Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden A Community Initiative concerning Transnational co-operation on spatial.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III B Neighbourhood Programme
Advertisements

Neighbourhood programme
INTERREG III B, PHARE CBC and TACIS CBC Programme -Combination of EU instruments for transnational co- operation in the BSR CEEC\NIS participation in BSR.
Second Partner Search Forum (PSF) in Tromsö 7-8 June 2002 Bo Löwendahl, BSR Joint Secretariat, Karlskrona Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia.
Financial means in BSR INTERREG III B & IIIA The basics all stakeholders should know about the financial management in BSR INTERREG III B and IIIA Belarus.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Transnationality and locally implemented pilot actions in the BSR.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden QUICK & EASY Money for the Reports - How funds and information flow.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden INTERREG III B General Introduction BSR INTERREG III B Joint Secretariat.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Progress report – structure and contents BSR INTERREG III B Joint.
1 Report on the Implementation of the EUSBSR Anders Lindholm European Commission Directorate General for Regional Policy.
EuropeAid European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument Cross Border Co-operation within the Baltic Sea Region Programme Hamburg, May 2007 Martin.
MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND FINANCE SEC. GEN. OF INVESTMENTS AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGING AUTHORITY CIP Interreg Interregioanal Cooperation in INTERREG III Programmes.
Estonia-Latvia-Russia Cross Border Cooperation Programme Unda Ozoliņa Head of the Joint Technical Secretariat Launching Conference Riga, July 14, 2010.
Ministry of sea, tourism, transport and development Department for cross border, interregional and transnational cooperation Darko Stilinović, Head of.
A Community Initiative on Transnational co-operation on spatial planning and regional development Mattias ALISCH Joint Secretariat Belarus Denmark Estonia.
Virtual University Initiatives and Challenges in the Baltic Sea Area April 7, 2005 Eija Ristimäki Head of Communications FVU Service Unit Baltic IT&T 2005.
Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III Strand A Christine Kassl-Hamza Silbergasse 25/ Wien Tel: +43 (0) Fax:
Current and future cooperation opportunities in CENTRAL EUROPE GovernEE Final Event, Hódmezővásárhely, 3 July 2013 Viera Slavikova, JTS CENTRAL EUROPE.
Latvia–Lithuania Cross Border Cooperation Programme 2007–2013 WORKSHOP “How to prepare good application?” Joint Technical Secretariat 3rd.
ICZM in Europe Anne Burrill
Part-financed by the European Union The new Baltic Sea Region Programme Susanne Scherrer, Director of the Joint Secretariat Rostock/Riga.
Baltic Sea Region (BSR) Transnational Programme (Interreg IVB) and its strategic projects BaltMet Inno Brainstorming Workshop, 7 November 2007,
EU funds for South East Europe: IPA II Cross-border Cooperation Programme BULGARIA-SERBIA Sofia, 2015.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden 4. Implementation of the BSR INTERREG IIIB Neighbourhood Programme.
Part-financed by the European Union Promoting attractive and competitive cities and regions Arve Skjerpen, Norway Member of the BSR INTERREG IIIB Steering.
Towards an integrated transport system in the Baltic Sea Region Project presentation at the TransBaltic foresight debate, Stockholm, 18 May 2010 Wiktor.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND INTERREG IIC Community Initiative concerning Transnational Co-operation on Spatial Planning
Part-financed by the European Union The Baltic Sea Region Programme by the Joint Technical Secretariat BSR INTERREG III B Neighbourhood Programme.
Contribution of the Territorial Cooperation Programmes to the EU Strategy for the Danube Region Kiril Geratliev, Director General “Territorial Cooperation.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Updated implementation strategy for the remaining Programme period.
THE PARTNERSHIP ELIGIBILITY OF PARTNERS LEGAL AND GENERAL ASPECTS by Desislava Yordanova.
Interreg III B for the Baltic Sea Region ( ) Interreg IIC/IIIB BSR Secretariat/W.Görmar, October 2001.
The Future of Transnational Cooperation in Central Europe ( ) Claudia Pamperl JTS INTERRREG IIIC East.
EUROPEAN STUCTURAL FUNDS Esben Poulsen, European Commission Head of the INTERREG Unit Directorate General for Regional Policy INTERREG IIIB Partner Search.
European Territorial Cooperation SAWP meeting, 9 July
Joint Programme for Cross-border Co-operation between Southern Finland Coastal Zone and Estonia in
Third PSF in Gdansk, June 2003 WORKSHOP INFORMATION Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Joint Secretariat,
1 European Territorial Cooperation in legislative proposals Peter Berkowitz Head of Unit Conception, forward studies, impact assessment, DG Regional Policy.
Transnational cooperation in North-West Europe today: a first appraisal Joint Technical Secretariat.
Part-financed by the European Union Baltic Sea Region programme 2007 – 2013 by Joint Secretariat.
Part-financed by the European Union Baltic Sea Region 2007– Profile Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Applicant Seminar, Riga, 9-11 April 2008.
Financing possibilities for implementation of the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region 21 September 2011 | Riga, Latvia.
Part-financed by the European Union Partnership Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Applicant Seminar for 1st application round Hamburg, April 2008.
Part-financed by the European Union Setting regions in motion by Giedrė Švedienė, Undersecretary Joint Programming Committee/Ministry of the Interior,
Russian National Sub-Committee BSR Interreg III B Neighbourhood Programme Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III B Neighbourhood Programme: Russian Perspective.
MANAGEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PROJECTS: BEST PRACTICES COOPERATING IN SOUTH WEST EUROPE 12th of October 2005.
KALININGRAD : A RUSSIAN REGION, A EUROPEAN OPPORTUNITY Regional Economic Development Agency Kaliningrad: a Russian region, an European opportunity by Alexey.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden The Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III B Programme After EU Enlargement.
Application procedure From theory to practice Dieter H. Henzler, Steinbeis-Transfercenter Cultural Resources Management, Berlin.
UBC Environment and Sustainable Development Secretariat,/Sakari Saarinen / Project Coordinator / NEW BRIDGES Kick-off 4-5 March 2009 New Bridges – Strengthening.
INTERREG IIIB project „RAIL BALTICA” Final Conference 10 January 2008 RAIL BALTICA.
The EGTC, a suitable instrument for Article 37(6)b? Background and main questions 17 March 2011 | Paris.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
Pre-accession funds for regional development Ieva Vērzemniece Ministry of Regional development and local governments.
IONAS Kick off meeting 2-3 July, Ancona Willy Sigl.
20 YEARS OF COOPERATION IN THE BALTIC SEA REGION: Participation of Saint-Petersburg in the development and implementation of programs and projects Saint-Petersburg.
PRESENTATION OF EUROPEAN TERRITORIAL COOPERATION OBJECTIVE PROGRAMMES FOR – POTENTIAL FOR COOPERATION Gediminas ČESONIS Deputy Director of Regional.
INTERREG II C Baltic Sea Region Supporting Spatial Planning in the BSR Workshop on Environmental Information in the Baltic Sea Region Hamburg
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden BALTIC SEA TRANSNATIONAL COOPERATION: RU PERSPECTIVE Irina Karelina.
Interreg IIIB Tacis Phare
INTERREG-IIIB CADSES Neighbourhood Program: a general overview
ESPON post 2013 Programme Kristīne Rasiņa
South-East European Space
Cross Border Cooperation under ENPI
Regional and Bilateral cooperation instruments
TRANSNATIONAL COOPERATION:
Interreg IIIC Cohesion Forum
Cohesion Forum Brussels, May 2001
Presentation transcript:

Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden A Community Initiative concerning Transnational co-operation on spatial planning and regional development

Content of the presentation 1.Programme area 2.Programme thematic content 3.Programme management 4.Programme budget 5.Project partnership and management 6.Project budget 7.Next call for applications

INTERREG III B programmes Alpine SpaceBaltic Sea RegionNorth Sea Region Atlantic Area Archimed South West Europe North West Europe Westers Mediterranean CADSESNorthern Periphery Most remote regions (3 programmes) Transnational cooperation on spatial planning and regional development

Cooperation area:  Denmark  Sweden  Finland  Germany (North – East)  Estonia  Lithuania  Latvia  Poland  Norway  Belarus (North – West)  Russia (North – West & Kaliningrad)

Strategic objective: Strengthening economic, social and spatial cohesion by promoting transnational economic relationships in order to reach an increased level of BSR integration and to form a region with sustainable growth prospects.

Priority 1: Promotion of spatial development approaches and actions for specific territories and sectors Priority 2: Promotion of territorial structures supporting sustainable BSR development Priority 3: Transnational and bilateral institution and capacity building in the Baltic Sea Region Programme priorities

Priority 4 – border regions (committed) Priority 5: Cross-border (INTERREG III A) priority Estonia-Latvia-Russia (North) Priority 6: Cross-border (INTERREG III A) priority Latvia-Lithuania-Belarus (South) Priority 7: Technical Assistance Programme priorities

Priority 1: Promotion of spatial development approaches and actions for specific territories and sectors Measure 1.1: Supporting joint strategies and implementation actions for macro-regions Measure 1.2: Promoting sustainable spatial development of specific sectors Measure 1.3: Strengthening integrated development of coastal zones, islands and other specific areas Measures in Priority 1

Priority 2: Promotion of territorial structures supporting sustainable BSR development Measure 2.1: Promoting balanced polycentric settlement structures Measure 2.2: Creating sustainable communication links for improved spatial integration Measure 2.3: Enhancing good management of cultural and natural heritage and of natural resources Measures in Priority 2

Priority 3: Transnational and bilateral institution and capacity building in the Baltic Sea Region Measure 3.1: Promotion of transnational institution and capacity building Measure 3.2: Bilateral maritime cooperation across the Baltic Sea Measures in Priority 3

 Transnational studies and strategies  Preparation of investments  Transnational exchange of experience  Training of professional staff  Workshops, seminars, networking, etc. Examples of eligible activities:

.... Monitoring Committee Steering Committee Municipalities & Regions National Sub-committees SFINDEDKN Supervising the programme Information and support Investitionsbank Schleswig-Holstein Joint Secretariat Selection of projects and funding decisions Paying Authority Managing Authority PLLTLVESTRU BSR INTERREG III B management structure BY Project’s Lead Partner Project Partner day to day programme management

Programme funding ERDF funds:149.0 M EURO* Norwegian national: 6.0 M EURO Total programme funding: M EURO All ERDF available for III B priorities was committed in 1-8 rounds *including the additional funding from the new MS and IIIA priorities

Partnership (minimum requirements) partners from three different countries two countries should be financial contributors one partner from EU

The Lead Partner Principle (example)

full financial and legal responsibility for: project management system submitting Application Form signing the Subsidy Contract reporting of the project progress requesting payments Lead Partner Principle

17 National, regional and local public authorities Public equivalent bodies Public equivalent body means any legal body:  governed by public or private law  established for the specific purpose of meeting needs of the general interest,  not having an industrial or commercial character only,  having legal personality, Who can be a project partner?

Who can be a Lead Partner? In addition a LP’s institution should:  Be financed, for the most part, by the State, or regional or local authorities, or other bodies governed by public law,  Or be subject to management supervision by those bodies,  Or have an administrative, managerial or supervisory board, more than half of whose members are appointed by the State, regional or local authorities or by other bodies governed by public law.

Examples of partners that can apply for funding from the BSR INTERREG III B National, regional and local public authorities: Ministries; regional councils; municipalities, etc.;

Institutions that could be considered as “Public equivalent bodies”: associations; academic institutions; research institutes; foundations; NGOs and non-profit organizations (community- based, humanitarian, industrial, cultural, etc.); development agencies, etc. Examples of partners that can apply for funding from the BSR INTERREG III B (2)

1. ERDF contributions up to 75% for Objective 1 regions up to 50% for other regions 2. National co-funding Partner’s own funding – eg. public funds at national, regional or local level BSR INTERREG III B Project Budget

Next call for main projects proposals As all ERDF for IIIB priorities is committed, there will be no further calls for proposals.

Thank you for your attention!