Foundations of Excellence TM in the First College Year Improving the First Year of College: Foundations for Excellence Scott E. Evenbeck IUPUI FACULTY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Model of Minority Student Retention
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Foundations of Excellence ® in the First College Year Focusing on Two-Year Colleges Randy L. Swing, Ph.D. Kathleen M. Morley, Ph.D. Policy Center on the.
Foundations of Excellence ® in the First College Year (4-year institutions) Salisbury University Project Description of Review Process of First College.
Foundations of Excellence ® in the First College Year Defining and Measuring Excellence in the Beginning College Experience Betsy O. Barefoot & John N.
Division of Student Affairs and Enrollment Management Supporting Student Success and Retention.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
1 Accreditation and the First-Year Experience Kay H. Smith, Ph.D. Associate Vice President for the Academic Experience College of Charleston.
Enrollment Management and Student Affairs at Portland State University Enrollment Management and Student Affairs is a student-centered organization, dedicated.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Learn and Serve Higher Education Grant. What is the purpose of Learn and Serve America? Learn and Serve America supports service- learning programs in.
An Outcomes-based Assessment Model for General Education Amy Driscoll WASC EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR February 1, 2008.
SEM Planning Model.
A Team-Based Assessment Model Annual Conference on First-Year Assessment October 12-14, 2008 San Antonio, Texas John N. Gardner Executive Director, Policy.
Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.
Be a Part of Something Great! Learning Communities at Wayne State.
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
GUIDANCE SYSTEM OF SUPPORT COLLEGE AND CAREER READY FOR ALL Guidance and Counseling Fall 2011.
Foundations of Excellence Results of Surveys A Presentation by Arlene Santos-George April 1, 2008.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
Towards an Integrated Academy: A Teaching and Learning Framework for Carleton University
ENGAGING LEADERS FOR CHANGE AND INNOVATION ADEA CCI 2011 Summer Liaison Meeting San Diego, CA June 27-29, 2011 Janet M. Guthmiller, DDS, PhD University.
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes in Student Development – Part I Student Development Division Meeting SUNY Oneonta May 9, 2008.
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
Building Collaborative Initiatives that Enhance Student Learning Nancy Mitchell and Linda Major.
Florida Secondary School Redesign Initiative: Eventually, Change Turns into Work ! Presented by: Barbara McClamma Christine Crocco Senior Program Associates.
Donna Younger, Ed.D. Oakton Community College Getting WISE © with New Community College Students: Success from the Start Chicago July 11, 2009.
1 Presenter: Angela Ward Intro. to Culturally Responsive Pedagogy Student –Focused Dialogue.
International Strategic Enrolment Management at the University of Victoria 2015 BCCIE Summer Seminar Carolyn Russell, Director, Student Recruitment and.
Leading Change. THE ROLE OF POLICY IN CHANGE Leading Change – The Role of Policy Drift to Quantitative Compliance- Behavior will focus on whatever is.
Research Findings: Good Practices in Student Retention and the First Year Experience Robert D. Reason Assistant Professor and Research Associate Foundations.
Presentation II A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement, and Policy Decisions.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
1 Created by Angela Ward Intro. to Culturally Responsive Pedagogy Student –Focused Dialogue.
Focus on the First-Year “ The First Year Matters” Presentation for the Academic Affairs Town Hall October 2, 2007.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Work of the Faculty Leadership Team An Overview. Our Charge Serving to recommend process Serving to set up a strategic plan.
 Traditional View of Excellence Research funding- whatever the topic Number of Doctoral Degree Programs Selectivity Invention/discoveries Size International.
Student Affairs and Services Creating an environment for learning and service.
Conducing a Self-study of the First Year Experience through the Foundations of Excellence Terisa C. Remelius, Ph.D. Assist. Vice President for Student.
East Carolina University’s Conceptual Framework for Preparing Education Professionals.
The First Year at the University of Wisconsin: Building a Foundation for Student Success Betsy Barefoot, EdD 2008 First-Year Conference University of Wisconsin.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Simpson County Schools Summer Leadership Retreat 2011 Enhancing Leadership Capacity and Effectiveness to Impact Student Learning and Staff Performance.
Columbus State University C ollege of Education and Health Professions PSC Program Review February 14-17, 2010.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
Office of Service Quality
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
Co-Curricular Assessment Plan STUDENT AFFAIRS - LEADERSHIP CENTER.
Graduate Program Completer Evaluation Feedback 2008.
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Service-Learning: A pedagogy and scholarship of civic engagement Marie Watkins, Ph. D. Faculty Assembly August 24, 2011.
Towards an Integrated Academy: A Teaching and Learning Framework for Carleton University
Learning Without Borders: From Programs to Curricula
UK First Year Experience: Wildcat Foundations
Improving the First Year: Campus Discussion March 30, 2009
Presentation transcript:

Foundations of Excellence TM in the First College Year Improving the First Year of College: Foundations for Excellence Scott E. Evenbeck IUPUI FACULTY COUNCIL MARCH 1, 2005 University College, 2005

Foundations of Excellence TM in the First College Year FOUNDATIONS TASK FORCE University College, 2005 Victor BordenRobert BringleKathy Burton Nathan ByrerMichael DonahueScott Evenbeck Sharon HamiltonMichele HansenJulie Hatcher Barbara JacksonAnastasia MorroneWilliam Orme James PerryRebecca PorterKevin Rome Catherine SouchDavid StocumRichard Ward Jeffrey WattGayle Williams

Foundations of Excellence™ in the First College Year FYE—a 20 year old reform movement Foundations Project—an attempt to move beyond a narrow focus –Aspirational model –Measurement model –First year as a distinct unit of analysis & set of experiences

Foundations of Excellence TM in the First College Year Working with two institutional sectors American Association of State Colleges and Universities Council of Independent Colleges Project participants from two associations Helping build and revise Foundational Dimensions™ 24 “Founding Institutions”—12 per sector Helping pilot Dimensions as measurement tool

Foundations of Excellence TM in the First College Year Dimensions— Characteristics of institutional effectiveness

Foundations of Excellence TM in the First College Year Foundational Dimensions Philosophy Organization Transitions Faculty All Students Engagement Diversity Improvement Roles & Purposes Educated Person Commitment Life Purpose © 2003 Policy Center

Resources Used in Self-Assessment Task Force Review of: –Program Evaluation –Faculty Survey –National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

Philosophy Approach the first year in ways that are intentional and based on a philosophy/rationale of the first year that informs relevant institutional policies and practices. The philosophy/rationale is explicit, clear and easily understood, consistent with the institutional mission, widely disseminated, and, as appropriate, reflects a consensus of campus constituencies. The philosophy/rationale is also the basis for organizational policies, practices, structures, leadership, and resource allocation. GRADE: B+

Organization Create organizational structures and policies that provide a comprehensive, integrated, and coordinated approach to the first year. These structures and policies provide oversight and alignment of all first-year efforts. A coherent first-year experience is realized and maintained through effective partnerships among academic affairs, student affairs, and other administrative units and is enhanced by ongoing faculty and staff development activities and appropriate budgetary arrangements. GRADE: A

Transitions Facilitate appropriate recruitment, admissions, and student transitions through policies and practices that are intentional and aligned with institutional mission. Institutions improve the academic and social readiness of students to make the transition to higher education environments by communicating clear curricular and co-curricular expectations and providing appropriate support for educational success. They are forthright about their responsibilities to students as well as students' responsibilities to themselves and the institution. They create and maintain linkages and curricular alignments between faculty and secondary school teachers, and they communicate with guidance counselors, families, and other sources of support, as appropriate. GRADE: C

Faculty Elevate the first college year to a high priority for the faculty. Chief academic officers, deans, and department chairs articulate expectations for substantial faculty interaction with first-year students, both inside and outside the classroom. The institutions’ system of rewards supports these expectations. GRADE: B-

All Students Serve all first-year students according to their varied needs. The process of anticipating, diagnosing, and addressing needs is ongoing and is subject to assessment and adjustment throughout the first year. Institutions provide services with respect for the students’ abilities, backgrounds, interests, and experiences. GRADE: B

Engagement Engage students, both in and out of the classroom, in order to develop attitudes, behaviors, and skills consistent with the desired outcomes of higher education and the institution’s philosophy and mission. An explicit goal of first-year instruction across the curriculum, engagement promotes intellectual curiosity and excitement. Engagement is also the basis for out-of-class learning and development. Whether in or out of the classroom, engagement promotes critical thinking, lifelong learning, moral and spiritual development, and civic responsibility. GRADE: B+

Diversity Ensure that all first-year students experience diverse ideas, worldviews, and peoples as a means of enhancing their learning and preparing them to become members of pluralistic communities. Whatever their demographic composition, institutions structure experiences in which students interact in an open and civil community with people different from themselves, reflect on ideas and values different from those they currently hold, and explore their own cultures and the cultures of others. GRADE: C-

Roles and Purposes Promote student understanding of the various roles and purposes of higher education, both for the individual and for society, and support the development of relevant personal goals. First-year students are provided opportunities to examine their motivation and goals with regard to higher education in general and to their own college/university. They are exposed to the value of general education as well as to the value of more focused, in-depth study of a field or fields of knowledge (i.e., the major). In general, institutions help students realize a variety of balance points: for example, learning for personal enrichment; learning to prepare for future employment; learning to prepare for citizenship, and learning to serve the public good. GRADE: B

Improvement Conduct assessment and maintain associations with other institutions and relevant professional organizations in order to achieve ongoing first-year improvement. This assessment is specific to the first year as a unit of analysis—a distinct time period and set of experiences, academic and otherwise, in the lives of students. It is also linked systemically to the institutions’ overall assessment. Assessment results are an integral part of institutional planning, resource allocation, decision-making, and ongoing improvement of programs and policies as they affect first-year students. As part of the enhancement process and as a way to achieve ongoing improvement, institutions are familiar with current practices at other institutions as well as with research and scholarship on the first college year. GRADE: A

Next Steps Data is being shared with key groups addressing student academic achievement and persistence: Gateway Group Council on Retention and Graduation Enrollment Management Council University College Faculty, Advisors, and Staff

Council on Retention and Graduation Continue emphasis on the first year (building on Foundations project). Work, in conjunction with the Enrollment Management Council and the Schools, on issues impacting transfer students. Attend to issues of seniors supporting them in moving to graduation.