Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 1 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Transceiver Pipeline and Radio Modeling.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PHY-MAC Dialogue with Multi-Packet Reception Workshop on Broadband Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks and Services 12 th -13 th September 2002 ETSI, Sophia Antipolis,
Advertisements

SoNIC: Classifying Interference in Sensor Networks Frederik Hermans et al. Uppsala University, Sweden IPSN 2013 Presenter: Jeffrey.
The Impact of Channel Estimation Errors on Space-Time Block Codes Presentation for Virginia Tech Symposium on Wireless Personal Communications M. C. Valenti.
2005/12/06OPLAB, Dept. of IM, NTU1 Optimizing the ARQ Performance in Downlink Packet Data Systems With Scheduling Haitao Zheng, Member, IEEE Harish Viswanathan,
Strider : Automatic Rate Adaptation & Collision Handling Aditya Gudipati & Sachin Katti Stanford University 1.
1 DOA-ALOHA: Slotted ALOHA for Ad Hoc Networking Using Smart Antennas Harkirat Singh & Suresh Singh Portland State University, OR, USA.
Wireless Sensor Networks Energy Efficiency Issues
Communication Systems Simulation - I Harri Saarnisaari Part of Simulations and Tools for Telecommunication Course.
Outline What is an ad hoc network Smart Antenna Overview
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
1 MOBMAC - An Energy Efficient and low latency MAC for Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks Proceedings of the 2005 Systems Communications (ICW ’ 05)
Propagation characteristics of wireless channels
1 Lecture 9: Diversity Chapter 7 – Equalization, Diversity, and Coding.
Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 1 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Transceiver Pipeline and Radio Modeling.
Noise and SNR. Noise unwanted signals inserted between transmitter and receiver is the major limiting factor in communications system performance 2.
Cooperative Diversity Scheme Based on MIMO-OFDM in Small Cell Network Dong-Hyun Ha Sejong University.
College of Engineering Resource Management in Wireless Networks Anurag Arepally Major Adviser : Dr. Robert Akl Department of Computer Science and Engineering.
Lecture 1 Wireless Networks CPE 401/601 Computer Network Systems slides are modified from Jim Kurose & Keith Ross All material copyright J.F.
CE 4228 Data Communications and Networking
A Framework for Energy- Scalable Communication in High-Density Wireless Networks Telvis Calhoun Wireless Sensor Networks CSC Dr. Li 8/27/2008.
CDMA Key Technology ZTE Corporation CDMA Division.
Network Coding Testbed Jeremy Bergan, Ben Green, Alex Lee.
Study on Power Saving for Cellular Digital Packet Data over a Random Error/Loss Channel Huei-Wen Ferng, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Computer.
Improving QoS Support in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Agenda Motivations Proposed Framework Packet-level FEC Multipath Routing Simulation Results Conclusions.
OPNET TM Modeler CS 541 Advanced Networking Spring 2009.
Computer Networks Performance Metrics. Performance Metrics Outline Generic Performance Metrics Network performance Measures Components of Hop and End-to-End.
Automatic Gain Control Response Delay and Acquisition in Direct- Sequence Packet Radio Communications Sure 2007 Stephanie Gramc Dr. Noneaker.
Sami Al-wakeel 1 Data Transmission and Computer Networks The Switching Networks.
Copyright: S.Krishnamurthy, UCR Power Controlled Medium Access Control in Wireless Networks – The story continues.
Dynamic Source Routing in ad hoc wireless networks Alexander Stojanovic IST Lisabon 1.
Wireless Mobile Communication and Transmission Lab. Chapter 8 Application of Error Control Coding.
Tufts University. EE194-WIR Wireless Sensor Networks. March 3, 2005 Increased QoS through a Degraded Channel using a Cross-Layered HARQ Protocol Elliot.
Doc.: n-proposal-statistical-channel-error-model.ppt Submission Jan 2004 UCLA - STMicroelectronics, Inc.Slide 1 Proposal for Statistical.
An Adaptive, High Performance MAC for Long- Distance Multihop Wireless Networks Presented by Jason Lew.
Space-Time and Space-Frequency Coded Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing Transmitter Diversity Techniques King F. Lee.
1 © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CCNA 3 v3.0 Module 4 Switching Concepts.
1 © 2006 Nokia pullola_ ppt / Extending Base Station Active Radio Link Set for Improved Uplink Scheduling Esa-Pekka Pullola Supervisor:
Cisco 3 - Switching Perrine. J Page 16/4/2016 Chapter 4 Switches The performance of shared-medium Ethernet is affected by several factors: data frame broadcast.
Data Communications & Computer Networks, Second Edition1 Chapter 6 Errors, Error Detection, and Error Control.
A Distributed Relay-Assignment Algorithm for Cooperative Communications in Wireless Networks ICC 2006 Ahmed K. Sadek, Zhu Han, and K. J. Ray Liu Department.
ECE 4710: Lecture #2 1 Frequency  Communication systems often use atmosphere for transmission  “Wireless”  Time-varying Electro-Magnetic (EM) Wave 
Gain (dB) Benefits –Resistance to jamming –Resistance to detection –Sharing of channels among multiple users Applications –Cellular code-division multiple-access.
Electromagnetic Spectrum
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Connecting Devices CORPORATE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, BHOPAL Department of Electronics and.
1. Physical Transmission Transmission Media Wire (guided) Coaxial cable Twisted Pair UTP STP Fiber Optic Wireless (unguided) Radio waves Microwave Infrared.
Chapter 11 Extending LANs 1. Distance limitations of LANs 2. Connecting multiple LANs together 3. Repeaters 4. Bridges 5. Filtering frame 6. Bridged network.
Multi-channel Wireless Sensor Network MAC protocol based on dynamic route.
Doc.: IEEE /66r0 Submission March 2000 Nada Golmie, NISTSlide 1 IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks WPAN Coexistence.
A Simple Transmit Diversity Technique for Wireless Communications -M
CHAPTER 1 Part 2.1  Noise.
Video Streaming Transmission Over Multi-channel Multi-path Wireless Mesh Networks Speaker : 吳靖緯 MA0G WiCOM '08. 4th International.
CCNA3 Module 4 Brierley Module 4. CCNA3 Module 4 Brierley Topics LAN congestion and its effect on network performance Advantages of LAN segmentation in.
E-MBS Feedback Channel Design (E-MBS) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/1877 Date Submitted: Source: Chih-Yuan Lin
Doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission November 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 1 Au Update on Estimating Packet Error Rate Caused by Interference.
Doc.: IEEE /157 Submission June 2000 Sunghyun Choi, Philips ResearchPhilips Research- USA Slide 1 Channel Model Proposal v2.0 for e MAC.
Accurate WiFi Packet Delivery Rate Estimation and Applications Owais Khan and Lili Qiu. The University of Texas at Austin 1 Infocom 2016, San Francisco.
Cellular Wireless Networks. Cellular Network Organization Multiple low power transmitters —100w or less Area divided into cells —Each with own antenna.
Performance Evaluation of Ethernet Networks under different Scenarios Lab 6
Transceiver Pipeline and Radio Modeling
A G3-PLC Network Simulator with Enhanced Link Level Modeling
Space-Time and Space-Frequency Coded Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing Transmitter Diversity Techniques King F. Lee.
OptiSystem applications: BER analysis of BPSK with RS encoding
Introduction to Opnet Mobile Networks Introduction to Opnet
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> January 2013
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> January 2013
Transceiver Pipeline and Radio Modeling
Enhanced-DCF Wireless MAC Protocol: Some Simulation Results
MIMO I: Spatial Diversity
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Mar. 2010
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 1 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Transceiver Pipeline and Radio Modeling

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 2 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Goals Introduce the OPNET Transceiver Pipeline –Capabilities –Defaults Modify pipeline –Show openness and extensibility –Model custom wireless effects

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 3 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Pipeline Models Scope –Each stage uses a pipeline model –Stages are referenced via a pipeline model object attributes -Point-to-Point - link attributes -Bus -Bus attributes -Radio - transceiver attributes –Stages must be compiled prior to reference Modeling method –Create stage in context of the pipeline model –Compile stage into object form –Change pipeline model object attribute to reference stage NOTE: Stage and procedure (pipeline model context) can be used interchangeably

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 4 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Default Pipeline Stage Location Default stages – / /models/std/links Default stage prefixes –dpt_* - default point-to-point –dbu_* - default bus –dra_* - default radio NOTE: OPNET can access pipeline stages from any path in mod_dirs

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 5 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Pipeline Stage Conventions File naming –.ps.c - C procedure –.ps.cpp - C++ procedure –.ps.o - object form Procedure naming –Same as file name w/o extension Compilation –op_mko -type ps -m –Generates.ps.o NOTE: Choices for pipeline stages in OPNET are taken from the set of.ps.o files located in mod_dirs.

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 6 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Radio Pipeline Models Execution sequence for one transmission transmitter (Continued on the next slide) Receiver Group Receiver Group Receiver Group Receiver Group Transmission Delay Link Closure Link Closure Link Closure Link Closure Channel Match Channel Match Channel Match Tx Antenna Gain Tx Antenna Gain Tx Antenna Gain Tx Antenna Gain Propagation Delay Propagation Delay Propagation Delay Propagation Delay Channel Match executed once at the start of simulation for each pair of transmitter and receiver channels stage 1 executed once per transmission stages 2-6 executed separately for each receiver

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 7 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Radio Pipeline Models (cont.) Execution sequence for one transmission (cont.) multiple receivers Received Power Background Noise Interference Noise Signal-to-Noise Ratio Bit Error Rate Error Allocation Error Allocation Received Power Received Power Rx Antenna Gain Background Noise Background Noise Received Power Interference Noise Interference Noise Signal-to-Noise Ratio Signal-to-Noise Ratio Interference Noise Bit Error Rate Bit Error Rate Signal-to-Noise Ratio Error Allocation Error Allocation Error Allocation Error Allocation Error Allocation Background Noise Bit Error Rate Stages 9-11 may be executed zero or more times Stages may be executed one or more times Rx Antenna Gain Rx Antenna Gain Rx Antenna Gain Error Correction 13

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 8 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Radio Pipeline Model Attributes Radio TransmitterRadio Receiver 8 Stages (6-13) Associated with Radio Receiver 6 Stages (0-5) Associated with Radio Transmitter Receiver Group Transmission Delay Link Closure Channel Match Tx Antenna Gain Propagation Delay Rx Antenna Gain Received Power Background Noise Interference Noise Signal-to-Noise Ratio Bit Error Rate Error Allocation Error Correction

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 9 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Stage 7: Receiver Power Invocation –Once for each destination channel –Called immediately after stage 6 - no intervening events Purpose –Computes signal power level at receiver –Typically based on transmitter power and frequency, distance, and antenna gains –Computed only for valid and noise packets Requirements –Sets RCVD_POWER TDA Results –Kernel uses value to record receiver power channel statistic –Places packets in separate lists based on match status

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 10 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Stage 7: Receiver Power (default) Name –dra_power Computation –Determines if signal lock is active –Computes received power -valid and noise packets -Computes path loss - free space -Determines in-band transmission power -Obtains tx and rx antenna gains Result –Value placed in RCVD_POWER for use by stage 9

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 11 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Stage 8: Background Noise Invocation –Called immediately after stage 7 - no intervening events Purpose –Represents effects of all background noise sources –Typically includes -thermal or galactic noise -neighboring electronics emissions -other unmodeled radio transmissions (commercial/amateur radio, TV) Requirements –Sets BKGNOIS TDA Results –Typically used by stage 10 in signal-to-noise computation

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 12 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Stage 8: Background Noise (default) Name –dra_bknoise Computation –Constant ambient noise –Constant background noise –Constant thermal noise Result –Value placed in BKGNOISE for use by stage 10 in signal-to-noise computation

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 13 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Packet Segments Portion of packet with constant signal-to-noise –Segmentation performed by kernel –SNR computation performed by pipeline model –Upon packet completion, kernel subtracts SNR of completing packet SNR Variations

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 14 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Stage 9: Interference Noise Invocation –Only if packet collision occurs Purpose –Accounts for concurrent transmissions –Compute the effect of noise on valid packets Requirements –Sets NOISE_ACCUM TDA –Sets NUM_COLLS TDA Results –Accumulates noise of interfering packets –Noise from packet completing reception is subtracted by kernel –Typically used in stage 10 for signal-to-noise ratio computations

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 15 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Stage 9: Interference Noise (default) Name –dra_inoise Computation –Increments collision count –Adds received power of colliding packet -Obtains power from RCVD_POWER TDA Result –Places accumulated noise in NOISE TDA –Value used in stage 10 in signal-to-noise computation RxTx 1 2 Valid RxTx 1 2 Noise Valid RxTx 1 2 Valid Noise Case 1: Case 2: Case 3:

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 16 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Stage 10: Signal-to-Noise Ratio Invocation (only for valid packets) –Operates on valid packets - those in valid list –Does not require collision for invocation Purpose –Computes the current average SNR –Typically based on received power and noise Requirements –Sets SNR TDA Results –Used by kernel to update receiver channel statistics –Used by later stages RxTx Valid RxTx 1 2 Noise Valid RxTx 1 2 Valid Noise Case 1: Case 2: Case 3:

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 17 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Stage 10: Signal-to-Noise Ratio (default) Name –dra_snr Computation –Obtains received power from RCVD_POWER TDA -Computed in stage 7 –Obtains background noise from BKGNOISE _TDA -Computed in stage 8 –Obtains interference noise from NOISE_ACCUM TDA -Computed in stage 9 –Computes signal-to-noise ratio (in dB) Result –Places in SNR TDA –Value used in stage 11 in bit-error-rate computation

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 18 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Stage 11: Bit Error Rate Invocation –Operates on valid packets - those in valid list –Does not require collision for invocation Purpose –Derives the probability of bit errors –Computed for each packet segment - constant SNR –Value typically obtained from modulation curve Requirements –Sets BER TDA Results –Used by the kernel to record BER statistic –Typically used in stage 12 for allocating errors RxTx Valid RxTx 1 2 Noise Valid RxTx 1 2 Valid Noise Case 1: Case 2: Case 3:

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 19 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Stage 11: Bit Error Rate (default) Name –dra_ber Computation –Obtains signal-to-noise ratio from SNR TDA -Computed in stage 10 –Obtains processing gain from PROC_GAIN TDA -Attribute of receiver channel –Computes effective SNR –Determines expected bit-error-rate -Modulation table lookup Result –Records BER TDA for use in stage 12 in error allocation computation

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 20 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Stage 12: Error Allocation Invocation –Called immediately after stage 11 - no intervening events Purpose –Estimates bit errors for packet segment Requirements –Sets bit-error accumulation in NUM_ERRORS TDA –Sets empirical bit error rate in ACTUAL_BER TDA Results –Kernel maintains a bit accumulator - NUM_ERRORS TDA –Kernel updates BER statistic - ACTUAL_BER TDA –Typically used in stage 13 for error correction

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 21 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Stage 12: Error Allocation (default) Name –dra_error Computation –Does not perform bit-by-bit error computations -Cannot retain bit-error location –Obtains probability of error - BER TDA –Computes probability of k errors –Generates uniform random number: r = (0 1] –Integrates probability mass over possible outcomes Result –Records NUM_ERRORS TDA

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 22 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Stage 13: Error Correction Invocation –Once for each valid packet –Called immediately after stage 12 - no intervening events Purpose –Determines acceptability of arriving packet Requirements –Sets PK_ACCEPT TDA Results –Rejected -destroyed by Kernel –Accepted -forwarded on output stream

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 23 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Stage 13: Error Correction (default) Name –dra_ecc Computation –Obtains threshold from ECC_TRESH TDA -Percentage of packet in error that still yields acceptability –Obtains packet length from op_pk_total_size_get () –Obtains number of errors from NUM_ERRORS TDA –Computes the percent error Result –Packet accepted or rejected depending on threshold and error –Releases signal lock

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 24 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Lab: Capture Mode - Overview Problem –Default pipeline stages use signal lock –Systems can lock on to lowest power signal -Higher power signal does not have lock, but dominates channel -Drowns out lower powered signal -Causes both communications to fail Goals –Modify stages to incorporate signal lock and power lock –Compare results between the two capture modes Purpose –Show additional stage modification –Incorporate power lock capability

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 25 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Lab: Capture Mode - Project/Scenario Return to OPNET Modeler (Radio) –Maximize application Open project –Capture_Mode View scenario –Signal_Lock -High powered transmitter -Low powered transmitter -Receiver

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 26 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Lab: Capture Mode - Choose Results / Simulation Observe chosen results –Pulldown menu: Simulation  Choose Individual Statistics -Node Statistics:Radio Transmitter: Traffic Sent (bits/sec) -Node Statistics:Radio Receiver: Traffic Received (bits/sec) -Node Statistic:Radio Receiver: Traffic Received High Powered Tx (bits/sec) -Node Statistic:Radio Receiver: Traffic Received Low Powered Tx (bits/sec) Execute simulation –Pulldown menu: Simulation  Run Simulation

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 27 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Lab: Capture Mode - View Results View Results –Pulldown menu: Results  View Results –Select statistics -Object Statistics:Capture Mode:High Powered Transmitter:Radio Transmitter: Traffic Sent (bits/sec) -Object Statistics:Capture Mode:Low Powered Transmitter:Radio Transmitter: Traffic Sent (bits/sec) -Object Statistics:Capture Mode:Receiver:Radio Receiver: Traffic Received (bits/sec) -Object Statistics:Capture Mode:Receiver:Radio Receiver: Traffic Received High Powered Tx(bits/sec) -Object Statistics:Capture Mode:Receiver:Radio Receiver: Traffic Received Low Powered Tx(bits/sec)

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 28 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Lab: Capture Mode - View Results (cont.) Show results –View mode -Statistics Overlaid –Filter -As Is -Average –Click Show Conclusion –Low powered transmission dominating -Longer packet lengths - longer signal lock retention –High powered transmission loss -Short packet lengths - shorter signal lock retention

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 29 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Lab: Capture Mode - Stage Modification Overview Goal –Modify three pipeline stages to model power lock –Modifications will eliminate signal lock Approach –Modify the pipeline stages -power model -inoise model -ecc model –Update Models -Project: Create new scenario -Node: Update node model –Execute simulation –View results

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 30 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Lab: Capture Mode - Open Pipeline Stage Open pipeline stage –Return to Windows NT Explorer –Go to directory containing file -c:\users\student\op_models –Double click to open file -opnetwork_capture_mode_power.ps.c

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 31 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Lab: Capture Mode - Modify Pipeline Stage Modify stage –Observe code block in middle of file -Line 59 through 91 –Cut entire else statement -Line 59: start cutting -Line 91: end cutting –Save file

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 32 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Lab: Capture Mode - Modify Pipeline Stage (cont.) Open pipeline stage –Return to Windows NT Explorer –Go to directory containing file -c:\users\student\op_models –Double click to open file -opnetwork_capture_mode_inoise.ps.c Modify stage –Modifications already complete –Observe code block at end of file -Line 69

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 33 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Lab: Capture Mode - Modify Pipeline Stage (cont.) Open pipeline stage –Return to Windows NT Explorer –Go to directory containing file -c:\users\student\op_models –Double click to open file -opnetwork_capture_mode_ecc.ps.c Modify stage –Modifications already complete –Observe code block at end of file -Line 60

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 34 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Lab: Capture Mode - Compile Stages Compile the pipeline stage –Return to a Command Prompt –Execute the compile command -op_mko -type ps -m opnetwork_capture_mode_power -op_mko -type ps -m opnetwork_capture_mode_inoise -op_mko -type ps -m opnetwork_capture_mode_ecc

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 35 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Lab: Capture Mode - Duplicate Scenario Return to OPNET Modeler (Radio) –Maximize application Refresh model directories –Pulldown menu: File  Refresh Model Directories –Required for OPNET to know about new files Duplicate scenario –Pulldown menu: Scenarios  Duplicate Scenario –Scenario name: Power_Lock

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 36 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Lab: Capture Mode - Update Node Model Open Receiver node model –Double click High Powered Receiver object -Node model: no_doppler_rt Change receiver module attribute –Right click receiver module –Change attribute -power model : opnetwork_capture_mode_power -inoise model : opnetwork_capture_mode_inoise -ecc model : opnetwork_capture_mode_ecc –Save node model -Pulldown menu: File  Save As -Filename: capture_mode_power_lock_rr Close node Model

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 37 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Lab: Capture Mode - Update Network Model Return to the Project/Scenario –Capture_Mode-Power_Lock Change Receiver node attribute –Right click Receiver node -Select Edit Attributes –Change model attribute value -Select Edit... -Select capture_mode_power_lock_rr –Close attribute edit box -Select Close Execute simulation –Pulldown menu: Simulation  Run Simulation

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 38 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Lab: Capture Mode - View Results View Results –Pulldown menu: Results  View Results –Select statistics -Object Statistics:Capture Mode:High Powered Transmitter:Radio Transmitter: Traffic Sent (bits/sec) -Object Statistics:Capture Mode:Low Powered Transmitter:Radio Transmitter: Traffic Sent (bits/sec) -Object Statistics:Capture Mode:Receiver:Radio Receiver: Traffic Received (bits/sec) -Object Statistics:Capture Mode:Receiver:Radio Receiver: Traffic Received High Powered Tx(bits/sec) -Object Statistics:Capture Mode:Receiver:Radio Receiver: Traffic Received Low Powered Tx(bits/sec)

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 39 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Lab: Capture Mode - View Results (cont.) Show results –View mode -Statistics Overlaid –Filter -As Is -Average –Click Show Conclusion –High powered transmission dominating -Obtaining power lock –Low powered transmission loss

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 40 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Lab: Capture Mode - Summary Signal lock –Representative of most systems –Locks on to first arriving signal –All other signals are noise, regardless of power level Power lock –Locks on to highest power signal –All other signals are noise –Example: IS-95 -Mobile unit moving between cells -Soft handoff process -Constantly demodulates 3 incoming signals in parallel -Monitors 4th incoming signal -Any of 3 active signals become weak, mobile can switch to high-powered signal

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 41 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Conclusion Transceiver pipeline –Scope –Capabilities –Default Pipeline Modifications –Closure model –Channel match model –Power, Inoise, and ECC models Pipeline stages –Flexible –Open –Extensible

Copyright © 2000 MIL 3, Inc. Modeling Custom Wireless Effects– 42 OPNET UNIVERSITY 2000 Further Information Documentation –Modeling Concepts -Communication Mechanisms –General Models -Pipeline Stages / Bus Link -Pipeline Stages / Point-to-Point Link -Pipeline Stages / Radio Link