Using SBAS to Enhance GBAS User Availability: Results and Extensions EIWAC 2010Tokyo, Japan Paper EN-030 12 November 2010 Sam Pullen, Ming Luo, Todd Walter,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Agenda Item 6 GNSS Operations Ross Bowie, NAV CANADA Rapporteur, Operational WG Navigation Systems Panel Thank you… Good morning… I am ... and member.
Advertisements

Agenda Item 6 GNSS Development Status and Future Work Eric Chatre, EC/ESA Rapporteur Technical WG, GNSS Panel Thank you… Good morning… I am ... and.
International Civil Aviation Organization
International Civil Aviation Organization
International Civil Aviation Organization
Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) for Aviation United Nations International Committee on GNSS December, 2005 Ken Alexander United States.
METIS First Master Training & Seminar
Report on SBAS Ionospheric Working Group Todd Walter Stanford University Todd Walter Stanford University
FAA’s Plan for the Future Use of GPS Briefed By: Kanwaljit S. Sandhoo (MITRE/CAASD) 8th European CGSIC/IISC Meeting, Prague December 2-3, 1999.
Copyright © 2010 Nobot All Rights Reserved.
Loran Integrity Performance Panel Loran Integrity & Performance Panel (LORIPP) Per Enge, Stanford University, November 2003 Based on the work of: Federal.
Aviation Benefits of GNSS Augmentation Workshop on "GNSS Applications for Human Benefit and Development“ Prague, Czech Republic September 2010 Jeffrey.
Space Weather influence on satellite based navigation and precise positioning R. Warnant, S. Lejeune, M. Bavier Royal Observatory of Belgium Avenue Circulaire,
Absolute Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (ARAIM)
Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) E. Douglas Aguilar CAPT, USAF.
Exercise IV-A p.164. What did they say? 何と言ってましたか。 1.I’m busy this month. 2.I’m busy next month, too. 3.I’m going shopping tomorrow. 4.I live in Kyoto.
Federal Aviation Administration GPS Augmentation Systems Status Leo Eldredge, GNSS Group Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) September 2009.
13/06/13 H. Rho Slide 1 Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick Evaluation of Precise.
Satellite-Based Augmentation Systems (SBAS) Combined Performance
Aviation Considerations for Multi-Constellation GNSS Leo Eldredge, GNSS Group Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) December 2008 Federal Aviation Administration.
Satellite Based Augmentation System (SBAS): – Augmentation of navigation satellite systems (GNSS). Operational SBAS or Systems being built (beyond study):
Aviation Benefits of GNSS Augmentation Workshop on the Applications of GNSS Chisinau, Moldova May 2010 Jeffrey Auerbach Advisor on GNSS Affairs Office.
Signal Deformation Proposal R. Eric Phelts, Gabriel Wong, Todd Walter, Per Enge Stanford University IWG 26 February 5-7, 2014.
ENC-GNSS 2006 – Manchester, UK Civil GPS Interface Committee International Sub-Committee May 7, 2006 John E. Augustine Acting Director, Office of Navigation.
Extending GPS and Galileo interoperability: from frequency/signals to integrity Francisco Salabert Head of GNSS Policy Office DDAS/ EUROCONTROL.
User Requirements for GNSS Interoperability at Global, Regional, National and Local Scales Matt Higgins Co-Chair of Working Group D of the International.
Introduction Dual Frequency SBAS = The solution for Ionosphere:
India GAGAN – Adoption within Asia Pacific Region Plan/Opportunities.
Page 1 SQM: SBAS Workshop ZETA ASSOCIATES 21 June 2005.
SBAS and GBAS Integrity for Non- Aviation Users: Moving Away from "Specific Risk" ION ITM 2011San Diego, CA. 25 January 2011 Sam Pullen, Todd Walter, and.
Introduction SBAS Selection Problem: Necessity of Monitoring:
FAA GNSS Evolutionary Architecture Study
© GMV, 2010 Propiedad de GMV Todos los derechos reservados EUROPEAN GNSS EGNOS AND GALILEO. CHARACTERISTICS AND ADVANTAGES OF BRUSSELS. OCTOBER 1 st, 2010.
10/7/ Innovative Solutions International Satellite Navigation Division ION NTM 01 Capabilities of the WAAS and EGNOS For Time Transfer SBAS, an Alternate.
Satellite Navigation Program Federal Aviation Administration.
© 2011 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. Advisory Vertical Guidance (Advisory VNAV) A Useful and Flexible Safety Enhancement S.V. Massimini,
日本語一 1月 7 日 New Year’s Greetings : E b0.
Shankar Ramakrishnan, Jiyun Lee, Sam Pullen and Per Enge
Presented to: IWG 26 By: Jason Burns (FAA) Date: February 5-7, 2014 Federal Aviation Administration DFMC Work Plan Update.
GALOCAD GAlileo LOcal Component for nowcasting and forecasting Atmospheric Disturbances R. Warnant*, G. Wautelet*, S. Lejeune*, H. Brenot*, J. Spits*,
Ionospheric Integrity Lessons from the WIPP Todd Walter Stanford University Todd Walter Stanford University
1 Airport mobiles surveillance and control by means of EGNOS METIS Workshop Benefits of EGNOS in Civil Aviation Istanbul 18 November 2009 Pierre GRUYER.
Present and Future of China Satellite-Based Augmentation System China Satellite Navigation Office February 2014.
Goal: I am comfortable using the counters ~dai, ~hiki, ~wa, and ~hon. Assignments: -Find 5 far-out interesting pictures from the internet and describe.
June 2013 Global SBAS Status Satellite Based Augmentation System (SBAS) Interoperability Working Group (IWG) June 2013.
Useful daily expressions
日本語1 2月12日 愛 あい. みっきーは みにーを あいしてい ます。 ほーまーは まーじを あいしてい ます。
The Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) Todd Walter Stanford University Todd Walter Stanford University
Federal Aviation Administration FAA Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Program Plans and Status GPS/WAAS/LAAS Leo Eldredge, GNSS Program Manager.
Global SBAS Status Satellite Based Augmentation System (SBAS) Interoperability Working Group (IWG) November 2013.
1 SBAS Implementation in the regions of ACAC and ASECNA Project with Community research funding EGNOS System Definition and Benefits.
平成 二十六年 一月五日・月曜日 Bellwork: 先生の日 学校に来なくてもいい Assignments: -
F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N 1 FAA Satellite Navigation Program Update Dan Salvano.
Satellite Navigation Program
F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N 1 Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) Dan Hanlon.
Munich SATNAV, Munich Satellite Navigation Summit February 21-23, 2006 Michael E. Shaw Director, U.S. National Space-Based PNT Coordination Office.
LAAS Ionosphere Anomaly Prior Probability Model: “Version 3.0” 14 October 2005 Sam Pullen Stanford University
RELATIVE CLAUSES Adjectival Clauses/Modifiers. RELATIVE CLAUSES A relative clause is the part of a sentence which describes a noun Eg. The cake (which)
J3H 9 月 24 日 今日の目標 ( もくひょう) To practice and become more proficient w/ 〜たり〜たり form To learn how to “nominalize” a verb To find a friend (???)
雪 ゆき. 雪や こんこ ゆき.
GPS Modernization & WAAS
1 Introduction of EGNOS operations: the perspective of an Air Navigation Service Provider METIS Workshop Benefits of EGNOS in Civil Aviation Istanbul 18.
Agenda Item 6 GNSS Operations Ross Bowie, NAV CANADA Rapporteur, Operational WG Navigation Systems Panel Thank you… Good morning… I am ... and member.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Satellite-Based Augmentation Systems (SBAS) Combined Performance International Committee on GNSS (ICG-4) Working Group A Saint Petersburg,
Signal Availability in the Polar Regions
The Experiment on DFMC SBAS
The Status of Dual-Frequency Multi-Constellation SBAS Trial by Japan
Experiments and Potential Applications
Augmentation Service from the Zenith
International Civil Aviation Organization
Presentation transcript:

Using SBAS to Enhance GBAS User Availability: Results and Extensions EIWAC 2010Tokyo, Japan Paper EN November 2010 Sam Pullen, Ming Luo, Todd Walter, and Per Enge Stanford University ( サム プーレ ン)

12 November 2010Use of External Information in GBAS2 Motivation GBAS availability is limited by the “geometry screening” implemented to mitigate hypothetical worst-case ionospheric anomalies. –Ground screening has severe impact on CAT I LAAS. –Airborne screening used in GAST-D (for CAT III) remains driven by ionospheric threats. External information is the key to removing this constraint. Three approaches have been envisioned: 1)Use of certified SBAS where it now or will exist 2)Use of uncertified “COTS” monitoring networks 3)Use of space weather forecasts and “nowcasts”

12 November 2010Use of External Information in GBAS3 Severe Ionospheric Anomaly in CONUS on 20 November :15 UT21:00 UT

12 November 2010Use of External Information in GBAS4 Time Variation of Ionospheric Delay on 20 November 2003

12 November 2010Use of External Information in GBAS5 Resulting Ionospheric Anomaly Threat Model for CONUS (note: plot not precisely to scale) SV elevation angle (deg) Slant iono. gradient bound (mm/km) Flat 375 mm/km Flat 425 mm/km Linear bound: y bnd (mm/km) = (el  15)/50 Also bounds on : Front speed wrt. ground: ≤ 750 m/s Front width: 25 – 200 km Total differential delay ≤ 50 m

12 November 2010Use of External Information in GBAS6 Worst-Case Impact on CAT I GBAS Maximum Ionospheric Error in Vertical (MIEV) at Memphis (24-Satellite SPS-Standard GPS Constellation)

12 November 2010Use of External Information in GBAS7 Parameter Inflation Required to Remove Unsafe Subset Geometries Use  pr_gnd / P-value inflation algorithm described in {Ramakrishnan, et al, ION NTM 2008} 10-meter VAL

SBAS to Augment GBAS (1): Today’s SBAS Coverage Source: T. Walter, et al, ION ITM 2010 WAAS EGNOS MSAS SBAS LPV Availability

SBAS to Augment GBAS (2): Future SBAS Network Expansion Source: T. Walter, et al, ION ITM 2010

SBAS to Augment GBAS (3): SBAS by 2025 (GPS L1-L5 w/Expansion) Source: T. Walter, et al, ION ITM 2010 WAASEGNOS MSAS GAGAN SBAS LPV Availability SDCM

GBAS Use of WAAS GIVE Values 12 November 2010Use of External Information in GBAS11

GIVE Method Case 1: All IGP’s are “Good” 12 November 2010Use of External Information in GBAS12

GIVE Method Case 2: One IGP is “Not Observed” 12 November 2010Use of External Information in GBAS13

GIVE Method Cases 3 and 4: One IGP is Either “Neutral” or “Bad” 12 November 2010Use of External Information in GBAS14 “Neutral” Case“Bad” Case

Validation via UIVE at Local Area Monitor (LAM) Site 12 November 2010Use of External Information in GBAS15 Source: J. Rife, et al, IEEE PLANS 2006 UIVE > 13 m threshold violated (briefly)  0.6 % of the time Proposed rules for GBAS are somewhat stricter  Need to retain geometry screening as a backup mode

SBAS UDRE for Clock/Ephemeris Monitoring 12 November 2010Use of External Information in GBAS16 UDRE Value UDRE Integer GBAS Class. Ephemeris MDE ≤ 50.0 m0 – 12Good500 m m13OK1500 m Not Monitored 14Neutral GBAS value (  2700 m) Do Not Use15 Do Not Use Exclude from Use Ensures that ephemeris threat never limits CAT I availability

SBAS SDM: Support of GBAS Approval of New Satellites 12 November 2010Use of External Information in GBAS17 Maximum of 4 SDM metrics used to demonstrate lack of signal deformation Recent Work of Dr. R. Eric Phelts at Stanford

12 November 2010Use of External Information in GBAS18 Alternatives to SBAS Despite expected growth of SBAS, some GBAS sites will lie outside good SBAS coverage –Also, no assurance that all SBAS systems will satisfy GIVE and UDRE performance assumptions. Two alternatives are worth considering: –Running SBAS-like algorithms on outputs of existing, “uncertified” receiver networks –Using space weather products now being developed: »“nowcasts” of the real-time situation »3 – 6 hour (?) look-ahead forecasts Both of these alternatives require replacements for high-integrity SBAS processors and datalinks.

Use of Regional Networks: Australian Example 12 November 2010Use of External Information in GBAS19  Enhancements of existing ground receiver networks can substitute for SBAS in specific regions. Source (of original map): Air Services Australia Ionospheric Threat Study

12 November 2010Use of External Information in GBAS20 Concerns with Use of External Information (1) The original “benefits case” for GBAS assumes that each site operates independently, as do ILS and MLS. –GBAS precision approaches are “ILS-lookalike”. Therefore, GBAS cannot rely on external information. –Recall that GBAS-only methods must run in the background at all times. –When SBAS cannot guarantee that no ionospheric threat exists, existing GBAS geometry screening provides required integrity assurance, but with reduced availability. Even if GBAS can operate without external information, the FAA is hesitant to count on it to meet advertised performance benchmarks.

12 November 2010Use of External Information in GBAS21 Concerns with Use of External Information (2) Non-aviation substitutes for SBAS are technically feasible but require guarantees that information provided is “safe” to civil aviation standards. Existing receiver networks must be “certifiable” without requiring “SBAS” levels of coding and redundancy (otherwise, not cost-effective). Automated data-transfer mechanism to each GBAS site must also be certified. −NextGen mission statement highlights the future importance and data-sharing networks, but most ATM information is of lower safety criticality (or is it?). −Understanding and providing this capability should be part of NextGen/SESAR/etc. and should not be limited to GNSS.

12 November 2010Use of External Information in GBAS22 Summary The use of external information is the most cost- effective way to enhance GBAS availability. –Guarantees absence of ionospheric anomalies at least 99% of the time. »Enhances precision approach availability »Enables other uses of GBAS (“DCPS”) –Monitors GNSS satellites to much tighter tolerances. SBAS is, by far, the most convenient way to obtain this information. –Algorithms and datalinks are already certified –Information delivered in timely manner on L1 frequency Where SBAS is not suitable, alternatives exist, but new safety certifications are needed.

Questions? Thank you for your attention 。 ご清聴は、ありがとうございました 。 Questions are welcome! 質問だったら、遠慮しないで、英語 にも日本語にも伺ってください。

12 November 2010Use of External Information in GBAS24 Backup Slides follow…