California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12,20071 Estimating the Generation Resource Mix of Electricity Imports to California – Energy Commission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CPUC Vision for Transmission Planning in the West Dian M. Grueneich, Commissioner California Public Utilities Commission Western Electricity Coordinating.
Advertisements

Reporting GHG Emissions from Power Purchases CPUC/CEC Workshop on Load-Based Reporting Mike McCormick, Policy Director April 13, 2007.
Policy Issues in the Treatment of CO2 Emissions—Oregon+ Hal T. Nelson, Ph.D. Visiting Professor Technical Advisor to the.
Alberta’s Future Electricity Needs: What’s the Real Story? Economic Developers of Alberta Annual Professional Conference April 10, 2014 John Esaiw, Director.
California GHG policy and implications for the power sector APEX Sydney Conference October 13, 2008 Anjali Sheffrin, PhD.
CVP Cost Allocation Public Workshop – January 18, 2013 “PLEXOS Methodology and Assumptions”
Technical Conference Avoided Cost Modeling January 6, 2015.
California Energy Commission Retail Electric Rate Scenarios: Key Drivers and Structure 2015 Integrated Energy Policy Report California Energy Commission.
Special Open Meeting of the Arizona Corporation Commission Energy Workshop February 16, 2001 Arizona Public Service Company Cary B. Deise Director, Transmission.
3/16/20001 BPA’s traditional revenue stream varies with water supply (higher water conditions, higher revenues) BPA’s revenues from Slice are independent.
1 John J. Conti Acting Director Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting Prepared for the Energy Technology System Analysis Program (ETSAP) Florence,
Tenth Annual Midwest Energy Conference March 7, 2007 How Best Satisfy Midwest Electric Load Growth? Thomas R. Casten Chairman Recycled Energy Development.
1.  What is a Renewable Energy Credit (REC)?  What are they used for?  Who uses them?  How is REC ownership tracked?  What is the Renewable Portfolio.
1.  Purpose  To present Staff’s Preliminary Findings on the 2012 Integrated Resource Plans of:  APS – Arizona Public Service Company  TEP – Tucson.
EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
Energy in the U.S. and California Introduction to GIS Vicky Hsu Fall 2012 Midterm.
California Energy Commission Workshop Nuclear Power Plant Issues
Preliminary Analysis of the SEE Future Infrastructure Development Plan and REM Benefits.
1 Enhancing the Role of Renewable Energy in California Robert A. Laurie Commissioner California Energy Commission Geothermal Resources Council Annual Meeting.
EMPIRE- modelling the future European power system under different climate policies Asgeir Tomasgard, Christian Skar, Gerard Doorman, Bjørn H. Bakken,
Policy Research Shop Support for the Policy Research Shop is provided by the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education, U.S. Department of Education.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future * NREL July 5, 2011 Tradeoffs and Synergies between CSP and PV at High Grid Penetration.
Study Results Drought Scenario Study This slide deck contains results from the 2011 TEPPC Study Program. This study shows the impact in the interconection.
Page 1 Scope 2 Emissions Accounting & Reporting 15 th May 2014
California’s Electricity Situation Briefing for the staff of the U.S. House of Representatives February 9, 2001 Energy Information Administration (Updated.
SAN MATEO COUNTY CCA TECHNICAL STUDY: OVERVIEW Community Choice Energy Advisory Committee June 25 th,2015.
Renewable Energy Delivery, Scheduling, and Firming / Shaping
Draft Avoided Cost Forecast and Marginal CO 2 Offset Value of Conservation Regional Technical Forum Maury Galbraith Northwest Power and Conservation Council.
CD4CDMCD4CDM Estimating CO 2 Emissions Reduction by example.
0 CPUC / CEC Workshop Reporting and Tracking GHG Emissions for a Load Based Cap PG&E Reporting Emissions and Estimating Emissions from Unspecified Purchases.
Base Case Draft – For Comment Rocky Mountain States Sub-Regional Transmission Study December 9, 2003.
California Energy Commission 2015 IEPR Self-Generation Forecast Sacramento, CA 7/07/2015 Asish Gautam Demand Analysis Office Energy Assessments Division.
The Future of Electric Power In Utah January 12, 2010.
Net Metering Technical Conference Docket No PacifiCorp Avoided Costs October 21, 2008 Presented by Becky Wilson Executive Staff Director Utah.
A Resource Adequacy Standard for the Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Technical Committee January 17, 2008 Portland Airport.
COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION: TECHNICAL STUDY RESULTS Peninsula Clean Energy September 24,2015.
Preliminary Results with the Regional Portfolio Model Michael Schilmoeller for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generation Resource Advisory.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Accelerating Energy Efficiency To Reduce the PNW Power System's Carbon Footprint Tom Eckman Manager, Conservation.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generating.
Powered by the Loads and Resource Information System (LaRIS) Pacific Northwest Loads and Resources Operational Peaking Adjustment Council Briefing.
Arizona Corporation Commission Energy Workshop February 16, 2001.
1March 24, 2000California PX Demand Responsiveness Workshop Christensen Associates Lessons from California The Role of Demand Response Energy Markets in.
Bill Savings Costs and Bill Saving in the Low Income Energy Efficiency Programs for 2002 to 2004 Bill Savings Public Workshop April 15, San Diego.
1 Monitoring Potential Emissions Leakage under the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI): Possible Lessons for Load-Based Cap-and-Trade Programs Christopher.
Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting October 4, 2011.
Capturing the Cost of Carbon in Electricity Markets Clare Breidenich Consultant Western Power Trading Forum CPUC Reporting Workshop San Francisco, CA April.
Allocation of CO 2 Emission Allowances in RGGI Dallas Burtraw, Karen Palmer, Danny Kahn Resources for the Future Presentation to RGGI Stakeholder Meeting.
October 29, Organizational role of Short-Term Planning and Hydro Duty Scheduling Relationship to other groups in BPA Planning and analysis job.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council A Look At The Council’s Conservation Planning Methodology and Assumptions A Look At The Council’s Conservation.
California Energy Commission Integrated Energy Policy Report Commissioner Workshop: Highlights of the Natural Gas Outlook Report November 03, 2015 Ivin.
Analysis of Tribal Set Aside Issues– Preliminary Summary of Results Prepared for : National Tribal Environmental Council Prepared by: ICF Consulting, December.
Lecture 16 Economic Dispatch Professor Tom Overbye Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS.
C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N Tracking Progress: Coal Marc Pryor Supervisor, Procurement & Modeling Unit California Energy Commission.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Workshop on the Staff Draft 2006 Summer Outlook Report December 8, 2005 Hearing Room B.
Capacity Metric & Hydro Capacity Assessment Decisions Mary Johannis PNW Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting June 20, 2007.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Interim Wholesale Electricity Price and Carbon Dioxide Production Forecasts Maury Galbraith Northwest.
PacifiCorp and CAISO Expanding Regional Energy Partnerships
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
PC30 BLM High Priority RE SWG – 10/26/15 WECC Staff W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
1 9. BUSINESS STRATEGIES IN ELECTRICITY MARKETS Asko Vuorinen.
Planning the Networked Grid Transmission Planning J.E.(Jeff) Billinton Manager, Regional Transmission - North Building the Networked Electricity Grid –
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
Pennsylvania Electric Supply GHG Forecast 1 Victoria Clark Stockholm Environment Institute - US Center 5/29/09.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Generating Resource Advisory Committee Meeting.
SM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® RETI 2.0 Workshop 03/16/2016 IOU Panel.
Prepared by California Department of Water Resources May 31, 2001
Outline Energy demand and prices Reserves and new sources of energy supply.
SDG&E Procurement Perspective IEPA 35th Annual Meeting September 21st, 2016 Dan Skopec Vice President, Regulatory Affairs Sempra Energy Utilities.
Division of Energy Resources
Study Results Drought Scenario Study
Presentation transcript:

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12,20071 Estimating the Generation Resource Mix of Electricity Imports to California – Energy Commission Staff Paper California Energy Commission and Public Utilities Commission Workshop on Reporting and Tracking Greenhouse Gas Emissions for a Load-Based Cap April 12 and 13, 2007 Al Alvarado Electricity Analysis Office California Energy Commission

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12,20072 Presentation Overview Purpose of Resource Mix Analysis Role of Electricity Imports Average Regional Methodology Alternative Approach to Estimate Resource Mix

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12,20073 Goals of Resource Mix Analysis Increase attribution of specific purchases and ownership Estimate unspecified purchases into what is bought & sold in the market Advance links between statewide and LSE accounting Incremental improvement of current estimate, while shifting emphasis to new reporting and tracking

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12,20074 Types of Electricity Imports Ownership shares of generation located out- of-state Contracts and other entitlements Purchases to satisfy customer obligations Purchases to cover unexpected short-term variations (i.e. forced outages) Economy Purchases Wheeling through CA

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12,20075 Average Methodology Used for GHG Emissions Imports Inventory 2000 to present GHG emission estimates apply the average generation mix in each region Current estimates reported in: –Net System Power Report –2006 Greenhouse Emissions Inventory Report

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12,20076 Limitations of Averaging Approach Does not account for specific ownership or power purchase agreements Ignores system constraints Does not capture when and what types of electricity is purchased Assumes California is purchasing the same mix as region’s native load Does not account for other state’s priority preferences

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12,20077 Revised Approach to Estimate Imports Resource Mix First identify ownership generation Identify long-term power purchase contracts and entitlements (i.e. Hoover) Remaining balance are considered unspecified system imports

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12,20078 Specified and Unspecified Imports by Region for 2005

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12,20079 Estimating Sources of Unspecified Imports Separate Northwest and Southwest regions – different generation profiles Coordination with other western efforts Initial study uses marginal generation analysis for Southwest mix Initial study uses marginal generation analysis and sales assessment for Northwest

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12, Rationale for Marginal Generation Analysis Used for Electricity System Imports Utilities and generators typically use their cheapest electricity supplies to meet customer obligations Baseload generation is usually the lower cost resource, mostly owned by utilities Remaining surplus are generally the marginal generation resources Electricity from marginal generation will be sold if there is a market

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12, Southwest Study System simulations to respond to stakeholder questions on marginal resource assumptions Test to see what generation is re-dispatched with reduced imports Transfer capability reduced to amount needed for specified resources Transmission constraints create GWH coal- generation drop (0.1%) Natural gas generation increase in CA & Southern Nevada, declines in rest of SW

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12, Table Southwest Electricity Imports Resource Mix (GWh) Resource TypeSpecifiedUnspecified Unspecified Percent Total Percent mix Coal34, % 35, % Nuclear7,0740 0% 7, % Hydropower2,0930 0% 2,0933.4% Natural Gas017,360 96% 17, % Renewables00 0% 00.0% Total Imports44,15918, % 62,242100% Percent Specified and Unspecified 71%29%100%

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12, Unspecified Imports from Northwest NW predominately hydroelectric system High correlation between NW water conditions and California system imports Identify types of sellers to California Attribute generation mix to each seller: –IOU, POU & Other = WA/OR disclosures –Canada = Hydro –IPP & Marketers = 50% Hydro, 46% Gas, 4% Coal

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12, Table Northwest Electricity Imports Resource Mix (GWh) Resource TypeSpecifiedUnspecified Unspecified Percent Total Percent mix Coal5651,5728.8%2, % Nuclear %4662.3% Hydropower1,43211, %13, % Natural Gas03, %3, % Renewables %4862.4% Other900%9 Total Imports2,40417,882100%20,286100% Percent Specified and Unspecified 12%88%100%

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12, Comparison of the 2005 Total Statewide Imports Resource Mix Using the Revised and Average Estimation Methods Resource TypeRevised MethodAverage Method Coal45.9%59.4% Large Hydro18.6%18.2% Natural Gas25.8%15.5% Nuclear9.1%6.8% Renewables0.6%0.0% Total100.0%

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12, Inter-State Coordination Working with Washington and Oregon energy staff Better understand purpose and tracking methodologies between states A coordinated regional tracking system is needed –Avoid double-counting and shifting emission attributions –LSE transaction choices that lead to actual emission reduction

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12, Partial Data Available to Track Imports Metered gross and net power flows between 3 CA and out-of-state control area operators Electricity generation and fuel use by power plant Power Source Disclosure for 70% of CA FERC and EIA Reporting Limited information on the generation source of the electricity imports Additional types of data needed to advance ability to track transactions

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12, Conclusion The revised methodology provides a more detailed characterization than previous approaches More LSE purchase data would refine the resource mix estimates This is an interim approach for historical and near- term tracking More policy analysis and inter-state discussion needed prior to finalizing methodology

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12, Background Slides

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12, Net Electricity Imports (MWh) RegionYearQ1Q2Q3Q4Annual total PNW ,1321,475,6152,242,6203,472,1316,826, ,619,4909,208,7248,551,7114,806,16727,186, ,482,2767,534,0885,992,7304,294,35022,303, ,853,3045,992,2025,035,3055,949,92420,830, ,997,0215,731,7117,064,8453,492,10720,285,684 SW ,349,53512,742,71811,124,85814,387,37353,604, ,253,56012,385,21012,137,49217,161,83255,938, ,249,40212,576,50114,764,95116,264,78158,855, ,885,63915,559,71116,903,48617,601,50665,950, ,851,57712,815,95415,582,76017,934,36962,184,661

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12,200721

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12, Net System Power Report Imports from PNW and SW (GWh)

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12, Net Electricity Imports (GWhs) Import TypeNWSWTotal % of Total Specified Imports2,40444,15946,56356% Unspecified Imports17,88218,08335,96544% Total Imports20,28662,24282,528 Regional %25%75% Source: California Energy Commission

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12,200724

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12, Facility NameDependable Capacity (MW) Ownership Shares PercentMW Intermountain1, %1,738 Mohave1, %915 Four Corners2, %740 Navajo2, %477 Reid Gardner %178 San Juan1, %399 Palo Verde3, %1,060 Total13,6965,507 California Utility Ownership Shares of Generation Facilities Located Out-of-State (Dependable Capacity MW)

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12, Facility Name Intermountain12,85512,94713,02013,85213,118 Mohave6,7666,7126,4016,7156,954 Four Corners5,2114,4685,4255,1715,403 Navajo3,6863,7803,4613,7573,611 Reid Gardner1,1471,2531,2261,2151,176 San Juan2,8633,0002,7433,0243,016 Palo Verde7,8738,4597,8327,7067,074 Total Generation40,40240,62040,10741,43940,351 Generation from California Utility Ownership Shares (Gigawatt hours per year)

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12, CA Utility Ownership of Out-of-State Plants (Summer Capacity MW) * IPP figures represent contracted capacity. ** Source: Global Energy Decisions

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12, Correlation Between PNW Hydro-Generation and Electricity Imports to California ( )

California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12, Statewide Electricity Imports Resource Mix (GWh) Resource TypeSpecifiedPercent MixUnspecified Percent MixTotalPercent Mix Coal35,55776%2,2956%37,85246% Nuclear7,23516%3051%7,5409% Hydropower3,5258%11,81133%15,33619% Natural Gas00%21,30559%21,30526% Renewables2371%2491%4861% Other90%0 9 Total46,563100%35,965100%82,528100% Specified and Unspecified56% 44% 100%