2012 A-F LETTER GRADES Arizona Department of Education - Research & Evaluation Division.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Turning Point Grades Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Advertisements

1 AZ Learns Legacy Profiles vs. A-F Profiles Assessment-Dr. Heather Cruz.
Teacher Evaluation Instructional Collaboration Day #2 January 3, 2014.
NYSED Teacher Student Data Linkage (TSDL) Overview.
School Counseling and Guidance Program Intentional Guidance (Results sample)
1 Arkansas Grade Inflation Report Office of Public School Academic Accountability Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Charity Smith Assistant Commissioner.
Courtney Mills. ESEA (Formerly AYP)  Federal Accountability  August  0 – 100, A – F  One per school (includes a breakdown by grade band)  Two Components:
Department of Public Instruction Kirsten Baesler, State Superintendent 600 East Boulevard Ave., Department 201 Bismarck, ND Beth Larson-Steckler.
ANNUAL 2012 REPORT OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT DATA 1 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Indianapolis-Carmel MSA
English Language Learners in the Arizona Accountability SYSTEM
Presented by John Black and Robert Gray Arizona Department of Education WHAT TO DO WHEN A SCHOOL EARNS A “D” OR “F” UNDER THE NEW STATE LAW?
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
TEACHER-STUDENT DATA LINKAGES (TSDL) A FOLLOW-UP ON THE NEW YORK STATE DATA MODEL APPROACH FOR TEACHER/LEADER EVALUATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONAL IMPROVEMENT.
Delivering Enterprise Data to Kansas LEAs presented by Kathy Gosa Director of Information Technology Kansas State Department of Education co-presented.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Small/ASAM Schools and PI Categorical Program Director’s.
Assessing Classroom Learning. OOPS – Bluebook Assessment Strategy #1 Group Presentation on Instruction Classroom Assessment Traditional Assessment Student.
AZ Learns and A-F Letter Grades Arizona Department of Education Presentation to the NCAASE Committee ASU Washington Center, Washington D.C. March 7, 2012.
Gilbert Public Schools District Report Card 2012/2013 Presented by Brandie Harris and Barb VeNard.
Arizona Group B Teachers SLO Informational Webinar Dr. Carrie L. Giovannone Deputy Associate Superintendent of Research & Evaluation.
Texas Demographic Characteristics and Trends Joint House Redistricting Committee hearing with the House Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence.
Common Core State Standards & Current Legislation.
Commission for Environmental Cooperation of North America CEC Council Joint Public Advisory Committee June 2008 Government Conference Center Ottawa,
School Performance Index School Performance Index (SPI): A Comprehensive Measurement System for All Schools Student Achievement (e.g. PSSA) Student Progress.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
2.2 Alternating Current and Voltage
Data to Action: Results and Next Steps for the Healthy Kids Colorado Survey (HKCS) HKCS Advisory Committee Overview October 2014.
Monitoring Significant Disproportionality in Special Education Systems Performance Review & Improvement Fall Training 2011.
ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Index Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 3 of 8.
ESEA Flexibility: Gap Reduction Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 5 of 8.
1 1 DSHS | Planning, Performance and Accountability ● Research and Data Analysis Division ● FEBRUARY 2011 Substance Abuse Treatment Opportunities for Health.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1 Effect Size Lens on Local SAT and State Math Test Results.
Parent Information Night Oklahoma’s A-F School Grading System.
Mr. Gifford’s 5th Grade Math
2014 A - F Letter Grades - AIMS The State of Arizona utilizes AIMS to measure student growth. In measuring student growth, the State of Arizona then identifies.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
By Brian Patrick Federal Programs Director Whiteriver Unified School District #20 WHITERIVER UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: SEPTEMBER 12, 2012 I.ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW.
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY 14/15 Governing Board Presentation May 13, 2014 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
1.7 Composition of Functions
How to calculate relative frequency (%) Definitions Calculation Example.
Oct. 13, 2015 Flagstaff Oct. 14, 2015 Phoenix Oct. 15, 2015 Tucson Arizona Charter Schools Program: Getting Ready for the 2016 Grant Cycle 1.
Learning Growth Model Adrienne Shendler, Ashlund Haskell, and Shelby Hines.
American Indian Model Schools Organizational Chart Proposal V6 November 2015 Superintendent Woods-Cadiz.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
ESEA Flexibility: Achievement Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 4 of 8.
Do Now: ► How fast is the worlds population growing? Which country is growing at the fastest rate?
Delivering Enterprise Data to Kansas LEAs presented by Kathy Gosa Director of Information Technology Kansas State Department of Education co-presented.
ROCA REPORT CARD Presented to Institute of International Bankers March 4, 2008.
Implementation Year 2: Student Academic Progress (Rating Tables) Dr. Carrie L. Giovannone & Dr. Yating Tang Arizona Department of Education September 2013.
Novice Reduction & Non-Duplicated Gap Group
NAEP 2005 Reading and Mathematics Results. Overview of the 2005 Reading and Mathematics Assessment 1.
AZLEARNS Evaluations AZ LEARNS Evaluations.
CALCULATE THE GROWTH RATE: Birth Rate = 10 Individuals Immigration = 20 Individuals Death Rate = 15 Individuals Emigration = 5 Individuals Growth Rate.
Standards of Learning 2007 All Students Action Achievement Accountability ■■ Fairfax County Public Schools Department of Accountability Comparisons: Fairfax.
Student Growth and Performance Update: A Comparison of RttT & Non-RttT Ohio Public School Districts An Overview of Local LEA Data: Nordonia Hills City.
Arizona Framework for Teacher Effectiveness Governing Board Meeting May 1, 2012.
Operationalizing the General Assembly’s School Performance Grades (Senate Bill 795, Excellent Public Schools Act) October 2012 Superintendents’ Feedback.
WorkKeys February 19 – 21, 2013 Online
Florida Charter Schools:
Growth Models Oklahoma
Why was the NCAAAI Developed?
Student Growth and Performance Update:
-.&- ·Af& Q 0 "i'/
Unit 2 (Reading) F 2015 Unit 2 (Reading) H 2015
Project Process Gather information Set up team Plan project
THE GROWTH ENVIRONMENT.
Jeanne M. Burns, Ph.D. Louisiana Board of Regents May 22, 2013
Jeanne M. Burns, Ph.D. Louisiana Board of Regents May 22, 2013
Presentation transcript:

2012 A-F LETTER GRADES Arizona Department of Education - Research & Evaluation Division

2012 A-F Letter Grades 1733 Schools Included

Percent Passing – All Schools * *K-2 School not included Frequency of Schools

Mean Growth – All Schools * *K-2 School not included Frequency of Schools Overall Growth Points

2012 A-F Letter Grades Traditional A-F Letter Grades NumberPercent A38224 B55435 C46630 D15810 NR121 Total 1572 Small Schools A-F Letter Grades NumberPercent A125 B3315 C3415 D8237 NR6128 Total 222 K-2 A-F Letter Grades ABCDTotal Number Percent

Traditional Schools Comparison – 2011 and % 24% 36% 33% 30%12% 10%

Traditional Schools Comparison – 2011 and 2012 Total Points 2012

2012 A-F Letter Grades Alternative Schools Number A-ALT9 B-ALT37 C-ALT50 D-ALT32 NR-ALT35 Total163

2012 A-F Letter Grades

2012 A-F Letter Grades – All, Charter & Non-Charter Non-Charter(N=1288)Charter(N=284)ALL(N=1572) Non-Charter(N=89)Charter(N=133)ALL(N=222)Non-Charter(N=62)Charter(N=101)ALL(N=163) Traditional Small Schools Alternative Schools

2012 A-F Letter Grades - LEAs LEAsNumberPercent A11622 B15629 C14627 D10419 Pending143 Total536 LEAsNumberPercent A-ALT37 B-ALT1633 C-ALT2552 D-ALT48 Total48 *Please Note: LEAs with only one school - the LEA’s A-F Letter Grade is the same as their school LEAs with only Alternative schools - the LEA’s letter grade is an average of their schools’ All components of the A-F Letter Grade model (Traditional*) used for LEAs was calculated at the LEA level 1% cap applies at the LEA level for students taking AIMS A

Success Stories A School went from a ‘D’ to an ‘A’ with a 32 point increase in growth and a 20 point increase in composite points A Charter school increased 20 points in growth and had 7 point increase in composite points A high school with 100% Native American population went from a ‘D’ in 2011 to a ‘B’ in 2012 with a 20 point increase in growth and a 4 point increase in composite points 2 schools went from a ‘D’ to an ‘A’ 11 schools went from a ‘D’ to a ‘B’ 18 schools had an increase of 20+ growth points

Thank you Dr. Carrie L. Giovannone Deputy Associate Superintendent Research & Evaluation