TWS Aids for Student Teachers & Interns Overview of TWS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Advertisements

Teacher Work Sample Contextual Factors Learning Goals
The Teacher Work Sample
Writing Assessment Plans for Secondary Education / Foundations of Educations Department 9 th Annual Assessment Presentation December 3, 2013 Junko Yamamoto.
PORTFOLIO.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
Learning Objectives, Performance Tasks and Rubrics: Demonstrating Understanding and Defining What Good Is Brenda Lyseng Minnesota State Colleges.
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
The Teacher Perfor m ance Assessment. The Teacher Performance Assessment is a tool that requires the beginning teacher to document the essential steps.
Ohhhhh, Christopher Robin, I am not the right one for this job... The House on Pooh Corner, A.A. Milne.
Office of Professional Preparation and Licensure (OPPL) Annual Report.
The Program Review Process: NCATE and the State of Indiana Richard Frisbie and T. J. Oakes March 8, 2007 (source:NCATE, February 2007)
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Personal Project: Assessment Criteria
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Teacher Work Sample Contextual Factors Learning Goals.
Teacher Certification Next Steps……. How certification works within your current practice Student Growth Criterion 3: Recognizing individual student learning.
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
Standards for Education and Rehabilitation of Students who are Blind and Visually Impaired A general overview of accepted standards for Teachers of the.
Emporia State University Phil Bennett (Some Slides by Dr. Larry Lyman) Teacher Work Sample The Teachers College.
Candidate Work Sample. Section I: Unit Topic or Title.
BY Karen Liu, Ph. D. Indiana State University August 18,
Emporia State University Ken Weaver (Some Slides by Dr. Larry Lyman) Teacher Work Sample The.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Writing Your Program’s SPA Report(s) Cynthia Conn, Ph.D., Associate Director, Office of Academic Assessment Chris Geanious, Project Director, College of.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Emporia State University Phil Bennett (Some Slides by Dr. Larry Lyman) Teacher Work Sample
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.
NCATE STANDARD I REVIEW Hyacinth E. Findlay Carol Dawson Gwendolyn V. King.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Human Learning Asma Marghalani.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Introduction to the Teacher Work Sample Portfolio Presented by Frank H. Osborne, Ph. D. © 2015 EMSE 3123 Math and Science in Education 1.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
Subgrant Goals and Activities Frostburg State University.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Deciphering SPA Requirements Kathy Hildebrand, Ph.D., Assistant Dean of Assessment & Continuous Improvement, College of Education Cynthia Conn, Ph.D.,
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov February 16, 2011.
National Board Study Group Meeting Dan Barber 5 th Grade Teacher, Irwin Academic Center
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Teacher Work Sample. Lectures Objectives: 1.Define the teacher work sample. 2.Integrate lesson plans with a practice Teacher Work Sample in terms of the.
National Board Process
A performance assessment for teacher candidates
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov March 23, 2011.
Partnership for Practice
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
California Teaching Performance Assessment
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Overview of the Teacher Work Sample (TWS)
Jeanie Behrend, FAST Coordinator Janine Quisenberry, FAST Assistant
Deconstructing Standard 2a Dr. Julie Reffel Valdosta State University
The Teacher Work Sample: An Authentic Assessment
Presentation transcript:

TWS Aids for Student Teachers & Interns Overview of TWS

The Mission of the Teacher Work Sample The TWS measures the ability to: Construct and deliver an instructional unit Construct challenging and meaningful assessments Adapt instruction to meet student needs Measure learning gains and achievement Analyze and reflect on teaching decisions and results TWS

The TWS Vision TWS The TWS Vision is to: Connect the performance of candidates to PK-12 student learning Assess candidate performance relative to national, state, and institutional standards Provide a framework for teacher professional development Develop self-assessment & reflection skills

The Renaissance PartnershipRenaissance Partnership “To become accountable for the impact of teacher candidates and graduates on the learning of P-12 students” A Paradigm Shift from Teaching to Learning The information from Teacher Work Samples is used to advance the quality of teachers and K-12 student learning by the Renaissance Partnership, a five year initiative by eleven universities and their partner schools. The Renaissance Partnership is devoted to the pursuit of quality and best practices in teacher education.Renaissance Partnership

Preparation for the TWS Completing a TWS became a requirement for all student teachers & interns beginning Spring Elementary interns learn about the TWS process beginning in Block 1 classes. During Block 2 (first P. D. S. semester), interns prepare a sample reading TWS using elements of the TWS design. Elementary (Block 3) complete a TWS as part of the EL431 Secondary (Phase 1) complete a “Practice” TWS (prior to student teaching). Secondary (Phase 2) complete a TWS as part of the ED431 course. Alternate Route interns complete a TWS as part of the ED894 Internship II course. ESU supervisors will provide appropriate assistance to interns. Mentor teachers/supervisors may provide assistance as provided by the TWS Assistance Policy. TWS

Bloom’s Taxonomy & Stenberg’s Triarchic Levels Use Benjamin Bloom’s Taxonomy to classify and label your objectives. Robert Sternberg’s Triarchic Levels may also help you understand cognitive type objectives. Following are some web sites that will provide additional information. Bloom Sternberg 2SternbergTriarchicTheory.html

Interns/student teachers should show: A high level of questions and reflections Strong performance assessment Proficiency at implementing modifications and adaptations Sensitivity to student learning DETAILS EXAMPLES

TWS Scoring Completed Teacher Work Samples will be assessed by trained evaluators for: Quality Completeness Alignment Checklists and rubrics (detailed in a later presentation) You will be challenged to show quality in Assessment design Reflection on professional development plan Alignment of objectives, instruction, and assessment

Overview of 7 Teacher Work Sample Factors Demonstrates knowledge of: community & school factors characteristics of students students’ varied approaches to learning students’ skills & prior learning QPA/NCA school improvement plan Demonstrates implications for instruction & assessment Contextual Information & Learning Environment Unit Learning Goals & Objectives Includes a variety that are significant & challenging Appropriates for students Aligned with standards Focused on student learning Classified according to level & domain Factors Instructional Design & Implementation Aligned with learning goals & instruction Clarifies criteria for performance Includes multiple instructional strategies & approaches Includes adaptations on individual student needs Demonstrates appropriate use of technology Demonstration of Integration Skills Analysis of Classroom Learning Environment Analysis of Assessment Procedures Reflection & Self-Evaluation Demonstrates the ability to integrate instruction across and within subject matter fields Demonstrates: motivation skills communication skills classroom management skills how classroom environmental factors affect learning Interprets data Aligns assessments with TWS objectives Provides evidence of impact on student learning Demonstrates variety of assessments Justifies assessments & adaptations Demonstrate: Effect on student learning Implications for future teaching of this unit Implications for professional development Alignment among goals, instruction & assessment

CHECKLIST Checklist Use the following checklist to help ensure that your TWS meets guidelines and recommendations: Your completed work must not exceed 25 pages (12 point font, double-spaced with one-inch margins) with the numbering starting with content addressing Factor 1 You must use the cover page provided Do not include any names of your students anywhere in your completed Teacher Work Sample; instead refer to students by number or alias If you hand in a paper copy, do not put it into a notebook or folder; staple it in the upper left hand corner Be sure pages are numbered Include your name on the Cover Page only (not on every page) so that your TWS can be scored anonymously Classify Unit Objectives as low, middle, and high levels, and label each objective according to its domain (cognitive, affective, or psychomotor) The pre- and post-assessments should be related specifically to the TWS Objectives identified in Factor 2 Pre- and post-assessments need not be the same but must measure the same TWS Objectives in the same ways Demonstrates the ability to use Descriptive writing skills, Analytical writing skills, Reflective writing skills Demonstrates that the student teacher has made appropriate modifications and adaptations in teaching to meet the learning needs of all students Must be received in the Dean’s Office by the date indicated Delivered by , mail or in person All exceptions related to TWS must be approved by the Associate Dean and department chair If you are having problems, contact your university supervisor

KSDE Performance Assessment Flow Chart Identify unit topic. Develop well aligned goals/ outcomes for unit. Specify Performance outcomes/ objectives for unit. Develop assessment plan. Describe setting/ context of learning. Design instruction to fulfill outcomes & meet students’ needs (with accommodations as needed) Analyze and record pre- assessment data (individual & groups). Conduct pre- assessment of learners. Design/align pre- assessment with items for each goal. Teaching and learning activities Analyze pre & post assessment data by individual, groups, & goals. Display student learning gain scores in graphic form. Write a narrative interpretation of the data. Write a reflective essay and self-evaluation (What have I learned from the experience). Conduct post- assessment of learners. Deadlines to be announced Use national, state, district, and/or school standards/ goals