Juvenile Fitness for Trial: Psychiatrists, Psychologists and Lawyers (O)Watt, B. D., O’Leary, J., & O’Toole, S. CRICOS CODE 00017B.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ARREST.
Advertisements

What is Psychology and Law? Division 41: American Psychology- Law Society.
Forensic Issues in Learning Disability Psychiatry Dr Jayne Kerridge Consultant Psychiatrist in Intellectual Disabilities.
Disability Justice Service Presentation to Swan Rotary Club Friday 14 February 2014.
Legal Principles Essentially a test of fairness Essentially a test of fairness “It is a cardinal rule of our law that no man can be tried for a crime unless.
Crimes (Domestic & Personal Violence) Act New legislation Act came into force on Monday 10 March 2008 Stand-alone Act Replaces Part 15A Crimes Act.
90 Trial Procedures (review) Role of the Jury. 90 The Adversarial System Trial procedures in Canada are based on the adversarial system: two or more opposing.
Pathways to care in the absence of a local specialist Forensic Service, what we do in York. By Bekki Whisker.
Towards Objectifying Mentally Unfit for Trial in South Australia: Creation of the MacCAT-Au(SA) Thesis Confirmation Seminar for the Doctorate of Psychology.
O FFENDERS WITH A M ENTAL I LLNESS Molly, Campbell and Amanda.
The Roles of Judge and Jury Court controls legal rulings in the trial Court controls legal rulings in the trial Jury decides factual issues Jury decides.
Mental Health Expert OPD Protocol Governing Referral and Examination.
The Structure of Criminal Proceedings September 18, 2007.
Parents with Mental Illness in the Child Protection System Susan Smalling.
Elements of Criminal Liability
What are our duties under the law? I n Canada, law and justice is not only the business of Members of Parliament, judges, lawyers and police services!
Chapter 3 Criminal trial process. In this chapter, you will study the process of a criminal trial. You will look at the criminal jurisdiction of NSW courts,
Youth detention population in Australia. 2 Introduction In Australia: – young people who are charged with or proven guilty of criminal offences may be.
The Role of Family Consultants in the Family Court- A Guide for the Effective Solicitor.
Forensic Resources in PsycINFO Topics in PsycINFO of Relevance to Forensics PsycINFO is a research database published by the American Psychological Association.
Alcohol-Exposed Youth and the Court Jo Nanson, Ph. D., Judge Mary- Ellen Turpel-Lafond, P. Blakley,M. D., Ph. D.
Understanding decision making - Prosecuting complaints Karen Mobbs Director of Proceedings Health Care Complaints Commission Patrick Griffin Barrister.
Fitness to Stand Trial Alberto L. Choy MD FRCPC Psychology 344 Forensic Psychology Fall 2003 University of Toronto, Mississauga.
Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 18 Mental Health and the Law.
Legal Studies 3C.  The criminal justice system is a system of laws and rulings which protect community members and their property. It determines which.
Trial on Indictment in the Crown Court
Law & Criminal Justice in PsycINFO Topics in PsycINFO of Relevance to Law & Criminal Justice PsycINFO is a research database published by the American.
CJ233: Introduction to Forensic Psychology
Procedure Procedure at Trial. 1) Court Clerk reads the charge Indictment - if vague - quashed (struck down)
Criminal Trial Process “Innocent until proven guilty”
CH 29 PAGES Forensic Psychiatry. I. Definition 1. Forensic Psychiatry is a subspecialty of psychiatry that deals with people who are involved.
JURY Janaya Di Pietro. INTRODUCTION A jury is a group of ordinary citizens brought to a court to hear evidence and decide on issues of fact on the basis.
Introduction to Forensic Psychiatry World Psychiatric Association Scientific Section Forensic Psychiatry Secretary: Prof. Birgit A. Völlm.
Psychiatric Defences in Criminal Law Dr Richard Furst Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist Level 8 Practice, Sydney 23 rd February 2014.
By the end of this chapter, you should be able to:  LO1 Describe the structure of the court system, and the role and significance of each level of criminal.
Jury Selection Process. Role of the Jury Juries are fundamental to the Canadian justice system. In a criminal trial, 12 people are chosen at random to.
TYPES OF LAW. CIVIL LAW Civil Law deals with wrongs against a group or individual. The harmed individual becomes the plaintiff in a civil law suit and.
Protecting a Fair Trial
In the Courtroom. Democratic Society Equal rights Freedom of speech Fair Trial These are just a few of the fundamental human rights.
Defamation & Media Contempt of Court. Defamation Act 2013 Libel – is when the defamation is written down or broadcast. Internet s Newspaper Magazines.
Juvenile Crime.  Juvenile: a person under the age of 18  Some states have it as 16, but regardless there are special laws that deal with juveniles who.
Procedure Procedure from Arrest to Trial. i) Laying a charge 1) Arrest Formally charged with a criminal offence, taken to the station to be booked Or.
PROSECUTION AND CRIMINAL TRIAL PROCESS TRIAL PROCESSES.
Working With Young People Presented by: Katrina Jefferson, Community Legal Education Lawyer.
KITS V JUNE , 2014 BREAKING DOWN AND UNDERSTANDING THE PSYCHOLOGICAL : WHAT YOU DON’T KNOW CAN HURT YOU M. Connie Almeida, PhD, LSSP, Licensed Psychologist.
Comparing the Inquisitorial and Adversarial Systems.
Forensic Psychology. History of Forensic Psychology American psychologists at turn of 20 th C. relatively disinterested in applying research topics to.
Queensland Advocacy Incorporated Systems and Legal Advocacy for vulnerable people with Disability Changes to the Mental Health Act (Qld) David Manwaring,
Guided Notes Chapter 29 Pages
Criminal and Civil Competence
STANDARDS: SS8CG6 The student will explain how the Georgia court system treats juvenile offenders. a. Explain the difference between delinquent behavior.
History of Forensic Psychology
TRIAL PROCEDURES.
Juries.
The Concept of Fundamental Justice
Also known as the ‘accusatorial’ system.
The Role of the Jury.
Chapter 16 Section 3 Juvenile Crime.
Law & Criminal Justice in PsycINFO
Juvenile Forensic Evaluations
LAW CRIMINAL LAW 2018 RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL
LESSON OBJECTIVES Chapter 4: A Separate System for Juveniles
Roles and Responsibilities in the Courtroom
Juvenile Offenders Delinquent acts and unruly acts are legal terms for behavior in minors under the age of 16. Delinquent behavior is an act committed.
Trial Procedures Lesson 54 CLU 3MR.
Trial Procedures Lesson 39 CLU 3ER.
Forensic Psychiatrist
Guided Notes Chapter 29 Pages
LAW OF JURY SELECTION (SPRING 2019)
LAWR4S Exam Review Study Notes and Hints.
Presentation transcript:

Juvenile Fitness for Trial: Psychiatrists, Psychologists and Lawyers (O)Watt, B. D., O’Leary, J., & O’Toole, S. CRICOS CODE 00017B

Our research objective To consider the adequacy of current safeguards, both legal and forensic, relating to the treatment of juvenile offenders who may lack fitness to plead in QLD courts Why are we interested? Our collective experience as practitioners in law, social work & forensic psychology Our discussions with current practitioners, particularly in relation to some groups e.g. petrol sniffers International research focusing on juvenile adjudicative competence An absence of Australian research on this (important) topic

The test for unfitness in QLD Where unfitness (relating to cognitive impairment) is in issue, the question can be determined either by a jury in superior courts or more often by the Mental Health Court (MHC). Separate statutory tests apply depending on whether unfitness is raised in superior courts OR the MHC, but regardless, both are informed by the common law test in R v Presser [1958] VR 45: To be fit to stand trial the accused must be able to : understand the nature of the charge plead to the charge exercise the right to challenge the empanelling of jurors understand the nature of proceedings follow the course of proceedings in a general sense understand the substantial effect of evidence against them make a defence or answer the charge (if represented) instruct counsel

Year Total number of references Adult references References < 17 years at time of offence Percentage of adult references Percentage of references < 17 years at time of offence 2006/ / / / / TOTAL Referrals to the MHC

Method Semi-structured interviews with professionals who work with juvenile defendants in QLD: 20 youth justice workers. 20 legal professionals. Seven mental health professionals.

Measure Interview schedule designed for current study: Definition of fitness for trial and relevant conditions. Number of young people whom fitness was a concern over the preceding 12 months. For each juvenile, demographics, the underlying condition, relevant Presser rule and outcome. Ratings for most relevant reason of non-referral to QLD Mental Health Court.

Results

Wasn't really picked up and has never been assessed. Mental health court often takes a long time to go through. Previously been through children's court. Solicitor takes over and does not ask as much of the juvenile.

Implications – Lack of referral to MHC Legal Practitioners (LPs) and Youth Justice Officers (YJOs) have concerns about fitness for significantly > young people than are being referred to the MHC per year – Limitations Subject to recall Can’t exclude double counting Limited sample of practitioners

Implications – Lack of referral to MHC Analysis of LP responses – Approx 19% of children LP’s identified as having concerns re fitness referred to MHC Only another 10% otherwise discontinued by Pros/in lower courts Therefore - Low numbers of referrals to MHC not purely related to low numbers for whom LP’s have concern

Implications – Lack of referral to Mental Health Experts LPs only refer to Mental Health Experts for assessment 53% of the time Without such assessment - discontinuance and/or referral to MHC less likely Reasons for non-referral for assessment – Largely immaturity (indicates the current process for dealing with fitness due to immaturity may be inadequate or underutilised)

Implications - Pragmatism Reasons for non-referral to MHC in QLD largely pragmatic/tactical/other: – Eg. From LPs Penalties were so minor so it was easier to get it out of the way. Easier and quicker to plead out. Takes too long to go through MHC. – Eg. From YJOs Process takes too long.

Summary More children identified as having fitness issues than ultimately referred to MHC Non-referral only partially explained by discontinuance Immaturity is a potential unfitness issue - its lack of recognition provides reason for non- referral to Mental Health Experts/MHC Pragmatic/tactical/other reasons observed as main reasons for non-referral to MHC

CRICOS CODE 00017B Suzie O’Toole: Bruce Watt: Jodie O’Leary: