Intellectual Property Patents & Trademarks TC 310 June 19, 2008
Patent Background Patent Clause is in Constitution Power of Congress Needs statute to have effect Protects products, processes Allows a temporary monopoly Make, use, sell Incentive to innovate
Process Patent Statutes create Patent Office Application necessary Provisional Formal Patent Office examines New Useful Nonobvious
Novelty (newness) Something brand new Make use of prior knowledge Cite literature Inevitableness Conflicts over Priority Conception Reduction to practice Due diligence
Utility Must have some use of value Novelty/ curiosity fails test Something can be novel, no utility Specific Utility Substantial utility Research process no Effective drug, not on people, yes
Nonobviousness Similar to novelty BUT, now we deal with inevitable Fail this test if Others could do it easily Indicated as possible Still use old inventions Add synergy is key
Abusing Patents Double Patents Break up invention Several patent protections Terminal Disclaimer used instead Only 1 Patent Ever Allowed per invention No extensions
Infringement Two-step process Examine patent Apply description to object Do not need to be identical, just similar Can apply to sub-parts of patent Ignorance not a defense Patent holder must make infringer aware
Telecom Patents Laws of Nature not patentable Includes algorithms Processes using laws of natures are What is patentable? Software Video game hardware Infrastructure devices Online processes (facebook example)
Trademarks Unlike Patents, Trademarks are purely statutory Problems with federalism Lanham Act of 1946 Cover only Interstate matters Serves to identify producer, market producer
Rules for Trademarks Must be in use before protected Can expire Federal registry of trademarks This is optional Distinctiveness Marks must be sufficienty different
Loss of Protection Abandonment Discontinue use, no intent to resume 3 years Not changing to remain distinctive Excused abandonment Discontinued, but want to resume Economic situations Burden is on users
Infringement Confusion is the standard Similarity Sound, connotation, appearance, goods, “trade channels” Conditions of sale Impulse v Considered Actual confusion Amount of time, similarity of goods
Telecom Trademarks Importance in Telecom Use of AT&T name by Cingular Services very similar, name matters Use of URLs Want trademark to match URL Willing to pay?