THE BENEFITS OF SINGLE-STREAM RECYCLING California Integrated Waste Management Board California Roundtable Single-Stream Recycling May 23, 2005 Sacramento,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Created by Susan Neal. On the next slide, click and try to figure out what state is displayed. To find out the answer, click again.
Advertisements

Single Stream Recycling Brown-Outagamie-Winnebago Counties City of Oshkosh Common Council, June 10, 2008.
Greening our Fleet Utah Governors Energy Summit April 2014 Waste Management’s Natural Gas Fleet.
Waste Management in New York City a brief and incomplete introduction.
Presented to SWAC February 16, 2012 City of Cleveland Automated Waste Collection And Curbside Recycling Program.
Hub and Spoke Recycling Systems in North Carolina NC SWANA Fall Conference Rob Taylor NC Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Service.
Waste Collection. Lesson Objectives  Understand problems and concerns associated with MSW collection.  Compare and contrast privately and publicly operated.
Leftover Paint Collection - Why the Current System is Not Working Charlotte, North Carolina – September 2006 Government Perspective.
2 Coca-Cola in Alabama There are more than 1,800 Coca-Cola associates in the state.
Feb 17, 2010 Revised Blue Box Program Plan Draft for Consultation.
“Use of Resources” Climate Change Workshop CIWMB Early Action Measures “Use of Resources” Climate Change Workshop CIWMB Early Action Measures Evan W.R.
Titus Secondary MRF Services Summary – Why a secondary MRF Compliments existing recycling industry collection system Provides solutions for several.
Recycle America® Recycle America® eCycling sm Services Municipal Waste Management Association 2002 Fall Summit November 2002.
PARADIGM CHANGE: WASTE IS A RESOURCE Ramey/Washington County Resource Recovery Project Victoria Reinhardt, Ramsey County Commissioner.
Recycling Plan and Analysis Summary Report PowerPoint Presentation: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting December 2005 Fairbanks North Star Borough.
1 Best Practices in Single Stream Recycling Susan Kinsella & Richard Gertman Conservatree Environmental Planning Consultants CRRA Conference Workshop August.
Boğaziçi University Institute of Environmental Sciences E.Sc 531-Solid Waste Management Duygu Dinçer Mechanical Separation & Processing of MSW.
“Conversation in Commodities”
City of Loveland Solid Waste Division Diversion Versus Disposal: Determining the Costs Diversion Versus Disposal: Determining the Costs.
CONVERSION TECHNOLOGIES MARKET IMPACT ASSESSMENT CIWMB Board Meeting September 22, 2004 Susan V. Collins Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC.
CAN RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING WORK IN THE U.S.? Bill Caesar, CEO WCA.
Anaerobic Digestion and the Path Towards Zero Waste Paul Relis Senior Vice President CR&R Incorporated July 14,2009.
Recycle America ® “ Sustainable Recycling Programs” Municipal Waste Management Association 2002 Fall Summit November 2002.
Waste Management Opportunities and Service Offerings for Lake County.
Department of Public Works Non-Exclusive Solid Waste Collection Franchise System – Review April 28, 2014.
4/30/03 Jonathan V.L. Kiser, NAWTEC XI 1 By Jonathan V. L. Kiser For NAWTEC 11 Tampa, Florida April 30, 2003 Recycling & WTE: On-Going Compatibility Success.
The U.S Conference of Mayors Mayors Water Council Municipal Waste Management Association Resolution # 90 The Importance of Municipal Water New York City.
Strategies for Charter Municipalities To Minimize MSW Disposal After 2018 Presented to the Board of Directors of the Municipal Review Committee, Inc. 24.
California Integrated Waste Management Board Sustainability and Market Development Committee Agenda Item 15 December 5,
Issues facing MRFs regarding material output quality Mike Jefferson Commercial Director, Valpak.
California Roundtable May 23, 2005 Sacramento, California Donna Perala City of San Jose Single Stream & Beyond.
Commingled Recycling Consolidation Waste Industries Vance/Granville Branch October 2014.
Overview of State E-Waste Laws Barbara Kyle Electronics TakeBack Coalition June 2, 2009.
Packaging & Sustainable Waste Management Meghan Stasz Senior Director, Sustainability Grocery Manufacturers Association.
® FSS Update Rosa Fulton Executive Director, FSS MTAC May 20, 2010.
CONVERSION TECHNOLOGIES MARKET IMPACT ASSESSMENT Preliminary Results Workshop April 15, 2004 Susan V. Collins Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC.
Single Stream Recycling Material Recovery Facilities
Take the Risk out of Sustainability Willis Construction Risk Management Conference September 2013.
National Impact of La Cultura Cura Last 30 Years 1 The National Compadres Network’s La Cultura Cura (LCC) National Impact:  Over Half a Million individuals.
State Trends in Premiums and Deductibles, : Eroding Protection and Rising Costs Underscore Need for Action Cathy Schoen Senior Vice President.
Single Stream Works for Us! 2006 ANNUAL MEETING COLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN SWANA CHAPTER October 5th and 6th, 2006 Alamosa, Colorado Tom Strickland, Recycling.
CASELLA RESOURCE SOLUTIONS ZERO-SORT® RECYCLING COLLECTION ORGANICS ENERGY LANDFILLS casella.com 1 Bob Cappadona Vice President Casella November 5, 2015.
Designing Recycling Systems “Right” Alex Danovitch Eureka Recycling GRRN Conference October 19th, 2009.
Presentation of Contractor’s Report “California 2008 Statewide Waste Characterization Study” CIWMB Strategic Policy Development Committee September 9,
Board Workshop: Overview Of CIWMB Waste Characterization Studies and Tools May 9, 2006.
Oral Presentation Of Results Of The 2005 Targeted Statewide Waste Characterization Studies (FY BCP #2 “Update Statewide Waste Characterization”)
State Perspective on Recycling Trends NC APWA, September 2012 Scott Mouw NC DEAO.
A Fairfax County, VA, publication Department of Public Works and Environmental Services Working for You! Return to Source Separated Recyclables Fairfax.
Rumpke of Ohio, Inc Recycling Initiatives Steve Sargent Director of Recycling.
G enesee County: Material Recovery Facility Feasibility Study Michigan State University UP 494: Planning Practicum April 29th, 2016 Vincent Chen Hank Hong.
Curbside Recycling: Home. Work. Play. Kate Bailey, June 2016.
RecyclingPartnership.org 1 Recycling Rate vs Recovery Rate MEASURE. Scott Mouw NC Department of Environmental Quality, Recycling and Materials Management.
1 REFUSE AND RECYCLING STUDY COLLECTION ALTERNATIVES AND COST COMPARISONS May 18, 2009.
ZWZ Atlanta April 1, The Organics Business has developed This is Good.
Collier County Tourism Research
Population and Economic Trends For Northern Colorado
Collier County Tourism Research
Flexible Film Packaging Diversion Options
Essential Health Benefits Benchmark Plan Selection, as of October 2012
Developing a MRF Public-Private Partnership in the City of Dallas
Growing our Partnerships October 31, 2017
Have Fun With Geography Created by Susan Neal
Impacts of a Change from Dual Stream to Single Stream Recycling
NC Marine Debris Symposium
Collier County Tourism Research
Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project Doing More with Our Waste
Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project Doing More with Our Waste
Cathy Schoen Senior Vice President The Commonwealth Fund
Recycling Today and in the Future
United States & Puerto Rico
Presentation transcript:

THE BENEFITS OF SINGLE-STREAM RECYCLING California Integrated Waste Management Board California Roundtable Single-Stream Recycling May 23, 2005 Sacramento, CA

Today’s Topics  Diversion is King  Safety as a Key Driver  Efficiencies and Economic Benefits  Processing Challenges

WM/RAA in California  WM/RAA is California’s largest recycler of MSW  WM/RAA operates approximately 24 Recycling facilities in California  Of those 11 do Single Stream processing  RAA Markets over 500,000 tons per year from California not including glass  WM/RAA has invested over $25 Million in SS technology in California  A vast majority of our residential recycling customers are serviced with single stream collection

Where We Process SS Edmonton, Alberta (9/01) Cleveland, OH (1/01) Dayton, OH (9/02) York, PA (2/02) Lake County, IL (3/03) Minneapolis, MN (2/02) Birmingham, AL (2/02) Tucson, AZ (10/02) Santa Maria, CA (6/03) San Leandro, CA (1998) Raleigh, NC (1/03) Visalia, CA (prior 2000) Napa, CA (2003) Carson, CA Pico Rivera, CA Los Angeles, CA Gardena, CA Phoenix, AZ (1/97) Santa Rosa, CA (9/01) Lodi, CA (7/02) Castroville, CA (8/02) Binghamton, NY (9/02) Liverpool, NY (12/02) Columbus, OH (10/02) Woodinville, WA (7/03) Chicago, IL (7/04) Orlando, FL (planned) Salt Lake City, UT (4/03) Jackson, MS (2/04) Rogers, AR (7/95)

Since Passage of AB 939 Diversion is King Residential  Historic - 25% recycling / 75% disposal  Current Goals - 75% recycling / 25% disposal Commercial  Historic - Grade Specific (OCC, SWL, SOP)  Current - Grade Indifferent – Commercial Single Stream Processing

Diversion is King  Higher participation rates (participation rates) – convenience – simplicity (potentially fewer restricted materials)  Higher recovery rates (lbs/hh/mo) – higher participation – more materials in programs – reduced scavenging

Diversion is King What do our numbers show?  Based on a survey of California managers we estimate 20-30% increase in volume after switching to SS  Northwest USA - Tons collected in Skagit and Snomish County (125,000 HH’s) show tonnage increases of between 7 and 36% after converting to SS

Diversion is King What do others numbers show?  Dallas, Tx (pilot program) - 6 lbs/HH/Mo vs 54 lbs/HH/Mo - 25% participation vs 74% participation  Brooklyn Park & Hennepin Recycling Group (41,000 HH) - BP 40 lbs/HH/Mo vs 49 lbs/HH/Mo - BP 46% participation vs 72% participation - HRG 36 lbs/HH/Mo vs 47 lbs/HH/Mo - HRG 50% participation vs 71% participation

Safety is Key Driver  Key Concerns – Safety of our workers – MSW workers – third deadliest occupation in Florida ( ) – Almost 50% of all MSW workers might expect to suffer muscoskeletal or dermal injuries each year

Safety is Key Driver  Reduced collection safety risks (twisting, sprains, cuts, etc.)  +  Reduced MRF safety risks (cuts, etc.)  +  Reduced TRIR (both collection and processing)  +  Reduced employee turnover  =  Lower workmen’s comp costs

Efficiencies and Economies  Optimize fleet utility —Increase payloads —Reduce drive-times  Improve safety  Increase opportunities —Commercial Single Stream —Multi-family

Efficiencies and Economies MRF Equipment  Capital intensive ($1MM to $6MM for equip)  Increase production (30 – 40 tph throughput)  Auto-assist separation (screening, optical ) MRF Operation  Improve safety (TRIR reduction)  Improve presentation of material for sorters  Improve flexibility & market access

Processing Challenges  Increased residue levels Typical 2-stream MRF has about 4% residue (blended value of fiber and container residue) Typical single stream MRF has 6-8% residue What we are doing: can reduce to less than 4 % with no sort glass and no sort plastic technologies  Glass breakage Typical commingled containers has 50-60% glass breakage Typical single stream has 60-90% depending on vehicle and compaction ratios What we are doing: can minimize effect with optical sorting and better screening  Quality control of collected materials in fully automated routes What we are doing: Use manual or semi-automated routes and using route checkers

Processing Challenges “The quality of the product going to market. We’ve got to make sure that what’s going into the bales is meeting the specs of the mills.” RAA President Pat DeRueda at Waste Expo commenting on the biggest challenges recycling faces.

Summary of Benefits  Increased diversion through improved participation & lbs. per set-out  Reduce unit costs (time per stop, trucks on street, & processing costs per ton)  Greater employee safety  Improve aesthetics & convenience  Making residential recycling economical and sustainable  “Securing” and growing the residential fiber stream

Questions & Answers