Rights Warning/Waiver Certificate

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CH 14 Citizenship and Equal Justice
Advertisements

AJ 104 Chapter 14 Self-Incrimination.
Section 3 Introduction-1
The Government must respect ALL legal rights of all people. It must treat people fairly.
Unit I: Basic Principles of Government The Citizens.
The Investigation Phase Criminal Law and Procedure.
Vivek Barbhaiya and John Coriasco
Rights of the Accused th – Amendment Presumption of innocence Presumption of innocence Manzanar –one of our big failings Reasonable doubt Reasonable.
Do you know your civil rights?
POP QUIZ How did the Courts increase the political power of people in urban areas and those accused of a crime? GIVE AN EXAMPLE.
Warren Court. Warm-up Do you have rights when you are being arrested? What rights do you have?
1966 Chief Justice Warren’s handwritten notes about the case.
Miranda v. Arizona 1966 Read Miranda v. Arizona Parties Facts Issue.
GOVERNMENT CHAPTER 20 Read the chapter and these notes, then answer each part of the 6 questions.
Cases and Terms – Chapter 8 – Rights of the Accused Module 8 Amendments 4 -7.
Our Criminal Justice System
15.3 The American Legal System
Rights of Suspects The Fourth Amendment The Fifth Amendment.
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 1.6 FIFTH AMENDMENT. Fifth Amendment "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment.
The Bill of Rights The First 10 Amendments to the Constitution
U.S. Constitutional Amendments 1-10
Call to Order These three officers were accused of taking two Baltimore teens out to the county, taking their shoes and cellphone batteries, and leaving.
By: Holden Luce.  Mapp was accused of harboring a criminal involved in a bombing case.  The Officers confronted Mapp at her home and demanded that she.
{ Criminal Trial Procedure What happens when the police arrest a criminal suspect?
Reem K, Madeline R, Miranda G, Emily K, & Britney F Government 4 th Hour Mr. Baker.
Arrests and Miranda. 2 Copyright and Terms of Service Copyright © Texas Education Agency, These materials are copyrighted © and trademarked ™ as.
An Overview of The Mapp, Gideon, Escobedo, and Miranda cases. Copyright 2010; The Nichols Law Firm, PLLC; By Atty. Brendon G. Basiga.
III. Rights of the Accused. A. Exclusionary Rule Exclusionary Rule – Supreme Court ruled any evidence collected illegally cannot be used in federal court.
GOOD AFTERNOON Individually make a list of all the movies, TV shows, books, or songs that have something to do with crime.
Chapter 1 The Pursuit of Justice Unit #1 Notes Packet.
Call To Order Complete the following statement: You have the right to remain silent… And take out your homework!!!
The U.S. Bill of Rights. 1st Amendment The 1st Amendment guarantees freedom of religion, speech, the press, assembly, and petition. This means that we.
4 th 5 th and 6 th Amendments By: YOGI PATEL COLE DAURIZIO JASON TRAN STEPHANIE SCHRADER Nichelle Anderson Atia Harris Kathy Cooper Lucas Pincione.
Ashley Nine March 25, 2010 Period 7.  Poor living immigrant from Mexico living in Arizona.  He was charged with rape and kidnapping.  He was arrested.
Unit 4 Lesson 8: Miranda v. Arizona
Homework: Read/OL 14.3 for Monday FrontPage: Have 3 worksheets on your desk.
How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.
Arrests and Miranda.  Right to a grand jury  Protection against double jeopardy  Protection against self-incrimination  Right to due process  Custody.
 Online Miranda quiz Online Miranda quiz. The constitutional implications of custodial interrogation.
The Bill of Rights was included in the Constitution to guarantee the rights of citizens. Va. and other states would only ratify the Constitution if the.
BELLWORK What are the three types of crime? (Page 430)
Miranda V. Arizona By: Elise Kloppenburg. Facts of the Case Phoenix, Arizona 1963 Ernesto Miranda, 23 years old Arrested in his home Taken to the police.
How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.
Land Mark Supreme Court Cases Assignment
Supreme Court Cases of the 60s. Mapp v. Ohio, 1961 What happened? - illegal search of home found “obscene materials”. Mapp was convicted. Brought to court.
Miranda Warnings. Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Objective Students.
Tracing Our Rights
HW due today- Finish researching a second case Agenda NVCs Warm-up Establishment clause and balancing test Crime and amendments Rights of the accused Objectives.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising.
Criminal Law Day 2.
Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.
Miranda v. Arizona.
Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual rights
Warm-up Has anyone tried to get you to confess to something you didn’t do? How did this happen? Have you ever confessed to something and then regretted.
Aim: What are the protections offered by the case of Miranda vs
Rights of Criminal Suspects
Important Court Cases of the 20th Century
Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.
The Bill of Rights The Fifth Amendment.
15.3 The American Legal System
Miranda v. Arizona 5th Amendment
October 18, 2018 Modern Issues in the U.S. Agenda:
Miranda Rights You have the right to remain silent…
Civics & Economics – Goals 5 & 6 The us legal system
Rights Warning/Waiver Certificate
Defendants’ Rights Edgenuity Lessons 3.4 and 3.5.
Rights of the Accused No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury,
Rights of the Accused Part 1
The 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendments
Presentation transcript:

Rights Warning/Waiver Certificate DA FM 3881 Rights Warning/Waiver Certificate

DA FM 3881 191-376-5127 Task: Advised suspect of Art 31-Miranda rights Conditions: Given a suspect or accused, a blank DA 3881 or a GTA 19-6-6 and access to CID Reg 195-1 Standards: You must, without error, advise suspect of his/her Miranda rights and prepare the DA 3881

Front Back

1. Enter the location where the rights advisement is taking place 2. The date and time gets filled in when the suspect signs the form 3. Name is self explanatory Bldg #515, room #117, Ft Wherever, MT 12345 John William D. B Co. 1st/25th Inf Schofield Barracks, HI 96858 (808) 655-1234 123-45-6789 E-5 / AD 4. SSN and Grade is self explanatory 5. Enter the unit address of military or the home address of civilians

1. Enter the Agency which you represent 2. Enter the offense 3. Read each item word for word from the back of the form and have the suspect initial when they understand each item. Military Police Assault (Art #128, UCMJ) JWD JWD JWD JWD Q. Have you been advised of your legal rights and requested a lawyer within the past 30 days? A. 4. Ask this specific question and annotate their response and have them initial. If the answer is YES, stop questioning and contact your supervisor.

While explaining the suspects rights, read word for word this passage which is found on the back of the form. This will help explain their rights and standardize your interaction with all suspects you encounter. All of this is on the form!

Continued…..

Continued… Continue with the filling the form

1. If the suspect is willing to make a statement, they sign block #3 2. You sign block #4 regardless if they waive or invoke and print or type your name in block #5 3. Your unit in block #6. Watchin, Ima John W. Dean HHC 25th Inf, Schofield Barracks, HI 96857 (808) 655-1234 Snuffy, Joe Snuffy, Joe 123rd MP Detachment, Ft Wherever, MT 96858 (808) 438-7114 4. Fill in the witnesses of the rights advisement (if available) in blocks 1a – 2b.

1. The suspect has the option of checking one, both or neither of these blocks and initialing   John W. Dean Refused to sign If the suspect chooses not to make a statement, they sign here. Sometimes suspects are uncooperative and they do not want to sign, if this happens write “Refused to sign” in this block. This is when it good to have a witness.

How We Got Our Miranda Rights On March 13, 1963, $8.00 in cash was stolen from a Phoenix, Arizona bank worker. Police suspected and arrested Ernesto Miranda for committing the theft. During two-hours of questioning, Mr. Miranda, who was never offered a lawyer, confessed not only to the $8.00 theft, but also to kidnapping and raping an 18-year-old woman 11 days earlier. Based largely on his confession, Miranda was convicted and sentenced to twenty years in jail. Miranda's attorneys appealed. First unsuccessfully to the Arizona Supreme Court, and next to the U.S. Supreme Court. On June 13, 1966, the U.S. Supreme Court, in deciding the case of MIRANDA v. ARIZONA, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), reversed the Arizona Court's decision, granted Miranda a new trial at which his confession could not be admitted as evidence, and established the "Miranda" rights of persons accused of crimes. Ernesto Miranda was given a second trial at which his confession was not presented. Based on the evidence, Miranda was again convicted of kidnapping and rape. He was paroled from prison in 1972 having served 11 years. In 1976, Ernesto Miranda, age 34, was stabbed to death in a fight. Police arrested a suspect who, after choosing to exercise his Miranda rights of silence, was released

Mapp v. Ohio (1961): Looking for someone else, Cleveland, Ohio Police entered Dollie Mapp's home. Police did not find their suspect, but arrested Ms. Mapp for possessing obscene literature. Without a warrant to search for the literature, Ms. Mapp's conviction was thrown out. Escobedo v. Illinois (1964): After confessing to a murder during questioning, Danny Escobedo changed his mind and informed police that he wanted to talk to a lawyer. When police documents were produced showing that officers had been trained to ignore the rights of suspects during questioning, the Supreme Court ruled that Escobedo's confession could not be used as evidence. Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees that people cannot be forced to testify against themselves in a criminal case. It also provides that a person cannot be placed in jeopardy twice for the same offense. Amendment 5 also guarantees that (1) a person cannot be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; (2) a person cannot be held to answer for a "capital, or otherwise infamous crime" unless he or she has been indicted by a grand jury, except that military personnel are subject to court-martial; (3) property cannot be taken from a person without just compensation. Amendment 5 is a part of the Bill of Rights that was ratified on Dec. 15, 1791.