Summary of Findings: Reliability Student-Level Reliability (α) Grades 3-5 Grades 6-12 Overall Reliability (all items)0.940.96 Student Learning0.900.94.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Section 2: Historical Perspective of Policy 2320 Dr. Donna Davis Deputy Director, OEPA.
Advertisements

TEACHER EVALUATION IN NEW JERSEY: PREVIEW OF FINAL REPORT RUTGERS GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION.
WHY USE A STUDENT SURVEY? The survey is a unique form of actionable feedback that districts, schools and teachers can use to inform practice. Students.
Parent School Climate Survey Results and Analysis November 2010.
Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts Wednesday, June 11, :00-4:00pm ET.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Georgia School Standards District Strategic Plan School Strategic Plan (SSP) Heavy focus on CRCT, ITBS, Perceptual Surveys Teacher Evaluation Instrument.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © DE-PBS Key Features Evaluation: Matching Philosophy & Measurement Sarah K. Hearn, M.Ed., Delaware Positive.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
Why Student Perceptions Matter Rob Ramsdell, Co-founder April 2015.
Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts Inventory Planning Training.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Beginning Teacher Support Program Peer Review Process Training for Charter Schools June 2013.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Copyright © 2011 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of Intel.
Student Perception Survey Toolkit Colorado’s Student Perception Survey Planning Webinar for Districts.
This document is an editable template. Please make sure to customize it for your district before distributing. Copyright 2014 by The Colorado Education.
Superintendent Goals Update. District Level Leadership Research McRel Internationally recognized private, non-profit organization in Denver,
TIMELESS LEARNING POLICY & PRACTICE. JD HOYE President National Academy Foundation.
Session Materials  Wiki
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.
Data for Student Success Regional Data Initiative Presentation November 20, 2009.
Using Student Surveys: Implications for State and District Policy May 1, #aypfevents.
Colorado’s Student Perception Survey. Agenda Why use a Student Perception Survey? What the Research Says Survey Overview Survey Administration Use of.
January 31, 2014 Data Use Information and Guide. Copyright © 2014 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. What is “TELL Oregon” ? TELL Oregon is an anonymous.
Documenting Current Practice and Defining Key Dimensions Ann-Marie Faria, Ph.D. & Jessica Heppen, Ph.D. American Institutes for Research.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
Kindergarten Individual Development Survey (KIDS) District 97 pilot involvement December 11, 2012.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Scoring and Reporting of Results Teachers and School Leaders access reports online within 6 weeks of administration. Scoring based on % positive (Most.
Alaska Staff Development Network – Follow-Up Webinar Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska April 17, :45 – 5:15.
EVALUATIONS, STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES & KEEP AUG 25, 2014 BILL BAGSHAW, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR.
Teacher Effectiveness Pilot II Presented by PDE. Project Development - Goal  To develop a teacher effectiveness model that will reform the way we evaluate.
Moving Beyond Compliance: Four Ways States Can Support Districts and Local Data Use 2012 MIS Conference Dan Domagala, Colorado Department of Education.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
© CCSR The CCSR 5 Essentials Survey Helping Schools Organize for Improvement Elaine Allensworth The University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School.
- 0 - Collaborative Inquiry via Professional Learning Communities MSDF Impact Assessment.
Scaling Integration: A Vision for Collaboration across the SLV BOCES Curtis Garcia.
We worry about what a child will be tomorrow, yet we forget that he is someone today. --Stacia Tauscher.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Standard 1- Leadership & Vision Sara Saffell Amy Blackwell Marilyn McDonald 1. Leadership and Vision-Educational leaders inspire a shared vision for comprehensive.
RSU #4 Library Media Program Preparing Students for the 21st Century.
SELF-ASSESSMENT SURVEY: TRADEWINDS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Illinois Department of Children & Family Service/Chicago State University STEP Program - NHSTES May THE STEP PROGRAM Supervisory Training to Enhance.
CCSSE 2015 Findings for OSU Institute of Technology.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
District Climate Survey—Parents & Community Results and Analysis June /10/20101.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 11  What role will student feedback play in your district next year?
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Using Student Perception Survey Results A Training for Principals This presentation is a template and should be customized to reflect the needs and context.
Background CPRE brings together education experts from renowned research institutions to contribute new knowledge that informs K- 16 education policy &
Superintendent Formative Evaluation April 26, 2015.
Preparing for the NYCDOE Student Perception Survey Aaron FeuerEric Weisman CEO - PanoramaPartnerships Director- Panorama.
Student Perception Survey: Survey Coordinator Training Office of Policy and Evaluation Spring 2016.
1 Introduction Overview This annotated PowerPoint is designed to help communicate about your instructional priorities. Note: The facts and data here are.
[School Name]’s Student Perception Survey Results This presentation is a template and should be customized to reflect the needs and context of your school.
Student Perception Survey: Survey Coordinator Training Office of Policy and Evaluation April 2016.
Strategic and School Improvement Plans: WPS 2021 Wareham Wakes up the World! Every Student Every Day.
Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Pulaski County Schools June
OEA Leadership Academy 2011 Michele Winship, Ph.D.
Doc Data Do’s and Don’ts *Developed by the New Teacher Center.
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
Presentation transcript:

Summary of Findings: Reliability Student-Level Reliability (α) Grades 3-5 Grades 6-12 Overall Reliability (all items) Student Learning Students-Centered Environment Classroom Community Classroom Management Teacher-Level Reliability (α) Grades 3-5 Grades 6-12 Overall Reliability (all items) Student Learning Students-Centered Environment Classroom Community Classroom Management

Relationship between SPS Overall Percent Favorable and Overall Evaluation Rating

What about the survey elements? Classroom CommunityClassroom Management Student-Centered Environment Student Learning

Summary of Findings - Validity Analyzed 14,539 open-ended responses (3-5 and 6- 12) We find that not only were the majority of students taking the survey seriously, but that many of the responses were specific and actionable in nature –98.6% (N=14,341) were considered substantive –66.3% (N=9,646) were coded as actionable –Moreover, although some subjects and grades were slightly more likely to garner actionable feedback, in general actionable responses came from students in all grades and subjects

What Students are Saying About Teachers Overview of Student Feedback for Teachers

Guiding principles for administration We know that teachers care about their practice and especially about their students. –They also may experience nervousness and anxiety about the surveys, and district and school leaders must address those fears. By itself, a reliable and valid instrument does not ensure that teachers will receive good feedback. Messaging matters! –Engage stakeholders early and often –Make the process as transparent as possible Give stakeholders real decision-making power

Engaging Stakeholders Forming a planning committee Building educator investment Building student understanding and comfort Informing other stakeholders

Key Decisions Use a vendor or manage administration internally? Online or paper/pencil survey administration? When will the survey be administered? How will students and teachers be sampled? Include an open-ended question on the survey? How will survey results be used?

Key Decision: How will survey results be used? Consider a “hold-harmless” pilot year As a formative tool Reflect on individual practice Identify over-arching trends and create strategies to address them. As a part of an evaluation Used as an artifact for determining ratings for professional practices Included as one of several multiple measures Sharing teacher-level results

Contact Information Colorado’s Student Perception Survey Website: Amy Farley, Director, Research and Impact

Questions? Elaine Allensworth, Consortium on Chicago School Research Amy Farley, Colorado Legacy Foundation Kendra Wilhelm, Denver Public #aypfevents