M. McConnell1, J. R. Macri, J. M. Ryan, K. Larson, L. -A. Hamel, G

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RHESSI Studies of Solar Flare Hard X-Ray Polarization Mark L. McConnell 1, David M. Smith 2, A. Gordon Emslie 4, Martin Fivian 3, Gordon J. Hurford 3,
Advertisements

1 Continuous Scintillator Slab with Microchannel Plate PMT for PET Heejong Kim 1, Chien-Min Kao 1, Chin-Tu Chen 1, Jean-Francois Genat 2, Fukun Tang 2,
LECTURE- 5 CONTENTS  PHOTOCONDUCTING MATERIALS  CONSTRUCTION OF PHOTOCONDUCTING MATERIALS  APPLICATIONS OF PHOTOCONDUCTING MATERIALS.
Present Status of GEM Detector Development for Position Counter 1.Introduction 2.GEM 3.Readout Board 4.Fabrication Test 5.Large GEM 6.Readout Electronics.
東京大学におけるMSGCの開発 東京大学 二河久子 藤田薫、高田夕佳、高橋浩之 2007/01/27 佐賀大学.
Section Two Requires e-h pair creation data from Section One and electric field model from Maxwell software package (Fig. 6 - left). The induced strip.
GEM Detector Shoji Uno KEK. 2 Wire Chamber Detector for charged tracks Popular detector in the particle physics, like a Belle-CDC Simple structure using.
N-XYTER Hybrid Developments Christian J. Schmidt et al., GSI Darmstadt JINR, Dubna, Oct. 15 th 2008.
RHESSI Studies of Solar Flare Hard X-Ray Polarization Mark L. McConnell 1, David M. Smith 2, A. Gordon Emslie 4, Martin Fivian 3, Gordon J. Hurford 3,
Studies of Small Scintillating Cells with Modified Geometries Alexander Dyshkant for NICADD at NIU.
Science Specification Table 12 keV keV for neutral particles 40.5 cm 2 image plane Electronic Noise 3 keV FWHM Proton Dead Layer
Paul Sellin Detector Research at the University of Surrey Dr Paul Sellin Centre for Nuclear and Radiation Physics Department of Physics University of Surrey,
3D PACKAGING SOLUTIONS FOR FUTURE PIXEL DETECTORS Timo Tick – CERN
10 B-based Multi-Grid Detectors as an alternative to 3 He In-beam test on the IN6 ToF spectrometer 10 B-based Multi-Grid Detectors as an alternative to.
Embedded Pitch Adapters a high-yield interconnection solution for strip sensors M. Ullán, C. Fleta, X. Fernández-Tejero, V. Benítez CNM (Barcelona)
Semiconductor detectors
Why silicon detectors? Main characteristics of silicon detectors: Small band gap (E g = 1.12 V)  good resolution in the deposited energy  3.6 eV of deposited.
Atsuhiko Ochi Kobe University 25/06/2013 New Small Wheel MicroMegas Mechanics and layout Workshop.
Detector development and physics studies in high energy physics experiments Shashikant Dugad Department of High Energy Physics Review, 3-9 Jan 2008.
Paul Sellin, Radiation Imaging Group Time-Resolved Ion Beam Induced Charge Imaging at the Surrey Microbeam P.J. Sellin 1, A. Simon 2, A. Lohstroh 1, D.
1 Digital Active Pixel Array (DAPA) for Vertex and Tracking Silicon Systems PROJECT G.Bashindzhagyan 1, N.Korotkova 1, R.Roeder 2, Chr.Schmidt 3, N.Sinev.
Recent Progress in Silicon Microcalorimeters and Their Prospects for NeXT (and other missions) Caroline A. Kilbourne NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
The Tungsten-Scintillating Fiber Accordion Electromagnetic Calorimeter for the sPHENIX Detector Craig Woody, for the PHENIX Collaboration Physics Department,
Fully depleted MAPS: Pegasus and MIMOSA 33 Maciej Kachel, Wojciech Duliński PICSEL group, IPHC Strasbourg 1 For low energy X-ray applications.
Performance limits of a 55  m pixel CdTe detector G.Pellegrini, M. Lozano, R. Martinez, M. Ullan Centro Nacional de Microelectronica, Barcelona, 08193,
Pixel 2000 Workshop Christian Grah University of Wuppertal June 2000, Genova O. Bäsken K.H.Becks.
Foundry Characteristics
1 Report on analysis of PoGO Beam Test at Spring-8 Tsunefumi Mizuno July 15, 2003 July 21, 2003 revised August 1, 2003 updated.
Development of CCDs for the SXI We have developed 2 different types of CCDs for the SXI in parallel.. *Advantage =>They are successfully employed for current.
Performance of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
Beam Tests of 3D Vertically Interconnected Prototypes Matthew Jones (Purdue University) Grzegorz Deptuch, Scott Holm, Ryan Rivera, Lorenzo Uplegger (FNAL)
5 th RD51 meeting (WG1) 25 May 2009 Atsuhiko Ochi ( Kobe University )
Charge collection in X-ray pixel detectors based on SI-GaAs doped with Cr G.I.Ayzenshtat a, M.V.Bimatov b, O.P.Tolbanov c, A.P.Vorobiev d a Science & Production.
Planar Edgeless Silicon Detectors for the TOTEM Experiment 1.E-09 1.E-06 1.E /T, 1e3/K Current, A (294K) (256K)(227K)(204K) Gennaro Ruggiero,
SEM Scanning Electron Microscope
Pixellated CZT high-energy X-ray instrument
Interconnection in IC Assembly
Takeshi Fujiwara, Hiroyuki Takahashi, Kaoru Fujita, Naoko Iyomoto Department of Nuclear Engineering and Management, The University of Tokyo, JAPAN Study.
JRA-1 ISRSI Consortium Meeting Perugia, INAF/IASF (BO,PA)
Page 1 Science Payload and Advanced Concepts Office STJs as Photon Detectors.
Lecture 3-Building a Detector (cont’d) George K. Parks Space Sciences Laboratory UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
PSD-V, London, September 1999 Two dimensional readout in a liquid xenon ionisation chamber V.Solovov, V.Chepel, A.Pereira, M.I.Lopes, R.Ferreira Marques,
Abstract Beam Test of a Large-area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System V. Bhopatkar, M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
-1-CERN (11/24/2010)P. Valerio Noise performances of MAPS and Hybrid Detector technology Pierpaolo Valerio.
Leo Greiner IPHC1 STAR Vertex Detector Environment with Implications for Design and Testing.
Beam Test of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger, A.
3D Position Sensitive CdZnTe Spectrometers Using 3 rd -Generation VAS/TAT Readout Electronics Feng Zhang, Zhong He, Glenn F. Knoll, David K. Wehe, James.
ICT 1 SINTEF Edge-On Sensor with Active Edge Fabricated by 3D-Technology T. E. Hansen 1), N. Ahmed 1), A. Ferber 2) 1) SINTEF MiNaLab 2) SINTEF Optical.
Development of a Single Ion Detector for Radiation Track Structure Studies F. Vasi, M. Casiraghi, R. Schulte, V. Bashkirov.
Status report Pillar-1: Technology. The “Helmholtz-Cube” Vertically Integrated Detector Technology Replace standard sensor with: 3D and edgeless sensors,
Room-Temperature Semiconductors: From concepts to applications Zhong He Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences Department The University of Michigan,
Development of the X-ray Detectors for XTP Cao Xue-lei Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS IHEP, Beijing.
PACKAGE FABRICATION TECHNOLOGY Submitted By: Prashant singh.
Update on works with SiPMs at Pisa Matteo Morrocchi.
CdTe prototype detector testing Anja Schubert The University of Melbourne 9 May 2011 Updates.
V.Aulchenko 1,2, L.Shekhtman 1,2, B.Tolochko 3,2, V.Zhulanov 1,2 Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, , Novosibirsk, Russia Novosibirsk State University,
Radiation Imaging Group
Manoj B. Jadhav Supervisor Prof. Raghava Varma I.I.T. Bombay PANDA Collaboration Meeting, PARIS – September 11, 2012.
N.Kimmel, the MPI Halbleiterlabor team and PNSensor References: H. Tsunemi et al., NIM A 421 (1999), H. Tsunemi et al., NIM A 436 (1999), Characterization.
Diagnostic Radiology II X-ray Tubes. Anode angle Anode angle defined as the angle of the target surface with respect to the central ray in the x-ray field.
P. S. Friedman Integrated Sensors, LLC
M. C. Veale1, S. J. Bell1,2, D. D. Duarte1,2, M. J. French1, M
THGEM: Introduction to discussion on UV-detector parameters for RICH
Planar Edgeless Silicon Detectors for the TOTEM Experiment
Detector R&D in KAPAC Outline Compton Camera SOI detector
Development of Gas Electron Multiplier Detectors for Muon Tomography
L.A. Hamel1, M. Benoit1, B. Dönmez2, J.R. Macri2, M.L. McConnell2,
Development of a Large Area Gamma-ray Detector
Beam Test Results for the CMS Forward Pixel Detector
Why silicon detectors? Main characteristics of silicon detectors:
Presentation transcript:

Three-Dimensional Imaging Performance of Orthogonal Coplanar CZT Strip Detectors M. McConnell1, J. R. Macri, J. M. Ryan, K. Larson, L.-A. Hamel, G. Bernard, C. Pomerleau, O. Tousignant, J.-C. Leroux, and V. Jordanov 1 Space Science Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 2Physics Department, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 3Yantra, Durham, NH 45th SPIE Meeting San Diego, CA 30 July - 4 August 2000

Traditional CZT Strip Detectors Concept Uses orthogonal strips on opposite sides of the detector. One set of parallel strips collects holes; the other collects electrons. Advantages Effectively provides N2 pixels with only 2N electrical channels. Considerably reduces complexity and power requirements. Disadvantages Effective detector thickness is limited by hole trapping to a few mm. Requires signal connections to both top and bottom surfaces.

Orthogonal Coplanar Anode Design Concept Both sets of orthogonal “strips” on same side of detector. Rows of interconnected “pixels” collect electrons. Orthogonal strips, at slightly different bias, act as steering electrodes and register induced-charge signals. Pixel row signals can be interpolated to get sub-pitch Y-coordinate. Strip signals can be interpolated to get sub-pitch X-coordinate.

Orthogonal Coplanar Anode Design CZT substrate with gold anode contact pattern. Advantages Provides N2 pixels with only 2N electrical channels. Considerably reduces complexity and power requirements. Electron-only device. Permits thicker detectors (> 1 cm). Limited by electron mobility. All signal connections on one side  close-packing.

Prototype CZT Detector Modules Prototype detectors have been fabricated and tested 5 mm thick CZT substrate (single-crystal, discriminator grade, eV Products) Gold anode contact pattern provides an 8  8 array of 1 mm “pixels”. Assembly of prototype detectors involves two key technologies Low-Temperature Co-fired Ceramics (LTCC) Polymer Flip-Chip (PFC) Bonding (no wire bonds)

Assembly of Prototype Modules assembled CZT module CZT substrate LTCC carrier

Low-Temperature Co-fired Ceramics Substrate fabrication featuring 170 µm filled vias for electrical connections. Provides low leakage under HV bias. Has thermal expansion coefficient similar to that of CZT. Underside of LTCC carrier showing electrical connections. Topside of LTCC carrier that is bonded to CZT.

Polymer Flip-Chip Bonding A low-temperature bonding process (T < 80° C). Conducting polymer bumps are stencil printed on CZT and the LTCC carrier. Bumps are 120 µm diameter and 20 µm high. A non-conducting epoxy is used as an underfill between the mating surfaces. Underfill provides both a strong mechanical assembly and thermal isolation. SEM photos showing polymer bumps on the patterned CZT substrate

Single “Pixel” Spectra Required coincidence between one strip and one pixel row. Bias levels: cathode = –800 V, anode pixels = 0 V, anode strips = –30 V. Measured FWHM resolutions are 3.4 keV (at 60 keV), 3.2 keV (at 122 keV), and 6.0 keV (at 662 keV).

Response Uniformity Uniformity measurements : 1) Energy resolution at 122 keV and 662 keV for each pixel row. 2) Signal pulseheight (at 122 keV) for each strip. These data indicate that the detector fabrication yielded reliable interconnections for all 64 “pixels”.

X-Y Spatial Resolution Charge sharing between adjacent strips permits sub-strip spatial resolution in X. Limited charge sharing between pixels reduces the ability to interpolate in Y. Lab measurements with a collimated alpha source.

where L is the detector thickness (= 5 mm in our prototypes). Depth Measurement Using both the cathode and anode signals, the interaction depth is given by, where L is the detector thickness (= 5 mm in our prototypes). Measurements with a Tungsten sheet at two different Z-positions differing by 500 µm. The difference between the two depth distributions yielded an effective slit measurement. sz ≈ 350 µm.

Attenuation Length Measurements Ratio of cathode to anode pulse heights used to determine the interaction depth for incident photon energies of 60 keV and 122 keV. Distribution of interaction depth measures the attenuation length (µ). These data demonstrate the ability to measure Z at all depths. µmeasured = 0.34 ± 0.04 mm µpublished = 0.27 mm µmeasured = 1.72 ± 0.15 mm µpublished = 1.65 mm

Measured and Simulated Signals anode surface pixel signal Simulated signals compare well with measured data. Here are seen comparisons for signals at three different depths within the detector. strip signal cathode surface

Signal Characteristics The characteristics of the anode strip signals can be used to define a measurement of the interaction depth without the cathode signal. Simulated Strip Signal Parameters

Measurements of Strip Signal Parameters The plot below shows the measured relationship between the strip signal risetime and the strip signal residual. The solid line represents the relationship expected based on simulations. These data support the claim that depth measurements will be possible using just the anode signals.

Time-Over-Threshold vs. Depth We have chosen to explore the use of the time-over-threshold (TOT) of the strip signal for determining the interaction depth. An analog circuit design has been developed to measure TOT. (poster paper by UNH student Kipp Larson, paper 4141-40, presented Monday) Event trigger came from a single pixel row with no coincident strip requirement. Lack of a strip coincidence requirement introduces events from adjacent “pixels”. These data were collected using a prototype TOT circuit, measuring a single strip.

Three-dimensional Imaging A VME-based DAQ system (developed at the Univ of Montreal) provides readout of all signal channels. incident beam Plot of interaction locations for a collimated beam of 122 keV photons (spot size ~200 µm) obliquely incident on cathode surface.

Conceptual Module Packaging Design The current concept for the packaging of a single CZT module is based on experience with the prototype. The concept involves a single module with 16  16 (256) logical pixels (32 channels) on a 1 mm pitch (2.56 cm2 active area). All front-end electronics will fit within the foot-print of the CZT substrate. Passive Circuit Components

Closely-Packed Array of CZT Modules The module design will provide a packing fraction of ~90-95%. An array of 20  20 modules with a total active area of 1024 cm2. Total power of 26 W for 12,800 channels, assuming 2 mW/channel (vs. 205 W for a 102,400 channel pixellated array).

Importance of Thicker CZT Detectors In many applications (e.g., astrophysics) good sensitivity is required at higher energies (above several hundred keV). These simulated results show the detection characteristics for a 12 mm  12 mm block of CZT with thicknesses between 5 and 15 mm. Even thicker detectors (> 15 mm) would possibly be required in some applications.

Current Status and Future Efforts We have successfully demonstrated the viability of a coplanar anode design for CZT strip detectors. We have developed a compact, reliable packaging concept that will permit the fabrication of large-area closely-packed arrays. Future efforts will be focused on: optimizing the anode design using simulation tools. fabrication and testing of thicker (10 mm) prototypes. continued development of circuitry to process the bipolar strip signal for the depth measurement (Larson et al., paper 4141-40). ASIC development. continued packaging development. studying the effects of multiple interaction sites at higher energies. evaluating the ability to measure incident photon polarization.