ASSESSMENT of SBM PRACTICES: “ SCHOOLS INITIATED ASSESSMENT FOR SELF- DIRECTED IMPROVEMENT.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -

Advertisements

Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.

Self-Study Tool for Alaska Schools Winter Conference January 14, 2010 Jon Paden, EED Deborah Davis, Education Northwest/Alaska Comprehensive Center.

Alabama Teacher Leaders VAL-ED Instructional Leadership Survey January 2013.

EFFECTIVE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (TA)

M & E for K to 12 BEP in Schools

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.

Moving Forward!. Let’s C.H.A.T. (Children, High Expectations, Academic Achievement, Teacher Growth) Missouri School Boards’ Association Annual Conference.

INDICATORS FOR PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTING CURRICULUM DELIVERY Clive Smith Department of Education Leadership and Management University of Johannesburg.

Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.

Program Improvement Unit Collaborating to increase student achievement and fundamentally improve the interaction between the teacher and the students to.

Ed-D 420 Inclusion of Exceptional Learners. What is an IEP?  An IEP is a documented plan developed for a student with special needs that:  describes.

Instructional Decision Making

1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.

Spending Public Money Wisely Scaling-Up Educational Interventions Barbara Schneider John A. Hannah University Distinguished Professor College of Education.

EBS Survey Vermont PBS “Bringing out the BEST in all of us.”

GOAL SETTING CONFERENCES BRIDGEPORT, CT SEPTEMBER 2-3,

Understanding Validity for Teachers

Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts Inventory Planning Training.

School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools” Self-Evaluation of Learning and Teaching Self-Evaluation of Learning and.

ASCA National Model: School Counselors Using Data

The Maryland Co-teaching Framework

Assessment Literacy Series

The District Technology Plan The District Technology Plan Melanie & David Dillard Melanie & David Dillard

ELearning Planning Overview. Goals of eLearning Planning Guide Reduce planning time and effort Increase eLearning effectiveness through targeted improvement.

1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.

KEYS to School Improvement Missouri National Education Association Teaching and Learning Director.

Indicators of Family Engagement Melanie Lemoine and Monica Ballay Louisiana State Improvement Grant/SPDG.

Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.

CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.

Clear Purpose: Assessment for and of Learning: A Balanced Assessment System “If we can do something with assessment information beyond using it to figure.

Orientation and Induction of Traditionally and Alternatively Educated New Teachers Jennifer Conkin October, 2012.

“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”

The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.

What is it we expect students to learn? Curriculum learning tasks need to be clearly stated 1.What policies and practices, regarding curriculum development,

On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.

Challenges and Trade-offs in Measuring the Outcomes of NSF’s Mathematics and Science Partnership Program: Lessons from four years on the learning curve.

Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.

Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.

IT’S ALL ABOUT THE BIG PEOPLE Presented by: Sylvia Mijuskovic.

July 2007 National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee & Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Role of Action Planning in The Developmental.

District Leadership Team Process. Leadership Team Active Coordination FUNCTIONS Implementation support Data-based action plan Coordination Capacity building.

An Integral Part of Professional Learning Communities.

Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.

Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.

Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.

Using the California After School Program Quality Self Assessment Tool

School Improvement Activities Accreditation (AdvancED) Process Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator, School Improvement.

Adapted from guidance presented on August 2013 by Alexandra Pressley, Associate in Education Improvement Services NYSED Local Assistance Plan Schools:

Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.

Planning for Continuous School Improvement

Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.

Campbell Collaboration Colloquium 2014 "Better Evidence for a Better World" Why The U.S. Is So Bad At Knowledge Transfer and Implementation Randy Keyworth.

Regional Sediment Management Policy and Implementation Workshop April, 2009.

Single Plan For Student Achievement January 27, 2016 Los Angeles Unified School District Local District Northwest “Building Academic Excellence Through.

Aims of the meeting: to inform you about Year 6 SATs to inform you about Year 6 SATs to encourage you to support your child and make a significant difference.

NEWARK PUBLIC SCHOOLS DEPARTMENT OF TEACHING & LEARNING Subcommittee Process Map Guidelines for Effective Subcommittee Meetings SLC Subcommittee Member.

Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.

Categorical Program Monitoring (CPM) Review, An Ongoing Process

Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)

Total No. of Learners Enrolled

REPUBLIC ACT NO AN ACT REQUIRING ALL ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS TO ADOPT POLICIES TO PREVENT AND ADDRESS THE ACTS OF BULLYING IN THEIR INSTITUTIONS.

Schools of Excellence Recognition Program For Century Learning

Assessment and Units of Study

Head Start / Community Providers Collaboration

Anita Smith Program Assessment Specialist South Region Chris LeMieux

New Prospect Elementary School

Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP)

So how do you score this answer?

Strategic Plan: Heards Ferry Elementary

Presentation transcript:

ASSESSMENT of SBM PRACTICES: “ SCHOOLS INITIATED ASSESSMENT FOR SELF- DIRECTED IMPROVEMENT

Why assess the SBM practices? Determine the level of SBM practices in school Provide basis on which to establish it plan of action Improve the SBM support systems through interventions that the school and other admin levels of Deped Determine effectiveness of SBM practices in the delivery of basic education services

Management of SCHOOL  resources  classroom instruction  students achievement

Assessment of SBM Practices Manual Guide key players in: assessing their SBM practices identifying their needs for technical support that ought to be given by the support system

Matrix of Scale of Practice

THE WHAT of the ASSESSMENT TOOL The instrument contains INDICATORS regarding the six (6) dimensions of SBM Practices

The WHAT (structure) of the ASSESSMENT TOOL Each INDICATOR has REQUIRED EVIDENCES as proof of the level of SBM practices

The WHAT (structure) of the ASSESSMENT TOOL Each SBM DIMENSION is to be responded to by a different group of school stakeholders. (Thus, responses to be considered as group answer through CONSENSUS )

TABLE on the NUMBER of ITEMS per DIMENSIONS DIMENSIONSLEVEL 1LEVEL 2LEVEL 3 1.School Leadership Internal Stakeholders External Stakeholders School Improvement Process School-Based Resources School Performance Accountability Total

WHO answers the tools? SBM DimensionRespondents 1. School LeadershipSchool head, asst to the SH, master teacher, dept. head 2. Internal StakeholdersParent assoc. Representative, teacher assoc. Chair, head of student council 3. External StakeholdersParent assoc. Representative, LGU/Brgy representative, SGC chair / rep, chair of other active groups 4. School Improvement ProcessSchool head, parent assoc rep, teacher assoc chair, head of student council 5. School-Based ResourcesSchool head, person in charge of School funds, SGC chair /rep, PTCA chair/reps, LGU 6. School Performance Accountability School head, parent assoc rep, teacher assoc chair, head of student council, SGC chair, LGU / Brgy.

Group STUDY ( 10 MINUTES) AND APPRECIATION OF THE INSTRUMENT

Questions: Upon reading the material, identify 5 most significant points in the tool. Give 2 the two easiest items to answer. Give the two most difficult items to answer. If you are to give two tips to the people who will answer the tool, what would they be?

ADMINISTRATION of SBM ASSESSMENT

THREE STAGES STAGE 1:School Head’s Orientation by the DO STAGE 2: Responding to the Instrument by the School Stakeholders Phase 1: Orientation of School Stakeholders as Respondents Phase 2: Actual Inventory of Evidences Phase 3:Summarizing the Responses STAGE 3: Focused Group Discussion (FGD)

The Scoring Template DIMENSION Level 1 Items /Score Level 2 Items / Score Level 3 Items /Score 1.School Leadership Internal Stakeholders External Stakeholders School Improvement Process School Based Resources School Performance Accountability 23 / / / 168

Template 2: SBM Assessment of Practice Result School:____ Address___ Division_____ SBM Dimension IndicatorActions to be taken By WhomResources Needed (Human/ Material )

SBM Assessment of Practice Result Division_____ Consolidate d Data from schools per district SBM Dimension IndicatorActions to be taken Resources Needed (Human/ Material )