were HV 9 HV sites carried 52% of traffic 9 HV sites carried 52% of traffic

Traditional Intercept Method Computer Tablets Traffic Control Plans

License Capture Methods Match or Mailout Match or Mailout Plates recorded by Plates recorded by Video camcorders Video camcorders High-speed cameras High-speed cameras Voice recorders Voice recorders Manually with ‘observers’ Manually with ‘observers’ and ‘recorders’ and ‘recorders’

Categories of HV Survey Methods Intercept Interview Intercept Interview Intercept Postcard Mailback Intercept Postcard Mailback License Match License Match License Mailout License Mailout

Data Elements Collected Intercept vs. License Methods Data Element Intercept License Match Licens out Local vs. Thru Trip O&D X ResidencyX Veh. Occupancy X Trip Purpose X Trip Length X Trip Frequency X

Select Example Across US External Survey HV Survey Method Used 1. Texas DOT License Mailout and License Match License Mailout and License Match 2. Tampa, FL License Mailout License Mailout 3. Denver, CO Intercepts on Freeway Off Ramps Intercepts on Freeway Off Ramps 4. Philadelphia, PA Intercepts on Shoulders of Freeway Intercepts on Shoulders of Freeway 5. Ohio, DOT License Mailout and Intercepts License Mailout and Intercepts 6. Phoenix, AZ Intercepts at Ramps/Interchanges Intercepts at Ramps/Interchanges 7. Los Angeles, CA License Mailout License Mailout 8. Raleigh, NC License Match, Rest Area Intercepts License Match, Rest Area Intercepts 9. Little Rock, AR License Mailout License Mailout 10. Chattanooga, TN Mailback at Ramps / Interchanges Mailback at Ramps / Interchanges

Factors Considered in Selecting HV Method Roadway cross-section, physical conditions Roadway cross-section, physical conditions Policies of DOT, affected agencies Policies of DOT, affected agencies Level of traffic (AADT) Level of traffic (AADT) Data elements and quality Data elements and quality Costs and resources available Costs and resources available Potential for negative feedback Potential for negative feedback

Intercept Interview Method Limited use in HV externals. Limited use in HV externals. Used more in toll feasibility, Used more in toll feasibility, user / attitudinal studies user / attitudinal studies Use along HV facilities: Use along HV facilities: At / near ramps or tolls At / near ramps or tolls On shoulders along interstate (one case) On shoulders along interstate (one case) At weigh stations, rest areas, truck stops for commercial vehicles / trucks At weigh stations, rest areas, truck stops for commercial vehicles / trucks External Surveys: Philadelphia (2001) Phoenix (1999), Denver (1998) External Surveys: Philadelphia (2001) Phoenix (1999), Denver (1998)

Intercept Interview PROsCONs Data quality Data quality Response rate Response rate All data elements All data elements collected collected Control of sampling Control of sampling Ability to follow-up Ability to follow-up Data available sooner Data available sooner Safety Safety Stopping vehicles Stopping vehicles Agency coordination Agency coordination TCP and permit TCP and permit approvals approvals Dependent on law Dependent on law enforcement enforcement Negative press / PR Negative press / PR

Intercept Postcard Mailback Method Postcard handout in lieu of interview Postcard handout in lieu of interview Limited use in externals, more in corridor or user / attitudinal studies Limited use in externals, more in corridor or user / attitudinal studies Used on / near freeway ramps, toll plazas Used on / near freeway ramps, toll plazas 2002 Chattanoonga, TN external 2002 Chattanoonga, TN external

Intercept Postcard Mailback PROsCONs Less disruption Less disruption Traffic delays shorter Traffic delays shorter Most data elements Most data elements collected collected Cost < intercept Cost < intercept Safety Safety Stopping vehicles Stopping vehicles Self selection bias Self selection bias Lower response rate Lower response rate TCP and permit TCP and permit approvals approvals Dependent on law Dependent on law enforcement enforcement

Video License Capture High-speed, specification camcorders used High-speed, specification camcorders used Rear license plates recorded Rear license plates recorded Info needed: plate #, state, time, direction Info needed: plate #, state, time, direction Camera’s on overpass or shoulder Camera’s on overpass or shoulder Used in majority of match / mailout surveys Used in majority of match / mailout surveys

License Match Method Plates matched between HV sites Plates matched between HV sites All HV sites recorded on same day All HV sites recorded on same day Used to estimate percent I-E and E-E trips (local vs. thru movements) Used to estimate percent I-E and E-E trips (local vs. thru movements) Travel time runs needed Travel time runs needed

License Match PROsCONs Safety Safety No traffic disruption No traffic disruption No TCP required No TCP required No use of state DMV No use of state DMV records records Limited data Limited data All sites must be All sites must be recorded on same recorded on same day day

Surveys Using License Match 2006 San Antonio / Austin External 2006 San Antonio / Austin External 8 HV sites requiring 34 video cameras 8 HV sites requiring 34 video cameras 42 intercept sites 42 intercept sites 2006 Dallas-Ft. Worth External 2006 Dallas-Ft. Worth External 9 HV sites requiring 36 video cameras 9 HV sites requiring 36 video cameras 34 intercept sites 34 intercept sites 2001 Metrolina Region External 2001 Metrolina Region External 43 video cameras 43 video cameras

License Mailout Method Most common method for HV sites in externals Most common method for HV sites in externals Same as ‘match,’ but plates queried against state DMV records and surveys mailed Same as ‘match,’ but plates queried against state DMV records and surveys mailed Used for non-commercial vehicles only Used for non-commercial vehicles only Mailout includes info on survey purpose, assurance for anonymity, toll free #, etc. Mailout includes info on survey purpose, assurance for anonymity, toll free #, etc.

License Mailout PROsCONs Safety Safety No traffic delay or No traffic delay or disruption disruption No TCP required No TCP required Most data elements Most data elements collected collected Data quality Data quality Use of DMV records Use of DMV records Quick turn-around Quick turn-around needed between needed between capture and mailout capture and mailout Out-of-state plates Out-of-state plates Negative PR, privacy Negative PR, privacy rights rights

What Traffic Level is High Volume? What Traffic Level is High Volume? Few agencies have HV ‘threshold’ value Few agencies have HV ‘threshold’ value Intercepts on freeways, interstates often prohibited Intercepts on freeways, interstates often prohibited Queuing analyses used to determine volume when queuing is problematic. Two categories: Queuing analyses used to determine volume when queuing is problematic. Two categories: Blocked traffic lane, 2-lane roadways Blocked traffic lane, 2-lane roadways Lane reduction, 2 or more lanes in survey direction Lane reduction, 2 or more lanes in survey direction

Queuing Analysis: Blocked Lane Queuing Analysis: Blocked Lane 2 lane roadways 2 lane roadways Queues correlated with traffic volume Queues correlated with traffic volume Number of surveyors has little affect Number of surveyors has little affect For TxDOT, veh / hour per lane problematic For TxDOT, veh / hour per lane problematic

Queuing Analysis: Lane Reduction Queuing Analysis: Lane Reduction 2 or more lanes in direction of survey 2 or more lanes in direction of survey TCP lane reductions TCP lane reductions Queues problematic as volumes approach 1,000 vph Queues problematic as volumes approach 1,000 vph Analysis supports TxDOT policy defining 20,000 ADT as HV Analysis supports TxDOT policy defining 20,000 ADT as HV

Technology in HV Surveys Current Current Video / camcorders, hi-speed cameras Video / camcorders, hi-speed cameras Infrared video Infrared video Optical character recognition (OCR) Optical character recognition (OCR) Video data reduction software Video data reduction software Radio frequency ID, Toll / E-Z tags Radio frequency ID, Toll / E-Z tags Future potential Future potential Cellular phone trackage Cellular phone trackage Vehicle telematics Vehicle telematics

License Mailout: TxDOT Practice License Mailout: TxDOT Practice Message boards used to inform public

License Mailout: TxDOT Practice License Mailout: TxDOT Practice Set-up on IH-10 at Texas / Louisiana border Set-up on IH-10 at Texas / Louisiana border March 2007

License Mailout: Lessons Learned Keep survey form simple Keep survey form simple Cover letter: content, tone, and appearance important Cover letter: content, tone, and appearance important Use pre-addressed, postage paid envelope or postcard Use pre-addressed, postage paid envelope or postcard Ensure return responses are anonymous Ensure return responses are anonymous Provide toll free number Provide toll free number Keep accurate records of all calls received Keep accurate records of all calls received No more than 3-day turn-around between capture and mailout No more than 3-day turn-around between capture and mailout

QUESTIONS Ed Hard (979)