Status of TPC experiment ---- Online & Offline M. Niiyama H. Fujimura D.S. Ahn W.C. Chang.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
High Level Trigger (HLT) for ALICE Bergen Frankfurt Heidelberg Oslo.
Advertisements

STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
Group Meeting 03/02/2004. Format of Weekly Group Meeting  Daily chore  Research report: electronic presentation required  Journal report.
Jin Huang Los Alamos National Lab.  Cited from March collaboration Meeting EC group Internal Communication Jin Huang 2 Preshower ID power drop significantly.
1 Scintillating Fibre Cosmic Ray Test Results Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Monday 29 th March 2004.
MICE CM Berkeley 9-12 Feb February 2005 Edda Gschwendtner 1 Control/Monitoring and DAQ for PIDs Edda Gschwendtner.
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome,
Report of the NTPC Test Experiment in 2007Sep and Others Yohei Nakatsugawa.
1 LEPS TPC Electronics 章文箴 Wen-Chen Chang Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica 03/30/2001.
Current Status of Hadron Analysis Introduction Hadron PID by PHENIX-TOF  Current status of charged hadron PID  CGL and track projection point on TOF.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
Beam test results of Tile/fiber EM calorimeter and Simulator construction status 2005/03/05 Detector Niigata University ONO Hiroaki contents.
Analysis strategy of high multiplicity data Toshiyuki Gogami 24/Feb/2011.
Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.
VC Feb 2010Slide 1 EMR Construction Status o General Design o Electronics o Cosmics test Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Geneva.
DE/dx measurement with Phobos Si-pad detectors - very first impressions (H.P Oct )
TOF Meeting, 9 December 2009, CERN Chiara Zampolli for the ALICE-TOF.
Jin Huang M.I.T. Hall A Analysis Workshop Dec 14, JLab.
DC12 Commissioning Status GOALS: establish operating conditions, determine initial calibration parameters and measure operating characteristics for the.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 EC / PCAL ENERGY CALIBRATION Cole Smith UVA PCAL EC Outline Why 2 calorimeters? Requirements Using.
TPC online reconstruction Cluster Finder & Conformal Mapping Tracker Kalliopi Kanaki University of Bergen.
Julien Bettane, Giulia Hull, Silvia Niccolai, Daria Sokhan 31/1/2012 Status and commissioning plan for the Central Neutron Detector.
1 Th.Naumann, DESY Zeuthen, HERMES Tracking meeting, Tracking with the Silicon Detectors Th.Naumann H1 DESY Zeuthen A short collection of experiences.
CALICE Digital Hadron Calorimeter: Calibration and Response to Pions and Positrons International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders LCWS 2013 November.
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
4 th Workshop on ALICE Installation and Commissioning January 16 th & 17 th, CERN Muon Tracking (MUON_TRK, MCH, MTRK) Conclusion of the first ALICE COSMIC.
22 September 2005 Haw05 1  (1405) photoproduction at SPring-8/LEPS H. Fujimura, Kyoto University Kyoto University, Japan K. Imai, M. Niiyama Research.
Tracking in High Density Environment
Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System Zepu Mao IHEP BESIII Annual Meeting 2005/05/29.
STAR TPC Cluster and Hit Finder Software Raimond Snellings.
Nov Beam Catcher in KOPIO (H. Mikata Kaon mini worksyop1 Beam Catcher in the KOPIO experiment Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO.
Status of New TPC( Ⅱ ) Performance Study Yohei Nakatsugawa LEPS Meeting in Taiwan.
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
1 Angle dependence of residual in Z niiyama lambda < 10 Layer 5 Lambda > 70 layer4 Wave form of signal depends on the angle between the track and the pad.
Jefferson Laboratory Hall A SuperBigBite Spectrometer Data Acquisition System Alexandre Camsonne APS DNP 2013 October 24 th 2013 Hall A Jefferson Laboratory.
KEK Test Beam Phase I (May 2005) Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE-FT Daresbury Aug 30th, 2005.
Noise and Cosmics in the DHCAL José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Collaboration Meeting University Hassan II Casablanca, Morocco September.
CLAS12 Trigger System part1: Level1 EC Revision 1, Feb 7, 2007.
Features needed in the “final” AliRoot release P.Hristov 26/10/2006.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
Low Momentum dE/dx Testbeam H.P. 7/24/98. Goals for Spectrometer are based on tracking and PID –Multiparticle correlation –production of particle species.
Christian Lippmann (ALICE TRD), DPG-Tagung Köln Position Resolution, Electron Identification and Transition Radiation Spectra with Prototypes.
T585 analysis status /2/2 HIDEYUKI SAKAMOTO Contents On small light yield problem checked by Aron’s information Tracking status Transverse and Longitudinal.
HMPiD upgrade variant; simulation status N. Smirnov Physics Department, Yale University, May, 06. CERN visit.
Status report - Tracking code - T.Gogami 9/30/2010.
18 th March 2008Measuring momentum using the TOFsSlide 1 Measuring momentum using TOF0 and TOF1 Progress report Mark Rayner (Oxford/RAL) Analysis Meeting,
A. SarratILC TPC meeting, DESY, 15/02/06 Simulation Of a TPC For T2K Near Detector Using Geant 4 Antony Sarrat CEA Saclay, Dapnia.
LAV efficiency studies with photons T. Spadaro* *Frascati National Laboratory of INFN.
Calibration algorithm and detector monitoring - TPC Marian Ivanov.
Test Beam Meeting Monday, January 31, 2000 Fpix1 Calibration Status 1.What we have 2.What to do Monitor Software to use now 1.Current Version 2.Calibration.
PoGOLiteMC_ ppt 1 Updated MC Study of PoGOLite Trigger Rate/BG January 30, 2007 Tsunefumi Mizuno (Hiroshima Univ.)
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
Nikhef Scientific Meeting 2000Onne Peters D0 Muon Spectrometer December 14-15, Amsterdam Onne Peters Nikhef Jamboree 2000.
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
Tracking, Computing & other Stuff. Correlation of detector hits The track segments of inner and outer MDCs are matched on Cluster level The track segments.
June 4, 2009 STAR TPC review Estimation of TPC Aging Based on dE/dx Measurements Yuri Fisyak.
April12 DST calibration status
Tracking results from Au+Au test Beam
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
TPC status - Offline Q&A
Jin Huang Los Alamos National Lab
Example of DAQ Trigger issues for the SoLID experiment
CLAS12 Timing Calibration
Study of dE/dx Performance in TPC at CEPC
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
Particle ID Diagnostics in the MICE Beamline
status of experiment trigger conditon (empty)
status of TPC experiment
Reconstruction and calibration strategies for the LHCb RICH detector
Presentation transcript:

Status of TPC experiment ---- Online & Offline M. Niiyama H. Fujimura D.S. Ahn W.C. Chang

From cosmic ray test, 1 track resolution is um in pad plane w/ magnet um in drift direction w/o magnet. If we apply magnetic field, residual in drift direction shifts layer by layer. Possible reason are - circle fitting is not suitable for our solenoid magnet. -> runge kutta is needed - E x B effect disturbs drift property of electrons in TPC. Bx at z=350mm is 0.5T -> simulation of drift property is needed. Results from cosmic ray test

Bx at z=350mm

E // B  Cycloid Motion E&M Calculation

Install & Geometry cm 40.7cm 20cm 32.4cm Collimator Shieldtarget TPC  solenoid Pb Top view Dipole magnet 37.5 cm

dipole magnet Downstream scintillators Side scintillators Shi eld Colli mator Upv eto EXP.HUTCH ( February ) February run

dipole magnet Downstream scintillators Side scintillators Shi eld Colli mator Upv eto EXP.HUTCH(M arch) Start c ounter TOF W all Veto @ TOF March run

Trigger condition Run in Feb, to know performance of TPC tag x (up-veto) x (8scinti M>=2) x (TPC side scinti M>=1) 95Hz at 400kHz tagger Run in Mar, Particle ID by spectrometer calibration of TPC. gamma-> pi+ pi- p, trigger is similar as K0 exp. - tag x (ATG) x (TOF M>=2) x (veto after TOF) x (TPC side scinti M>=1)

Eye scanning

At least one particle comes from target holder Reject if two tracks overlap each other Scanning criteria

Analysis dE is measured by pad rows By correction by dip angle between pad plane and track was applied. Truncated mean was used to suppress Landau distribution. - for each track, to get truncated mean, - cut the Landau tail of the distribution - keep 60% of the sample, which have the most lowest amplitude - get the mean value of the remaining distribution  truncated mean Circle fitting in pad plane, line fitting in arclength z plane dE/dx value of given tracks Cut condition ; chi2 for pad plane and arclength z plane

Momentum/charge ( dE/dx Truncated mean)*cos(lambda) Calibration of gain is not finished. Runge-Kutta tracking is not yet used. Just circle fitting for p_t determination proton Pions or electrons 1000 events eyescan

DAQ and Offline Analysis

1200-channel FADC Modules (10 bits, 40 MHz, pedestal-subtraction) for TPC

DAQ Speed  Goal: 100 Hz. In total 3 SUN SPARC (collector) to read out data in parallel.  Feb run:15Hz. # of words read = word, for 1 IRQ( = 4events), 1 module Unstable pedestal: drifting with temperatures. (Air- condition is desirable.)  March Run: 20Hz On-board width-cut for discrete pulses (<4 time bins). Tag*\bar{up}*ATG*\bar{e+e-}*(TOF M>=1) * (TPC side M>=2) # of words = 3000, 1 IRQ( = 4events) for 1 module  Where is the bottle neck of DAQ speed? Reduce the number of sampling to 600. Reduce the CLOCK from 40 MHz to 20 MHz. Look for the other possible source in collector or builder.

Determination of Particle Trajectory

TPC analyzer 1 Pad 1 pulse1 Pulse2 ………. ADC TDC ADC TDC Pad 2 pulse1 Pulse2 ………. ADC TDC ADC TDC If overlap in time direction was found in adjacent pad they are include in a cluster. Pad 3 pulse1 Pulse2 ………. ADC TDC ADC TDC Continue in all pads in layer while overlap is found In one layer Pad # Time

TPC analyzer 2 In one layer Cluster Hit x, y, z coordinate ADC To reduce # of hits to be searched by find track. Select hits of enough large ADC. BoneHit x, y, z coordinate ADC TrackFinder Under construction

TrackFinder  Track pattern recognition: Segment the acceptance into sub-volumes in (r,,z). Nose-finding algorithm: pick up hits on the most outer layer and search the nearest hit in the neighboring sub-volume inwards. Construct track-candidates: after conformal mapping, make the cut on the chi2 values of a straight line fit.  Track Parameters for RK fitting: Assuming uniform B field. Circle fitting on the transverse plane: (x0,y0) and (Px0,Py0) Slope of arclength vs z: (z0) and Pz0.  Runge-Kutta Fit with real B field map.

TPC Analyzer  Input file: MC ntuples or real data.  Output ntuples: hits information and track parameters.  Test with MC ntuples.  Test with real data.

Conclusion  TPC has started operation in this Feb.  We are taking data now with triggers from both tracks in TPC and spectrometer.  Struggling with large data size and slow DAQ speed. Need to improve it significantly.  Need to demonstrate the ability of track- finding and PID.  We need helps from other LEPS members for data-taking and offline analysis.