Company Logo Add Your Company Slogan On the highway measures of driver glance behavior with an example automobile navigation system Dean P. Chiang*, Aaron.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Loading and Unloading Students

Advertisements

Safe Incident Management Work Zones. SPO C. R. Moore Atlanta Police Department Special Operations Section Hit & Run / Traffic Fatality Unit

Driver response to a disabled pedestrian using a dangerous crosswalk Journal of Environmental Psychology (1992) 12, W. Andrew Harrell 學生：董瑩蟬.

COMMENTARY DRIVE A participatory system for safe driving designed to prevent accidents.

Björn Peters, VTI Active Attention A driving simulator experiment.

The Driving Task The driving task is everything it takes to operate a motor vehicle. The three skills of the driving task are: A. Physical-coordination.

IHRA-ITS UN-ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group Geneva, March, 2013 Overview of International Activities to Limit Distraction Document No. ITS (21st ITS,

Transportation Tuesday TRANSPORTATION TUESDAY REAR ENDERS – HOW CAN WE PREVENT THEM? A collision occurs when two vehicles occupy the same space!

The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Japan September / 2012 Informal document GRRF (73rd GRRF, September 2012,

Mobile phone use amongst New Zealand drivers Mark J.M. Sullman a,*, Peter H. Baas b Transportation Research Part F 學生 : 莊靖玟.

Human Factors Christopher J. Bonanti Associate Administrator Rulemaking, NHTSA NHTSA’s Driver Distraction Guidelines Informal document WP (160.

International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 35 (2005) 939–953 Situation awareness and workload in driving while using adaptive cruise control and a.

HERO UNIT Training Module Work Zone Traffic Control And Incident Management Operations.

Lesson 6 Traffic Safety Protecting People While Stabilizing The Incident.

Mobile Phone Use in a Driving Simulation Task: Differences in Eye Movements Stacy Balk, Kristin Moore, Will Spearman, & Jay Steele.

I ntroduction  B ackground  O bjectives/ P urpose M ethod  S ubjects  E quipment  S pecial C onsiderations  E xperimental P rocedure  L ab W ork.

The Effects of Text Messaging On the Driving Performance of Young Novice Drivers MUARC: Kristie Young, Simon Hosking & Michael Regan NRMA Motoring & Services:

USE OF VISUAL OCCLUSION TO ASSESS IN-VEHICLE HMI Dean P. Chiang Dynamic Research, Inc., Torrance, CA 22 May 2003 ITS America Annual Meeting, Minneapolis.

Advanced Lane Management Assist (ALMA) for Partially and Fully Automated Vehicles Robert L. Gordon, P.E. 1.

The Driver and Pedestrian Distraction Challenge Diane Wigle Safety Countermeasures Division National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) April.

Evaluating Effectiveness of Partitioning Complex Visual Displays on In-Vehicle Glance Behavior Momoha Takahashi 1,4, Ceyda D ü ndar 2,4, Yusuke Yamani.

Effects of practice, age, and task demands, on interference from a phone task while driving Author: David Shinar, Noam Tractinsky, Richard Compton Accident.

Cognitive demands of hands-free- phone conversation while driving Professor : Liu Student: Ruby.

Comparison of manual vs

Effects on driving behavior of congestion information and of scale of in-vehicle navigation systems Author: Shiaw-Tsyr Uang, Sheue-Ling Hwang Transportation.

LOGO Imperfect in- vehicle collision avoidance warning systems can aid distracted drivers Masha Maltz, David Shinar Transportation Research Part F 10 (2007)

Age-Differences in the Visual Information Processing Demands of Vehicle Instrument Panel Interfaces Heimstra Laboratories University of South Dakota Frank.

Logo Add Your Company Slogan A field evaluation of driver eye and head movement strategies toward environmental targets and distracters Professor: Liu.

Engrossed in conversation: The impact of cell phones on simulated driving performance Kristen E. Beede, Steven J. Kass ∗ Accident Analysis and Prevention.

Company Logo Add Your Company Slogan Automatic Control of Variable Message Signs in Aalborg 學生. 莊靖玟.

Hao Wu Nov Outline Introduction Related Work Experiment Methods Results Conclusions & Next Steps.

Human Supervisory Control May 13, 2004 Measuring Human Performance: Maintaining Constant Relative Position to a Lead Vehicle in a Simulation Paul.

Traffic Engineering Studies (Travel Time & Delay Studies)

Field dependence and driver visual search behavior Professor: Liu Student: Ruby.

Traffic & Road Safety Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, New Zealand Transport Engineering Research.

Company Logo Add Your Company Slogan Pirkko Rama *, Risto Kulmala Transportation Research Part F 3 (2000) 85±94 學生. 莊靖玟 Effects of variable message signs.

The New Jersey Driver Manual

Comparing Handheld and Voice-Control Interfaces When Using Mobile Phones and Portable Music Players Friday, December 17 th, 2010 Justin M. Owens Shane.

Modifying pedestrian behaviour 學生：董瑩蟬. Purpose This paper investigated the traffic signal add timer which effect pedestrian crossing behavior or not.

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Possible Example of Split of Regulation ～ Split of R79 and The New Regulation of Driving Assistance.

Accident Analysis and Prevention 31 (1999) 617–623 Dave Lamble *, Tatu Kauranen, Matti Laakso, Heikki Summala Cognitive load and detection thresholds in.

Spencer Oatts, Ben Gibson, Carl White, Yongli Zou, & Chris Dula Department of Psychology East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN.

Comparison of manual vs. speech-based interaction with in-vehicle information systems Driving Behavior Simulation Lab Jannette Maciej ∗, Mark Vollrath.

Research Elements of Integrated Vehicle Based Safety Systems Jack Ference, IVBSS Technical Manager ITS America Annual Meeting May, 2005.

Age differences in visual abilities in nighttime driving field conditions Professor: Liu Student: Ruby.

A comparison of two license plate acquiring methods Ubiquitous computing David Filipovic.

Modeling pedestrians road crossing behavior in traffic system micro-simulation in China 學生：董瑩蟬.

Age Differences in Visual Search for Traffic Signs During a Simulated Conversation 學生：董瑩蟬.

Dangers of Distracted Driving

Educating Older Drivers Listening Session for the White House Conference on Aging Policy Committee Theme: Transportation Hosted by the Committee on the.

Tova Rosenbloom Journal of Safety Research 37 (2006) 207 – 212 Driving performance while using cell phones: An observational study 學生. 莊靖玟.

I can be You: Questioning the use of Keystroke Dynamics as Biometrics Tey Chee Meng, Payas Gupta, Debin Gao Ke Chen.

Driver landmark and traffic sign identification in early Alzheimer’s disease E Y Uc, M Rizzo, S W Anderson, Q Shi, J D Dawson J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry.

Fion C.H. Lee, Alan H.S. Chan International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 37 (2007) 197–206 Attending visual and auditory signals: Ergonomics recommendations.

Towards an express-diagnostics for level of processing and hazard perception Boris M. Velichkovsky et al. Transportation Research Part F 5 (2002)

Mobile phone use while driving in a sample of Spanish university workers 學生 : 莊靖玟.

Narration/dialogue: Camera motion: Video effect: Audio effect: Shot duration: Transition to next scene: Storyboard Panel #

DSRC and SPaT, SSM, SRM & MAP

Defeating Distracted Driving 1. Wikipedia Distracted Driving Definition Driving while engaged in other activities Talking on a cell phone Texting Eating,

Tim Horberryb, Cathy Bubnicha, Laurence Hartleya,*, Dave Lamblea Drivers' use of hand-held mobile phones in Western Australia 學生. 莊靖玟.

Do Now Questions 1.How far in advance should you signal before turning your vehicle? 2.The meaning of a hand signal when a drivers hand and arm are downward.

SAVE-IT SAfety VEhicles using adaptive Interface Technology Phase 1 Research Program Quarterly Program Review Task 3: Performance Task Leader: Paul Green.

June 2016 Using Naturalistic Driving Data to Examine Teen Driver Behaviors Present in Motor Vehicle Crashes,

LOGO Ronald R. Mourant *, Najla Ahmad, Beverly K. Jaeger, Yingzi Lin Displays 28 (2007) 145–149 Optic flow and geometric field of view in a driving simulator.

LOGO D.E. Haigney a,b,*, R.G. Taylor c, S.J. Westerman c Transportation Research Part F 3 (2000) 113±121 Concurrent mobile (cellular) phone use and driving.

In-Vehicle Driver Distractions & Eye Movements

Lane change driver reaction times

Working Principle of Blind Spot Technology in Car

HERO UNIT Training Module

Investigation Of Time And Speed Perception Using A Driving Simulator

Presentation transcript:

Company Logo Add Your Company Slogan On the highway measures of driver glance behavior with an example automobile navigation system Dean P. Chiang*, Aaron M. Brooks, David H. Weir Applied Ergonomics 35 (2004) 215–223 學生. 莊靖玟

Company Logo Introduction  These additional attentional workloads without affecting primary task performance unduly.  The secondary workload can become sufficiently high that it begins to affect primary task performance.  Of particular interest is the task of navigation system destination entry.

Company Logo Method Participants  Ten drivers participated in the evaluation.  Nine of the drivers were novice users of the navigation system and 1 had used it previously.  The driver sample included 5 males and 5 females.  Their average age was 33.  Their average mileage per year was 13,400 (21,500 km).

Company Logo Method Apparatus  The example vehicle was a 2000 Acura 3.2 RL equipped with the Acura Navigation System.  The vehicle instrumentation consisted of video cameras and recording, and driver control and vehicle response sensors.  Four cameras were mounted on: ＊ the side mirrors and angled down ＊ top of the instrument panel ＊ between the driver and passenger seats

Company Logo Method Apparatus

Company Logo Procedure for destination entry

Company Logo Procedure for destination entry

Company Logo Procedure for destination entry

Company Logo Procedure for destination entry

Company Logo Procedure for destination entry

Company Logo Procedure for destination entry

Company Logo Experimental procedure  Their primary task was to maintain the vehicle speed, maintain a safe following distance, and keep the vehicle in the lane.  The drivers first did 3 practice trials with the vehicle parked.  Then the drivers did 3 evaluation trials on the city streets.  They were directed to the freeway.

Company Logo Results  The following definitions adapted from SAE, 1999 are used with the glance behavior data: ＊ Target—the forward road scene, the navigation system display, or other. ＊ Fixation time—the duration of a fixation at 1 target. It does not include the transition time to or from the target. ＊ Glance duration—fixation time plus the transition to the target, the glance time. ＊ Total fixation time—the sum of the individual fixation times on 1 target for a destination entry.

Company Logo Results ＊ Total glance time (TGT)—the sum of the individual glance times on 1 target. ＊ Total task time (TTT)—the elapsed time between when a driver first looks away from the road until he or she finally looks back after the last fixation for 1 destination entry. ＊ Transition—a change in eye fixation location from 1 target to another. ＊ Entry chunk—1 or more entry keystrokes, or other entry actions, made during one fixation on the display.

Company Logo Results Glance behavior results

Company Logo Results Glance behavior results

Company Logo Results Glance behavior results

Company Logo Results Glance behavior results

Company Logo Results Glance behavior results

Company Logo Results Glance behavior results

Company Logo Results Glance behavior results

Company Logo Results Glance behavior results

Company Logo Results Glance behavior results

Company Logo Results Driving performance results

Company Logo Results Subjective rating results

Company Logo Results Subjective rating results

Company Logo Discussion  The drivers were able to accomplish the destination entry tasks with acceptably short glance durations, acceptable total task times, and with satisfactory subjective ratings for ease of entry.  The glance durations and eyes off road time behavior used by the drivers were within previously suggested rules of thumb for safe operation. (e.g., Green, 1999; Tijerina, 1999, 2000; Farber, 2000; Greenberg;2000; Zwahlen, 1988),