The European Forest and Agricultural Sector Optimization Model Uwe A. Schneider (Land Use Economics) Contributors Christine Schleupner (Wetland Geography)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INSEA Integrated Sink Enhancement Assessment Sixth Framework Programme Vladimir Stolbovoy, JRC Web:
Advertisements

Meeting of Heads of National Forest Research Institutes Brussels 12 November 2004 Future research issues in the European context Risto Päivinen European.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop March 22 – 24, 2011 Kyiv, Ukraine.
Towards More Sustainable and Market-based Payment for Ecosystem Services A Pilot Project in Lijiang, China Lu Zhi.
Introduction to IMPACT. Models Models are logical constructs that represent systems Models can: – Simplify a complex system – Provide insights to the.
Natural capital, ecosystem services and the UK dairy industry Les Firbank Firbank Ecosystems Ltd & University of Leeds.
Enough for all? Bernd Möller, Ph.D. Sustainable Energy Planning & Management Group Department of Development and Planning Aalborg University, Denmark Biomass.
Arno Becker Institute for Food and Resource Economics (ILR), University of Bonn ImpactsMarket development Policy measures Policy objectives Leading to.
Topics 1.FASOM Basics 2.FASOM Equations 3.Analyzing FASOM 4.Modifying FASOM.
Building Sustainable Agriculture and Food Systems in Europe and globally – A critical review of the Common Agriculture Policy and proposals for change.
The Global Forest and Agricultural Sector Optimization Model Uwe A. Schneider Christine Schleupner Kerstin Jantke Erwin Schmid Michael Obersteiner Energy.
European Non-Food Agriculture ENFA FP6 Scientific Support to Policies (SSP 3)
FNU Seminar 15 November 2006 Land-use option conservation: Habitat requirements for wetland species in Europe Kerstin Jantke Research Unit Sustainability.
Integrated Assessment of Sustainability =Economic analysis +Non-market analysis.
Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues.
Modelling sustainable management of the Murray- Darling Basin John Quiggin Risk and Sustainable Management Group Schools of Economics and Political Science,
“And see this ring right here, Jimmy?... That’s another time the old fellow miraculously survived some big forest fire.” ENFA/INSEA FORESTRY…..
Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change Economic Potential of Wetland Habitats in Europe Yvonne Scheidegger Uwe A. Schneider.
The European Forest and Agricultural Sector Optimization Model (EUFASOM) Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainabilty and Global Change Hamburg University.
1 Forestry Program Ϊ Ϊ Ϊ Ϊ Ϊ I N S E A 1 I N T E G R A T E D S I N K E N H A N C E M E N T A S S E S S M E N T INSEA PARTNERS Uwe Schneider Dagmar Schwab.
ENFA Model ENFA Kick-off Meeting Hamburg, 10 May 2005.
SGM P.R. Shukla. Second Generation Model Top-Down Economic Models  Project baseline carbon emissions over time for a country or group of countries 
Lake Drukšiai/Drisviaty basin Institute of Ecology of Vilnius University.
I N T E G R A T E D S I N K E N H A N C E M E N T A S S E S S M E N T INSEA PARTNERS Forest production and carbon storage -potentials of European forestry.
European Policy for Food Safety Research and Horizon 2020
European Non-Food Agriculture Introduction Uwe Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change Hamburg University 23 April 2008.
How to value ecosystem goods and services in agriculture at increasing land use pressure ? Katarina Hedlund Lund university, Sweden.
Socio-Economic Modeling for Large-scale Quantitative Climate Change Analysis Group “B6” Summary Presented by Ian Foster.
1 IFPRI-IPC SEMINAR A POST-BALI FOOD SECURITY AGENDA GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURAL NATURAL RESOURCES. ROLE AND VIEWS OF ARGENTINA, BRAZIL, PARAGUAY.
What are the opportunities for an organic sector to develop on a large scale in Myanmar? Nyan Lin Shan Maw Myae Co.,Ltd.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Importance and Uses of Agricultural Statistics Section A 1.
Tradeoff Analysis: From Science to Policy John M. Antle Department of Ag Econ & Econ Montana State University.
Inclusion of the agricultural sector in greenhouse gas mitigation policies Problems and potential instruments Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability.
Common Agricultural Policy - FoEE FoEE meeting Monor May 2009 o Europe is a big player o CAP is at the heart of EU food system o What is FoEE going to.
Liberalization of Trade in Biofuels: Implications for GHG Emissions and Social Welfare Xiaoguang Chen Madhu Khanna Hayri Önal University of Illinois at.
Soil carbon in dynamic land use optimization models Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change Hamburg University.
European Carbon Sinks Modeling Status, Data, Analytical Gaps, EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change Hamburg University.
Econometric Estimation of The National Carbon Sequestration Supply Function Ruben N. Lubowski USDA Economic Research Service Andrew J. Plantinga Oregon.
Investment in Sustainable Natural Resource Management (focus: Agriculture) increases in agricultural productivity have come in part at the expense of deterioration.
Overview of Economic Methods to Simulate Land Competition Forestry and Agriculture Greenhouse Gas Modeling Forum National Conservation Training Center.
Biofuels, Food Security and Environmental Sustainability: Global Challenges and Opportunities Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte The Politics of Food Conference.
Agriculture’s Role in Climate Change Mitigation July 18, 2007 (revised) Daniel A. Lashof, Ph.D. Science Director Climate Center Natural Resources Defense.
The Role of Biofuels in the Transformation of Agriculture Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte and Chad M. Hellwinckel The Economics of Alternative Energy Sources.
USDA Role in Supporting Decisions on Climate Change William Hohenstein Global Change Program Office January 10, 2005.
Social Welfare and Environmental Degradation Tradeoffs in Agriculture: The Case of Ecuador Eduardo Segarra, Professor Department of Agricultural and Applied.
How to value ecosystem goods and services in agriculture at increasing land use pressure ? Katarina Hedlund Lund university, Sweden.
Impacts of Agricultural Adaptation to Climate Policies Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University Contributors.
Defra Bioenergy Crops R&D Programme Bruno Viegas Sustainable Farming and Food Science Division.
Wetlands By: Gus Naughton. What are wetlands? A wetland is an area of land whose soil is saturated with moisture either permanently or seasonally. Such.
Office of International Research, Education, and Development, Virginia Tech Economic and Impact Analysis of Conservation Agriculture Practices Mike Bertelsen,
Collaborative CGIAR-ESSP Project Outline (1) "Pressures on agriculture from climate change mitigation" Motivation Ambitious climate protection goals: e.g.
COMPETITIVE ECONOMIC POTENTIALS of NON-FOOD OPTIONS International Food Security Impacts of European Non-Food Options Chris Llull a, Uwe A. Schneider a,b,
Economic Assessment of GHG Mitigation Strategies for Canadian Agriculture: Role of market mechanisms for soil sinks Presentation to GHG Modeling Forum.
Forest restoration in Brazil Rebecca Mant, Senior Programme Officer, UNEP-WCMC and the REDD-PAC team.
Assessing future impacts of land use policies in Brazil.
Land use in the coming decades Science, Policy and Economics Uwe A. Schneider Sustainability and Global Change Research Unit, Hamburg University.
EUFASOM – Inputs, Outputs, Linkage Options CCTAME – Kick-Off Meeting Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University.
Phase 2 Research Questions Theme 1: Nutrition, food safety and value addition 1)Which combinations of technology packages can reduce household vulnerability.
Modeling the Impacts of Forest Carbon Sequestration on Biodiversity Andrew J. Plantinga Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics Oregon State.
Network for Certification and Conservation of Forests.
What are the key issues around land use & what are the trade-offs between food security and GHG mitigation objectives on the land? Pete Smith ClimateXChange.
The Role of Ecoagriculture in Meeting Food Security Challenges Sara J. Scherr Director, Ecoagriculture Partners ABCG Workshop, Washington, D.C. October.
Mitigation The potential to use protected areas in carbon storage and capture.
Ecosystem Services and Management
Bioenergy Supply, Land Use, and Environmental Implications
Applying an agroecosystem model to inform integrated assessments of climate change mitigation opportunities AM Thomson, RC Izaurralde, GP Kyle, X Zhang,
Mapping and assessment of ecosystem and their services
A three steps assessment
Landscape management for resilient value chains
Presentation transcript:

The European Forest and Agricultural Sector Optimization Model Uwe A. Schneider (Land Use Economics) Contributors Christine Schleupner (Wetland Geography) Kerstin Jantke (Wetland Biology) Erwin Schmid (Crop Simulation) C. Ivie Ramos (Bioenergy Options) FOREST SECTOR MODELING STATE-OF-THE-ART AND FUTURE CHALLENGES IN AN EXPANDING GLOBAL MARKETPLACE November 17-20, 2008 Seattle, Washington, USA

EUFASOM Characteristics Partial Equilibrium, Bottom-Up Model Maximizes sum of consumer and producer surplus Constrained by resource endowments, technologies, policies Spatially explicit, discrete dynamic Integrates environmental effects Programmed in GAMS, Solved as LP

Food Timber Fiber Bioenergy Biomaterial Carbon Sinks Land use competition Nature Reserves Sealed Land

EUFASOM Structure Resources Land Use Technologies Processing Technologies ProductsMarkets Inputs Limits Supply Functions Limits Demand Functions, Trade Limits Environmental Impacts

Economic Surplus Maximization Market Equilibrium Forest InventoryLand Supply Water Supply Labor Supply National Inputs Import Supply Processing Demand Feed Demand Domestic Demand Export Demand CS PS

EUFASOM Modeling System EUFASOM Crop & Tree Simulation Models Spatial Analysis Tools Farm level & GIS Data Viable Population Analysis Systematic Wetland Conservation Planning Engineering Equations Other Economic Models Climate Models

Novel Features Biodiversity (Wetlands) Markov Chains (against curse of dimensionality)

Wetland Biodiversity Physical Wetland Potentials Species Conservation Targets Systematic Conservation Planning EUFASOM Reserve Locations Land Prices

Physical Wetland Potentials Physical Wetland Potentials Spatial Analysis of Wetlands

Peatland (Fens, Bogs) Wetforests Marshes, Reeds, Sedges Open Waters

Existing Wetlands Potential Wetlands Open Waters

Systematic Conservation Planning Systematic Conservation Planning Viable Population Analysis

8 69VertebrateWetlandSpecies Biodiversity Scope

Mammals 1.Castor fiber Eurasian BeaverEuropäischer Biber 2.Galemys pyrenaicusPyrenean DesmanPyrenäen-Desman 3.Lutra lutraEuropean OtterFischotter 4.Microtus cabreraeCabrera's VoleCabreramaus 5.Microtus oec. arenicolaDutch Root VoleNiederländische Wühlmaus 6.Microtus oec. mehelyiPannonian Root VoleUngarische Wühlmaus 7.Mustela lutreolaEuropean MinkEuropäischer Nerz 8.Myotis capacciniiLong-fingered BatLangfußfledermaus 9.Myotis dasycnemePond BatTeichfledermaus Reptiles 1.Elaphe quatuorlineataFour-lined SnakeVierstreifennatter 2.Emys orbicularisEuropean Pond TortoiseEuropäische Sumpfschildkröte 3.Mauremys caspicaStripe Necked TerrapinKaspische Wasserschildkröte 4.Mauremys leprosaSpanish TerrapinSpanische Wasserschildkröte Amphibians 1.Alytes muletensis Mallorcan Midwife ToadBalearen-Geburtshelferkröte 2.Bombina bombina Fire-Bellied ToadRotbauchunke 3.Bombina variegata Yellow-Bellied ToadGelbbauchunke 4.Chioglossa lusitanica Golden-striped SalamanderGoldstreifensalamander 5.Discoglossus galganoi Iberian Painted Frog Iberian painted frog 6.Discoglossus montalentii Corsican Painted Frog Korsischer Scheibenzüngler 7.Discoglossus sardus Tyrrhenian Painted Frog Sardischer Scheibenzüngler 8.Pelobates f. insubricus Common Spadefoot Italienische Knoblauchkröte 9.Rana latastei Italian Agile Frog Italienischer Springfrosch 10.Salamandrina terdigitata Spectacled Salamander Brillensalamander 11.Triturus carnifex Italian Crested Newt Alpen-Kammolch 12.Triturus cristatus Great Crested NewtKammolch 13.Triturus dobrogicus Danube Crested Newt Donau-Kammolch 14.Triturus karelini Southern Crested Newt Balkankammmolch 15.Triturus montandoni Carpathian Newt Karpatenmolch Birds 1.Acrocephalus paludicolaAquatic WarblerSeggenrohrsänger 2.Alcedo atthisKingfisherEisvogel 3.Anser erythropusLesser White-fronted GooseZwerggans 4.Aquila chrysaetosGolden EagleSteinadler 5.Aquila clangaSpotted EagleSchelladler 6.Ardea purpurea purpureaPurple HeronPurpurreiher 7.Ardeola ralloidesSquacco HeronRallenreiher 8.Asio flammeusShort-eared OwlSumpfohreule 9.Aythya nyrocaFerruginous DuckMoorente 10.Botaurus stellaris stellarisBitternRohrdommel 11.Chlidonias hybridusWhiskered TernWeißbartseeschwalbe 12.Chlidonias nigerBlack TernTrauerseeschwalbe 13.Ciconia ciconiaWhite StorkWeißstorch 14.Ciconia nigraBlack StorkSchwarzstorch 15.Crex crexCorncrakeWachtelkönig 16.Fulica cristataCrested CootKammbläßhuhn 17.Gavia arctica Black-throated DiverPrachttaucher 18.Gelochelidon niloticaGull-billed TernLachseeschwalbe 19.Glareola pratincolaCollared PratincoleBrachschwalbe 20.Grus grusCraneKranich 21.Haliaeetus albicillaWhite-tailed EagleSeeadler 22.Hoplopterus spinosusSpur-winged PloverSpornkiebitz 23.Ixobrychus m. minutusLittle BitternZwergdommel 24.Marmaronetta angustrostrisMarbled TealMarmelente 25.Milvus migransBlack KiteSchwarzmilan 26.Nycticorax nycticoraxNight HeronNachtreiher 27.Oxyura leucocephalaWhite-headed DuckWeißkopf-Ruderente 28.Pandion haliaetusOspreyFischadler 29.Pelecanus crispusDalmatian PelicanKrauskopfpelikan 30.Pelecanus onocrotalusWhite PelicanRosapelikan 31.Phalacrocorax pygmaeusPygmy CormorantZwergscharbe 32.Philomachus pugnaxRuffKampfläufer 33.Platalea leucorodiaSpoonbillLöffler 34.Plegadis falcinellusGlossy IbisBraunsichler 35.Porphyrio porphyrioPurple GallinulePurpurhuhn 36.Porzana parva parvaLittle CrakeKleines Sumpfhuhn 37.Porzana porzanaSpotted CrakeTüpfelsumpfhuhn 38.Porzana pusillaBaillon´s CrakeZwergsumpfhuhn 39.Sterna albifronsLittle TernZwergseeschwalbe 40.Tadorna ferrugineaRuddy ShelduckRostgans 41.Tringa glareolaWood SandpiperBruchwasserläufer

2016 cells25 countries6 biogeo-regions Biodiversity - Spatial Resolution

Species – Habitat Mapping

Mixed Integer Programming threshold 0 area population

Aquila Clanga Aquila Clanga Representation Maximum

Systematic Conservation 10 representations of each species (n Species =72) 151 cells selected (n Cells =2016)

Area in million hectares Representation Minimum Mires (Peat lands) Wet Forest Wet Grass Water Course Water Bodies All Wetland

Million Euro per year Representation Minimum Area Minimization (Endogenous Land Prices) Area Minimization (Exogenous Land Prices) Cost Minimization (Endogenous Land Prices) Cost Minimization (Exogenous Land Prices)

Regional Location of Wetlands land area constant land costs increasing land costs Scandinavia Central Europe Western Europe Eastern Europe Southern Europe

Curses of Dimensionality Soil Carbon Dynamics

Soil Organic Carbon (tC/ha/20cm) Time (years) Wheat-Lucerne 3/3 Wheat-Lucerne 6/3 No-till wheat-fallow Tilled wheat-fallow

Curse of Dimensionality? 20 species 5 management options per species 10 regions 5 soil types per region 5,000 land use alternatives

Curse of Dimensionality? 20 species 5 management options per species 10 regions 5 soil types per region 20 periods 5*E41 Trajectories

Soil Carbon Transition Probabilities SOC1SOC2SOC3SOC4SOC5SOC6SOC7SOC8 SOC SOC21 SOC SOC SOC50.5 SOC SOC71 SOC No-till wheat-Fallow

Markov Process Indexes: t = time, u = management, o,ố = soil carbon state

Time (years) Wheat-Lucerne 3/3 Wheat-Lucerne 6/3 No-till wheat-fallow Tilled wheat-fallow Soil Organic Carbon (tC/ha/20cm)

Time (years) Wheat-Lucerne 3/3 Wheat-Lucerne 6/3 No-till wheat-fallow Tilled wheat-fallow

Extensions? Markov chains are applicable to relatively independent environmental qualities (tree density, humus, salt, contamination) Method not suitable for complex environmental properties (climate)

Conclusions Today’s solution – tomorrow’s problem? EUFASOM aims at integrated assessments of food, climate, biodiversity, and water issues from land use Computing power and model integration offer new opportunities – what about validation?

References Schneider, U.A. “Soil organic carbon changes in dynamic land use decision models” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 119 (2007) 359–367 Cowie, A., U.A. Schneider and L. Montanarella (2007). Potential synergies between existing multilateral environmental agreements in the implementation of Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry activities. Environmental Science & Policy 10(4): Schneider U.A., J. Balkovic, S. De Cara, O. Franklin, S. Fritz, P. Havlik, I. Huck, K. Jantke, A.M.I. Kallio, F. Kraxner, A. Moiseyev, M. Obersteiner, C.I. Ramos, C. Schleupner, E. Schmid, D. Schwab, R. Skalsky (2008), “The European Forest and Agricultural Sector Optimization Model – EUFASOM”, FNU-156, Hamburg University and Centre for Marine and Atmospheric Science, Hamburg. Schleupner, C. Estimation of Spatial Wetland Distribution Potentials in Europe. FNU Hamburg, Hamburg University and Centre for Marine and Atmospheric Science.