Part 9: Hypothesis Testing - 2 9-1/29 Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business Department of Economics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business
Advertisements

Econometric Analysis of Panel Data
Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business
Part 11: Asymptotic Distribution Theory 11-1/72 Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business Department of Economics.
Part 17: Nonlinear Regression 17-1/26 Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business Department of Economics.
Part 12: Asymptotics for the Regression Model 12-1/39 Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business Department of Economics.
BA 275 Quantitative Business Methods
3. Binary Choice – Inference. Hypothesis Testing in Binary Choice Models.
[Part 1] 1/15 Discrete Choice Modeling Econometric Methodology Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
Part 8: Hypothesis Testing 8-1/50 Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business Department of Economics.
[Part 3] 1/49 Stochastic FrontierModels Stochastic Frontier Model Stochastic Frontier Models William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Econometric Analysis of Panel Data
Microeconometric Modeling
Part 12: Random Parameters [ 1/46] Econometric Analysis of Panel Data William Greene Department of Economics Stern School of Business.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University Lab Sessions.
So far, we have considered regression models with dummy variables of independent variables. In this lecture, we will study regression models whose dependent.
Chapter 11 Multiple Regression.
1 MF-852 Financial Econometrics Lecture 6 Linear Regression I Roy J. Epstein Fall 2003.
Part 4: Partial Regression and Correlation 4-1/24 Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business Department of Economics.
Part 7: Multiple Regression Analysis 7-1/54 Regression Models Professor William Greene Stern School of Business IOMS Department Department of Economics.
Econometric Methodology. The Sample and Measurement Population Measurement Theory Characteristics Behavior Patterns Choices.
1. Descriptive Tools, Regression, Panel Data. Model Building in Econometrics Parameterizing the model Nonparametric analysis Semiparametric analysis Parametric.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Part 24: Multiple Regression – Part /45 Statistics and Data Analysis Professor William Greene Stern School of Business IOMS Department Department.
Efficiency Measurement William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Part 5: Random Effects [ 1/54] Econometric Analysis of Panel Data William Greene Department of Economics Stern School of Business.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Efficiency of Public Spending in Developing Countries: A Stochastic Frontier Approach William Greene Stern School of Business World Bank, May 23, 2005.
[Part 4] 1/43 Discrete Choice Modeling Bivariate & Multivariate Probit Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Efficiency Measurement William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Efficiency Measurement William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Frontier Models and Efficiency Measurement Lab Session 1 William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction 1Efficiency Measurement.
Byron Gangnes Econ 427 lecture 3 slides. Byron Gangnes A scatterplot.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Frontier Models and Efficiency Measurement Lab Session 4: Panel Data William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction 1Efficiency.
Multiple Regression. Simple Regression in detail Y i = β o + β 1 x i + ε i Where Y => Dependent variable X => Independent variable β o => Model parameter.
Efficiency Measurement William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Frontier Models and Efficiency Measurement Lab Session 2: Stochastic Frontier William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
[Topic 2-Endogeneity] 1/33 Topics in Microeconometrics William Greene Department of Economics Stern School of Business.
1/69: Topic Descriptive Statistics and Linear Regression Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University New.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
1/62: Topic 2.3 – Panel Data Binary Choice Models Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University New York NY USA.
Empirical Methods for Microeconomic Applications University of Lugano, Switzerland May 27-31, 2013 William Greene Department of Economics Stern School.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
Econometric Analysis of Panel Data
Microeconometric Modeling
Statistical Inference and Regression Analysis: GB
Econometric Analysis of Panel Data
Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business
Linear Regression.
Microeconometric Modeling
Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business
Chengyuan Yin School of Mathematics
Econometrics Analysis
Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business
Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business
Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business
Microeconometric Modeling
Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business
Microeconometric Modeling
Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business
Microeconometric Modeling
Empirical Methods for Microeconomic Applications University of Lugano, Switzerland May 27-31, 2019 William Greene Department of Economics Stern School.
Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business
Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business
Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business
Presentation transcript:

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business Department of Economics

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 Econometrics I Part 9 – Hypothesis Testing Part 2

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 Structural Change Time series regression, LogG =  1 +  2 logY +  3 logPG +  4 logPNC +  5 logPUC +  6 logPPT +  7 logPN +  8 logPD +  9 logPS +  A significant event occurs in October We will be interested to know if the model 1960 to 1973 is the same as from 1974 to 1995.

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 Chow Test

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 Residuals Show the Implication of the Restriction of Equal Coefficients. Loss of fit in the first period.

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 Algebra for the Chow Test

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 Structural Change Test

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 Application – Health and Income German Health Care Usage Data, 7,293 Individuals, Varying Numbers of Periods Variables in the file are Data downloaded from Journal of Applied Econometrics Archive. This is an unbalanced panel with 7,293 individuals. There are altogether 27,326 observations. The number of observations ranges from 1 to 7 per family. (Frequencies are: 1=1525, 2=2158, 3=825, 4=926, 5=1051, 6=1000, 7=987). The dependent variable of interest is DOCVIS = number of visits to the doctor in the observation period HHNINC = household nominal monthly net income in German marks / (4 observations with income=0 were dropped) HHKIDS = children under age 16 in the household = 1; otherwise = 0 EDUC = years of schooling AGE = age in years MARRIED=marital status WHITEC = 1 if has “white collar” job

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 Men | Ordinary least squares regression | | LHS=HHNINC Mean = | | Standard deviation = | | Number of observs. = | | Model size Parameters = 5 | | Degrees of freedom = | | Residuals Sum of squares = | | Standard error of e = | | Fit R-squared = | | Adjusted R-squared = | |Variable| Coefficient | Standard Error |b/St.Er.|P[|Z|>z]| Mean of X| |Constant|.04169*** | |AGE |.00086*** | |EDUC |.02044*** | |MARRIED |.03825*** | |WHITEC |.03969*** |

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 Women | Ordinary least squares regression | | LHS=HHNINC Mean = | | Standard deviation = | | Number of observs. = | | Model size Parameters = 5 | | Degrees of freedom = | | Residuals Sum of squares = | | Standard error of e = | | Fit R-squared = | | Adjusted R-squared = | |Variable| Coefficient | Standard Error |b/St.Er.|P[|Z|>z]| Mean of X| |Constant| | |AGE |.00026* | |EDUC |.01941*** | |MARRIED |.12081*** | |WHITEC |.06445*** |

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 All | Ordinary least squares regression | | LHS=HHNINC Mean = | | Standard deviation = | | Number of observs. = | | Model size Parameters = 5 | | Degrees of freedom = | | Residuals Sum of squares = | All | Residuals Sum of squares = | Men | Residuals Sum of squares = | Women |Variable| Coefficient | Standard Error |b/St.Er.|P[|Z|>z]| Mean of X| |Constant|.04186*** | |AGE |.00030*** D | |EDUC |.01967*** | |MARRIED |.07947*** | |WHITEC |.04819*** |

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 F Statistic for Chow Test --> Calc ; k = col(x) ; List; dfd = (tm + tf - 2*k) ; Chowtest = ((sall - sm - sf)/k) / ((sm+sf)/dfd) ; FCrit = Ftb(.95,k,dfd) $ DFD = CHOWTEST = FCRIT =

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 Use Dummy Variables

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 Wald Test for Difference

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 Specification Test: Normality of   Specification test for distribution  Standard tests: Kolmogorov-Smirnov: compare empirical cdf of X to normal with same mean and variance Bowman-Shenton: Compare third and fourth moments of X to normal, 0 (no skewness) and 3  4 (meso kurtosis)  Bera-Jarque – adapted Bowman/Shenton to linear regression residuals

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 Testing for Normality

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 The Stochastic Frontier Model u i > 0, usually assumed to be |N[0,  ]| v i may take any value. A symmetric distribution, such as the normal distribution, is usually assumed for v i.

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 Application to Spanish Dairy Farms InputUnitsMeanStd. Dev. MinimumMaximum MilkMilk production (liters) 131,108 92,539 14,110727,281 Cows# of milking cows Labor# man-equivalent units LandHectares of land devoted to pasture and crops FeedTotal amount of feedstuffs fed to dairy cows (tons) 57,94147,9813, ,732 N = 247 farms, T = 6 years ( )

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 Stochastic Frontier Model

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 Nonnested Regression Models  Davidson and MacKinnon: If model A is correct, then predictions from model B will not add to the fit of model A to the data.  Vuong: If model A is correct, then the likelihood function will generally favor model A and not model B

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 Davidson and MacKinnon Strategy  Obtain predictions from model A = AFit  Obtain predictions from model B = Bfit  If A is correct, in the combined model (A,Bfit), Bfit should not be significant.  If B is correct, in the combined model (B,Afit), Afit should not be significant.  (Unfortunately), all four combinations of significance and not are possible.

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 Application Model A LogG(t) =  1 +  2 logY(t) +  3 logPG(t) +  4 logPNC(t) +  5 logPUC(t) +  6 logPPT(t) +  7 logG(t-1) +  Model B LogG(t) =  1 +  2 logY(t) +  3 logPG(t) +  4 logPNC(t) +  5 logPUC(t) +  6 logPPT(t) +  7 logY(t-1) + w

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 B does not add to Model A

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 A Does Add to Model B

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 Voung  Log density for an observation is L i = -.5*[log(2  ) + log(s 2 ) + e i 2 /s 2 ]  Compute Li(A) and Li(B) for each observation  Compute D i = L i (A) – L i (B)  Test hypothesis that mean of D i equals zero using familiar “z” test.  Test statistic > +2 favors model A, < -2 favors model B, in between is inconclusive.

Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29