1. ACCJC INSTITUTION-SET STANDARDS DISCUSSION 2 A “standard” is the level of performance set by the institution to meet educational quality and institutional.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LACCD Strategic Plan Internal Scan A. Enrollment Trends and Student Characteristics.
Advertisements

ACCJC’s Annual Report Institution-Set Standards REVISED March 19, 2014 PaRC Presentation E. Kuo Foothill IR&P.
INVESTIGATING MILESTONES AND COMPLETIONS AT A LOCAL INSTITUTION BASED ON ADELMAN’S STUDY, “THE TOOLBOX REVISITED.” What’s in YOUR toolbox? DANIEL MARTINEZ,
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges 2010 Report: Moreno Valley College Calculation presented by presented by David Torres, Dean Institutional.
STUDENT EQUITY PLAN PROGRESS PRESENTATION TO BOARD FEBRUARY 28, 2012.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
Defining a Career Skills Building Student Cohort & Outcome.
Understanding Colleague Data Using Colleague data to complete the Spring IPEDS surveys Matt Smith: Pitt Community College.
SBVC Student Equity Plan A Update and Historical Overview James E. Smith, Ph.D. Dean, Research, Planning, and Institutional Effectiveness.
Academic Attainment in California Community Colleges: Racial And Ethnic Disparities in the ARCC 2.0/Scorecard Metrics Tom Leigh Alice van Ommeren.
Summary of Emerging Trends in Higher Education Spring 2011.
ARCC /08 Reporting Period Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research & Planning February 2010.
ACCJC’s Annual Report Institution-Set Standards March 5, 2015 PaRC Meeting E. Kuo Foothill IR&P.
A Comprehensive Analysis of a PrOF Instructional Data Packet To illustrate the data analysis process CRC Research Office 2009.
Student Success Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges September 2011.
Defining a Career Skills Building Student Cohort & Outcome.
Student Performance Profile Study: An Examination of Success and Equity Matt Wetstein, Interim Vice President of Instruction Office of Planning, Research,
Oklahoma’s Experience: Proposed Measure Construction for 2P1-Completion Phoenix Data Quality Institute June 14-16, 2006 Kathy Spengler Oklahoma State Regents.
Peralta Community College District Open Forum 2015 Strategic Plan January 21, 2015.
REPORT TO THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES MARCH 7, 2012 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT INSTITUTIONAL.
Fact Book Fall 2010 Outcomes *Unless otherwise specified, charts exclude students taking only non-credit courses.
Capital Community College Demographic Data for Remedial Cohorts 2002, 2003, 2004.
2014 Student Success Scorecard PaRC Presentation May 7, 2014 E. Kuo FH IR&P *Formerly known as the Accountability Reporting for Community Colleges (ARCC)
Student Success Scorecard PaRC Presentation April 17, 2013 FOOTHILL COLLEGE E. Kuo FH IR&P *Formerly known as the Accountability Reporting for Community.
1 System Level Accountability Measures Sept. 17, 2003.
Brand Review SP’09 “Get to Know MSJC Students from the Perspective of the Facts and the Stats” Key Focus Areas: Headcount Key Focus Areas: Headcount MSJC.
Student Success Scorecard De Anza College 2015 Mallory Newell Office of Research and Planning.
Ethnicity CategoryFall 2009 Cohort (2 Years) Fall 2008 Cohort (3 Years) Fall 2007 Cohort (4 Years) Fall 2006 Cohort (5 Years) Fall 2005 Cohort (6 Years)
 California community colleges serve over 2.9 million students each year  70 to 80% of students enrolled in California community colleges need developmental.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
Student Equity Plan Tables Submitted 12/18/2015 in the SCC Student Equity Plan Katherine Zoloty SSSP & Student Equity Research Analyst.
Mallory Newell Office of Institutional Research and Planning
Student Pathways as defined exclusively by Units Earned Units Earned in Following Spring Term Units Earned in Next Fall Term Units Earned in First Fall.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Fall Enrollment by Ethnic Group and Year Grant Campus Year ETHNIC GROUP Nonresident alien Hispanic/Latino American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Black.
With Institutional and Program Level Data
SLOCCCD Board of Trustees Meeting November 2, 2016
The U.S. Higher Education Landscape: Equity Lens Applied
Chancellor’s Office Data Resources for Student Success October 7, 2015
Student Success Scorecard and Institution-Set Standards 2014
Student Success Scorecard Spring 2017
Capital Community College
SLOCCCD Board of Trustees October 1, 2014
2016 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
Dental Hygiene Total Enrollment by Race, to (1 of 2)
2017 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
Student Success Scorecard & Other Institutional Effectiveness Metrics
Dental Laboratory Technology Total Enrollment by Race, to (1 of 2)
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
To FYE… and Beyond Butte College.
Dental Assisting Total Enrollment by Race, to (1 of 2)
Dental Laboratory Technology Total Enrollment by Race, to (1 of 2)
UNTHSC Fall Enrollment by Program: Asian/ Pacific Islander
Dental Assisting Total Enrollment by Race, to (1 of 2)
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
Internal Scan Presentation
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
Inge Bond Presentation to College Council November 4, 2011
SCC Recent High School Graduates: Number & Ethnic Profile
Graduate Ethnicity by Gender
Dental Hygiene Total Enrollment by Race, to (1 of 2)
MSJC Demographics AY 2007-’08
SLOCCCD Board of Trustees October 7, 2014
Disproportionate Impact Study
SCC Student Ethnicity Profile (Fall 2012 to Fall 2016)
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
IBHE Proprietary Advisory Committee Institution Impact Report
Presentation transcript:

1

ACCJC INSTITUTION-SET STANDARDS DISCUSSION 2

A “standard” is the level of performance set by the institution to meet educational quality and institutional effectiveness expectations. This number may differ from a performance improvement “goal” which an institution may aspire to meet (ACCJC, 2013). 3

Student Achievement Data Requested by ACCJC  Course Completion Rate (14b.)  Student Retention Rate-Fall to Fall (15b.)  Student Degree Completion (16b.)  Student Transfer to 4-year Colleges/universities (17b.)  Student Certificate Completion (18b.) 4

Proposed Method for Setting the Standards 1.Review most current and historical performance (multi- year/longitudinal data disaggregated by ethnicity and other demographic characteristics as appropriate) 2.Generate multi-year averages for performance (5-8 years) 3.Determine performance indicators based on data analysis, institutional history and context (standards) 5

Proposed Method for Using the Standards Develop a performance range and/or color coding (Trapp, 2013): Range =>5% above target-excellent + or – 5%- on target-good =<5% below target-needs attention 6

(14b.) Successful Course Completions* - Fall Terms Race/Ethnicity Fall 2005Fall 2006Fall 2007Fall 2008Fall 2009Fall 2010Fall 2011Fall 2012 %N%N%N%N%N%N%N%N State Totals65% 67% 68% 69% 70% District Totals66%34,23965%32,18065%33,84367%38,32867%40,51967%41,07569%35,54569%34,473 Alas/Nat.Amer61%46457%34553%34563%35264%23260%19772%17072%155 Asian64%37571%43374%78672%1,69873%1,77472%1,69776%1,56174%1,463 Black/Af.Amer57%1,68452%1,56456%1,58156%1,44657%1,40958%1,50562%1,36160%1,218 Hispanic63%15,20763%14,40963%15,61364%18,54064%20,82065%21,61866%19,61067%19,357 Non-Resident Alien76%1779%5676%5073%6076%11174%8572%5483%12 Pac Islander94%1752%2973%4960%16250%11975%10674%6682%55 Two or More68%20062%27966%45469%1,25965%1,56263%1,67868%1,56867%1,672 White71%12,17970%11,51070%12,10671%13,30471%13,52373%13,42776%10,57173%9,989 Unknown70%4,09664%3,55566%2,85967%1,50775%96972%76274%58472%552 * Successful Course Completions is defined here as the ratio of successful grade marks (A,B,C,CR,P) to all grade marks (A,B,C,D,F,W,CR,NC,P,NP,I) for credit courses. Plus/Minus grades are included in the ratio. 7 Step 1. Review most current and historical performance

(14b.) Successful Course Completions* - Fall Terms Race/Ethnicity Eight-Year Average Eight-Year State Average67% Eight-Year District Average67% Alas/Nat. Amer.63% Asian72% Black/African Amer.57% Hispanic64% Non-Resident Alien76% Pac Islander70% Two or More66% White72% Unknown70% * Successful Course Completions is defined here as the ratio of successful grade marks (A,B,C,CR,P) to all grade marks (A,B,C,D,F,W,CR,NC,P,NP,I) for credit courses. Plus/Minus grades are included in the ratio. 8 Step 2. Generate multi-year averages for performance

Student Course Completion (14b.)Rate Fall % Eight-Year District Average67% Eight-Year Average by Ethnicity-Low57% Institutional Standard Recommendation65% Successful Course Completions is defined as the ratio of successful grade marks (A,B,C,CR,P) to all grade marks (A,B,C,D,F,W,CR,NC,P,NP,I) for credit courses. Plus/Minus grades are included in the ratio. 9 Step 3. Determine performance indicators (standards)

* Successful Course Completions is defined here as the ratio of successful grade marks (A,B,C,CR,P) to all grade marks (A,B,C,D,F,W,CR,NC,P,NP,I) for credit courses. Plus/Minus grades are included in the ratio. (14b.) Successful Course Completions* - Fall Terms Age Fall 2005Fall 2006Fall 2007Fall 2008Fall 2009Fall 2010Fall 2011Fall 2012 %N%N%N%N%N%N%N%N State Totals65% 67% 68% 69% 70% District Totals66%34,23965%32,18065%33,84367%38,32867%40,51967%41,07569%35,54569%34,473 Under 2066%12,69562%12,22563%12,95964%14,96364%15,41865%15,12467%13,74067%12, %11,45663%10,37462%10,82865%12,09365%13,21966%14,19868%12,66169%13, %8,88870%8,51871%8,90472%10,02572%10,80971%10,68274%8,36770%8, and Above79%1,20076%1,06379%1,15279%1,24779%1,07378%1,07177%77773%663 10

* Successful Course Completions is defined here as the ratio of successful grade marks (A,B,C,CR,P) to all grade marks (A,B,C,D,F,W,CR,NC,P,NP,I) for credit courses. Plus/Minus grades are included in the ratio. (14b.) Successful Course Completions* - Fall Terms Gender Fall 2005Fall 2006Fall 2007Fall 2008Fall 2009Fall 2010Fall 2011Fall 2012 %N%N%N%N%N%N%N%N State Totals65% 67% 68% 69% 70% District Totals66% % % % % % % %34473 Female67% % % % % % % %18960 Male66% % % % % % % %15462 Not Indentified65%19159%12069%17175%25971%20456%13751%8049%51 11

* Successful Course Completions is defined here as the ratio of successful grade marks (A,B,C,CR,P) to all grade marks (A,B,C,D,F,W,CR,NC,P,NP,I) for credit courses. Plus/Minus grades are included in the ratio. (14b.) Successful Course Completions* - Fall Terms Student Load Fall 2005Fall 2006Fall 2007Fall 2008Fall 2009Fall 2010Fall 2011Fall 2012 %N%N%N%N%N%N%N%N State Totals65% 67% 68% 69% 70% District Totals66%34,23965%32,18065%33,84367%38,32867%40,51967%41,07569%35,54569%34,473 Full-Time75%17,74376%15,35075%16,12176%18,63776%21,14379%20,75678%19,05080%17,880 Part-Time57%16,49655%16,83056%17,72258%19,69156%19,37656%20,31959%16,49557%16,593 12

**Student Retention is defined as the ratio of all students who complete a course with any grade (A,B,C,D,F,W,CR,NC,P,NP, and I) in the initial Fall term and is registered for a course past census (registration code starts with 'R' or = 'DW') in the subsequent Fall term. (15b.) Student Retention** from Fall to Fall > > > > > > > > 2013 Retention Rate 43% 45%43%46%43%49% Subsequent Fall Term 4,5334,8015,4765,8416,1605,9225,5965,392 Initial Fall Term 10,61311,03912,11113,60913,41513,61911,42111,053 13

Student Degree Completion (16b.) District Total Associate in Arts for Transfer (A.A.-T) Degree 142 Associate of Science (A.S.) degree Associate of Arts (A.A.) degree Degrees Awarded are defined as a count of all associate degrees awarded in an academic year. Students can earn multiple awards in a given year. Chancellor's Office approved awards are Associate of Arts, Associates of Science (Source: DataMart) 14

Transfer Velocity Cohort: The cohorts are first-time college students with a minimum of 12 units earned who attempted a transfer level math or English course. The outcome is transfer to a four-year institution within a given time period subsequent to initial enrollment. Dividing the number of students with enrollments at a Bachelors-granting institution by the total size of the Transfer Cohort yields the transfer rate. The initial group or cohort of first-time students is evaluated six years after initial enrollment in order to determine if they have shown behavioral intent to transfer (Source: Datamart). 15

(17b.) Transfer Rates Ethnicity Cohort 2002/2003Cohort 2003/2004Cohort 2004/2005Cohort 2005/2006Cohort 2006/2007 Transfer Rate # of Transfers # in Cohort Transfer Rate # of Transfers # in Cohort Transfer Rate # of Transfers # in Cohort Transfer Rate # of Transfers # in Cohort Transfer Rate # of Transfers # in Cohort Overall State Transfer Rate40%57,233142,73742%43,840105,54341%44,800108,59542%47,376113,91241%55,735137,510 Overall District Transfer Rate 33% % % % % African-American29%103550%132632%113444%184163%2946 American Indian/Alaskan Native 31%41345%51113%21531%51636%514 Asian29%186324%187522%115042%235545%3271 Filipino35%61750%51063%101633%51524%938 Hispanic26% % % % % Pacific Islander50% %1517%16 Unknown35% %286340%338344% %59140 White Non-Hispanic40% % % % %

(17b.) Transfer Rates GenderCohort 2002/2003Cohort 2003/2004Cohort 2004/2005Cohort 2005/2006Cohort 2006/2007 Transfer Rate # of Transfers # in Cohort Transfer Rate # of Transfers # in Cohort Transfer Rate # of Transfers # in Cohort Transfer Rate # of Transfers # in Cohort Transfer Rate # of Transfers # in Cohort Overall Transfer Rate 33% % % % % Female29% % % % % Male31% % % % % Unknown---100%2250%3656%91628%518 17

(17b.) 18

Certificates Awarded are defined as a count of all certificates awarded in an academic year. Students can earn multiple awards in a given year. Chancellor's Office approved awards are Certificate requiring 18 to fewer than 30 semester units, Certificate requiring 30 to fewer than 60 semester units and Certificate requiring 60 or more semester units (Source: DataMart) Student Certificate Completion (18b.) District Total Certificate requiring 60+ semester units Certificate requiring 30 to < 60 semester units Certificate requiring 18 to < 30 semester units Certificate requiring 6 to < 18 semester units

Questions? 20

Thank you! 21