OVERVIEW OF ISSUES DR AND AMI HELP SOLVE Dr. Eric Woychik Executive Consultant, Strategy Integration, LLC APSC Workshop on DR and AMI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Advertisements

Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
PV Market Trends and Technical Details. All of US has Suitable Solar Resource for Large Scale PV Deployment.
0 © 2011 Silver Spring Networks. All rights reserved. Building the Smart Grid.
WinDS-H2 MODEL Wind Deployment Systems Hydrogen Model Workshop on Electrolysis Production of Hydrogen from Wind and Hydropower Walter Short Nate Blair.
24 May 2007 PROGRESS & PROMISE ON DR/AMI Dr. Eric Woychik Executive Consultant, Strategy Integration, LLC APSC Workshop on DR and AMI.
24 May 2007 DEMAND RESPONSE BENEFITS Dr. Eric Woychik Executive Consultant, Strategy Integration, LLC APSC Workshop on DR and AMI.
Dynamic Distribution Grids © 2012 San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All trademarks belong to their respective owners. All rights reserved. Neal Bartek.
Technical Conference Avoided Cost Modeling January 6, 2015.
1 Pacific Gas & Electric Company MTS: Evolution of the Electric Distribution System Manho Yeung, Senior Director, System Planning and Reliability PG&E.
1.  Purpose  To present Staff’s Preliminary Findings on the 2012 Integrated Resource Plans of:  APS – Arizona Public Service Company  TEP – Tucson.
Understanding Ontario’s Electricity System
SmartMeter Program Overview Jana Corey Director, Energy Information Network Pacific Gas & Electric Company.
Power Utilities in the Telecom Business in the USA: Past Failures and Future Trends Mike Oldak Vice President & General Counsel Utilities Telecom Council.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
Terry Chandler Power Quality Inc, USA Power Quality Thailand LTD Sept /6/20091www.powerquality.org all rights reserve.
Least Cost System Operation: Economic Dispatch 1
REGULATORY MECHANISMS TO ENCOURAGE DR/AMI Dr. Eric Woychik Executive Consultant, Strategy Integration, LLC APSC Workshop on DR and AMI.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future * NREL July 5, 2011 Tradeoffs and Synergies between CSP and PV at High Grid Penetration.
Ludington Pumped Storage Plant and Wind Power Operational Considerations David Lapinski Consumers Energy Company June 16, 2009.
Energy Trends. 2 Trift bridge 560’ long 333’ high.
Efficiency and Demand Response NARUC Washington, DC February 14, 2006 Steve Specker President & CEO.
1 Reforming the Energy Vision (REV) “Utility of the Future” Tom Mimnagh Consolidated Edison Co of New York New York Energy Week April 23, 2015.
Warren Lasher Director, System Planning October 4, 2014 Our Energy Future.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Adding Incremental Flexibility to the Pacific Northwest Power System? Maury Galbraith Northwest Power.
Applications and Benefits of Energy Storage Maui, Hawaii June 16, 2010 Garth P. Corey, Consultant Sandia National Laboratories Sandia is a multiprogram.
Freeport Generating Project Project Description Modernization projects at Power Plant #2 Developers – Freeport Electric and Selected Development Company.
NGEIR Technical Conference Presentation May 16, 2006.
Avoided Costs of Generation
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
ETAAC Energy Sector Energy Storage Smart Grid July 12, 2007 San Francisco, CA.
All forecast information reflects planning assumptions as of December Entergy System Strategic Supply Resource Plan Plan Description (For the planning.
1 CPUC Avoided Cost Workshop Introduction and Overview.
Overview of Distributed Generation Applications June 16, 2003 Harrisburg, PA Joel Bluestein Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc.
Smart Capacity Markets: Can they be Smart Enough? Tim Mount Department of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University Smart Capacity.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
An Overview of the U.S. Electric Power Grid Generation Choices, Reliability, Challenges Tom Ferguson, P.E. Adjunct Instructor Dept. of Electrical Engineering.
Greg Miller – EVP, Market Development
0 Distributed Energy Resources: Going Small IEP 2015 Annual Conference September 30, 2015 Colin Cushnie V.P., Energy Procurement & Management Southern.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Wind & Transmission: The Clean Energy Superhighway Mark Lauby Manager, Reliability Assessments, NERC.
An Overview of the U.S. Electric Power Grid Generation Choices, Reliability, Challenges Tom Ferguson, P.E. Adjunct Instructor Dept. of Electrical Engineering.
Renewables and System Services Ann Scully.
Kevin Hanson Doug Murray Jenell Katheiser Long Term Study Scenarios and Generation Expansion Update April, 2012.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
1 Demand Response A 28 Year History of Demand Response Programs for the Electric Cooperatives of Arkansas by Forest Kessinger Manager, Rates and Forecasting.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® SM Preferred Resources Pilot August 17, 2015
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
Power Association of Northern California Maintaining Grid Reliability In An Uncertain Era May 16, 2011 PG&E Conference Center Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive.
NARUC/FERC COLLABORATIVE: DEMAND RESPONSE Paul Suskie, Chairman, Arkansas Public Service Commission July 15, 2007.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Overview of Draft Sixth Power Plan Council Meeting Whitefish, MT June 9-11, 2009.
Southern California Edison The San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station April 14, 2011.
EDISON INTERNATIONAL® SM Smart Grid Value Proposition October 4, 2010 Lynda Ziegler.
An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.
Extra electricity slides
Utility Benefits of Demand Response Trevor Lauer DTE Energy Marketing Executive Conference Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.
CEC Public Workshop Order Instituting Informational and Rulemaking Proceeding (08-DR-01) March 3, 2008.
Clean Power Plan EW Tim Wilson Director of Energy Supply Services.
BGE Smart Grid Initiative Stakeholder Meeting September 17, 2009 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing and Regulatory Services.
RENEWABLES AND RELIABILITY
Evolving Economic Dispatch in SPP
Teaching The Duck To Fly
MIT tour of the California ISO Control Center March 31, 2015
Alternative ICAP Proposal
Solar Energy Commercialization
Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive Operations Advisor California ISO
Presentation transcript:

OVERVIEW OF ISSUES DR AND AMI HELP SOLVE Dr. Eric Woychik Executive Consultant, Strategy Integration, LLC APSC Workshop on DR and AMI

l Overview Aim: To define the needs and opportunities Demand Response and Automated Metering Infrastructure are best applied to Demand Response vs. Energy Efficiency Super-peak needs and Summer Heat Waves Define the resource types Displace Combustion Turbines & Ramping Capacity Selected Resources: G + T + D + env. mitigation

l Demand Response (DR) vs. Energy Efficiency (EE) DR is generally more available during the peak and super peak periods; provides capacity deferral for select hours May be automatic, or dispatchable on short notice EE is generally provided over a longer duration, to provide energy reduction Is not generally flexible, but is fixed in its application Permanent DR is something in between, providing capacity reductions on a constant basis Managed, such as to optimize facility demand reduction May be relatively fixed, such as “ice storage” DR over a duration can also help save energy DR and EE can be great compliments when integrated

l What is Demand Response? Interruptible load (e.g., by industrial customers) Dispatchable, direct load control (e.g., AC or irrigation) Automatic demand response; smart thermostat or control Price response, on-call, manually activated and/or preset Thermostat operation (e.g., temperature set-back) Permanent demand response; managed with controls Manually or automatically triggered load reductions (e.g., lighting controls)

l Super-Peak Needs and Summer Heat Waves Electricity peak may be 1 PM until 8 PM, summer months (June and September) – so just 87 days or 610 hours Super-peak is likely 2 PM to 8 PM, during the 16 hottest days of the year, about 100 hours or less (about 1%) Electricity generation capacity is maximum Transmission and power flows are maximum Air conditioning (AC) is used to the maximum AC loads increase system peak & reduce load factor Summer heat waves are a major driver of super-peak NOAA, NASA, NERC, and IGCC, suggest climate change Average and peak temperatures appear to be increasing

l Basic Electricity Resource Types Purchases -- on the market …at a cost Reserves -- available for contingencies and peaks Peaking – ramping or load following High capacity factor load following (CF LF) Intermediate (load factor) Baseload – e.g., coal and nuclear Transmission (may be ignored in some least cost plans) Demand Response (DR) and Energy Efficiency (EE)

l Entergy Arkansas Electricity Peak & Resources Entergy System Strategic Supply Resource Plan, Plan Description, 2006 Intermediate Peaking Base Reserves Purchases High CF LF

l Peak Demand, Load Factor, and Retirements SWEPCO peak demand (August 16) record 4,910 MW Entergy Arkansas peak demand is about 5,600 MW Load factor in AR is declining with increased use of AC Decision to retire an existing plant Compare the forward cost of the existing unit with the forward cost of alternatives – this is oversimplified Many older gas and oil-fired units run at low capacity factors to serve the peaking and reserve roles Decision to add a new coal plant, is related to older units that will shift roles to serve peaking and reserves Add new coal as baseload then use existing old plants?

l Displace Combustion Turbine & Ramping Capacity Recent AEP-SWEPCO CT proposal for 332 MW was $102.8 million (for used units at 50% of new). Each 80 MW CT must operate at 75% of capacity for NOx Can operate from 52MW to 83MW and 104MW to 332MW Ramping capacity is to meet loads rapidly, typically between hours to avoid voltage lags & grid requirements Baseload and intermediate plants ramp slowly Peaking units ramp quickly (but many older units are used) More renewables (must-take power); more ramping needs Criteria for peaking/ramping capacity are lowest life-cycle cost, reliable, flexible, and environmentally responsible

l Ramping and Load Following Resources System faces large daily load swings that require ramping and load following resources Combined Cycle Gas Turbines (CCGTs) are typically desired for operational flexibility and to limit exposure to high purchase power prices Replace current 35+ year old conventional gas plants? Utilities need resources in transmission critical regions Reduce production costs at minimum run levels Where Reliability Must Run (RMR) units are needed For ramping and load following

l Selected Resources: G + T + D + env. mitigation DR and AMI can reduce or fully defer the capital and operating costs for system expansion: Generation Transmission Distribution Environmental mitigation Transmission deferral – Rocky Mountain Power & NEISO Distribution deferral – Commonwealth Edison & PG&E Environmental mitigation – preferred loading order (CA)

l Basic Ways DR/AMI Resolves System Needs Reduce overall system loads -- the EE effect Reduce system peak and locational loads – the DR effect Reduce existing and new generation needs Reduce existing and new transmission needs Reduce existing and new distribution costs… Reduce environmental mitigation costs DR/AMI can be installed when supply-side are more difficult AMI provides automated meter reading, remote connect/disconnect, communications to the home, and may enable building automation