NCATE Standards for Professional Development Schools Doug MacIsaac Stetson University Cynthia Hutchinson University of Central Florida.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome to Site Management Amy Thompson. Agenda I.Foundation Introductions Setting the Session Agenda II.Site Management Principles III.Site Management.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Capacity Building Global Support Program Enhance the institutional capacity necessary to support professionals in implementing tiger conservation over.
PORTFOLIO.
Parents as Partners in Education
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
RTI as a Lever for School Change School Partnerships for Change in Teacher Education Tom Bellamy—February 2, 2011.
Research has shown that healthy students are better learners. How can you develop a healthy school community using a Comprehensive School Health Approach?
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
ETT 429 Spring 2007 Technology Standards. NETS-T Background International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) created National Educational Technology.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Northampton – Development Opportunities a framework for enabling positive change.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Strategic Planning Retreat for UWF Boards and Leadership Teams June 12, 2013 Charting the Future: Pursuing Our Vision.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
Outline of Presentation 1.Mission, Vision and Values for Task Force 2.Definition of Engagement 3.Explanation of Research-Informed Framework 4.Characteristics.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Transitioning from NCATE and TEAC to CAEP: How? Patty Garvin, Senior Director,
Characteristics of Effective Learning Communities PowerUp Orientation.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
How to Frame an Ed.D. Program The following are a set of examples of how programs can be framed to make them unique and focused around the values of the.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Raising standards, improving lives The use of assessment to improve learning: the evidence 15 September Jacqueline White HMI National Adviser for Assessment.
Looking at our School—LAOS School Development Planning Initiative.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
Interagency Collaboration: Transition’s Reality Show Sharon deFur Jeanne Repetto coe.ufl.edu.
Primary Purposes of the Evaluation System
Summary of the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) and NCATE's Educational Computing and Technology facilitation Standards for K-12.
School Effectiveness Framework Building effective learning communities together October 2009 Michelle Jones Professional Adviser WAG.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Conceptual Framework Presentation, 2006, Slide 1 The Conceptual Framework for Programs that Prepare Professionals Who Work in Schools What - Why - and.
Developing & Sustaining Community Schools to Build a Systemic Initiative April 8, 2010 Janice Chu-Zhu, Sr. Dir. Natl. Capacity Building Coalition Forum.
COMMUNITY COALITION BUILDING. Workshop Objectives  Describe effective community coalition building  What?  Why?  How?  Key challenges and success.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
Effective Partnerships: Focus on Results. Effective Partnerships OBJECTIVE 4-H and military partners will be able to assess and align their services to.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Capacity Development Results Framework A strategic and results-oriented approach to learning for capacity development.
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
Council of Europe Forum Strasbourg, September 2006 Norman Sharp OBE Director, QAA Scotland
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Program Review For School Counseling Programs
Insert your name and a picture. Change the Design Template.
February 21-22, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

NCATE Standards for Professional Development Schools Doug MacIsaac Stetson University Cynthia Hutchinson University of Central Florida

Standards for Quality Professional Development Schools

Outline Introduction to NCATE Standards Purpose Key concepts How the Standards are Structured Five standards Composed of elements Developmental in nature Indicators and Examples PDS Standards Activity Discussion

Key Concepts 1.Time Before the Beginning 2.Integration of Professional and Student Learning Through Inquiry 3.Placing Students at the Center of PDS Work 3.Learning in the Context of Practice 4.Boundary Spanning

Key Concepts 6.Blending of Resources 7.Principal Partners and Institutional Partners 8.The Expanded Learning Community 9.The PDS as a Standards-Bearing Institution 10.Leveraging Change

PDS Standards There are five standards that address the characteristics of PDSs

PDS STANDARDS Standard I: Learning Community Standard II:Accountability and Quality Assurance Standard III:Collaboration Standard IV:Diversity and Equity Standard V: Structures, Resources, and Roles

The PDS Standards are strongly connected and in many instances they overlap. Consequently, they should be viewed together as a whole.

Developmental Guidelines Standards relate to various stages of PDS development. Guidelines are cumulative in nature

Developmental Levels Beginning Level Developing Level At Standard Leading Level

Beginning Level Beliefs, verbal commitments, plans, organization and initial work are consistent with the mission of the PDS PDS partners are committed to key concepts of the PDS and earliest work evidences initial steps in that direction

Developing Level Partners are pursuing the PDS mission Partial institutional support Movement toward institutionalization

At Standard PDS mission is integrated into the partnering institutions PDS work is expected and supported PDS work reflects best practice PDS partners work together to promote positive outcomes for all learners PDS policies and practices support PDS participants in meaningful ways

Leading Level PDS work is sustaining and generative Systematic changes in policy and practice in partner institutions Influence on policy at district, state, and national level Potential for leveraging change

The PDS Standards Each standard consists of several elements

Standard 1 Learning Community Supports Multiple Learners Work and Practice are Inquiry-Based and Focused on Learning Shared Personal Vision of Teaching and Learning Grounded in Research and Practitioner Knowledge Serve as Instrument of Change Extended Learning Community

Standard II Accountability and Quality Assurance Develop Professional Accountability Assure Public Accountability Set PDS Participation Criteria Develop Assessments, Collect Information, and Use Results Engage with the PDS Context

Standard III Collaboration Engage in Joint Work Design Roles and Structures to Enhance Collaboration and Develop Parity Systematically Recognize and Celebrate Joint Work and Contribution of Each Partner

Standard IV Diversity and Equity Ensure Equitable Opportunities to Learn Evaluate Policies and Practices to Support Equitable Learning Outcomes Recruit and Support Diverse Participants

Standard V Structure, Resources, and Roles Establish Governance and Support Structures Ensure Progress Towards Goals Create PDS Roles Resources Use Effective Communication

Standards Activity

Discussion