Tomographic reconstruction of stellar wavefronts from multiple laser guide stars C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart, N. M. Milton T. Stalcup, M. Snyder, & R. Angel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geminis Future AO Program A Decade of AO Evolution at Gemini Recent AO Program Highlights Doug Simons Gemini Observatory.
Advertisements

Fast & Furious: a potential wavefront reconstructor for extreme adaptive optics at ELTs Visa Korkiakoski and Christoph U. Keller Leiden Observatory Niek.
Subaru AO in future. Outline Overview of AO systems at Mauna Kea and in the world. Ongoing plan of AOS at Subaru and Mauna Kea. What’s in future.
1 AN ALIGNMENT STRATEGY FOR THE ATST M2 Implementing a standalone correction strategy for ATST M2 Robert S. Upton NIO/AURA February 11,2005.
GLAO Workshop, Leiden; April 26 th 2005 Ground Layer Adaptive Optics, N. Hubin Ground Layer Adaptive Optics Status and strategy at ESO Norbert Hubin European.
Thomas Stalcup June 15, 2006 Laser Guidestar System Status.
Page 1 Lecture 12 Part 1: Laser Guide Stars, continued Part 2: Control Systems Intro Claire Max Astro 289, UC Santa Cruz February 14, 2013.
George Angeli 11 September, 2001 Current Concepts and Status of GSMT Control Systems.
The Project Office Perspective Antonin Bouchez 1GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov
Laser guide star adaptive optics at the Keck Observatory Adam R. Contos, Peter L. Wizinowich, Scott K. Hartman, David Le Mignant, Christopher R. Neyman,
Na- Laser guide star AO with dynamical refocus
NGAO Companion Sensitivity Performance Budget (WBS ) Rich Dekany, Ralf Flicker, Mike Liu, Chris Neyman, Bruce Macintosh NGAO meeting #6, 4/25/2007.
Aug-Nov, 2008 IAG/USP (Keith Taylor) ‏ Instrumentation Concepts Ground-based Optical Telescopes Keith Taylor (IAG/USP) Aug-Nov, 2008 Aug-Sep, 2008 IAG-USP.
Low order wavefront sensor trade study Richard Clare NGAO meeting #4 January
Optical Alignment with Computer Generated Holograms
Widening the Scope of Adaptive Optics Matthew Britton.
Keck Next Generation Adaptive Optics Team Meeting 6 1 Optical Relay and Field Rotation (WBS , ) Brian Bauman April 26, 2007.
PALM-3000 PALM-3000 Instrument Architecture Antonin Bouchez PALM-3000 Requirements Review November 12, 2007.
WFS Preliminary design phase report I V. Velur, J. Bell, A. Moore, C. Neyman Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
A Short Presentation of Ongoing AO Work at Lund Observatory Mette Owner-Petersen Lund Observatory Workshop for “Forskarskolen i Rymdteknik” Gothenburg.
Don Gavel: Keck NGAO meeting April 25, LAO Activities Relevant To Keck NGAO Donald Gavel NGAO Team Meeting 6 April 26, 2007.
Thermally Deformable Mirrors: a new Adaptive Optics scheme for Advanced Gravitational Wave Interferometers Marie Kasprzack Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur.
1 On-sky validation of LIFT on GeMS C. Plantet 1, S. Meimon 1, J.-M. Conan 1, B. Neichel 2, T. Fusco 1 1: ONERA, the French Aerospace Lab, Chatillon, France.
Adaptive Optics Nicholas Devaney GTC project, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias 1. Principles 2. Multi-conjugate 3. Performance & challenges.
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Mechanical Design Eric James.
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Subsystem Optical Designs R.A.Buchroeder.
Center for Astronomical Adaptive Optics Ground layer wavefront reconstruction using dynamically refocused Rayleigh laser beacons C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart,
Adaptive Optics with Adaptive Filtering and Control Steve Gibson Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of California, Los Angeles
Laboratory prototype for the demonstration of sodium laser guide star wavefront sensing on the E-ELT Sexten Primary School July 2015 THE OUTCOME.
A visible-light AO system for the 4.2 m SOAR telescope A. Tokovinin, B. Gregory, H. E. Schwarz, V. Terebizh, S. Thomas.
GLAO simulations at ESO European Southern Observatory
Telescopes & recent observational techniques ASTR 3010 Lecture 4 Chapters 3 & 6.
1 Manal Chebbo, Alastair Basden, Richard Myers, Nazim Bharmal, Tim Morris, Thierry Fusco, Jean-Francois Sauvage Fast E2E simulation tools and calibration.
NSF Center for Adaptive Optics UCO Lick Observatory Laboratory for Adaptive Optics Tomographic algorithm for multiconjugate adaptive optics systems Donald.
Low order modes sensing for LGS MCAO with a single NGS S. Esposito, P. M. Gori, G. Brusa Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri Italy Conf. AO4ELT June.
AO review meeting, Florence, November FLAO operating Modes Presented by: S. Esposito Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri / INAF.
FLAO system test plan in solar tower S. Esposito, G. Brusa, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
Early scientific goals for the MMT’s multi-laser-guided adaptive optics Michael Lloyd-Hart, Thomas Stalcup, Christoph Baranec, N. Mark Milton, Matt Rademacher,
1 1 st Light AO 4 LBT Pyramid WFS Adaptive Secondary MMT Unit.
February 2013 Ground Layer Adaptive Optics (GLAO) Experiment on Mauna Kea Doug Toomey.
ATLAS The LTAO module for the E-ELT Thierry Fusco ONERA / DOTA On behalf of the ATLAS consortium Advanced Tomography with Laser for AO systems.
Status report of AO188+LGS (+future AO) Yutaka Hayano (Subaru Telescope, NAOJ) S. Oya, M. Hattori, Y. Saito, Y. Minowa, M. Ito, H. Terada, T.S. Pyo, H.
Improved Tilt Sensing in an LGS-based Tomographic AO System Based on Instantaneous PSF Estimation Jean-Pierre Véran AO4ELT3, May 2013.
Ground Layer AO at ESO’s VLT Claire Max Interim Director UC Observatories September 14, 2014.
The Active Optics System S. Thomas and the AO team.
1 MCAO at CfAO meeting M. Le Louarn CfAO - UC Santa Cruz Nov
SITE PARAMETERS RELEVANT FOR HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGING Marc Sarazin European Southern Observatory.
Experimental results of tomographic reconstruction on ONERA laboratory WFAO bench A. Costille*, C. Petit*, J.-M. Conan*, T. Fusco*, C. Kulcsár**, H.-F.
Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 1 Adaptive Optics Requirements, Concepts, and Performance.
March 31, 2000SPIE CONFERENCE 4007, MUNICH1 Principles, Performance and Limitations of Multi-conjugate Adaptive Optics F.Rigaut 1, B.Ellerbroek 1 and R.Flicker.
GLAO Workshop Leiden April 2005 Remko Stuik Leiden Observatory.
Atmospheric Turbulence: r 0,  0,  0 François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz) Adaptive Optics in the.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Wavefront sensors, correctors François Wildi Observatoire de Genève.
Active Optics and Wavefront Sensing at the Upgraded 6.5-meter MMT Xiaoyin Zhu Dec 12, 2012 OPTI 521 Paper Synopsis By T.E. Pickering, etc.
Overview Science drivers AO Infrastructure at WHT GLAS technicalities Current status of development GLAS: Ground-layer Laser Adaptive optics System.
On the Evaluation of Optical Performace of Observing Instruments Y. Suematsu (National Astronomical Observatory of Japan) ABSTRACT: It is useful to represent.
Opening New Frontiers with the GMT, Seoul, October Giant Magellan Telescope How does an adaptive secondary mirror support the unique qualities of.
The Self-Coherent Camera: a focal plane wavefront sensor for EPICS
Comète axe 2 - TC1 : RSA n°2 - SPART/S t Cloud Workshop Leiden 2005 Performance of wave-front measurement concepts for GLAO M. NICOLLE 1, T. FUSCO.
Fundamentals of adaptive optics and wavefront reconstruction Marcos van Dam Institute for Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Lawrence Livermore National.
AO4ELT, Paris A Split LGS/NGS Atmospheric Tomography for MCAO and MOAO on ELTs Luc Gilles and Brent Ellerbroek Thirty Meter Telescope Observatory.
Robo-AO Overview: System, capabilities, performance Christoph Baranec (PI)
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes Center for Adaptive Optics.
Gemini AO Program March 31, 2000Ellerbroek/Rigaut [ ]1 Scaling Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics Performance Estimates to Extremely Large Telescopes.
Lecture 14 AO System Optimization
Pyramid sensors for AO and co-phasing
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
NGAO Trade Study GLAO for non-NGAO instruments
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Presentation transcript:

Tomographic reconstruction of stellar wavefronts from multiple laser guide stars C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart, N. M. Milton T. Stalcup, M. Snyder, & R. Angel MMT Science Symposium, June 2006 Center for Astronomical Adaptive Optics Steward Observatory, The University of Arizona Image courtesy Gabor Furesz

Tomography - Introduction Atmospheric tomography is the measurement of the three dimensional structure of turbulence in the atmosphere. Accomplished by measuring the integrated wavefront aberration from multiple probes, either stars or artificially generated laser beacons. The integrated wavefront distortion along any line of sight contained by the beacons can be calculated. When using LGS as probes and a single deformable mirror (DM) to correct for a single line of sight is known as laser tomography adaptive optics (LTAO) In contrast to our previous studies of simple ground layer AO (GLAO) where the beacon signals are averaged to get an estimate of ground layer turbulence which leads to improved seeing over large, 2+ arcminute, fields.

Tomography at the MMT We have deployed a five beacon Rayleigh laser guide star (RLGS) source at the MMT to test ground layer and tomographic reconstruction of atmospheric turbulence. Multi-laser wavefront sensing has been chosen as the baseline for GMT, and the technology needs to be tested. Development of a competitive LGS AO system at the MMT which can support the current and future suite of AO instruments. Switched from a prototype to a facility instrument at the beginning of On sky this past April. Intend to close the AO loop around LGS measurements in the fall. Here, I present our system and first results of open loop tomographic adaptive optics at the MMT.

Prototype WFS Instrument Wavefront Sensor (WFS) Instrument mounts to MMT Cassegrain focus. Three cameras run simultaneously. RLGS WFS: Multiple laser guide star Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor. Hexapolar geometry, breaks pupil into 36 or 60 subapertures. Uses a range gated Lincoln Labs CCID18 chip. Dynamic refocus system removes the focus term from each pulse of the RLGS over its range gate from 20 – 29 km NGS WFS: Optical clone of the MMT-AO NGS WFS camera with an E2V CCD39. Pupil broken into 12x12 subapertures of which 108 are illuminated. Sensor on translation slide, to allow exploration of field in one axis. Wide Field Tilt Sensor: 2.5 arcminute field, measures image motion of all stars within field RLGS WFS NGS WFS Tilt Sensor

New Facility WFS Instrument Facility Wavefront Sensor Instrument mounts to MMT Cassegrain focus. Mounts all current and future AO instruments to underside of WFS Instrument in the same way as with the MMT’s NGS AO system. RLGS WFS: Same design transferred from prototype instrument. NGS WFS: Clone of current MMT NGS AO system. Field steering mirror to give larger 2 arcminute diameter field. Single Star Tilt Sensor: Standard CCD57, looking into upgrading to APD’s. Same 2 arcminute field as NGS WFS Variable beam splitter between NGS WFS and Tilt Sensor Limiting magnitude V=16 at 200 fps

WFS Instrument

Improvement in LGS WFS 50 fps 36 subapertures Defective CCD fps 60 subapertures New CCD 200 fps 60 subapertures June 2005September 2004April 2006

Improvement in LGS WFS

Atmospheric Parameters During our runs, able to collect information about atmospheric parameters at the MMT site, Mt. Hopkins, AZ. Estimated height of ground layer by estimating θ 0gl from single beacon correction of NGS at different separations and relating them through equation (Hardy 1998): h g = 380m (Sept 2004) h g = 530m (June 2005) Joint estimation of r 0 and L 0 * (at λ = 500 nm): June 2005 r 0 = cm, L 0 = m with mean 19 m April 2006 (limited data so far) r 0 = cm, L 0 = 13.5 to 27 m *formal method developed by F. Chassat (dissertaton 1992)

Wavefront Reconstruction Wavefront reconstruction of the laser beacons and the ground truth natural star: RLGS wavefront reconstruction by inversion of synthetic influence matrix of Zernike modes on our geometry of Shack-Hartmann pattern. NGS wavefront reconstruction by using the same reconstructor matrix as used in the closed-loop MMT NGS AO system. The NGS WFS is optically the same, so we can use the same reconstructor. Stellar tilt measurements made from image motion off of wide field tilt camera. GLAO estimates based on simple average of LGS reconstructed wavefronts.

Tomographic Reconstruction Tomographic reconstruction assumes linear relation between LGS and NGS wavefronts: For each i th set of simultaneous wavefront measurements, â i is an estimate of NGS zernike coefficients, b i are the measured LGS zernike coefficients and tilt measurements of field stars, and T is the tomographic reconstructor. We derive T by a direct inversion of the data using singular value decomposition (SVD). T is given by: Where B is constructed from ~3000 data vectors b, and inverted with SVD to give B -1. A is constructed from the corresponding vectors a.

Tomographic Reconstruction Camera Data:NGSTilt SensorLGS Reconstructed Wavefronts: NGS Tomographic Estimate Individual Beacons

GLAO vs. Tomography Example of GLAO vs. Tomography in tracking Zernike mode Defocus (Dashed Blue) NGS ground truth, (Sold Black) LGS Estimate

Residual RMS after correction Example of RMS residual wavefront error after GLAO and LTAO correction RMS residuals over Zernike orders 2 through 8 for nine separate 60 second data sets Seeing conditions: r 0 = 13 – 22 cm L 0 = 12 – 25 m

April 2006 Results June 2005 Uncorrected: 511 nm GLAO Residual: 360 nm Tomographic Residual: 259 nm (single tilt star) Tomographic Residual: 243 nm (3 field tilt stars) April 2006 Uncorrected: 395 nm GLAO Residual: 277 nm Tomographic Residual: 157 nm (single tilt star) *Fitting error on LGS WFS geometry: ~130 nm

Simulated PSFs BandUncorrectedGLAOLTAODiffraction Limit J H K Uncorrected FWHM (arcseconds) GLAOLTAO 60 s exposures with simulated turbulence up to Zernike order 100 Real time images at 50 fps with simulated turbulence up to Zernike order 30 Simulated K-band PSFs using recorded wavefront information from Zernike orders 1 through 8

Future Work Prepare system for closed loop operation in GLAO mode Fall ’06. Characterize system, analyze actual performance using J H K imager PISCES at 0.027”/pixel plate scale. Further analysis on optimal tomographic reconstructors Start science program Build new 4 arcminute field 4Kx4K GLAO NIR camera

Conclusion What we have learned about multi laser wavefront sensing at the MMT: Our new facility WFS Instrument is continually improving in throughput and optical alignment. MMT site has good seeing characteristics. Able to demonstrate in open loop LTAO techniques. The residual RMS stellar wavefront aberration after GLAO and LTAO correction is constant in time, over a range of atmospheric conditions. This correction useful into J H and K bands.