H- beam collimation in the transfer line from 8 GeV linac to the Main Injector A. Drozhdin The beam transfer line from 8 GeV Linac to the Main Injector.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Optics and magnetic field calculation for the Hall D Tagger Guangliang Yang Glasgow University.
Advertisements

Feb 09, 2012 L. Vorobiev, I. RakhnoPage 1 Multi-Turn Stripping Injection and Foil Heating with Application to Project X Presentation Based on: Phys. Rev.
Stripping foil studies for Project-X A.I. Drozhdin May 29, 2012 Outline 1. H - handling in the beam line: a) foil stripping b) stripping due to Blackbody.
Alexandr Drozhdin March 16, 2005 MI-10 Injection.
Beam Loss in the Extraction Line for 2 mrad Crossing Angle A.Drozhdin, N.Mokhov, X.Yang.
Recirculating pass optics V.Ptitsyn, D.Trbojevic, N.Tsoupas.
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
Sergey Antipov, University of Chicago Fermilab Mentor: Sergei Nagaitsev Injection to IOTA ring.
T. Horn, SHMS Optics Update SHMS Optics Update Tanja Horn Hall C Users Meeting 31 January 2009.
100 MeV- 1 GeV Proton Synchrotron for Indian Spallation Neutron Source Gurnam Singh Beam Dynamics Section CAT, Indore CAT-KEK-Sokendai School on Spallation.
Collimation System for Beam Loss Localization with Slip Stacking Injection in the Fermilab Main Injector Bruce C. Brown Main Injector Department Accelerator.
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
Loss problems associated with the acceleration of radioactive beams and what we can do about it A.Jansson f fermilab Loss issues (and ideas for solutions)
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Simultaneous Delivery of Parallel Proton Beams with the EURISOL Driver
I. Strasik et al. ● Halo Collimation of Proton and Ion Beams in FAIR Synchrotron SIS 100 ● CERN Halo Collimation of Proton and Ion Beams in.
Laser Stripping and H 0 monitor systems 10/18/2011B.Cheymol, E. Bravin, U. Raich, F. Roncarolo BE/BI1.
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
F Project X: 8 GeV Recycler Injection S. Nagaitsev, D. Johnson, J. Lackey Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
Analytical considerations for Theoretical Minimum Emittance Cell Optics 17 April 2008 F. Antoniou, E. Gazis (NTUA, CERN) and Y. Papaphilippou (CERN)
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
03/30/06 DEJBNL&FNAL PD Collaboration kickoff meeting Beams-doc Current layout of beams from PD ~ 700m Active Length 8 GeV Linac 8 GeV neutrino.
Adiabatic eRHIC Extraction June 3, 2015Stephen Brooks, eRHIC meeting1 With emittance growth analysis.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In our previous discussion, we implicitly assumed that the distribution of particles in phase space followed the ellipse defined.
1 st September 2005LHC-LUMI 05 - G.Arduini – CERN/AB Optical requirements for the magnetic lattice of the high energy injectors (SSPS in the SPS tunnel)
Beam Loss Simulation in the Main Injector at Slip-Stacking Injection A.I. Drozhdin, B.C. Brown, D.E. Johnson, I. Kourbanis, K. Seiya June 30, 2006 A.Drozhdin.
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS OF NICA ACCELERATOR COMPLEX Tuzikov A., JINR, Dubna, Russia.
ATF2 background and beam halo study D. Wang(IHEP), S. Bai(IHEP), P. bambade(LAL) February 7, 2013.
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
Project X RD&D Plan Beam Transfer Line and Recycler Injection David Johnson AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
Design options for emittance measurement systems for the CLIC RTML R Apsimon.
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
ILC EXTRACTION LINE TRACKING Y. Nosochkov, E. Marin September 10, 2013.
Kiyoshi Kubo Electron beam in undulators of e+ source - Emittance and orbit angle with quad misalignment and corrections - Effect of beam pipe.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Principals of fast injection and extraction R. Apsimon.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Beam collimation in the transfer line from 8 GeV linac to the Main Injector A. Drozhdin The beam transfer line from 8 GeV Linac to the Main Injector is.
Muons, Inc. 14 Jan 2010 S. Kahn--IR Quads 1 IR Quadrupoles with Exotic Materials Steve Kahn, Muons Inc. Bob Palmer, BNL Don Summers, Ole Miss.
Accumulator & Compressor Rings with Flexible Momentum Compaction arccells MAP 2014 Spring Meeting, Fermilab, May 27-31, 2014 Y. Alexahin (FNAL APC)
Hybrid Fast-Ramping Synchrotron to 750 GeV/c J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory MAP Collaboration Meeting March 5, 2012.
Dark Current in ILC Main Linac N.Solyak, A.Sukhanov, I.Tropin ALCW2015, Apr.23, 2015, KEK LCWS'15, Tsukuba, 04/2015Nikolay Solyak1.
J-Parc Neutrino Facility Primary Proton Beam Design A. K. Ichikawa(KEK), Y.Iwamoto(KEK) and K.Tanabe(Tokyo) et.al. 7 th Nov. 2003,
Recycler Injection with Carbon Foils Dave Johnson, Alexandr Drozhdin, Leonid Vorobiev September 8, 2010 Project X Collaboration Meeting.
Halo Collimation of Protons and Heavy Ions in SIS-100.
PS2 WG Injection and extraction systems Basics and assumptions
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
Alignment and beam-based correction
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
Collimation Concept for Beam Halo Losses in SIS 100
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
Compensation of Detector Solenoid with Large Crossing Angle
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
PS2 Injection/Extraction Layout
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels?
Beam Loss Simulations LHC
Overall Considerations, Main Challenges and Goals
Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, July 16, 2015
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Presentation transcript:

H- beam collimation in the transfer line from 8 GeV linac to the Main Injector A. Drozhdin The beam transfer line from 8 GeV Linac to the Main Injector is based on a periodic FODO structure with phase advance of 60 degree per cell. As shown in the table this lattice has sufficiently less maximum beta-functions for the same amounts of dispersion and total length. This is an advantage for off-momentum collimation.

Dec. 10, 2004 A.Drozhdin Horizontal beta function (top) and dispersion (bottom) in the 45, 60 and 90-degree phase advance per cell achromatic lattices. 16 cells of 45, 12 cells of 60 and 8 cells of 90-degree lattices are shown.

Dec. 10, 2004 A.Drozhdin Top: off-momentum collimation in two locations of beam line - with positive and negative dispersion. Bottom: collimation in one location of beam line. Minimal horizontal aperture of the elements is equal to 6 sigma in the first case, and 9 sigma in the second one. If one assumes a distance between the beam pipe and the edge of the beam equal to 3 sigma, the required radius of aperture is equal to 9 sigma in the first case, and 12 sigma in the second one.

Dec. 10, 2004 A.Drozhdin Comparison of "one and two dispersion wave" 60-degree lattices for 95% emittance of 6.0 mm-mrad and 1.5 mm-mrad. "One-wave dispersion lattice" is used for off-momentum collimation by two stripping foils located at 3 sigma from both sides of the beam at only one place of the beam line. Displacement of off-momentum particles should be bigger than 6 sigma of the beam.

Dec. 10, 2004 A.Drozhdin The beam line consists of matching section between Linac and FODO lattice ( m), amplitude collimation (3 cells without bending magnets, m), momentum collimation and jitter correction section (6 cells with dipoles, m), straight section included for proper positioning of the Linac and beam line at the Fermilab site (6 cells, m), second part of momentum collimation (6 cells with dipoles, m) and matching section between FODO lattice and Main Injector MI10 straight section (40.68 m). The total length of transfer beam line is m. The location of stripping foils and beam dumps are shown by a vertical bars directed down in in the bottom figure. Nov.15, 2004 A.Drozhdin

Dec. 10, 2004 A.Drozhdin A final design of 8 GeV beam transfer line is done using the existing Main Ring dipoles B2 (aperture: 48mm X 23mm) and Main Injector horizontal and/or vertical correctors (gap aperture 48 mm). The required strength of vertical and horizontal correctors in this lat- tice is equal to BL= T-m. This corrector placed near a focusing quadrupole produces a beam displacement in the next focusing quadrupole of 38.1 mm. Dipole B2 field is as low as 0.05 T to prevent H(-) ions stripping by magnetic field. The bending angle of B2 magnet at Pc= GeV is radian. The quadrupole aperture is D=79 mm. The quadrupole field at radius of 35 mm is T.

Dec. 10, 2004 A.Drozhdin Halo collimation is done by stripping of H(-) ions at the foil located upstream of the focusing quadrupoles and then intercepting of H(o) atoms and protons by the beam dump located in 5 m behind the focusing quadrupole. Six foil- dump stations are used for amplitude collimation in the first six cells of beam line, and two stations in the positive and negative dispersion wave maximum for momentum collimation.

Dec. 10, 2004 A.Drozhdin At these simulations the 95% emittance of initial beam, including halo, is equal to 4.17 mm-mrad (size of halo is a factor of 5/3 of the beam core size) and sigma of momentum distribution is A 3 sigma of the beam (core) is 4.15 mm at the foils and 3.61 mm at the beam dumps. Collimation of the beam is done with amplitude foils and beam dumps located at 4.25 mm from the beam center. Momentum collimating foils and beam dumps are at 6.5 mm from the beam center. As horizontal dispersion at the foil is D=6.5 m, this provides collimation of the beam at dP/P=0.001.

Dec. 10, 2004 A.Drozhdin Dump 8 Dump 7 Dump 4 Dump 3 Dump 6 Dump 5 Left side figures: 3-sigma core of the beam (green) and beam without collimation (red). Right side figures: beam population after collimation at every 60 degree (red) and intercepted halo at the beam dumps (green). Dump 1 Dump 2

Dec. 10, 2004 A.Drozhdin Calculated horizontal, vertical and momentum distributions of the beam without and with collimation at the entrance to the MI-10 straight section of the Main injector.

An amplitude and momentum collimation is done by stripping of H- ions at the foil located upstream of the focusing quadrupole and then intercepting of Ho atoms and protons by the beam dump located in 5 m behind the focusing quadrupole. Dump 8 Dump 2 December, 2004 A.Drozhdin H- handling in the beam line

The Doppler Effect (top figure) shifts lab frame infrared photons (green curve) to energies (blue and magenta) in excess of the range where the cross section of photodetachment (red) is large. The average calculated collision distance at 8GeV is L=1.7e+06 m, and the beam loss rate 1/L=5.7e-07 1/m. The rate is increased by 3 order of magnitude with H- ions energy rise from 0.8 to 8 GeV (middle). The beam pipe temperature (bottom) lowered to liquid nitrogen temperature (77 K) permits to decrease the photodetachment rate by 3 order of magnitude. Ref. H.C.Bryant and G.H.Herling, Journal of Modern Optics, 53, 45 (2006). December, 2004 A.Drozhdin H- stripping due to Blackbody radiation

H- stripping due to residual gas The total electron loss cross section can be expressed as: The total electron loss cross section for H, He, N, O and Ar from the measurements and scaled to 8 GeV are presented in Table The loss rate due to collision with i-th species of the residual gas is andhere The measured residual gas pressure in FNAL A150 beam line, and calculated loss rates are shown in Table Fef. G.H.Gillespie, Phys. Rev. A 15, 563 and A 16, 943 (1977), G.H.Gillespie, Nucl. Intr. & Meth. B 2, 231 (1984) and B 10/11, 23 (1985) December, 2004 A.Drozhdin

Magnetic field stripping When an H- ion with momentum P moves in magnetic field B, it experi- ences an electric field E that is the Lorentz-transform of the magnetic field in the lab system: The stripping of H- ions by the magnetic field (Lorentz stripping) was calculated using (M.A.Furman) equation for ion's lifetime in its own rest frame system. In a range of E= MV/cm A=7.96e-14 s-MV/cm C=42.56 MV/cm. The mean decay length in the lab system is The stripping probability was calculated as Ref. G.M.Stinson et al., Nucl. Instr. & Meth. 74, 333 (1969) The rates of stripping in the beam line elements Blackbody at 300 K: 5.7e-07 1/m Residual gas at P=1e-08: 1.8e-08 1/m Magnetic field at 500 Gauss: 6.4e-10 1/m A sum of stripping probabilities at each element of beam line for every particle of the beam was calculated using STRUCT. December, 2004 A.Drozhdin

Dec. 10, 2004 N. Mokhov The MARS15 calculations on instantane- ous temperature rise per a single pulse of 1.5e14 protons accidentally lost in iron and aluminum collimators. The iron collimator withstands a single pulse but is melt if the next pulse arrives. Aluminum collimator melts after a single pulse. If follow the SNS policy that the collimator should withstand two pulses in a row, than the optimal solution would be a 0.5-m long and 10-mm radially thick graphite insert in 1-m long steel collimator.

Dec. 10, 2004 A.Drozhdin There are three major mechanisms for 8 GeV H(-) ions stripping blackbody radiation (i.e., thermal pho-tons), magnetic field and residual gas. The calculated stripping rates are: Residual gas at 1e-07 torr : 3.2e-07 1/m Magnetic field at 600 Gauss: 3.0e-071/m Blackbody at 300 K: 5.3e-07 1/m. The total loss rate inside the bending magnet (worse case) is about 1.2e-06 per meter. H(o) loss along beam line without H(o) collimators (top), with 2 shadow collimators upstream of the bend regions (aperture 13 X 13 mm-mm) (middle) and with internal collimators inside the B2 dipoles are shown. The stripping rate of 1.2e-06 per meter is assumed everywhere along the beam line.

The idea of the H-zero collimator is to get the H-zero losses from blackbody radiation to shower up deep inside the body of the magnet, but not in the interconnect region or near the downstream end where it will irradiate the interconnect region. It doesn’t have to be a great collimator – we are only looking for a factor of 5-10 to make the activation of the magnet end regions less of a problem. Dec. 10, 2004 G.W.Foster

Dec. 10, 2004 A.Drozhdin H(o) loss along beam line without H(o) collimators (top), with 2 shadow collimators upstream of the bend regions (middle) and with internal collimators inside the B2 dipoles (bottom) are shown. The shadow collimators located upstream of the bend region protect only first dipole and not effect losses at the other ones. The B2 internal collimators decrease H(o) losses at the last 2-m region of the magnet body by more than three order of magnitude.

Dec. 10, 2004 A.Drozhdin H(o) loss along beam line with internal collimators inside the B2 dipoles located at 2.5 m, 2 m and 1.5m upstream of the dipole end. H(o) loss with horizontal aperture of internal B2 collimator of mm and mm

Dec. 10, 2004 A.Drozhdin Conclusions The transfer beam line is based on a periodic FODO structure with phase advance of 60 degree per cell. This lattice has sufficiently less maximum beta functions for the same amounts of dispersion and total length compared to 90- degree lattice, that is an advantage for off-momentum collimation. Halo collimation is done by stripping of H(-) ions at the foil located upstream of the focusing quadrupoles and then intercepting of H(o) atoms and protons by the beam dump located in 5 m behind the focusing quadrupole. Six foil- dump stations are used for amplitude collimation, and two stations in the positive and negative dispersion wave maximum for momentum collimation. Collimation of the beam is done with amplitude foils located at 3 sigma and beam dumps at 3.5 sigma from the beam center. Momentum collimation is done at dP/P= The iron beam dump withstands a single pulse of accidentally lost 1.5e14 protons but will be melt if the next pulse arrives.