University of North Texas Climate Survey Task Force Members Mickey Abel, College of Visual Arts & Design Christy Crutsinger, Provost Office, Chair Tracy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bernie Engel, Professor and Head Agricultural and Biological Engineering 1 March 25, 2014.
Advertisements

PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Teaching and Learning Center What Do We Offer?? 9/27/2012.
FACULTY SENATE WELFARE COMMITTEE REPORT Committee Members: Ellie Shahinian Baldwin, Keith Fevurly, Rebecca Forgash, Derren Duburguet, Ibon Izurieta, Elizabeth.
NSF ADVANCE: Institutional Transformation for Faculty Diversity ADVANCE Faculty Work Life Survey: Comparison of Statistically Significant Gender Differences.
Tenure Track Faculty Survey Spring  Population:241 ◦ Female: 79 ◦ Males: 162 ◦ Faculty of Color: 54  Sample:159 (66%) ◦ Females: 52 (66%) ◦ Males:
Notes on Promotion and Tenure for New Faculty Beverly Davenport Sypher Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs October 18, 2011.
Law School Survey of Student Engagement Users’ Workshop November 4, 2011 Seton Hall Law School 1.
AdvanceVT Mentoring. Let’s Benchmark: Who Does Mentoring Well? 2008 Faculty Worklife Survey, 700 tenure- track faculty responses (53% RR); College RRs.
Campus Climate for UNC Charlotte Faculty Findings from the 1998, 2001, & 2004 UCLA HERI Faculty Surveys Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment Office of.
What’s it Like to be a Professor? REU July 7, 2009 Michael J. Lewis, Director Department of Computer Science Binghamton University (SUNY)
1 Faculty Leadership Development Programs at Virginia Tech Peggy Layne, P.E., Director, AdvanceVT.
1 Faculty Climate Survey Highlights Institutional Research & Faculty Development and Diversity March 2008.
Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education (COACHE) University of Minnesota.
Expectation & Experience Surveys 1998 & 2002 AIRPO, June West Point, New York.
Promotion and Ten ure October 21, 2014 S. Laurel Weldon Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs (Interim) PURDUE FACULTY.
INQUIREINSPIREINNOVATEIMPLEMENT Leadership, Community and Values University of Washington LEADERSHIP, COMMUNITY and VALUES Preliminary Findings: Surveys.
COACHE Survey Results Faculty of Arts & Science March 28, 2014.
Finding The Right Institutional Fit For You How To (Safely) Find Out About The Culture Of The Department And College.
HIGHLIGHTS OF SURVEY RESULTS OF TENURED AND TENURE TRACK FACULTY NDSU FORWARD Survey of Work/Life Balance:
Sex comparisons among science faculty at Hunter College Hunter College Gender Equity Project & Provost’s Office 2007 Science Faculty Survey Department.
University Senate August 26, 2014 KEY FINDINGS FROM THE COACHE FACULTY JOB SATISFACTION SURVEY.
San Luis Obispo Community College District SENSE 2012 Findings for Cuesta College.
SENSE 2013 Findings for College of Southern Idaho.
COACHE Presentation LUCINDA FINLEY Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs.
Teacher Engagement Survey 2014
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.
Faculty Climate Survey College of Business
Promotion and Tenure Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
COACHE Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey: Associate Professors Associate Professors Community Meeting October 30, 2013 Nancy Whelchel, Associate.
Faculty Climate Survey College of Merchandising, Hospitality and Tourism
World of Work: The Academic Job Search Tracey Jandrisits Executive Advisor to the Provost and Manager of Faculty Relations and Recruitment Office of the.
COACHE Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey Deans’ Council Meeting November 8, 2012 Betsy Brown and Nancy Whelchel.
WSU SAMPLE  All full-time tenured and tenure-track faculty  All campuses  Response rate: 57.6 % (N=603)  At least 50 % response rate in all colleges.
UBC Department of Finance Office Staff Survey Forum Presentation March 17, 2004.
Task Force Members Mickey Abel, College of Visual Arts & Design Christy Crutsinger, Provost Office, Chair Tracy Everbach, Frank W. and Sue Mayborn School.
KerryAnn O’Meara Associate Professor, Higher Education Co-PI UM ADVANCE Corbin M. Campbell Research Assistant ADVANCE Research and Evaluation: EDUC Report.
Presented by the Faculty Affairs Office September 2013.
HERE: PERSPECTIVES ON LEARNING, LIVING AND WORKING AT MASSART June 1, 2015 Health Resources in Action.
College of Liberal Arts Tenure and Promotion workshop: PROCEDURES AND POLICIES 17 October 2014.
KerryAnn O’Meara Associate Professor, Higher Education Co-PI UM ADVANCE Corbin M. Campbell Research Assistant ADVANCE Research and Evaluation: ARHU Report.
1 Faculty Motivation and Policies Steven R. Hall Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair of the MIT Faculty.
Faculty Survey Highlights University Council Presentation Lynn McCloskey Edward S. Macias April 7, 2008.
Retention and Advancement for Mid Career Faculty K.D. JoshiKelly Ward Associate Professor of Interim Chair and Information Systems Professor, Education.
KerryAnn O’Meara Associate Professor, Higher Education Co-PI UM ADVANCE Corbin M. Campbell Research Assistant ADVANCE Research and Evaluation: BSOS Report.
Promotion and Ten ure October 2015 Alyssa Panitch Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs PURDUE FACULTY.
KerryAnn O’Meara Associate Professor, Higher Education Co-PI UM ADVANCE Corbin M. Campbell Research Assistant ADVANCE Research and Evaluation: ENGR Report.
Outline Survey overview Instrument Construction Survey Logistics Response Rates Uses of Survey Data Communication with campus groups Program evaluation.
Faculty Well-Being North Carolina State University March 10, 2009 Committee on Faculty Well-Being.
Faculty Climate Survey College of Engineering
Faculty Well-Being Survey: Reappointment, Promotion & Tenure & Post-Tenure Review Presentation for NC State Faculty Senate February 27, 2007 Nancy.
COACHE Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey: Non-Tenure Track Faculty Non-Tenure Track Faculty Community Meeting October 14, 2013 Nancy Whelchel,
2008 COACHE Survey of Pre-Tenure Faculty Faculty Senate January 25, 2011 Betsy Brown and Nancy Whelchel.
KerryAnn O’Meara Associate Professor, Higher Education Co-PI UM ADVANCE Corbin M. Campbell Research Assistant ADVANCE Research and Evaluation: BMGT Report.
Bias Tidbits Multidisciplinary Work A forthcoming paper in the American Journal of Evaluation by Irwin Feller discusses the issues, noting that in disciplines.
Klod Kokini Associate Dean for Academic Affairs College of Engineering Professor of Mechanical Engineering 1 ADVANCE-FAST October 21, 2014.
Faculty Well-Being Survey: Assessment Activities Presentation for the NC State Assessment Work Group May 2, 2007 Nancy Whelchel, PhD Assistant Director.
Northwest ISD Board Presentation Staff Survey
What Women have said helps them to succeed An evaluation of the women’s programs.
Faculty Climate Survey Highlights
ADVANCE Research and Evaluation: ENGR Report
Faculty Climate Survey
Task Force Members Mickey Abel, College of Visual Arts & Design
The 2015 COACHE Survey YORK COLLEGE Faculty Satisfaction
Considerations in Engineering
Senate Ad hoc Committee for the Assessment of the Higher Education Research Institute (HERI) Faculty Survey Report on Findings Felicia Lassk, Associate.
Promotion and Tenure: Some Suggestions
2018 Great Colleges Survey for Champlain College
Preliminary Findings from the 2008 ISU Faculty Needs Assessment
Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results
Presentation transcript:

University of North Texas Climate Survey

Task Force Members Mickey Abel, College of Visual Arts & Design Christy Crutsinger, Provost Office, Chair Tracy Everbach, Frank W. and Sue Mayborn School of Journalism Francisco Guzman, College of Business Warren Henry, College of Music Kuruvilla John, College of Engineering Linda Marshall, College of Arts & Sciences Mariela Nunez-Janes, College of Public Affairs and Community Service Mike Sayler, College of Education Sanjukta Pookulangara, College of Merchandising, Hospitality, and Tourism Mark Vosvick, Faculty Senate Angela Wilson, College of Arts & Sciences Jerry Wircenski, College of Information

The Survey Research Institute at Cornell University was contracted to administer the online survey. Survey was open between November 8, January 25, Initial invitation and three reminders were sent to participants. Incentives were offered to full-time faculty members in departments achieving 80% response rate.Methodology

For departments achieving an 80% response rate by December 14 th, the names of full-time faculty were entered into a drawing to win $ to apply toward faculty travel or other professional development activities. Total of 700 participants completed the survey out of 1059 with valid addresses, achieving a 66.10% response rate. Additionally, 60 participants started the survey and answered at least on question, but did not complete it.Methodology

Hiring Teaching Research Service Merit Promotion Workload Resources Mentoring Work/Family Balance Diversity Satisfaction Climate Survey Instrument

Response Rate by Rank

How satisfied were you with the following hiring factors?Hiring

Hiring Please rate your level of agreement about how faculty hiring is done in your department.

Teaching Please rate your level of agreement with each of the following statements about teaching in your department.

Research Think about the value of your own creativity/scholarship/research in your department. In comparison to your colleagues: How much does your department value your scholarship/research? Undervalued Very Highly Valued

Research How much do you agree with each of these statements? ITEM Assistant Professor Associate Professor Full Professor Lecturer Interdisciplinary creatively/scholarship/research is valued in my department Interdisciplinary creatively/scholarship/research is rewarded in my department *2.8* UNT provides the needed infrastructure for interdisciplinary work 2.5*2.3*2.4 I sometimes collaborated with members of my department My collaborations with people outside my department of the university are usually better than collaborations with department colleagues When people in the department are working on something related to my expertise, they ask for my input I find my research collaborations rewarding Range: (1= Strongly disagree, 4 = Strongly disagree) *significant at.05 level

Service In my department, committee assignments are made fairly. Range: (1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree) * significant at.05 level

Service Think about all of the service activities you actually do (100% of your service), including formal and recognized activities as well as informal activities. How much of your service is… Range: (1 = none of it, 4= all of it)** significant at.01 level * significant at.05 level

Merit Think about the feedback you receive from merit reviews. Is the evaluation you receive… Range: (1 = Never, 5 = Always) *significant at.01 level, ** significant at.05 level

Promotion Did you seriously consider going up “early” for tenure and promotion to associate professor?

Promotion How often do you receive feedback specific to promotion and tenure issues? * N = 149 valid casesMean = 2.78 Range: ( 1 = Never, 4 = More than once a year) * Assistant Professors were only respondents

Promotion Did you ever start the process for promotion, but not complete it to the final decision point? * N = 545 valid casesMean = 1.95 * Lecturers were not included

Promotion Did you go up for promotion, after withdrawing from the process or after being turned down at an earlier time? * N = 545 valid casesMean = 1.94 * Lecturers were not included

Promotion If so were you promoted at the time? * N = 35 valid casesMean = 1.09 * Lecturers were not included

Promotion How important is/was it to you to achieve the rank of full professor? Range: (1 = Not at all important, 4 = Very important) ** significant at.01 level

Promotion How much did the following factors affect your decision to apply for promotion to full professor at UNT? (Rank of Full Professor but not hired as Full Professor) ITEM Full Professor I believed I was ready3.8 A colleague thought I should 2.8 My chair thought I should 2.9 My dean thought I should 2.4 One of more people did not think I should 1.4 No one every talked to me about it 1.5 I needed to make a better salary 2.5 Range: (1 = None, 4 = Alot)

Promotion ITEM Associate Professor Full Professor Assistant Professor Associate Professor Lecturer Members of my department give me helpful advice **2.9** The tenure and promotion requirements are very clear **2.5** The tenure and promotion process is fair and consistent It is difficult to know exactly what I should be doing to be promoted I am reluctant to talk about controversial issues because it might affect my promotion *2.5* I am comfortable asking about performance expectations I feel like I have control over whether I will be promoted Good mentoring is critical to my being promoted Range: ( 1 = Strongly disagree; 4 = Strongly agree) **significant at.01 level, *.05 significant at.05 level Please address the following issues about tenure and promotion to Associate Professor / Full Professor.

Promotion Range: (1 = Very unlikely; 4 = Very likely) How likely are you to be promoted?

Workload Please choose the proportion of time you spent during the academic year for each of the following. For new faculty, choose the proportion of time you spent working during the fall semester. ITEM Assistant Professor Associate Professor Full Professor Lecturer Preparing to teach assigned courses, labs, etc.3.6**3.3** 3.8** Teaching the assigned courses, labs, studies and communicating with those students 3.6**3.4**3.3**3.9** Teaching or mentoring students in any type of independent study, master theses or dissertations 3.4**3.6**3.5**2.8** Formally advising students 3.0**3.4** 3.2 Advising or mentoring “extra” students who seek you out, not those assigned to you Conducting your scholarly activities (i.e., research, composing, etc.) 3.6**3.5** 2.3** Writing proposals (e.g., grants) to conduct your research/scholarship/creative activities 3.4**3.0**2.9**1.9** Providing peer reviewing (i.e., reviewing the scholarly or creative work of others) 3.2** 3.5**1.8** External paid consulting Mentoring other faculty 1.8**3.0**3.4**2.4** Committee, administrative, or governance work inside your department 2.8**3.6** 3.1** Committee work at the college or university level 2.3**3.2**3.3**2.6** Outreach or community service 2.7**3.0*3.1**3.2** Advising or working with student organizations 2.5**2.7**2.5**3.2** Range: (1 = Much less than other people, 5 = Much more than other people) ** significant at.01 level * significant at.05 level

Resources Range: (1 = Very dissatisfied, 4 = Very satisfied) * significant at.01 level, **significant at.05 level How satisfied are you with the distribution of the following in your department?

Mentoring How important is mentoring for each of the following areas? ITEM Assistant Professor Associate Professor Full ProfessorLecturer To learn how things are done at UNT 3.3**3.1**3.0**3.4** To learn how to get along in your department of college 3.2**3.12.9**3.1* To improve teaching or manage students 3.1**3.0**3.1**3.4** To improve research or scholarly/artistic activities To move into leadership positions2.9**3.0*2.8**3.2** Range: ( 1 = None, 4 = A great deal) ** significant at.01 level; * significant at.05 level

Work/Family Balance ITEM Assistant Professor Associate Professor Full Professor Lecturer Household responsibilities2.8** 2.5**2.9** Childcare2.1*2.0**1.6**1.8* Caring for someone who is ill, disabled, aging or with special needs 1.6*1.9* Your health Cost of living2.8** 2.4**2.9** Meeting work expectations3.4**3.1**2.9** 3.1** The way your personal life and work interfere with each other 2.9** 2.6**2.7 Having a successful academic/artistic career3.4**3.1**2.8**2.9** Your salary3.0**3.1**2.6**3.1** Faculty morale in your department2.6**3.0**2.82.7* Subtle discrimination2.1*2.4**2.0**2.1* Range: ( 1 = None; 4 = A great deal) ** significant at.01 level; * significant at.05 level The following are possible sources of stress for faculty. Rate the amount of stress you feel about each one.

Work/Family Balance ITEM Assistant Professor Associate Professor Full Professor Lecturer Prospects for tenure 3.1**1.6**1.1**1.8** Prospects for promotion 3.0**2.8**1.2**2.6** Leadership opportunities 2.1**2.2**1.8**2.3** The amount of support in your work environment 2.6**2.7**2.3**2.5* Acceptance for people like you 2.2**2.11.9**2.0 The racial, ethnic or cultural climate at UNT 2.1**2.0**1.7** Opportunities to have a happy social life 2.4** 2.0**2.1** Time to do your research/scholarship/creative activities 3.3** 2.9**2.5** Time to spend with students 2.5* 2.3*2.4 Time to spend with your spouse or significant other Time to spend with your children or other family members **2.4**2.5 Range: ( 1 = None; 4 = A great deal) ** significant at.01 level; * significant at.05 level The following are possible sources of stress for faculty. Rate the amount of stress you feel about each one.

Diversity Try not to think about a specific individual, just give your general sense of how comfortable a new faculty member would be in your department if she or he were…

Satisfaction How likely would you be to…

Satisfaction How often have you…

The following questions refers to the climate at UNT for faculty who are members of underrepresented groups, including underrepresentation based on race, sexual orientation, gender, religion, etc. Please indicate if you agree or disagree with each statement. Climate Range ( 1 = Strongly disagree, 4 = Strongly agree) ** significant at.01 level; * significant at.05 level

Open-ended Responses Hiring Offers (N=513) Hiring Practices (N=278) Teaching (N=274) Research (N=178) Service (N=218) Merit (N=239) Promotion (N=254) Workload (N=159) Resources (N=169) Mentoring (N=189) Work/Family Balance(N=147) Diversity (N=133) Satisfaction (N=172) Climate/Fairness (N=118) Total Responses: 3,041

Dissemination of Results Ideas for Dissemination of Results Provost Council Advance Grant Initiative Team Opportunity Task Force Ad-hoc Committee for Development of New Faculty Evaluation, Promotion & Tenure Policy Committee Faculty Senate Executive Committee Faculty Senate Faculty Mentor Committee Committee on the Status of Women Committee on the Status of LGBT Faculty Committee on the Status of People of Color