DHCP - Prefix Delegation for NEMO Ralph Droms (Cisco) Pascal Thubert (Cisco) 59th IETF, NEMO WG.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mobile IPv6. Why study Mobility in IPv6? What is so different about Mobile IPv6 ?
Advertisements

1 Introduction to Mobile IPv6 IIS5711: Mobile Computing Mobile Computing and Broadband Networking Laboratory CIS, NCTU.
Mobility Support in IPv6 Advanced Internet, 2004 Fall 8 November 2004 Sangheon Pack.
MIP Extensions: FMIP & HMIP
1Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date University of Twente On the Security of the Mobile IP Protocol Family Ulrike Meyer and Hannes Tschofenig.
Mobile IPv6 趨勢介紹 1. Mobile IP and its Variants Mobile IPv4 (MIPv4) – MIPv4 – Low-Latency Handover for MIPv4 (FMIPv4) – Regional Registration for MIPv4.
MOBILE NETWORK LAYER Mobile IP.
1 DSMIP6 Support QUALCOMM Inc. Jun Wang, George Cherian, Masa Shirota Notice.
Network Localized Mobility Management using DHCP
IPv4 and IPv6 Mobility Support Using MPLS and MP-BGP draft-berzin-malis-mpls-mobility-00 Oleg Berzin, Andy Malis {oleg.berzin,
IPv6 Address Provisioning In IPv6 world there are three provisioning aspects wich are independent of whether the IPv6 node is a Host or CE router: IPv6.
Overview of the Mobile IPv6 Bootstrapping Problem James Kempf DoCoMo Labs USA Thursday March 10, 2005.
Mobile IPv6 - NSIS Interaction for Firewall traversal draft-thiruvengadam-nsis-mip6-fw-04 S. Thiruvengadam Hannes Tschofenig Franck Le Niklas Steinleitner.
1 © NOKIA NSIS MIPv6 FW/ November 8 th 2004 Mobile IPv6 - NSIS Interaction for Firewall traversal draft-thiruvengadam-nsis-mip6-fw-01 S. Thiruvengadam.
1 Route Optimization based on ND-Proxy for Mobile Nodes in IPv6 Mobile Networks Jaehoon Jeong, Kyeongjin Lee, Jungsoo Park, Hyoungjun Kim ETRI
Mobile IP Overview: Standard IP Standard IP Evolution of Mobile IP Evolution of Mobile IP How it works How it works Problems Assoc. with it Problems Assoc.
IPv6 Network Mobility on Ad hoc network for Transportation System Assoc. Prof. Lee Bu Sung, Francis.
Slide 1, Dr. Wolfgang Böhm, Mobile Internet, © Siemens AG 2001 Dr. Wolfgang Böhm Siemens AG, Mobile Internet Dr. Wolfgang.
National Institute Of Science & Technology Mobile IP Jiten Mishra (EC ) [1] MOBILE IP Under the guidance of Mr. N. Srinivasu By Jiten Mishra EC
1 MIPv6 CN-Targeted Location Privacy and Optimized Routing draft-weniger-mobopts-mip6-cnlocpriv-01 IETF #68, Prague, March 2007.
1 Sideseadmed (IRT0040) loeng 5/2010 Avo
Internet Goes Mobile Alper Yegin KIOW 2003 at APNIC 16 August 19th, Seoul, Korea.
Req1 - Separability Old: –An RO scheme MUST have the ability to be bypassed by traffic types that desire to use bidirectional tunnels through an HA. New:
NEtwork MObility (NEMO) Houcheng Lee. Main Idea NEMO works by moving the mobility functionality from Mobile IP mobile nodes to a mobile router. The router.
NEMO Requirements and Mailing List Discussions/Conclusions T.J. Kniveton - Nokia Pascal Thubert - Cisco IETF 54 – July 14, 2002 Yokohama, Japan.
네트워크 기반 지역 이동성 지원 프로토콜 적용 기술 Internet Computing KUT ( Youn-Hee Han.
NEtwork MObility (NEMO) Houcheng Lee. Main Idea NEMO works by moving the mobility functionality from Mobile IP mobile nodes to a mobile router. The router.
Prefix Delegation Protocol Selection T.J. Kniveton MEXT Working Group IETF 70 - December ’07 - Vancouver.
1 Notice Contributors grant a free, irrevocable license to 3GPP2 and its Organization Partners to incorporate text or other copyrightable material contained.
1 Behcet Sarikaya Frank Xia Ted Lemon July 2011 DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation as IPv6 Migration Tool in Mobile Networks IETF 81
1 Motorola PMIPv4 Call Flows: Bearer Setup with Dual Anchoring Parviz YeganiVojislav VuceticAlmon Tang (408) (732) (847)
1 Julien Laganier MEXT WG, IETF-79, Nov Authorizing MIPv6 Binding Update with Cryptographically Generated Addresses
Dynamic Management of Multiple Mobile Routers Manabu Tsukada, Thierry Ernst, Ryuji Wakikawa and Koshiro Mitsuya Graduate School of Media and Governance,
IP Address Location Privacy and Mobile IPv6 draft-koodli-mip6-location-privacy-00.txt draft-koodli-mip6-location-privacy-solutions-00.txt.
Thierry Ernst - MOTOROLA Labs / INRIA Ludovic Bellier - INRIA project PLANETE Claude Castelluccia - INRIA project PLANETE Hong-Yon Lach - MOTOROLA Labs.
1 Mobility Support in IPv6 (MIPv6) Chun-Chuan Yang Dept. Computer Science & Info. Eng. National Chi Nan University.
Network Architecture Protection (draft-vandevelde-v6ops-nap-01.txt) Brian Carpenter, Ralph Droms, Tony Hain, Eric L Klein, Gunter Van de Velde.
1 NetLMM Vidya Narayanan Jonne Soininen
Introduction to Mobile IPv6
Santhosh Rajathayalan ( ) Senthil Kumar Sevugan ( )
Enabling Binding Update via access authorization Charles Perkins, Basavaraj Patil IETF 82 [netext] WG / Taipei November 16, 2011.
Nemo RO taxonomy P. Thubert, M. Molteni (Cisco) C. Ng (Panasonic) H. Ohnishi (NTT) E. Paik (Seoul Nat. Univ.) 59th IETF, NEMO WG.
Mobile IP 순천향대학교 정보기술공학부 이 상 정 VoIP 특론 순천향대학교 정보기술공학부 이 상 정 2 References  Tutorial: Mobile IP
Mobile IPv6 and Firewalls: Problem Statement Speaker: Jong-Ru Lin
MOBILE IP Optimization of packet forwarding
REGIONAL COLLEGE FOR EDUCATION RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY.
Ασύρματες και Κινητές Επικοινωνίες Ενότητα # 10: Mobile Network Layer: Mobile IP Διδάσκων: Βασίλειος Σύρης Τμήμα: Πληροφορικής.
Mobile IPv6 with IKEv2 and revised IPsec architecture IETF 61
1 Route Optimization and Location Privacy using Tunneling Agents (ROTA) draft-weniger-rota-01 Kilian Weniger, Takashi Aramaki IETF #64, Nov 2005.
Basic Nemo Usages Pascal Thubert (Cisco) Ryuji Wakikawa (Keio) Vijay Devarapalli (Nokia) 59th IETF, NEMO WG.
Network Mobility (NEMO) Advanced Internet 2004 Fall
2003/3/1856th IETF NEMO WG1 Basic Network Mobility Support draft-wakikawa-nemo-basic-00.txt Ryuji Wakikawa Keisuke Uehara
NEMO Basic Support update IETF 61. Status IANA assignments done Very close to AUTH48 call Some issues raised recently We need to figure out if we want.
Home Network Models Pascal Thubert (Cisco) Ryuji Wakikawa (Keio) Vijay Devarapalli (Nokia) 63rd IETF, NEMO WG.
Paris, August 2005 IETF 63 rd – mip6 WG Mobile IPv6 bootstrapping in split scenario (draft-ietf-mip6-bootstrapping-split-00) mip6-boot-sol DT Gerardo Giaretta,
Service Flows Distribution and Handoff Technique based on MIPv6 draft-liu-dmm-flows-distribution-and-handoff-00
th IETF NEMO WG 1 NEMO RO Problem Space Prepared for 55 th IETF By Pascal Thubert (Cisco), Ng Chan Wah & Takeshi Tanaka (Panasonic)
Mobile IP THE 12 TH MEETING. Mobile IP  Incorporation of mobile users in the network.  Cellular system (e.g., GSM) started with mobility in mind. 
MOBILE IP & IP MICRO-MOBILITY SUPPORT Presented by Maheshwarnath Behary Assisted by Vishwanee Raghoonundun Koti Choudary MSc Computer Networks Middlesex.
RFC 3775 IPv6 Mobility Support
<draft-ohba-pana-framework-00.txt>
Booting up on the Home Link
Mobile Networking (I) CS 395T - Mobile Computing and Wireless Networks
Route Optimization of Mobile IP over IPv4
NEMO Basic Support Protocol IETF 60, San Diego
Support for Flow bindings in MIPv6 and NEMO
IETF67 B. Patil, Gopal D., S. Gundavelli, K. Chowdhury
2002 IPv6 技術巡迴研討會 IPv6 Mobility
NETLMM 및 IETF 이동성기술 표준화 동향
Prefix Delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6
Presentation transcript:

DHCP - Prefix Delegation for NEMO Ralph Droms (Cisco) Pascal Thubert (Cisco) 59th IETF, NEMO WG

3/1/2004NEMO WG - IETF 592 Problem Summary 1.Delegation of prefixes from home network to MR 2.Delegation of local prefixes to MR for hierarchical NEMO

3/1/2004NEMO WG - IETF 593 Delegation from HA to MR MR needs prefixes from home network to be assigned within mobile network Proposal: Use DHCPv6 (through tunnel) for prefix delegation HA acts as DR, MR acts as RR HA configured with prefixes from home network HA acts as DHCPv6 relay agent for other configuration MR acts as DHCPv6 relay agent for MNs

3/1/2004NEMO WG - IETF 594 Use of DHCPv6 for Delegation Provides a dynamic provisioning of NEMO-prefixes Controls the NEMO-prefix lifecycle Can be coupled with a backend authorization system for basic nemo explicit prefix mode Similar to draft-paakkonen-nemo-prefix-delegation; reuses NEMO and DHCPv6 PD Could be coupled with NAI for full discovery (ftp://ftp-eng.cisco.com/mipdrafts/MIPv6/draft-patel-mipv6-nai-option-01.txt)ftp://ftp-eng.cisco.com/mipdrafts/MIPv6/draft-patel-mipv6-nai-option-01.txt

3/1/2004NEMO WG - IETF 595 Local Delegation for Hierarchical NEMO Latest draft: draft-droms-nemo-dhcpv6-pd-01.txt A new Local Mobility Management Model To NEMO what HMIP is to MIPv6 (So keep in mind the HMIP model) Standards based (NEMO + DHCP-PD)

3/1/2004NEMO WG - IETF 596 DHCP-PD based LMM (1) Access router for visited link (AR-VL) owns an aggregation AR-VL is NEMO HA for that aggregation AR-VL is also DHCP-PD for that aggregation MR builds local CoA from AR-VL prefix MR obtains prefix from AR-VL via DHCP-PD MR exposes delegated prefix as NEMO-prefix

3/1/2004NEMO WG - IETF 597 DHCP-PD based LMM (2) MR binds Delegated Prefix to AR-VL using NEMO explicit prefix (from local CoA) MR autoconfigures a global CoA from its Delegated Prefix to bind its own NEMO-prefixes to its HA Only the Delegated Prefix is exposed for visitors to build a CoA Recursively, MRs build a local CoA Address from visited Prefix, forming a tree Visitors packets are tunneled to AR (as a local HA), not to MR Home

3/1/2004NEMO WG - IETF 598 Inherits HMIP benefits for LMM  When a MR moves within the tree of a given AR-VL, the MR keeps its delegated prefix  the global CareOf from delegated prefix does not change so no need to rebind Home  MR builds a new Local CoA from same AR-VL’s aggregation and rebinds its Delegated Prefix to AR-VL using NEMO  When moving outside of the AR-VL tree, the MR may keep the Delegated Prefix and bind it from outside for a small period of time Nested NEMO Route Optimization  Visitors packets are tunneled to AR-VL (as a local HA), not to MR Home  AR-VL decapsulates nested tunnels and forwards only the inner MR-HA tunnel  So no pinball routing and no nested tunnels in the Infrastructure  Local Nested tunnels can be saved using Reverse Routing Header Security  Visitors packets can not attack Home since they are not sent over MR-HA  AR-VL can be used for AAA, filtering and firewalling purposes Privacy between visitors and visited in nested NEMO  Only local delegated prefixes are exposed in the clear for visitors  Visitors can uses RFC 3041 to protect their ID when building their local CoA  Visitors can use ESP to protect their data Standards based  Mostly reuses standards flows (NEMO + DHCP-PD from draft 0) Advantages of the solution

3/1/2004NEMO WG - IETF 599 Example of DHCP-PD based LMM AR owns DHCP:AGGR:DHCP::/48 MR1 autoconfs DHCP:AGGR:DHCP:DHCP::MR1 MR1 gets DHCP:AGGR:DHCP:MR1::/64 from AR using DHCP-PD MR1 binds DHCP:AGGR:DHCP:MR1::/64 with CoA DHCP:AGGR:DHCP:DHCP::MR1 to AR using NEMO Explicit Prefix MR1 autoconfs DHCP:AGGR:DHCP:MR1::MR1 MR1 binds its own MNets with CoA DHCP:AGGR:DHCP:MR1::MR1 to HA1 MR2 autoconfs DHCP:AGGR:DHCP:MR1::MR2 MR1 tunnels MR2’s packets to AR Etc… HA HA2 MR1 Other MR MN NEMO binding: MR1 via DHCP:AGGR:DHCP:MR1::MR1 Other MR MR2 MN Access Link DHCP:AGGR:DHCP:DHCP::/64 DHCP:AGGR:DHCP:DHCP::DHCP DHCP:AGGR:DHCP:DHCP::MR1 DHCP:AGGR:DHCP:MR1::MR2 DHCP:AGGR:MR1:MR2::MR2 Delegated MNet DHCP:AGGR:DHCP:MR1::/64 AR Delegated MNet DHCP:AGGR:DHCP:MR2::/64 HA1 DHCP:AGGR:DHCP:MR1::MR1 NEMO binding: MR2 via DHCP:AGGR:DHCP:MR2::MR2

3/1/2004NEMO WG - IETF 5910 Mailing List issues ?