Working Group Training Compiling Evidence for a Successful Chapter LaMont Rouse, Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interpreting & Applying the Standards October 4, 2006 Dr. Luis J. Pedraja, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Advertisements

Evaluator 102: An Introduction to Interpreting the Standards Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
Chairs & Evaluators Workshop: Interpreting the Standards Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
PAINLESS PERIODIC REVIEW Cynthia Steinhoff Anne Arundel Community College Arnold, Maryland.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
ACCREDITATION Community Day February 1, Significance of Accreditation Accreditation – Accreditation – Allows the students at KC to apply for Federal.
Placement Workshop Y2, Sem 2 Professional Practice Module (PPM)
Purpose of Group Activities  Prepare Work Plan for the university that will facilitate the development of UDG proposal that addresses 4 prescribed activities.
How to Interpret and Apply the Characteristics of Excellence: A Framework for Determining Compliance Karen Stout, President Montgomery County Community.
Periodic Department Review A System of Affirmation LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
The Role of Faculty During the Self-Study Process Ensuring Success at Cedar Crest LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
DEBRA G. KLINMAN, PH.D. ELLIE A. FOGARTY, ED.D. VICE PRESIDENTS, MSCHE Tips, Strategies, and Best Practices for Team Chairs.
WELSSA – Advancing the Gospel of Jesus Christ First Lutheran Lake Geneva, WI.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the New Members of the Board of Trustees, September.
Florida Catholic Conference Accreditation Program
MNSAA Accreditation January 2014 New School Training The Whole Learning School Sarah W. Mueller Executive Director.
The Institutional Effectiveness Plan An Excellent Way to Convey Evidence of Assessment Ellen M. Boylan, Ph.D. Marywood University NEAIR – 33 rd Annual.
Periodic Program Review for Academics Affirming Excellence in Education LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing 1 Accreditation Overview.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
BASIC IRRS TRAINING Lecture 7
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives The Mission Report Purpose and objectives What is not needed? Evolution of the.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the Board of Trustees, May 11, 2012.
Delta State University College of Education Annual Student Update Part II Dissertation January16, 2010.
ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines: Consensus Conference (CC) SOP Edited by EDC-SC September 2013.
Calhoun ISD Facilitated School Improvement Planning October 1, 2012 Beth Brophy and Mitch Fowler DO Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan.
PREPARING REPORTS CoB Center for Professional Communication.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
Middle States Accreditation – update at Town Hall, 2/19/2014 Middle States Accreditation: Update at Town Hall Meeting February 19, 2014.
Scientific Communication
Periodic Program Review Guiding Programs in Today’s Assessment Climate LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Middle States Self-Study Process : 2013 College Senate SUNY Oneonta October 15, 2012.
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
CCC: Where Teaching and Learning Transform Lives, Putting Together the Self- Study Puzzle Corning Community College August 24, 2012.
Streamlining & Redesign of the Accreditation Process: Preliminary Discussions Donna M. Gollnick.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives The Mission Report Purpose and objectives What is not needed? Evolution of the.
THE VISIT. BASIC PRINCIPLES Peer Evaluation Standards-Based System Relationship to Standards: compliance; substantial compliance; or non compliance.
Middle States Reaccreditation Process at The Catholic University of America.
December 8, 2010 Ensuring Educator Excellence Accreditation Handbook 2. Team Member Ethics 3. Responsibilities prior to arriving at the Site Visit.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
BIR Update Sessions: General Updates January-February 2009 Ensuring Educator Excellence.
A STUDENT’S GUIDE ACCREDITATION WHAT IS ACCREDITATION? The process by which a college is certified by a regional accrediting agency, such as the.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
The Periodic Review Report and Middle States Accreditation PRR Workshop April 9, 2008.
Committee on University Effectiveness Working Group on Institutional Assessment April 8, 2011.
 Reading Quiz  Peer Critiques  Evaluating Peer Critiques.
Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Too l PREPARING FOR A TADAT ASSESSMENT.
Select Slides… Spring 2013 Training Strengthening Teaching and Learning through the Results of Your Student Assessment of Instruction (SAI) For Faculty.
The NJIT Accreditation Process: Launching the Middle States Commission on Higher Education Self Study Presentation to Committee on Academic Affairs September.
SELF STUDY: COUNTDOWN TO THE TEAM VISIT MSCHE ANNUAL CONFERENCE – 2009 Debra Klinman.
THE EVALUATION AND POST EVALUATION Evaluator Training Workshop November 4, 2014.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
Accreditation Update Self-Study Progress and Review MPC Flex Days Spring 2015.
Implementing Digital Campaigns Clive Whysall CAM Examiner Assignment brief December 2013 / March 2014.
Review visit Heli Mattisen Visit to one HEI – 1-3 days Committee has a working room where, among others, pre-requested documents/materials.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
HRM 498 ASSIST Experience Tradition/hrm498assist.com
BASIC IRRS TRAINING Lecture 7
Middle States Conference December 3, 2014
Surviving an Accreditation Visit and other accreditation hot topics
Team Project Step 1: Submit name of 3 organizations by next week (in class). I will select one for your team. Proposal format: Cover page-1p Brief Introduction.
IRRS REFRESHER TRAINING Lecture 4
Warm-Up: Check the vignette
NEASC 2014 The Plan “Unless you have been hiding under a rock, you know that the College is preparing for a NEASC visit in “NEASC, or the New England.
WELCOME !! HI THERE.
Bus 100: Business communications
Accreditation: Working towards the self-study
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

Working Group Training Compiling Evidence for a Successful Chapter LaMont Rouse, Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance

Goals of the Self-Study To demonstrate compliance with Middle State’s Standards of Excellence To provide a process whereby Cedar Crest can make recommendations for improvement To determine how to improve enrollment through new markets and educational offerings

Thank you This process can only be completed with your assistance Middle States wants you to join in the national conversation on improving the quality of undergraduate education This self-study process should be a collegial process. Please try to find consensus. If we work smart and steady, we should be able to keep stress levels to a minimum.

Self-Study Time Line Fall 2012: Working groups will seek to gather evidence in order to answer the research questions Spring 2013: Working groups submit their draft chapter to the steering committee -- The steering committee then produces the self-study report The End of Phase I

Self-Study Time Line Public Phase Fall 2013: Campus reviews the document and suggests changes and modifications. -- CCC sends the draft report to evaluation team chair (S/he may also make suggestions and changes) -- Team chair makes a preliminary visit

Self-Study Time Line Team Visit Phase Spring 2014: There is a team visit -- A preliminary report will be issued -- There is an institutional response Summer 2014: Middle States meets and acts

Getting Things Done Best Practices in the Division of Labor 1)Determine who will address each question; 2)Identify what documents will support in the answering of the question -- If no document exists or data is incomplete, inform the WG Chair. -- If the document exists “in someone’s head,” then please gather that data through a formal process (answer sheet, interview, etc.)

Getting Things Done Important Positions Within Each Working Group 1) Someone must be in charge with organizing the appendixes list (source documents). Give each a specific identification. -- Interface with those tasked with gathering evidence to update the list every two weeks 2) Someone must keep notes/minutes from meetings (This demonstrates shared governance) -- Prefer meetings at least twice per month

Writing During Phase I Try to answer each question in a couple of paragraphs (2 to 4) Answers should (can) contain 3 parts 1) Brief discussion of the process at Cedar Crest 2) Discussion of the data/information sources 3) Analysis of the data/information

Writing During Phase I Writing Analysis -- Determine if a chart, table or graph could be included when answering your question. -- If one is developed, relay it to the appendix keeper --Draw conclusions and make comparisons. Explain what the results mean, why they are important. In general, positive trend lines are solid indicators. Negative trend lines may need further discussion and explanation. -- Text-based data should be judged on their alignment with the question

Writing During Phase II Developing A Chapter (Spring 2013) -- The answers will all be merged into one text. Overlapping answers will also be merged where possible. -- The questions will be synthesized and turned into subheadings -- Don’t worry about length.

Writing During Phase II Elements of the Chapter Format -- Each chapter begins with a Summary -- The body -- Each chapter concludes with commendations, suggestions and recommendations Commendations acknowledge what the College does well. Suggestions are collegial advice Recommendations have to be acted upon (and reported out in the 2019 PRR)

Writing During Phase II Determining the Difference Between Suggestions and Recommendations -- Suggestions will help improve operations and perhaps marginally impact the institution. -- Recommendations acknowledge that the College could be substantively improved in a particular area and that it needs to adopt this proposal in order to be in alignment with the standard. Without being formulaic, let me suggest: 3 to 5 commendations 3 to 4 suggestions 2 to 3 recommendations

Final Reminders Work smart Build consensus Remember the big picture: -- To strengthen Cedar Crest for the next generation! If you need help, ask.