Pension Plan Allocation to Real Estate when Plan Trustees have Reputational Utility Kiat-Ying Seah and James D. Shilling National University of Singapore.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Optimal Risky Portfolios. Review Mix one risky asset with the risk-free asset 1. E(r c ) = wE(r p ) + (1 - w)r f  c = w  p c= complete or combined.
Advertisements

Brief introduction on Logistic Regression
Yale School of Management Sharpening Sharpe Ratios Will Goetzmann Jonathan Ingersoll Matthew Spiegel Ivo Welch.
Inflation-Protecting Asset Allocation: A Downside Risk Analysis ERES Conference, 5 th July 2013 Tim Koniarski, Steffen Sebastian.
1 Risk, Returns, and Risk Aversion Return and Risk Measures Real versus Nominal Rates EAR versus APR Holding Period Returns Excess Return and Risk Premium.
BUSINESS SCHOOL Portfolio Selection with Skew Normal Asset Returns Quan Gan Discipline of Finance, University of Sydney.
Optimal Decentralized ALM Jules H. van Binsbergen, Stanford University Michael W. Brandt, Duke University and NBER Ralph S.J. Koijen, University of Chicago.
CAS 1999 Dynamic Financial Analysis Seminar Chicago, Illinois July 19, 1999 Calibrating Stochastic Models for DFA John M. Mulvey - Princeton University.
Sandy Lai SMU 1 Real Effects of Stock Underpricing Harald Hau University of Geneva and SFI
Asset Allocation Week 4. Asset Allocation: The Fundamental Question How do you allocate your assets amongst different assets ? –There are literally thousands.
Empirical Financial Economics 5. Current Approaches to Performance Measurement Stephen Brown NYU Stern School of Business UNSW PhD Seminar, June
FINANCE 9. Optimal Portfolio Choice Professor André Farber Solvay Business School Université Libre de Bruxelles Fall 2007.
INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS ©2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies CHAPTER 7 Optimal Risky Portfolios 1.
Empirical Financial Economics 4. Asset pricing and Mean Variance Efficiency Stephen Brown NYU Stern School of Business UNSW PhD Seminar, June
Mutual Investment Club of Cornell Week 8: Portfolio Theory April 7 th, 2011.
Ch. 6 Risk Aversion and Investment Decisions, Part II: Modern Portfolio Theory 6.1 Introduction 6.2 More about Utility Functions 6.3 Description of the.
1 Fin 2802, Spring 10 - Tang Chapter 6: Asset Allocation Fina2802: Investments and Portfolio Analysis Spring, 2010 Dragon Tang Lecture 9 Capital Allocation.
Asset Management Lecture 22. Review class Asset management process Planning with the client Investor objectives, constraints and preferences Execution.
Chapter 6 An Introduction to Portfolio Management.
Vicentiu Covrig 1 Portfolio management. Vicentiu Covrig 2 “ Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their.
Asset Classes 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 10.00% 0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00% Expected Risk (standard deviation) Private Equity.
Economics 434 – Financial Market Theory Tuesday, August 25, 2009 Tuesday, August 24, 2010Tuesday, September 21, 2010Thursday, October 7, 2010 Economics.
Risk Premium Puzzle in Real Estate: Are real estate investors overly risk averse? James D. Shilling DePaul University Tien Foo Sing National University.
Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management
FIN638 Vicentiu Covrig 1 Portfolio management. FIN638 Vicentiu Covrig 2 How Finance is organized Corporate finance Investments International Finance Financial.
1 ASSET ALLOCATION. 2 With Riskless Asset 3 Mean Variance Relative to a Benchmark.
Expected Utility, Mean-Variance and Risk Aversion Lecture VII.
Moden Portfolio Theory Dan Thaler. Definition Proposes how rational investors will use diversification to optimize their portfolios MPT models an asset’s.
18 September 2003 Joeri van Alphen Lodewijk van Pol Modelling Active Management AFIR 2003, Maastricht.
Alex Carr Nonlinear Programming Modern Portfolio Theory and the Markowitz Model.
Intermediate Investments F3031 Summary to Date Investing is about measuring and understanding the risk/return relationship Risk –Measured through the use.
INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin CHAPTER 27 The Theory of Active.
Lecture Presentation Software to accompany Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Seventh Edition by Frank K. Reilly & Keith C. Brown Chapter 7.
UK real estate fund performance ERES Stockholm, June 2009 Malcolm Hunt (IPD), Tony Key, Stephen Lee (Cass Business School)
Some Background Assumptions Markowitz Portfolio Theory
SESSION 19: SAVING AND INVESTING Talking Points Saving 1. Saving is allocating part of one’s current income toward the purchase of goods and services in.
Empirical Financial Economics Asset pricing and Mean Variance Efficiency.
Portfolio Performance Evaluation
Yale School of Management Portfolio Management I William N. Goetzmann Yale School of Management,1997.
0 Portfolio Managment Albert Lee Chun Construction of Portfolios: Introduction to Modern Portfolio Theory Lecture 3 16 Sept 2008.
©2014 OnCourse Learning. All Rights Reserved. CHAPTER 21 Chapter 21 Real Estate and Portfolio Theory: Strategic Investment Considerations SLIDE 1.
Risk and Return Professor Thomas Chemmanur Risk Aversion ASSET – A: EXPECTED PAYOFF = 0.5(100) + 0.5(1) = $50.50 ASSET – B:PAYS $50.50 FOR SURE.
FIN437 Vicentiu Covrig 1 Portfolio management Optimum asset allocation Optimum asset allocation (see chapter 7 Bodie, Kane and Marcus)
Portfolio Management Unit – 1 Session No.4 Topic: Investment Objectives Unit – 1 Session No.4 Topic: Investment Objectives.
Fiduciary Investment Monitoring. Obligation to properly research investments both before and after making them –Apply system of fiduciary mandates which.
FYP Briefing. Project #56 Is R&D a Priced Factor in APT Market Model for Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) –R i = a i + b i R mt + ε i Where Ri = expected.
Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management First Canadian Edition By Reilly, Brown, Hedges, Chang 6.
Valuing an Insurance Enterprise and Reserve Estimates Using Bootstrapped Statutory Loss Information William C. Scheel DFA Technologies, LLC
Goal Programming Linear program has multiple objectives, often conflicting in nature Target values or goals can be set for each objective identified Not.
“Differential Information and Performance Measurement Using a Security Market Line” by Philip H. Dybvig and Stephen A. Ross Presented by Jane Zhao.
© 2008 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. 3/1/2008 LCN Role of Immediate Annuities in Retirement.
Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 24-1 Portfolio Performance Evaluation.
Efficient Diversification II Efficient Frontier with Risk-Free Asset Optimal Capital Allocation Line Single Factor Model.
1 Public Pension Risk Dynamics Bob McCrory EFI Actuaries.
Optimal portfolios and index model.  Suppose your portfolio has only 1 stock, how many sources of risk can affect your portfolio? ◦ Uncertainty at the.
PORTFOLIO OPTIMISATION. AGENDA Introduction Theoretical contribution Perceived role of Real estate in the Mixed-asset Portfolio Methodology Results Sensitivity.
Chapter 18 Portfolio Performance Evaluation. Types of management revisited Passive management 1.Capital allocation between cash and the risky portfolio.
Utility Theory Investors maximize Expected Utility U = f(W) U(W) W Risk Averse Investor.
Travis Wainman partner1 partner2
Chapter 7 An Introduction to Portfolio Management.
The Farm Portfolio Problem: Part I Lecture V. An Empirical Model of Mean- Variance Deriving the EV Frontier –Let us begin with the traditional portfolio.
FIN437 Vicentiu Covrig 1 Portfolio management Optimum asset allocation Optimum asset allocation (see chapter 8 RN)
Investments, 8 th edition Bodie, Kane and Marcus Slides by Susan Hine McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
4-1 Business Finance (MGT 232) Lecture Risk and Return.
Optimal Deposit Insurance Eduardo Dávila (NYU, Stern)
Portfolio Selection (chapter 8)
Chapter 8 The Gain From Portfolio Diversification
Portfolio Performance Evaluation
RISK AVERSION AND PORTFOLIO CHOICE
Alternative Investments and Risk Measurement
Presentation transcript:

Pension Plan Allocation to Real Estate when Plan Trustees have Reputational Utility Kiat-Ying Seah and James D. Shilling National University of Singapore DePaul University, Chicago ERES 2010 Milan, Italy

Objectives  Tries to explain why institutions invest very little in real estate. An entropy model where institutions care about what their target returns are Conformity matters Persistent portfolio allocation Implication: allocation is based on a power utility not on a mean-variance variety

Motivation  Reality: institutions invest 2.5% to 4% of total assets in real estate  Normative studies: 15-20% (Fogler, 1984) 43%(Webb and Rubens, 1987) 19-28% (Giliberto, 1993)  Modelling idea: - Pension plans are fiduciaries and care about how others assess their performance: include “Reputation” in utility function.

Pension Trustee’s Objective function  Measure reputation by an entropy function  Objective of each plan trustee: maximize reputation subject to a shortfall constraint

Allocation is a function of belief-choice  Optimal belief choice: multinomial logit probabilistic choice function Trustees will skew their portfolio toward assets with higher returns. Prob of choosing a target that deviates from group mean is low – conforming behavior.

Given beliefs, solve for portfolio 1.Power utility form, risk aversion is endogenous 2.What matters? Target returns, W 0 Z Surplus returns S T Initial Funding Ratio matters

Data and Results  Data are obtained from CRSP/COMPUSTAT   Summary Statistics:

Summary Statistics

Portfolio Simulations 1.SRMP looks at total portfolio variance 2.Entropic cares about the entire distribution

Empirical Evidence  Use Sharpe’s (1992) “style” methodology: Regress pension surplus returns on six benchmark returns. Collect R-square statistic for each pension plan. Because R-square varies from 0 to 1, transform this variable using the logistic transformation = “STYLE” variable Run the following regression: Style = F (Target surplus return, Conformity, Initial Funding Ratio)

Conclusion  Empirical results are the same when we include firm fixed effects.  Reputational utility causes institutions to Skew portfolio away from real estate to achieve minimum target rate of return. Achieving minimum target rate of return requires that pension trustees be conformists. Explains herding behavior.