Towards multimodal meaning representation Harry Bunt & Laurent Romary LREC Workshop on standards for language resources Las Palmas, May 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reference Resolution And Cognitive Grammar Susanne Salmon-Alt Laurent Romary Loria - Nancy, France ICCS-01 San Sebastian, May 2001.
Advertisements

Berliner XML Tage. Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Oktober 2004 SWEB2004 – Intl Workshop on Semantic Web Technologies in Electronic Business Intelligent.
Profiles Construction Eclipse ECESIS Project Construction of Complex UML Profiles UPM ETSI Telecomunicación Ciudad Universitaria s/n Madrid 28040,
1 University of Namur, Belgium PReCISE Research Center Using context to improve data semantic mediation in web services composition Michaël Mrissa (spokesman)
ARCHITECTURES FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS
An overview of EMMA— Extensible MultiModal Annotation Michael Johnston AT&T Labs Research 8/9/2006.
What is Software Design?. Systems Development Life- Cycle Planning Analysis Design Implementation Design.
Empirical and Data-Driven Models of Multimodality Advanced Methods for Multimodal Communication Computational Models of Multimodality Adequate.
RRL: A Rich Representation Language for the Description of Agent Behaviour in NECA Paul Piwek, ITRI, Brighton Brigitte Krenn, OFAI, Vienna Marc Schröder,
MLIF: A Metamodel to Represent and Exchange Multilingual Textual Information ISO TC37 SC4 WG Samuel Cruz-Lara, Gil Francopoulo, Laurent Romary,
Chapter 20: Natural Language Generation Presented by: Anastasia Gorbunova LING538: Computational Linguistics, Fall 2006 Speech and Language Processing.
I1-[OntoSpace] Ontologies for Spatial Communication John Bateman, Kerstin Fischer, Reinhard Moratz Scott Farrar, Thora Tenbrink.
Marakas: Decision Support Systems, 2nd Edition © 2003, Prentice-Hall Chapter Chapter 1: Introduction to Decision Support Systems Decision Support.
The RDF meta model: a closer look Basic ideas of the RDF Resource instance descriptions in the RDF format Application-specific RDF schemas Limitations.
Second Language Acquisition and Real World Applications Alessandro Benati (Director of CAROLE, University of Greenwich, UK) Making.
Web Service Architecture Part I- Overview and Models (based on W3C Working Group Note Frank.
1 Component Description Ariadne Client/Server Architecture Interactive Systems Labs Prepared by: Matthias Denecke Date.
1 TECO-WIS, 6-8 November 2006 TECHNICAL CONFERENCE ON THE WMO INFORMATION SYSTEM Seoul, Republic of Korea, 6-8 November 2006 ISO 191xx series of geographic.
10 December, 2013 Katrin Heinze, Bundesbank CEN/WS XBRL CWA1: DPM Meta model CWA1Page 1.
Basic Concepts The Unified Modeling Language (UML) SYSC System Analysis and Design.
Lecture 1, 7/21/2005Natural Language Processing1 CS60057 Speech &Natural Language Processing Autumn 2005 Lecture 1 21 July 2005.
TMF - a tutorial TMF - Terminological Markup Framework Laurent Romary - Laboratoire Loria.
Knowledge Mediation in the WWW based on Labelled DAGs with Attached Constraints Jutta Eusterbrock WebTechnology GmbH.
ONTOLOGY SUPPORT For the Semantic Web. THE BIG PICTURE  Diagram, page 9  html5  xml can be used as a syntactic model for RDF and DAML/OIL  RDF, RDF.
CLARIN web services and workflow Marc Kemps-Snijders.
Ontology Development Kenneth Baclawski Northeastern University Harvard Medical School.
Slide 1 Wolfram Höpken RMSIG Reference Model Special Interest Group Second RMSIG Workshop Methodology and Process Wolfram Höpken.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Towards Translating between XML and WSML based on mappings between.
Status report of : Framework for generating ontologies ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting, Redwood City, USA, November 17, 2010 Dongwon Jeong,
Recognition of meeting actions using information obtained from different modalities Natasa Jovanovic TKI University of Twente.
Copyright © 2013 Curt Hill The Zachman Framework What is it all about?
Working group on multimodal meaning representation Dagstuhl workshop, Oct
Experiments on Building Language Resources for Multi-Modal Dialogue Systems Goals identification of a methodology for adapting linguistic resources for.
ISO TC 37 / SC4 Language Resources An overview (Ammended 2-5 février 2002) Laurent Romary.
Scalable Metadata Definition Frameworks Raymond Plante NCSA/NVO Toward an International Virtual Observatory How do we encourage a smooth evolution of metadata.
1 MFI-5: Metamodel for Process models registration HE Keqing, WANG Chong State Key Lab. Of Software Engineering, Wuhan University
EuroRoadS for JRC Workshop Lars Wikström, Triona Editor of EuroRoadS deliverables D6.3, D6.6, D6.7.
ET-ADRS-1, April ISO 191xx series of geographic information standards.
Nicoletta Calzolari Berlin, October PWI ISO SC 4/WG 4 Lexicon-Ontology relations PWI Nicoletta Calzolari Exploratory meeting.
ENTERFACE 08 Project 2 “multimodal high-level data integration” Mid-term presentation August 19th, 2008.
©Ferenc Vajda 1 Semantic Grid Ferenc Vajda Computer and Automation Research Institute Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
Jan 9, 2004 Symposium on Best Practice LSA, Boston, MA 1 Comparability of language data and analysis Using an ontology for linguistics Scott Farrar, U.
A comprehensive framework for multimodal meaning representation Ashwani Kumar Laurent Romary Laboratoire Loria, Vandoeuvre Lès Nancy.
ISO-PWI Lexical ontology some loose remarks Thierry Declerck, DFKI GmbH.
Referring to Objects with Spoken and Haptic Modalities Frédéric LANDRAGIN Nadia BELLALEM & Laurent ROMARY LORIA Laboratory Nancy, FRANCE.
TMF - Terminological Markup Framework Laurent Romary Laboratoire LORIA (CNRS, INRIA, Universités de Nancy) ISO meeting London, 14 August 2000.
Working with Ontologies Introduction to DOGMA and related research.
Information Dynamics & Interoperability Presented at: NIT 2001 Global Digital Library Development in the New Millennium Beijing, China, May 2001, and DELOS.
The RDF meta model Basic ideas of the RDF Resource instance descriptions in the RDF format Application-specific RDF schemas Limitations of XML compared.
SEAMLESS: Demo Version 1.4 “Presenting current developments and welcoming your feedback” For contact:
Towards a roadmap for standardization in language technology Laurent Romary & Nancy Ide Loria-INRIA — Vassar College.
Formal Specification: a Roadmap Axel van Lamsweerde published on ICSE (International Conference on Software Engineering) Jing Ai 10/28/2003.
Goteborg University Dialogue Systems Lab Comments on ”A Framework for Dialogue Act Specification” 4th Workshop on Multimodal Semantic Representation January.
SemAF – Basics: Semantic annotation framework Harry Bunt Tilburg University isa -6 Joint ISO - ACL/SIGSEM workshop Oxford, January 2011 TC 37/SC.
ONION Ontologies In Ontology Community of Practice Leader
SEESCOASEESCOA SEESCOA Meeting Activities of LUC 9 May 2003.
EEL 5937 Content languages EEL 5937 Multi Agent Systems Lecture 10, Feb. 6, 2003 Lotzi Bölöni.
Understanding Naturally Conveyed Explanations of Device Behavior Michael Oltmans and Randall Davis MIT Artificial Intelligence Lab.
A Test Case Suite for Hornlog+ RuleML 1.01 A Test Case Suite for Hornlog+ RuleML 1.01 CS6795 Semantic Web Techniques Team 3: Zhenzhi Cui Radhika Yadav.
Conversational role assignment problem in multi-party dialogues Natasa Jovanovic Dennis Reidsma Rutger Rienks TKI group University of Twente.
W3C Multimodal Interaction Activities Deborah A. Dahl August 9, 2006.
Software Architecture for Multimodal Interactive Systems : Voice-enabled Graphical Notebook.
WP6 Emotion in Interaction Embodied Conversational Agents WP6 core task: describe an interactive ECA system with capabilities beyond those of present day.
Comparison of ZOOM with other Formal Methodologies Hsiu-Chien Jing SE690 Initial Presentation School of CTI, DePaul University Supervised by Dr. Jia October,
Metadata Issues in Long-term Management of Data and Metadata
SysML v2 Formalism: Requirements & Benefits
Kenneth Baclawski et. al. PSB /11/7 Sa-Im Shin
Chapter 2 Database Environment.
Session 2: Metadata and Catalogues
Semantic Markup for Semantic Web Tools:
Presentation transcript:

Towards multimodal meaning representation Harry Bunt & Laurent Romary LREC Workshop on standards for language resources Las Palmas, May 2002

Scope What should we consider as meaning? –How the processing of the input should lead to some update of the information state of the system (domain model, discourse model, user model, etc.); –This comprises both propositional content and communicative function. Such a representation: –Should support both interpretation and generation; –Should support any kind of multimodal input and output; –Should support the variety of semantic theories;

Objectives –Provide interface formats within a MM dialogue architecture Incremental construction (reference interpretation etc.) up to a final representation (e.g. fixed frame à la MUC) or system action/feedback; Should also be a basis for the definition of annotation schemes of MM semantic content. –Specification and comparison of application-specific representations Towards a framework allowing one to compare existing representations (e.g. M3L) or define a new one, while ensuring some level of interoperability between these.

What it is not A domain model representation, or an ontology –There is OIL, DAML, Topic Maps, UNL etc. A representation of lower-level linguistic or gestural information (e.g. syntax, etc.) –Some features may be percolated, though, or pointed to… A representation of the underlying processes –Focus on the output of what is done by a given module

Basic constraints Expressive and semantic adequacy –Coverage of phenomena and inferencing capacities Uniformity (representation for various types of inputs and outputs) Incrementality (usable at various stages) –Before/after fusion, semantic/pragmatic aspects Underspecification and partiality Openness and Extensibility –Compatibility with various theories and approaches –Method for designing schemas (XML or others), rather than one specific schema

Methodology Basic components –Represent the general organization of any semantic structure –Parameterized by data categories taken from a common registry application specific data categories General mechanisms –To make the thing work General categories –Descriptive categories available to all formats

Basic components (1) Temporal structures (“events”) –Dialogue turns/utterance –Gestures –Actions on/in the task Referential structures (“participants”) –Individuals and objects participating in an event Comprises spatial structures –Propositional content

Basic components (2) Restrictions (on temporal and referential structures) –E.g. Gesture types, Linguistic modifiers, Dialogue acts, etc. Dependency structures (linking events and referential structures) –E.g. Participant roles (cf. AGENT-SOURCE- GOAL), Discourse/rhetorical structure, temporal relations

General mechanisms Links –Internal links –To lower levels (syntactic structures, prosodic cues, gestural trajectories, etc.) –To domain model (types and instances) Alternatives (cf. ambiguities) –E.g. disjunction of internal links

General categories Architectural –Producer (consumer?) of the information, confidence, devices Environmental –Time stamps, spatial information (speaker’s position, graphical configurations, gestural trajectories etc.) Interactional –Speaker (user state?), other addressees etc.

Combining basic components and data categories Just to illustrate things…

Example utterance present wanttogo … sing agent In black: basic components and mechanisms (meta-model of semantic representation) In blue: parameter component chosen from reference registries Categories Values Pointer to speaker’s characteristics Peter: I want to go …

utterance <dialAct cert=“0.8”>Order <dialAct cert=“0.3”>Inform present active none wanttogo … I Pronoun sing first … Paris ProperNoun third … Nancy ProperNoun third … agent source goal I want to go from Paris to Nancy

utterance Order present active none wanttogo … gestural : designation I … here adverb there adverb co-designation I want to go from here to there

Future work SIGSEM Working group on meaning representations (ACL) –Liaison with ISO TC37/SC4 - linguistic resources Preparation of a working draft –Liaison with Isle –Liaison with SIGMedia and SIGDial –W3C/VoiceXML