10th Configuration Management Benchmarking Conference June 15-18, 2003 Hershey, PA 2003 CONFERENCE " A Decade of Sharing" NEI Business Update Presented.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Strengthening statistical capacity in support of progress towards the Internationally Agreed Development Goals in countries of South Asia United Nations.
Advertisements

A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
How to Document A Business Management System
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Session V: Programme Roles and Responsibilities
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Do You Know ???.
1 LBNL Enterprise Computing (EC) January 2003 LBNL Enterprise Computing.
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
EEN [Canada] Forum Shelley Borys Director, Evaluation September 30, 2010 Developing Evaluation Capacity.
Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit
Copyright 2003 Cuyahoga Community College District Knowledge Management: Making it Fly in Higher Education Presenter: Amy C. Eugene Director, Knowledge.
EVALUATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE STRATEGY PRESENTED BY DR SHYAM PATIAR.
Development plan and quality plan for your Project
Recent international developments in Energy Statistics United Nations Statistics Division International Workshop on Energy Statistics September 2012,
Roles and Responsibilities QMS Infrastructure. All Rights Reserved, Juran Institute, Inc Performance System.v1 1.PPT Learning Objectives 1.Become.
REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS (PRP) August Peer Review Panel: Background  As a requirement of the ESEA waiver, ODE must establish a process to ensure.
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
© 2003 IBM Corporation July 2004 Technology planning for not-for-profit organizations IBM volunteer name Title, organization.
FY2010 PEMP Notable Outcomes October 15, FRA, LLC Board of Directors 10/15-16/2009 Office of Quality and Best Practices Performance Evaluation Management.
Roles and Responsibilities
An update from the National Committee on Levee Safety Presented to the TWCA by Karin M. Jacoby, PE, Esq. June 17, of 14An Involved Public and Reliable.
INTOSAI Public Debt Working Group Updating of the Strategic Plan Richard Domingue Office of the Auditor General of Canada June 14, 2010.
Working Definition of Program Evaluation
ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP FOR CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT IN SWHISA CONTEXT B.D June 2006 H.R.D I.D O.D.
Michalis Adamantiadis Transport Policy Adviser, SSATP SSATP Capacity Development Strategy Annual Meeting, December 2012.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
ERCOT and Utilicast Public Document February 17, 2009 Nodal Program Oversight Report 9 System Integration Assessment.
BPK Strategic Planning: Briefing for Denpasar Regional Office Leadership Team Craig Anderson Ahmed Fajarprana August 11-12, 2005.
Strong9 Consulting Services, LLC 1 PMI - SVC I-80 Breakfast Roundtable Monthly Meeting Thursday, October 12, :00 am – 9:00 am.
Presented by: Masoud Shams Ahmadi February 2007 Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Selection Presented by: Masoud Shams Ahmadi
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Capacity Self-Assessment as a management tool for organisational development planning u A model used for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and European Integration,
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.
External Review Exit Report Anderson School District 4 November , 2014.
Catawba County Board of Commissioners Retreat June 11, 2007 It is a great time to be an innovator 2007 Technology Strategic Plan *
10th Configuration Management Benchmarking Conference June 15-18, 2003 Hershey, PA 2003 CONFERENCE " A Decade of Sharing" CMBG History Presented By: Mike.
Working Group on Public Debt Progress Report 7th Meeting of the Steering Committee of the INTOSAI Committee on the Knowledge Sharing and Knowledge Services.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
NIMSL Nuclear Information Management Strategic Leadership Community of Practice.
Configuration Management Benchmarking Group Conference June 6 – 9, 2004 Kansas City, MO © 2004 CMBG CMBG History Presented By: Mike Stout CMBG Steering.
Process Description and Quality Guidelines – Two Birds with One Stone European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics Q2014 Rudi Seljak, Tina Steenvoorden.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
The Case for Participation Enter Date Enter Presentation Audience.
2006 CMBG Conference CMBG History Presented By: Rick Harris CMBG Steering Committee.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
Transmission Advisory Group NCTPC Process Update Rich Wodyka September 7, 2006.
Planning for Sustainability 1 Susan Ramsey Pearls of Wisdom Consulting Lia Katz ASTHO (202)
NUPIC Perspective Stan Mitchell – NUPIC Chair. Presentation Title2 NUPIC Overview NUPIC Organization established to accomplish the following objectives.
Standard Design Process Overview
Design Oversight Working Group (DOWG) – Next Steps
DNP Initiative ENG-003 Standard Design Process Overview Configuration Management Benchmarking Group June 12, 2017.
Roles and Responsibilities
Configuration Management Benchmarking Group (www. cmbg
Description of Revision
Configuration Control and the Standard Nuclear Performance Model
By Jeff Burklo, Director
PEMPAL – Facilitating Practical Solutions in PFM across ECA
How to Manage Guidance from Multiple Organizations into CM
CMBG Steering Committee
Energy Statistics Compilers Manual
Configuration Management AP-929, Revision 1 Mike Stout Chairman CMBG Steering Committee April 9, 2019 Cleveland 2005.
February 21-22, 2018.
{Project Name} Organizational Chart, Roles and Responsibilities
Roles and Responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

10th Configuration Management Benchmarking Conference June 15-18, 2003 Hershey, PA 2003 CONFERENCE " A Decade of Sharing" NEI Business Update Presented By: Vince Gilbert Director, Business Services Director, Business Services Nuclear Energy Institute

2 Objective … To highlight recent NEI activities äNEI Benchmarking Update äStandard Nuclear Performance Model Update äIndustry-wide benchmarking process äCommunities of Practice äCMBG projects and Issues äProcess Congress Concept

3 Performance Improvement äThe objective of performance improvement is to continuously explore ways to:  Increase business efficiency  Lower operating cost  Maintain or improve safety

4 Performance Improvement äThis is accomplished by:  Focusing on process management  Maintaining a Standard Nuclear Performance Model  Conducting benchmarking projects  Understanding Change Management  Developing and Maintaining “Communities of Practice” in each process area

6 Benchmarking Projects äRecently Completed  Equipment Reliability 9/02  Computer Software 3/03 äIn Progress  Work Management Role in Nuclear Asset Management äIn Planning (Five new projects on list)

9 Support for Communities of Practice was unanimous … ä Participants get value from networking with peers, involvement in projects to address high priority industry needs within their process area. ä Alignment with the Standard Nuclear Performance Model leads to efficient interfaces among related process areas. ä CoPs provide a strategic focus in a process area previously lacking among the large number of uncoordinated special issue groups in the industry.

DefinitionDefinition A Community of Practice (CoP) is an industry peer group of experts in a business process or sub-process defined in NEI's Standard Nuclear Performance Model (SNPM). The group serves as the “owner” of a particular process or sub-process, managing the solution of business process issues for the industry in that area. A CoP, then, is a more formal and comprehensive group than a Special Issue Group (SIG), scores of which have formed over the years within the nuclear industry. CoPs are led by a steering team and governed by a formal charter to implement the functions below. SIGs are peer groups of experts in a technical area who meet to share knowledge and experience.

11 FunctionsFunctions äSupport and guide industry management of strategic business process issues äDefine and administer appropriate industry projects for their process area äDevelop, approve, adjust process Key Performance Indicators in the SNPM

12 FunctionsFunctions äRecommend adjustments to cost definitions in the SNPM äDetermine future benchmarking direction äIntegrate, coordinate and provide guidance to special issue group activities to gain synergies on related industry process issues

13 CharacteristicsCharacteristics äThe formation of a leadership or steering team äA Charter describing the group's mission, objectives, and interfaces with NEI, the SNPM and SIGs äA Charter describing the group's mission, objectives, and interfaces with NEI, the SNPM and SIGs äA process for coordinating with the SIGs in the CoP process area, including incorporating expertise and providing and receiving feedback.

14 CharacteristicsCharacteristics äA set of fully developed cost definitions for their process äA completed intermediate level and up-to-date process description äA set of definitions of industry-wide performance indicators

15 CharacteristicsCharacteristics äA set of performance improvement projects äA process for identifying high value performance improvements in their process area and carrying out projects to help the industry achieve these improvements.

16 CMBG Issues and Objectives äContinue to Drive the CM process and Interfaces äCMBG projects  Key Performance Measures  CM Process Description and Process Description Interfaces (IM, IT)  Help us Resolve Issue from CoP of SS003 Information Management Issue: Ownership for Procedures Methodology and Content

17 CMBG Issues and Objectives ä Help us complete as much work as possible in time for SNPM Revision 4 deadline (October 2003) ä Continue Dialogue with INPO until revised AP-929, Revision 1 is issued ä Your group is doing a great job-keep it up!

18 NEI CoP Web Tool äIs coming äIdentify personnel who are willing to work in small groups as either:  Internal business consultant development – for management of projects later  To work on a specific project now via the Web tool after tool is available

19 Process Congress Concept äIndustry Business Meeting in Washington, DC äRepresentatives from:  NEI, INPO and EPRI  All Communities of Practice Steering Teams  NEI member suppliers and consulting companies  Special Issue Group leaders ä To discuss important issues and develop integrated improvement plans

20 For further information … äOn NEI initiatives in benchmarking and process improvements, contact  Adrian Heymer,  Vince Gilbert,  Amy Barreiro,