© Chevron 2008 ASTM PCEOCP VID Matrix Design and Funding Subgroup September 4, 2008 Detroit, MI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MAIN COMMITTEE OFFICERS DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.
Advertisements

MAIN COMMITTEE OFFICERS DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.
September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop MAIN COMMITTEE OFFICERS DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES September.
Task Group Chairman and Technical Contact Responsibilities ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Scott Orthey and Steve Mawn 1.
September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop Roberts Rules of Order September 23, 2013 ASTM Officers Training.
Transition from Q1- 8th to Q1- 9th edition
THE STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS STEP 1 PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL STAGE PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL CLOSING DATE FIRST TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING.
From Cutting Red Tape to Maximizing Net Benefits Alexander T. Hunt U.S. Office of Management and Budget Challenges on Cutting Red Tape Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Bureau of Indian Affairs December 2012 Tribal High Priority Projects Program 21st Alaska BIA Providers Conference.
How to Document A Business Management System
Lunchtime Topics Craig Weise Construction Reform Program Director Lisa Conomy Construction Counsel OSU Office of Legal Affairs.
World Health Organization
LifeCo Case Study Problem definition worksheet
Application for Approval of Funding for Residential Placement
ANC Bylaws Amendments July 22, Article III Membership B Membership Criteria, p. 2 “Neighborhood Group” shall mean a Homeowners Association or.
Engineering H193 - Team Project Gateway Engineering Education Coalition P. 1Spring Quarter Project Management Week 2 Day 2.
Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Presented by: Charles Kilfoil Bechtel National Waste Treatment Plant Richland WA.
Software Quality Assurance Lecture 4. Lecture Outline ISO ISO 9000 Series of Standards ISO 9001: 2000 Overview ISO 9001: 2008 ISO 9003: 2004 Overview.
Coordination Group FGDC Business Update Ken Shaffer FGDC Deputy Executive Director July 7, 2009 Updated 7/6/09.
© 2009 Chevron Oronite Companies. All rights reserved. Cummins ISM Reference Data Review for Cummins Surveillance Panel August 26, 2009 Jim Rutherford.
SHPE Jr. Chapter Training: Deliverables Maria Lopez Program Manager SHPE Foundation.
HD 2007 Rule Diesel Fuel Sulfur Testing and Sampling Methods and Requirements US EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality November 20, 2002.
Wednesday, September 29, 2010 Dennis Wisnosky DoD Business Mission Area Chief Technical Officer & Chief Architect in the Office of the Deputy Chief Management.
3rd WG meeting, Brussels Proposed Plan for Governance of the Washington Group Prepared by: Jennifer Madans, Barbara Altman, Beth Rasch (USA); Renée Langlois.
Update on the API Work Group Activities on Pipe Markings.
Formulae For each severity adjustment entity, X i = i th test result in original units in end-of-test order T i = i th test result in appropriate units.
Streamlining Project Final Version August 2005 Cutblock Integration Team Proposals Creating a streamlined forest information management model…
P1516.4: VV&A Overlay to the FEDEP 20 September 2007 Briefing for the VV&A Summit Simone Youngblood Simone Youngblood M&S CO VV&A Proponency Leader
Executive Session Director’s CD-1 Review of the LBNE Project September 25, 2012 Jim Yeck.
Lubricant Test Monitoring System (LTMS) Quick Deck Draft 3 March 2, 2012.
1 Accredited Standards Committee C63 ® - EMC Subcommittee 1: Techniques and Developments Zhong Chen SC1 Chair
Chris Albrecht Legal Counsel JGC Leadership Training
Watershed Management Act ESHB 2514 by 1998 Legislature RCW Voluntary Process Purpose: to increase local involvement in decision-making and planning.
VDOE Updates VESA Meeting October 1, 2015 Stacy Freeman, Title III Specialist Office of Program Administration and Accountability Virginia Department of.
JACTest Monitoring Center Test Monitoring Center Report to the Mack Test Surveillance Panel June 17, 2002 Montreal.
ISM Test Development Task Force Report June 21, 2004.
ESCIT Objectives ESCIT is charged to define lube oil effect on catalyst performance, not just to develop a P volatility test ESCIT should consider both.
LTMS Task Force Statistics Subgroup Report to Joint LTMS Open Forum San Antonio, TX May 11, 2010.
© Michael Crosby and Charles Sacker, 2001 Systematic Software Reviews Software reviews are a “quality improvement process for written material”.
Cat Aeration Task Force Additional Prove Out Testing Proposal 1 PC-11 Statisticians Task Force July 1, 2014.
LTP and FSS Plan Project Status Overview Presented by Bill Barley September 28, 2015.
© Chevron 2008 ASTM PCEOCP VID Matrix Design and Funding Subgroup April 25, 2008 Teleconference.
ASTM TECHNICAL GUIDANCE COMMITTEE Semi-Annual Report Presented by William A. Buscher III Updated March 6, 2016.
Implementing Program Management Standards at Duke Energy.
Welcome To Maricopa’s Hiring Processes Overview Hiring Managers, Screeners, Interviewers, HR Professionals College or District Executives involved in.
ESCIT Ballot January 8, Ballot Results Sequence IIIG preferred by a majority of the members –Sequence IIIG-EOT was the preferred duration Secondary.
Anti-counterfeit of Electronics 3 Definition Phase Status Update Member Meeting Luxemburg City, Luxemburg Project Lead: Michelle Lam (IBM) Project Facilitator:
Western Electricity Coordinating Council
Technical Guidance Committee Report
Formulae For each severity adjustment entity,
Chris Albrecht Legal Counsel
Agenda Introduction and membership
TechStambha PMP Certification Training
Robert’s Rules of Order
Caterpillar C13 Matrix Data Analysis
LTMS Task Force Statistics Subgroup Report to Joint LTMS Open Forum
Caterpillar C13 Test Matrix Update
SB 1664 Changes to Personnel Evaluations
2017 Virtual Officer’s Training Workshop
ASTM International Interlaboratory Study Program (ILS)
Robert’s Rules of Order
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1. Organizational Structure
Chris Albrecht Legal Counsel
Western Electricity Coordinating Council
Psychology Learner Quick Start Guide: Practicum/Internship Application
Project Overview.
Joint Office UNC Elections
Joint Office UNC Elections
Joint Office UNC Elections
Presentation transcript:

© Chevron 2008 ASTM PCEOCP VID Matrix Design and Funding Subgroup September 4, 2008 Detroit, MI

2 Membership – open to all PCEOCP members additive suppliers, lube suppliers, OEMs, ind. Labs, ILSAC, ACC, API, PCEOCP and TMC are all represented

3 Meeting and Balloting Follow ASTM rules for conducting the meeting Industry liaisons  PCEOCP-Thom Smith and Glen Mazzamaro  ILSAC – Jim Linden  ACC – Jerry Wang  API – Kevin Ferrick and David Smith  TMC – John Zalar Records posted on the TMC website Generally follow ASTM voting rules but limited to one vote per company Attempt unanimous consensus PCEOCP will have the final vote based on its rules

4 Timeline GF-5 timeline Revised subgroup timeline VID Consortium expects to release final report in August

5 Scope – Matrix Design The primary goal is to establish VID test precision Repeatability and reproducibility based on fully formulated reference oils representative of current technology such as GF-4 capable or GF-5 prototype The secondary goal is to establish base oil interchange and viscosity grade readacross guidelines The group will continue to monitor Precision Matrix Program until completed

6 Key Outputs – Matrix Design Matrix options Precision matrix that addresses  Repeatability and reproducibility  Engine age effect  Calibration recommendation + BOI + VGRA + BOI and VGRA

7 Combined Precision/BOI/VGRA Matrix – Step 1 (select 2~3 reference oils from ABCDX at the end) Stand 1Stand 2Stand 3Stand 4 ABCD EFGH IJKL MNOP QRST XXXX AACC DBBD Two independent labs/2 stands each Oils A-T & X are the 21 Oils from the BOI/VGRA Test Oil Matrix Oil X part of the BOI-VGRA matrix and is run on all 4 stands Oils A-D & X will be pre-selected to represent all 5 viscosity grades Run order to be established Provides Data for: Establishing BOI/VGRA, within stand & stand to stand comparisons, Lab to Lab comparisons

8 Stand 1Stand 2Stand 3Stand 4 R1R2R1R2 R1R2R1 R3 R1, R2 and R3 are selected from Step 1 oils A – D & X. R1, R2 & R3 will represent 0W, 5W, & 10W-30 These runs are required to establish reference oil identity, reference oil means, & reference oil standard deviations. Run order to be established. Additional reference oil data will come from non-matrix lab/stand calibration runs. (Supplemental data from additional labs & stands deemed ready by ASTM will be included in development of the precision statement unless identified and confirmed as a statistical outlier by the industry statistician team, assuming the last test of part of the data submission has started by the end of step 2) Combined Precision/BOI/VGRA Matrix – Step 2 (establish reference oils) Approved by all trade groups: ILSAC, API, ACC

9 Scope - Funding The primary purpose is to recommend minimum funding needs for proposed matrix options to ILSAC/Oil The funding recommendation will include sources and breakdown of funding

10 Key Outputs – Funding Funding estimate for each matrix options Precision only + BOI + VGRA + BOI and VGRA

11 Matrix Funding total test: 44 donated test: 10 Precision matrix test: 28 (4x7) BOI/VGRA test: 16 2/3 of donated tests go to offset precision 1/3 of donated tests go to offset BOI/VGRA Precision splits 3-way BOI/VGRA splits 2-way per test cost to be reported to API (MOA)

12 Other decided items Final lab selection – SwRI and Intertek Final, official lab quote – pending SP decisions on lab qualification criteria Official lab qualification and referencing criteria from SP Including coordinating reference oils to be run at the dependent labs Confirm the use of new engines (150 hr break-in) for matrix – yes with the following provision First engine is less than 400 hrs, the second should have less than XX hrs per SP Confirm test donation – per SP recommendation, funding may need adjustment accordingly Oil data submission and technology selection – OEMs make recommendations to PCEOCP Provide oil description and test pass/fail and actual fuel economy test results Selected additive suppliers will be notified individually Individual supplier will contact TMC to coordinate blending Base oil and blending target selection (BOI/VGRA) – API BOI/VGRA group make recommendations to PCEOCP Two group IIs and two groups IIIs, directly supplied to selected additive supplier Determine if precision is required for each viscosity grade – yes

13 Recommendations to PCEOCP Approve subgroup recommendations BOI/VGRA maps technology/base oil to matrix to PCEOCP BOI/VGRA to finalize blending targets to PCEOCP need selected supplier to do blend study initiate TMC activities Assign TMC as matrix manager Matrix oil distribution Lab/stand inspection and qualification Data reporting and analysis in coordination with SP Establish timeline for designed matrix