Early Childhood Outcomes Center1 Using Data for Program Improvement Christina Kasprzak, NECTAC/ECO Ann Bailey, NCRRC July 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Six Year Plan Meeting the state targets Region Meeting August 16, 2007.
Advertisements

Using outcomes data for program improvement Kathy Hebbeler and Cornelia Taylor Early Childhood Outcome Center, SRI International.
Virginia - March 2014 (Content adapted from 2014 MSRRC Forum) Preparing for the State Systemic Improvement Plan.
State Systemic Improvement Plan: Preparing, Planning, and Staying Informed Presentation to Louisiana ICC July 10, 2013.
Data, Now What? Skills for Analyzing and Interpreting Data
Local Control and Accountability Plan: Performance Based Budgeting California Association of School Business Officials.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Data Analysis for Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data 1.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Targets & Improvement Activities State Improvement Planning Carol Massanari, MPRRC Western Regional Resource Center APR Clinic 2010 November 1-3, 2010.
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
Using data for program improvement Early Childhood Outcomes Center1.
Using Data for Program Improvement Christina Kasprzak May, 2011.
Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities Presented by Jeanna Mullins, Mid-South Regional Resource Center, RRCP Document developed by members of the Systems.
Results-Driven Accountability OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS 1.
USDE and DHHS Listening and Learning Panel on Family Engagement
The Current Status of States' Early Childhood Outcome Measurement Systems Kathy Hebbeler, SRI International Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst October 17,
Ontario’s Special Needs Strategy Spring The Vision “An Ontario where children and youth with special needs get the timely and effective services.
A Model for Collaborative Technical Assistance for SPP Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14 Loujeania Bost, Charlotte Alverson, David Test, Susan Loving, & Marianne.
First, a little background…  The FIT Program is the lead agency for early intervention services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
The Early Learning Challenge Fund: Metrics and Data Danielle Ewen February 22, 2010.
May 20, Purpose of the Self- Assessment Required by the Head Start Performance Standards (i)(1) Head Start Ac 2007 Head Start Act Section.
By Jo Ann Vertetis and Karin Moe. Self-Assessment Can you define RTI? What is its purpose? Rate your understanding of RTI and how to implement it on a.
Overview of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP)
Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Results Driven Accountability PRT System Support Grant Targeted Improvement Plan Cole Johnson, NDE.
1 General Supervision. 2 General Supervision (and Continuous Improvement) 1.What are the minimum Components for General Supervision ? 2.How do the Components.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center1 Connecting the Three OSEP Family Outcomes with IFSP Outcomes and Local Practices Christina Kasprzak, NECTAC/ECO Connie.
Improvement Planning Mischele McManus Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services July 20, 2007
Using COS Data to Inform Program Improvement at All Levels Every day, we are honored to take action that inspires the world to discover, love and nurture.
2009 OSEP Project Directors Meeting Martha Diefendorf, Kristin Reedy & Pat Mueller.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Six Years of SPPs: Lessons Learning for Designing, Implementing.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
Data Workshop: Analyzing and Interpreting Data Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, NECTAC/ECO at FPG Cornelia Taylor, ECO at SRI Ann Bailey, NCRRC Presented.
What the data can tell us: Evidence, Inference, Action! 1 Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center Connecting TA for Part B Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14: Working Together to Support States OSEP Project.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs General Supervision: Developing an Effective System Implications for States.
Infrastructure Analysis: Part C Christina Kasprzak, ECTA, DaSy Verna Thompson, Early Development and Learning Resources, Delaware Joicey Hurth, NERRC and.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
Looking at Data Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center
EIA: Using data for program improvement
Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
G-CASE Fall Conference November 14, 2013 Savannah, Ga
Data Workshop: Analyzing and Interpreting Data
Supporting States in Building a Child Outcomes Measurement System
Integrating Outcomes Learning Community Call February 8, 2012
Monitoring Child Outcomes: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems (DaSy)
Early Childhood Transition APR Indicators and National Trends
Using outcomes data for program improvement
Using Family Survey Data for Program Improvement
Using Data for Program Improvement
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems (DaSy)
Data Workshop: Analyzing and Interpreting Data
Using Data for Program Improvement
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Using the Child and Family Outcomes Analysis Tools
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Presentation transcript:

Early Childhood Outcomes Center1 Using Data for Program Improvement Christina Kasprzak, NECTAC/ECO Ann Bailey, NCRRC July 2010

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center2 Systems Thinking: Systems are made up of interrelated, interconnected components Systems change involves changing the capacity, interrelationships, and interdependencies among parts, levels and stakeholders Desired changes in one part or level of the system must be accompanied by changes in other parts or levels

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center3 SPP as long term plan for systems change: EI/ECSE are systems of complex, interrelated components with goal of achieving outcomes for children and families Changes to EI/ECSE systems require a combination of improvement activities that are interconnected and support changes to infrastructure that work together to achieve the desired results

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center4 Developing improvement activities: Effective Policies, Procedures, and MOU Data Systems and Monitoring TA and Professional Development Fiscal Management Evaluation

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center5 Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes 6 The Need for Evaluation Provides an organized way of assessing work in progress and results obtained Assesses the impact of an activity on the area targeted for improvement Identifies strengths and weaknesses in the implementation of the improvement activity

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes 7 Types of Evaluation Process evaluation Evaluates the improvement process itself Impact evaluation Evaluates the results produced by the process

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes 8 Process Evaluation Questions Process evaluation questions might answer To what extent is the improvement activity being implemented as intended? To what extent is the improvement activity reaching the target audience (i.e., children, staff, parents)? Is everyone doing what they said they would do? Are resources still available to adequately support this improvement activity?

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes 9 Impact Evaluation Questions Impact evaluation questions might include Did the improvement activity accomplish what it was supposed to? Which parts of the improvement activity worked well? Which parts of the improvement activity did not work well? Should the agency continue the improvement activity? What has changed as a result of implementing the improvement activity?

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes 10 Reviewing Improvement Activities Improvement activities are aligned to the indicators, including if reflected across related indicators. Improvement activities reflect state priorities. Improvement activities are actionable. Improvement activities are realistic.

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes 11 Reviewing Improvement Activities Improvement activities include measures of performance. Improvement activities include timelines. Improvement activities identify responsibility for implementation. Improvement activities include technical assistance needs.

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes 12 Categorizing Improvement Activities Training and Professional Development Improve Data Collection Improve Systems Administration and Monitoring Improve Collaboration and Coordination Program Development Clarify/Examine/Develop Policies & Procedures Provide Technical Assistance Increase/Adjust FTE Evaluation

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes 13 Developing a Plan for Evaluation Identify the goal of the evaluation. Frame the evaluation questions to be answered. Identify evaluation methods and measurement options. Identify data sources. Determine data analysis techniques. Establish timelines.

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes What’s Next? Moving beyond data quality Understanding and manipulating the data you have Using data to make program improvements

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center15 Looking at Data: To better understand issues and areas of concern to focus improvement activities... What does the data analysis say? What are the ‘root causes’ of issues or challenges?

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center16 Using data for improvement E vidence I nference A ction

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center17 Evidence Evidence refers to the numbers, such as “89% of families reported...” The numbers are not debatable

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center18 Inference How do you interpret the #s? What can you conclude from the #s? Does evidence mean good news? Bad news? News we can’t interpret? To reach an inference, sometimes we analyze data in other ways (ask for more evidence)

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center19 Action Given the inference from the numbers, what should be done? Recommendations or action steps Action can be debatable – and often is Another role for stakeholders

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center20 Program improvement: At the state level – TA, policy At the regional or local level – supervision, guidance At the service/classroom level– implement high quality individualized family centered services

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center21 Key points Evidence refers to the numbers and the numbers by themselves are meaningless Inference is attached by those who read (interpret) the numbers You have the opportunity and obligation to attach meaning

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center22 Continuous Program Improvement Plan (vision) Program characteristics Child and family outcomes Implement Check (Collect and analyze data) Reflect Are we where we want to be?

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center23 Tweaking the System Plan (vision) Program characteristics Child and family outcomes Implement Check (Collect and analyze data) Reflect Are we where we want to be? Is there a problem? Why is it happening? What should be done? Is it being done? Is it working?

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center24 Outcome questions for program improvement, e.g. Do outcomes vary by Region of the state? Level of functioning at entry? Services received? Age at entry to service? Type of services received?

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center25 Looking at Family Outcomes by Subgroups System Characteristics Family Characteristics Child Characteristics Service Characteristics

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center26 Are there differences in outcomes across family characteristics? Race/ethnicity Family Income Primary language Family structure Etc

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center27 Are there differences in outcomes across child characteristics? Race/ethnicity Type of disability Length of time in services Etc

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center28 Examples of process questions Are ALL services high quality? Are ALL children and families receiving ALL the services they should in a timely manner? Are ALL families being supported in being involved in their child’s program? What are the barriers to high quality services?

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center29 Working Assumptions There are some high quality services and programs being provided across the state. There are some families who are not getting the highest quality services. If we can find ways to improve those services/programs, these families will experience better outcomes.

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center30 Action Given the inference from the numbers, what should be done? Develop improvement activities that are: Targeted based on data analysis Based on evidence based practices Interconnected, work together to accomplish the desired result

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center31 Small Group Scenarios

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center32 Small Group Scenarios Each table is assigned a scenario Choose a table / scenario As a group, walk through the scenario. Discuss and answer questions. Jot down your ideas and be prepared to share back some highlights.