Proteinuria as a surrogate outcome in CKD UKPDS Rudy Bilous Middlesbrough, UK.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PREVEND Study: Screening for micro-albuminuria
Advertisements

Newly diagnosed hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 1544) Randomisation Avoid ACE inhibitors/ beta-blockers (n = 390) Tight BP control (n =
Slides courtesy of Matt Hall Nottingham University Hospitals February 2011 Slides courtesy of Matt Hall Nottingham University Hospitals February 2011 Slides.
Proteinuria as a Surrogate Outcome in Chronic Kidney Disease Early Diabetes – Microalbuminuria (MA) Type 2 Diabetes in American Indians Robert G Nelson,
CKD In Primary Care Dr Mohammed Javid.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Chronic Kidney Disease in Diabetes Chapter 29 Phil McFarlane, Richard E. Gilbert, Lori MacCallum,
Temporal Trends in the Prevalence of Diabetic Kidney Disease in the United States Ian H. de Boer, MD, MS, Tessa C. Rue, MS, Yoshio N. Hall, MD, Patrick.
BLOOD PRESSURE LOWERING. UKPDS design Aim To determine whether intensified blood glucose control, with either sulphonylurea or insulin, reduces the risk.
Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use Evaluation Results
This lecture was conducted during the Nephrology Unit Grand Ground by Medical Student rotated under Nephrology Division under the supervision and administration.
(IRbesartan in MicroAlbuminuria, Type 2 Diabetic Nephropathy Trial)
CVD prevention & management: a new approach for primary care Rod Jackson School of Population Health University of Auckland New Zealand.
Benefits of intensive multiple risk factor intervention.
UKPDS Paper 81 Slides © University of Oxford Diabetes Trials Unit UKPDS slides are copyright and remain the property of the University of Oxford Diabetes.
Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Treatment of Hypertension Chapter 25 Richard E. Gilbert, Doreen Rabi, Pierre LaRochelle, Lawrence.
Facts and Fiction about Type 2 Diabetes Michael L. Parchman, MD Department of Family & Community Medicine September 2004.
The concept of Diabetes & CV risk: A lifetime risk challenge
Diabetic Microvascular Disease: The Role of Glycemic Control and the Impact on Public Health Robert E. Ratner, MD MedStar Research Institute Georgetown.
Early Detection and Prevention of Renal Failure Linda Fried, MD, MPH.
ACCORD - Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes ADVANCE - Action in Diabetes to Prevent Vascular Disease VADT - Veterans Administration Diabetes.
A significant proportion of diabetic patients develop diabetic nephropathy which can eventually progress to end-stage renal disease despite established.
Section 4: Managing progression of CKD. Glomerulosclerosis Reduction in number of functioning glomeruli Increased blood flow to remaining nephrons Intraglomerular.
RENAL DISEASE IN DIABETES
Diabetic Nephropathy Yiming Lit, M.D. May 5, 2009.
ACUTE STROKE — Hypertension is a common problem in patients with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes but the time course in relation to the duration.
Section 6: Management in primary care Particular emphasis on nurse practitioner’s role.
Joint Effects of Routine Blood Pressure Lowering and Intensive Glucose Control ADVANCE Adapted from EASD 2008.
0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Altering the Course of Renal Disease in Hypertensive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy with the A II Antagonist.
Selective vitamin D receptor activation with paricalcitol for reduction of albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes (VITAL study) Lambers Heerspink,
Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) Collaborative Study Group N Eng J Med 345: , 2001 Edmund J. Lewis, M.D. Muehrcke Family Professor of.
FDA Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee 1st June 2008 Rury Holman Clinical outcomes with anti-diabetic drugs: What we already know.
William C. Cushman, MD, FACP, FAHA Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Memphis, TN For The ACCORD Study Group.
The ADVANCE trial: update and new results Jean-François Gautier Saint Louis Hospital, Paris 12 th Meeting of the Mediterranean Group for the Study of Diabetes.
Dick de Zeeuw Department of Clinical Pharmacology University Medical Center Groningen The Netherlands Albuminuria; a tool for measuring non-blood pressure.
Dr M Sivalingam Renal Unit, Lister Hospital, Stevenage.
Enrollment and Outcomes Fan Fan Hou, et al. N Engl J Med 2006;354:
UKHDS (UKPDS): UK Hypertension in Diabetes Study Purpose To determine whether tight control of blood pressure (aiming for BP
2-4. Estimated Renal Function Estimated GFR = 1.8 x (Cs) x (age) Cockcroft-Gault eq. – Estimated creatine clearance (mL/min) = (140 – age x body weight,
Diabetes and the Kidney Richard Kingston Department of Renal Medicine Kent and Canterbury Hospital.
The MICRO-HOPE. Microalbuminuria, Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Reference Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation.
Risk Involved with Dual RAAS Blockade in Kidney Disease Source: Bakris GL. Dual RAAS blockade is desirable in kidney disease: Con. Kidney Int. 2010;78:546–549.
Risk Factors for Renal Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes: U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study 74 Ravi Retnakaran, Carole A Cull, Kerensa I Thorne, Amanda I Adler,
Changes in the concentration of serum C-peptide in type 2 diabetes during long-term continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy Department of Internal.
Cardiovascular Disease and Antihypertensives The RENAAL Trial Reference Brunner BM, and the RENAAL study group. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular.
The Significance of Albuminuria
What should the Systolic BP treatment goal be in patients with CKD?
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
Nephrology Journal Club The SPRINT Trial Parker Gregg
Section 4: Managing progression of CKD
The ACCORD Trial: Review of Design and Results
ACCORD Microvascular Outcomes
Diabetes type 2 Landmark Outcomes Trials
Heart failure in diabetes: effects of anti-hyperglycaemic drug therapy
Volume 352, Issue 9131, Pages (September 1998)
The Anglo Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial
Estimated GFR in Diabetes
So What is Albuminuria? An elevated urinary albumin excretion is a marker of endothelial dysfunction that symbolizes the kidney’s way to translate the.
The percentage of subjects with de novo development of renal function impairment (GFR
Type 2 diabetes.
Management of hypertension in patients with chronic kidney disease
Insights from the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT)
Trial analysis results comparing ACE inhibitors/ARBs with other antihypertensive drugs on renal disease progression End point Relative risk (95% CI) p.
SUSTAIN-6 Trial design: Patients with DM2 at high risk for CV events were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 fashion to either semaglutide 0.5 mg, semaglutide 1 mg,
Hypertension management in high risk type II diabetes with CKD: Insights from recent trials with a focus on albuminuria. A case based discussion  Matthew.
Volume 73, Issue 8, Pages (April 2008)
An ACCORD BP sub-analysis HR: 1.06; 95%CI: ; P=0.61
Michael R. Lattanzio, Matthew R. Weir  Kidney International 
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
An ACCORD BP sub-analysis HR: 1.06; 95%CI: ; P=0.61
Presentation transcript:

Proteinuria as a surrogate outcome in CKD UKPDS Rudy Bilous Middlesbrough, UK

UKPDS - Definitions  Microalbuminuria (MAU)> 50 mg/L  Clinical Proteinuria (CP)>300 mg/L  Spot urine sample annually  Albumin concentration (ACR not reported)  Immunoturbidimetry 1988 (RIA previous)  Lower limit 2 mg/L  CV 3.1 – 6.5% over range 4.4–136.7 mg/L

UKPDS - Outcomes  Fatal / non fatal renal failure (plasma creatinine > 250  M and/or RRT)  Aggregate microvascular (above +/or vitreous haemorrhage +/or photocoagulation.)  Surrogate endpoints (new MAU, CP, doubling plasma creatinine)  Latterly estimated creatinine clearance (eCrCl – CG formula) < 60 ml/min/1.73m 2  Reported per triennium, or B/L to year, or event rate per number at a given time point

UKPDS Outcomes  No impact on primary renal outcomes of either intensive glycaemic or tight blood pressure control  Combined microvascular outcome heavily weighted by photocoagulation

UKPDS Patient Randomisation for Glycaemic Control Study Lancet 1998; 352 :

Glycaemic Control Trial 1 Conventional N = 1138 Intensive N = 2729 Baseline MAU UAC > 50mg/L Uncorrected 12.4 % (127) 11.3 % (273) Baseline CP UAC > 300mg/L Uncorrected 2.1 % (21) 1.7 % (40)

Glycaemic Control Trial 2 Conv’lIntensiveRRp HbA1c Median 10y HbA1c Median 10y 7.9 % 7.0 % - < ? t test Microvascular endpoints pt yrs ( )# < 0.01 < 0.01 Log rank MAU 9 y % ( number) 25.4%(183/721)19.2%(338/1759)0.76( )* <  2 CP 9 y % (number)6.5%(47/721)4.4%(77/1759)0.67( )* < 0.03  2 x2 PCr 0 -9y% (number) 1.76%(11/625)0.71%(11/1547)0.40( )* < 0.03  2 (# 95 % CI ; * 99 % CI)x2PCr = doubling plasma creatinine

Copyright ©1998 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group, BMJ 1998;317: UKPDS Patient Randomisation to BP Study

Blood Pressure Trial 1 Less Tight <180/105mmHg N = 390 Tight <150/85 mmHg N = 758 Baseline MAU UAC > 50 mg/L Corrected 16 % (53) 18 % (114) Baseline CP UAC >300 mg/L Corrected 4 % (13) 3 % (18) UAC corrected to urine creatinine concentration of 8mM

Copyright ©1998 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group, BMJ 1998;317: Achieved Blood Pressure in UKPDS BP Study

Blood Pressure Trial 2 Less Tight TightRRp Mean BP 6y Mean BP 6y(estimated) 156 / 85 mmHg 142 / 80 mmHg- < ? t test Microvascular endpoints pt yrs ( )# < 0.01 < 0.01 ? test MAU 6 y % ( number) 28.5%(78/274)20.3%(110/543)0.71( )* < 0.01 ?  test CP 6 y % (number)8.6%(24/274)5.3%(29/543)0.61( )* ?  test x2 PCr 9y % NSNS (# 95 % CI ; * 99 % CI)

Copyright ©1998 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group, BMJ 1998;317: Surrogate outcomes in UKPDS BP Study

UKPDS Progression 1  5097 at baseline  4727 (92.7%) No nephropathy  333 (6.5 %) MAU (UAC > 50 mg/L)  37 (0.7 %) CP (UAC > 300 mg/L)  At 10.4 yrs median follow up :  867MAU  264CP  71Plasma Creatinine > 175  M  14Renal Replacement Therapy  17Renal Deaths

Progression rates for 5097 newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetic patients in UKPDS. Adler AI et al Kidney Int 2003 ; 63 :

UKPDS Progression 2 Baseline N = yrs N = yrs N = yrs N = 435 MAU or worse 7.3 % (370) 17.3 % (830) 24.9 % (696) 28.0 % (122) CP or worse 0.7 % (37) 3.1 % (149) 5.3 % (148) 7.1 % (31) PCr > 175  M or RRT % (19) 0.8 % (22) 2.3 % (10)

UKPDS Progression 3 Proportion alive at 10 yrs Years spent in stage (IQR) No nephropathy 87.1 % 18.9 (7.8 – 37.8) MAU 70.8 % 10.9 (4.5 – 21.8) CP 65.1 % 9.7 (4.0 – 19.4) PCr > 175  M or RRT 8.5 % 2.5 (1.0 – 5.0)

UKPDS Progression 4  38 % of 4031 developed MAU at 15 yrs  64 % had eCrCl > 60 ml/min/1.73m 2  24 % had eCrCl < 60 ml/min/1.73m 2 after MAU  12 % had eCrCl < 60 ml/min/1.73m 2 pre MAU  29 % of 5032 developed reduced eCrCl < 60 ml/min/1.73m 2 at 15 yrs  51 % had UAC < 50 mg/L  16 % had UAC > 50 mg/L after reduced eCrCl  33 % had UAC > 50 mg/L pre reduced eCrCl  Thus MAU does not always precede declining renal function

Proportion of patients reaching a renal event in UKPDS with no albuminuria, 5032 with normal plasma creatinine at baseline. Microalbuminuria >50mg/L, macroalbuminuria > 300 mg/L, reduced CrCl < 60 ml/min. Retnakaran et al Diabetes 2006 ; 55 :

UKPDS Progression 5 MAU 756 events CP 219 events CrCl 584 events Age at  Per 5 y __2.15( ) Male sex 1.18( )1.47( )0.55( ) Indo Asian 2.02( )2.07( )1.93( ) Waistcm1.01( )1.016( )0.95( ) Smoking1.20( )_1.25( ) Stepwise proportional hazards regression model. HR with 95 % CI

UKPDS Progression 6 MAU 756 events CP 219 events CrCl 584 events UAC Per 20 mg/L 1.004( )1.009( )1.009( ) Plasma Cr Per 10  M _1.087( )1.34( ) Systolic BP Per 10 mmHg 1.15( )1.15( )1.107( ) LDLCmM_1.17( )_ TriglyceridemM1.09( )1.15( )_ Stepwise proportional hazards regression model. HR with 95 % CI

UKPDS Caveats  Primary renal outcomes too infrequent  Mix of therapeutic and pathological microvascular outcomes  Surrogate renal outcome used urinary albumin concentration with high cut off  No allowance of impact of antihypertensive therapies on UAC

UKPDS Conclusions  Strong evidence of effectiveness of glycaemic and BP control in prevention of increases in albuminuria  Significant reduction in those doubling plasma creatinine (albeit small numbers)  Demonstration of poor prognosis for those with worsening renal function  Relatively slow progression of albuminuria toward renal impairment in T2DM  Discordance between eCrCl and UAC

Bibliography  Intensive blood-glucose control with SUs or insulin …. UKPDS 33. Lancet 1998 : 352 :  Tight blood pressure control….UKPDS 38 BMJ 1998: 317 : 703 – 13  Development and progression of nephropathy… UKPDS 64. Adler AI et al KI 2003 : 63 :  Risk Factors for renal dysfunction …. UKPDS 74. Retnakaran R et al Diabetes 2006 : 55 :