Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) If one goal of your project is to have real impacts on farmers through high quality technical research, then you will need.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Results Based Monitoring (RBM)
Advertisements

Role of CSOs in monitoring Policies and Progress on MDGs.
Participatory Research Aden Aw-Hassan Aleppo, April 28, 2005.
Measuring Impact – Making a Difference Carol Candler – NRF Graeme Oram – Five Lamps.
Systemic impact evaluation Evaluating impacts of agricultural projects The example of SOGUIPAH in Guinea AFD - J. Delarue.
CHAPTER 40 Probability.
Logic Models and Evaluation Glen W. White 1 Jamie Simpson 2 1 University of Kansas, Research and Training Center on Independent Living 2 Kansas Department.
Corry Bregendahl Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture Ames, Iowa.
Feed Assessment Tool (FEAST) Ben Lukuyu and Alan Duncan MilkIT annual planning meeting, Almora, India Nov 27 – Dec
Participatory Agricultural Development Farmer-First Process Design.
Calculate your carbon footprints Sam Chanthy Stockholm Environment Institute v CO 2.
Measuring and reporting outcomes for your BTOP grant 1Measuring and Reporting Outcomes.
A new vision for agriculture and nutrition - Implications for accountability and impact measurement Bibi Giyose, FAO Senior Nutrition Policy and Programme.
The Impact of HIV and AIDS on Agriculture and Food Security in the SADC Region From Research to Action.
Farmbook Suite Developing Agricultural Advisory Services For Smallholder Farmers Shaun Ferris.
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University1 digital libraries and human information behavior Tefko Saracevic, Ph.D. School of Communication, Information and.
Designing Surveys the art and science. For any type and style… Soil biota and effects of land use change Effectiveness of extension organisations Market.
Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Small-Scale Irrigation Alan Duncan Ethiopia Partner meeting, Mar From Plan to Action Field Studies and Ex Ante.
Economic Evaluation Tools Benefit-Cost Analysis Cost Effectiveness Analysis Financial Analysis/Feasibility Fiscal Impact Analysis Economic Impact Analysis.
1 Qualitative Evaluation Terms Coding/categorization The process of condensing qualitative data through the identification of common themes. Data Matrix.
BotswanaGhanaMaliSenegalTanzaniaZambia Development and Energy in Africa (DEA) Risø National Laboratory Denmark Energy Research Centre (ECN) Netherlands.
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
FIRST MEETING OF THE IFAD ROOTS AND TUBERS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES/PROJECTS Douala, Cameroun November 2007 Contribution of the PNDRT - CAMEROON André.
Monitoring the Impact of the IFAD-funded Participatory Resource Management Project (PRMP) in Tuyen Quang Province, Viet Nam Objectives of PRMP Improved.
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION Conditions of Work and Employment Programme (TRAVAIL) 2012 Module 15: Capacity development and training on Maternity.
Mali Work Packages. Crop Fields Gardens Livestock People Trees Farm 1 Farm 2 Farm 3 Fallow Pasture/forest Market Water sources Policy Landscape/Watershed.
MOST SIGNIFICANT CHANGE Youth Focused Monitoring and Evaluation System.
EVALUATION APPROACHES Heather Aquilina 24 March 2015.
Why Evaluate? Evaluating the Impact of Projects and Programs, Beijing, China April Shahid Khandker World Bank Institute.
MARKETS II M&E FRAMEWORK AND CHALLENGES Joseph Obado.
Methods: Pointers for good practice Ensure that the method used is adequately described Use a multi-method approach and cross-check where possible - triangulation.
Film training Media trainers Cocoa specialists External Cocoa Specilists Villagers Cycle repeated to make several videos STCP PARTICIPATORY COCOA VIDEO.
Conservation Agriculture as a Potential Pathway to Better Resource Management, Higher Productivity, and Improved Socio-Economic Conditions in the Andean.
Impact Evaluation in Education Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation Andrew Jenkins 23/03/14.
A main challenge in the “rainfed project”: Getting high quality biophysical data from farmer’s trials is difficult –Difficult to control for variation.
Deborah Duveskog, SLU Esbern Friis-Hansen, DIIS Evaluating Empowerment in the Rural Small-holder Context: Lessons from East Africa.
Monitoring and Evaluation Orientation 17 th May 2011 MCA Namibia.
Monitoring and Evaluation
111 CINDI PMER Workshop March, 2007 By Simon Opolot © 2007 Office of the Premier, KwaZulu-Natal Province, Private Bag X9037 Telecom House, 2nd Floor,
What skills do I need to do Participatory Research well? To work effectively with farmers as partners in developing new agricultural technologies, you.
Support the spread of “good practice” in generating, managing, analysing and communicating spatial information Evaluating and Reflecting on the Map-making.
SJI Impact Assessment 2014 Based on Impact Assessment for Development Agencies – Learning to Value Change (Chris Roche, Oxfam, digital file 2010)
Integration of ecological and indigenous knowledge into farm-level management tools in the Kalahari, Botswana Mark Reed and Andy Dougill Leeds Environment.
Sector Policy Advice and ICT in education Planning and Development of Education Systems Division.
27/04/2017 Strengthening of the Monitoring and Evaluation system for FTPP/FTTP in FAO /SEC December 2015 FTPP/FTFP Workshop, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
C R E S S T / U C L A 1 UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies Center for the Study of Evaluation (CSE) National Center for Research on.
The Income-Livelihood Matrix The income-livelihood matrix is a technique that can be used to get a rapid idea of farmer’s strategies for making a living.
Realizing the underexploited potential of multi-purpose legumes towards improved livelihoods and a better environment in crop- livestock systems in East.
Achievements of Phase 1, loose ends and new research topics to focus on in Malawi, Tanzania and Zambia Kihara group.
Monitoring and evaluation Objectives of the Session  To Define Monitoring, impact assessment and Evaluation. (commonly know as M&E)  To know why Monitoring.
Agricultural Research and Poverty Reduction Tiina Huvio, Advisor for Agriculture and Rural Development, MFA
Page 1 Rice innovation Practices in Bac Lieu province 19 th December 2013 Project: Adaptation to climate change through biodiversity promotion in Bac Lieu.
Analyze Systematic Procedures For Problem Solving By: Angelica Beltran and Jeaneece Suarez.
4.Model of Evaluation a. Hierarchical Criteria Model (classical model by Bennett, 1976) 1. Input (resource) 2. Activity 3. Participation 4. Reaction 5.
ICT4D: Evaluation Dr David Hollow DSV, University of Stockholm.
PROGRAM EVALUATION A TOOL FOR LEARNING AND CHANGE.
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
Project monitoring and evaluation
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 9. Periodic data collection methods.
Project Overview Tassilo Tiemann
To do research that can: produce high quality research?
How can Communities contribute in Project MIS
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
مديريت كارورزي پزشكي اجتماعي.
مدل زنجیره ای در برنامه های سلامت
4.2 Identify intervention outputs
Technology Adoption on Vegetable Agroforestry System in Nanggung
The Structure of your Simulation assessment
Risk is something we must consider in our work with farmers
Presentation transcript:

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) If one goal of your project is to have real impacts on farmers through high quality technical research, then you will need to have some way of finding out if you are achieving these impacts! The trouble is that many things affect farmers’ livelihoods, so you need some way to calculate the contribution of your research to their livelihoods.

Impacts (e.g. increased income) Outcomes (e.g. large areas planted with this variety) Outputs (e.g. selection of variety with high DM and sugar yields) Activities (eg. working with farmers to evaluate new sugar cane) Inputs (eg. planting material, money, labour, ideas, information) Things we do Impacts Easy Difficult How are impacts generated on your project?

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) You will also need a monitoring tool as the situation in the field can quickly get beyond the capacity of researchers to monitor individually….

farmers starting to evaluate forages An example from Sepaku in East Kalimantan

farmers expanded How big an area and which species? new farmers started to test forages 6 farmers did not expand or stopped 6

Farmers starting to evaluate forages Farmers expanding their forage area Farmers not expanding their forage area It is starting to become very complicated

Farmers starting to evaluate forages Farmers expanding their forage area Farmers not expanding their forage area Impossible to handle without a monitoring tool

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) You will also need a monitoring process because data on impacts from farmer trials can be misleading… Number of farmers out 47 out 93 out 47 new 93 new

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) You will also need a monitoring process because data on impacts from farmer trials can be misleading… 20 Average Area (sq m / farmer) Number of farmers Impact??

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) You will also need a monitoring process because data on impacts from farmer trials can be misleading… Average Area (sq m / farmer) Number of farmers Who? Many farmers? What impacts? How significant?

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Before you start a process of measuring the impacts of your research, you need to know: What impacts are happening? How many farmers are experiencing these impacts? Are the impacts significant in farmers’ lives? Only then should you start to quantify the impacts.

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Getting answers to these three questions may not be easy. Stories of impacts are often misleading (exaggerated or based on stories from just one farmer) Reports from the field are often very uninformative about ‘impacts’…only about outputs One method we have used to capture impacts as they start to happen in the field is the use of digital photography as a basis for monitoring

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) One method we have found very useful to capture impacts as they start to happen in the field is the use of digital photography

A simple process for M&E Laying a baseline for impact assessment Baseline Survey

A simple process for M&E Laying a baseline for impact assessment Baseline Survey From secondary information and results of participatory diagnosis and initial planning with communities: Village characterisation

A simple process for M&E Monitoring evaluation and adoption of innovations being tested by farmers Adoption Tree Surveys Laying a baseline for impact assessment Baseline Survey From secondary information and results of participatory diagnosis and initial planning with communities: Village characterisation

A simple process for M&E Common interest groups of farmers in villages working together on a particular issue (e.g. women working on improving pig production) Farmer Focus Groups Monitoring evaluation and adoption of innovations being tested by farmers Adoption Tree Surveys Laying a baseline for impact assessment Baseline Survey From secondary information and results of participatory diagnosis and initial planning with communities: Village characterisation

A simple process for M&E Common interest groups of farmers in villages working together on a particular issue (e.g. women working on improving pig production) Farmer Focus Groups Monitoring evaluation and adoption of innovations being tested by farmers Adoption Tree Surveys Laying a baseline for impact assessment Baseline Survey Informally monitor problems, innovations and activities Informal Observations From secondary information and results of participatory diagnosis and initial planning with communities: Village characterisation

A simple process for M&E Impacts identified by Farmer Focus Groups are followed up with measurements Quantifying Impact Common interest groups of farmers in villages working together on a particular issue (e.g. women working on improving pig production) Farmer Focus Groups Monitoring evaluation and adoption of innovations being tested by farmers Adoption Tree Surveys Laying a baseline for impact assessment Baseline Survey Informally monitor problems, innovations and activities Informal Observations From secondary information and results of participatory diagnosis and initial planning with communities: Village characterisation

Source: Werner Stür, CIAT Click the back button on your browser to return to the main menu