EPRI SCDC Cable Review Meeting Palo Alto 24 th October 2006 Meeting May 22-26th Sevenoaks UK Progress since.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QUICK QUIZ 24.1 (For the end of section 24.1)
Advertisements

1 Applied Superconductivity Research - University of Cambridge Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level.
EE3321 ELECTROMAGENTIC FIELD THEORY
Q1 for JLAB’s 12 Gev/c Super High Momentum Spectrometer S.R. Lassiter, P.B. Brindza, M. J. Fowler, S.R. Milward, P. Penfold, R. Locke Q1 SHMS HMS Q2 Q3.
Properties of cast resin transformers
Method of beam extraction from a synchrotron by the instrumentality of multilayer Cu-Fe shield Bondarenko Alexey.
Vertex Detector Cable Considerations Bill Cooper Fermilab VXD.
October, 2003 P. Fabbricatore and S. Farinon Spectrometer magnets – Possible layout of cryostat in the end region In order to define the cryostat layout.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
3. Electrostatics Ruzelita Ngadiran.
Nov PHYS , Dr. Andrew Brandt PHYS 1444 – Section 003 Lecture #20, Review Part 2 Tues. November Dr. Andrew Brandt HW28 solution.
Power Lines The power transmission line is one of the major components of an electric power system. Its major function is to transport electric energy,
WG8 N 1673 Late DIN comment to FCD Ballot ISO/IEC /FPDAM8 = WG8 N 1638 (SC17 N 3836) Source:
Possible HTS wire implementation Amalia Ballarino Care HHH Working Meeting LHC beam-beam effects and beam-beam interaction CERN, 28 th August 2008.
Status of CEPC Detector magnet
SuperGrid Update (Milwaukee, 3 April 2003).1. SuperGrid Update (Milwaukee, 3 April 2003).2 SuperGrid Update EPRI Superconductivity Working Group 3 April.
Bias Magnet for the Booster’s 2-nd Harmonic Cavity An attempt to evaluate the scope of work based of the existing RF design of the cavity 9/10/2015I. T.
ILC / ILD TPC Requirements of the support mechanics Volker Prahl ILD Workshop 2013 Cracow
Monday, Mar. 27, 2006PHYS , Spring 2006 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 1444 – Section 501 Lecture #16 Monday, Mar. 27, 2006 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Sources of Magnetic.
Ultra-Compact Electrical Machines for Wind Energy DE-FOA : Demo Machine C. L. Goodzeit and M. J. Ball May 1, 2014 Part 1: Design and Construction.
Superconducting Fault Current Limiters
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Pulsed Normal Quadrupoles for a Heavy Ion Fusion Driver Final Focus Section D. Shuman, S. S. Yu, LBNL.
Chapter 4 Overview. Maxwell’s Equations Charge Distributions Volume charge density: Total Charge in a Volume Surface and Line Charge Densities.
Thursday March 31, PHYS Dr. Andrew Brandt PHYS 1444 – Section 02 Lecture #16 Thursday Mar 31, 2011 Dr. Andrew Brandt HW7 Ch 27 is due Fri.
Zian Zhu Magnet parameters Coil/Cryostat/Support design Magnetic field analysis Cryogenics Iron yoke structure Mechanical Integration Superconducting Magnet.
PRY Base - Contents l PRY Support/Base/Platform in the MICE Hall l History l Requirements l Environment l Design l Structural Integrity l Preparation l.
Typical Telecommunications Network
MgB 2 wire application to high power superconducting dc cables Paul M. Grant R1.039: 13:30 5 March March 2002 Austin, TX Austin, TX R1 – Poster.
Outline: Main characteristics of the FRESCA2 cable Main characteristics of the strand Strand stability, an issue to avoid magnet quench at low field Procurement.
ILD solenoid magnet construction in Kitakami-site 17. December Tokusui Workshop KEK : Y.Makida, T.Okamura, Y. Sugimoto Toshiba : Nakamoto 、 Orikasa.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory High-Field Solenoids for a MC Final Cooling System AAC 2012 Austin, Texas June 11-15, 2012.
This section of work is also known as Hookes Law.
MICE/MuCool Coupling Magnets to 22 ICST/HIT MICE/Muool Coupling Magnets Progress Li Wang for MICE Group Institute of Cryogenics.
Hi-Lumi Conductor Procurement A.Ballarino, B. Bordini, L. Oberli HL-LHC/LARP International Review of Superconducting Cable for the HL-LHC Inner Triplets.
16 T Dipole Design Options: Input Parameters and Evaluation Criteria F. Toral - CIEMAT CIEMAT-VC, Sept. 4th, 2015.
Cold test of SIS-300 dipole model Sergey Kozub Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP), Protvino, Moscow region, Russia.
LMQXFA Cold Mass Assembly Antonios Vouris Fermilab February 3, 2016.
ECC Clément Lorin – Maria Durante Acknowledgements: Fresca2 team.
STATUS REPORT ON VACUUM CHAMBERS (Dipole & Straight) & DIPOLE MAGNETS FOR TL-2 OF CTF3 A.K. JAIN, S.S. PRABHU, S. KOTAIAH RRCAT, INDORE (INDIA)
1 BNL -FNAL - LBNL - SLAC P. Wanderer IR’07 - Frascati 7 November 2007 U.S. LARP Magnet Programme.
L. Sermeus TE-ABT-FPSELENA IIC meeting 3 th April Review of ELENA Injection kicker Luc Sermeus on behalf of WP 2.8 (with informations from EN-MME)
Dan Cheng, Xiaorong Wang 12/15/2015 MQXFA Connectors Discussion Part II.
HL-LHC Meeting, November 2013D2 Status and Plans – G. Sabbi 1 D2 Conceptual Design Status and Next Steps G. Sabbi, X. Wang High Luminosity LHC Annual Meeting.
14-Jun-161 Status of Horizontal Test Stand (HTS-2) Development Efforts Pradeep Kush, Prashant Khare, RRCAT, India Team Members: S.Gilankar, Rupul Ghosh,
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design Jim Kellie Glasgow University.
Preliminary analysis of a 16 T sc dipole with cos-theta lay-out INFN team October 2015.
Design ideas for a cos(2q) magnet
Nb3Sn wiggler development
Massimo Sorbi on behalf of INFN team:
HO Corrector Magnets: decapole test and future plans
High Order correctors coil manufacturing
CERN Conductor and Cable Development for the 11T Dipole
Cedric Garion, TE-VSC-DLM, WP12
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils
Requirements of the support mechanics
Main magnets for PERLE Test Facility
Analytical Cost Model (16 T dipole)
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
DOE/SC Status Review of 12 GeV SHMS HB Magnet: Update since Oct 2015
The Quench Detection-Wire-Feedthrough Plug-In of W7-X
Large aperture Q4 M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet
Overview of mechanical design & construction
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
High Current Direct Current (HCDC) Superconductor Cable
Cryostats Some ideas for the new Q1 to Q3 Hi-Lumi WP3 meeting
The superconducting solenoids for the Super Charm-Tau Factory detector
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
as a prototype for Super c-tau factory
CEPC Booster Ring Magnets
An alternative approach to the design of the corrector magnets
Presentation transcript:

EPRI SCDC Cable Review Meeting Palo Alto 24 th October 2006 Meeting May 22-26th Sevenoaks UK Progress since

Sevenoaks Meeting: th May 2006 Agreed cable types: – 2 x monopoles –100% redundancy Agreed target ratings: –10 GW (2x10 GW) –2 GW (2 x 1 GW) Developed cable design spread sheet –Add BSCCO PIT characteristic: I, H, T Actions: (See Bill’s slides) –Method to determine Magnetic field and PIT current/wire at outer surface of inner conductor –Circulate spreadsheet –In parallel prepare vacuum and cryogenic info to add –In parallel to add cable losses –In parallel to add circuit parameters

Progress Since May Spread sheet: –Added magnetic field and PIT current/wire at outer surface of inner conductor –Circulated Spreadsheet and ‘instructions’ Patent proposals submitted to EPRI: ‘contraction compensation’ Produced draft DC cable ‘design primer’ Performed preliminary sensitivity study to identify limiting boundaries (to present later) Performed outline search for extrudable insulation materials

DC Cable Configuration

Bi-Pole’s Advantages: Simplest Construction, Half-Insulation Thickness and Smaller Diameter and Longer Cable Conventional Bi-Pole Designs are Unsuitable No ground return, so lose one cable, lose circuit. Mutual magnetic field is perpendicular to PIT conductor Ground conductor is added to give N+1 security No outer HTSC shield: field is not contained Mutual magnetic field is perpendicular to PIT conductors

Selected Design: Two Monopoles Ground Returns Must be Current Carriers Half insulation thickness of one monopole One third insulation thickness of a single integrated bi-pole Ground conductors are added to give N+1 security Concentric HTSC conductor: field is parallel to PIT: OK No mutual magnetic field +ve pole -ve pole Integrated HTSC Ground return conductor Integrated HTSC Ground return conductor Does this cause problems to the bridge design and control? Opposite or same polarity poles?

DC Cable Sensitivity Study: Boundary Limitations Dry cable construction, extruded insulation, can be factory HV tested, joints are simplest. Voltage and current: no restriction Fault circuit current: 2 x rated current for 1 sec and 1K rise Maximum number of tapes in one pass on present stranding machines is 150. Perhaps extend to 250? (Need to ask manufacturers). See video of cable factory. Reel: –outer diameter: 4.2m –hub diameter: 20D (D is cable OD) –Width:2.4m (could increase) –Cable net weight: 30ton (could increase). Installation: See video of cable factory – Tensile load: F=COF x Unit Mass x Length –Maximum safe load on cable= 50N/mm 2 of stranded conductor area. PIT tape: –Present BSCCO minimum bend diameter: 70mm –Will tape width conform to circumference?

Present Spread Sheet Limits for 75mm OD Conductor Show: We need more tapes than present strander machine limit of 150 tapes Optimum voltage is ~ kV

For 75mm OD Conductor: 1 GW rating is OK 2 GW: too many tapes needed

No Duct Case: 1GW Cable is OK at 70kV and above with <150 tapes Optimum voltage for min OD is 120kV Max cable length on reel is 6.2kM, but reel weight is high at 38.4t Power per poleGW 1.00 CurrentA20,00016,66614,28012,50011,11110,0008,3336,6665,000 Pole voltagekV Duct internal diameter (target)mm Area inner quench conductormm Conductor OD (entered into sheet)mm Max current per tape inner conductorA Number of PIT wires-inner conductorNumber Number of PIT layers inner conductorNumber Insulation thicknessmm Number of PIT wires outer conductorNumber Number of PIT layers outer conductorNumber Cable outer diametermm Cable unit weightkg/m Cable weight on reelT54,75153,55048,15844,82142,99642,73038,37731,82824,489 Cable length on reelm4,1074,6964,9065,1725,4825,8666,1925,7955,199

Power per poleGW 1.00 CurrentA20,00016,66614,28012,50011,11110,0008,3336,6665,000 Pole voltagekV Duct internal diameter (target)mm Area inner quench conductormm Conductor OD (entered into sheet)mm Max current per tape inner conductorA Number of PIT wires-inner conductor Numb er Number of PIT layers inner conductor Numb er Insulation thicknessmm Number of PIT wires outer conductor Numb er Number of PIT layers outer conductor Numb er Cable outer diametermm Cable unit weightkg/m Cable weight on reelkg46,91943,60741,73939,47636,19433,80531,79927,14721,942 Cable length on reelm3,3363,5783,9554,1394,2014,1774,4114,4123,837 20mm Duct Case: 1GW Cable is OK at 70kV and above with <150 tapes Optimum voltage for min OD is kV Max cable length on reel is 4.4kM, but reel weight is OK at 27-32t

Power per poleGW1.0 CurrentA Pole voltagekV Duct internal diameter (target)mm Area inner quench conductormm Conductor OD (entered into sheet)mm Max current per tape inner conductorA Number of PIT wires-inner conductorNumber Number of PIT layers inner conductorNumber Insulation thicknessmm Number of PIT wires outer conductorNumber Number of PIT layers outer conductorNumber Cable outer diametermm Cable unit weightkg/m Cable weight on reelkg Cable length on reelm mm Duct Case: 1GW Cable is OK at 70kV and above with <150 tapes Optimum voltage for min OD is kV Max cable length on reel is 2.8kM and reel weight is OK at 22-25t

1 GW with no central duct: Optimum voltage is 120kV

Minimum voltage is 70kV, OK for <150 wires

At optimum 120kV only need 76 wires, so can double current and power to 2GW?

1GW Study Conclusions: To achieve 5 GW need: 5 x Increase in current per tape, or a very long factory strander, or a multi- pass application?

1GW: Unit weight falls with voltage

1GW with no central duct: very long length is possible

120kV Constant Voltage and Increment Current and Power with BSCCO 125A: Duct ID0mm120kV300-TapesIncrease Current Power per poleGW Current (A)A8,33010,00015,00020,00025,00030,00035,00040,00045,000 Pole voltage (kV)kV120 Duct internal diameter (target)mm Area inner quench conductormm ,0891,225 Conductor OD (entered into sheet)mm Max current per tape inner conductorA Number of PIT wires-inner conductorNumber Number of PIT layers inner conductorNumber Insulation thicknessmm Number of PIT wires outer conductorNumber Number of PIT layers outer conductorNumber Cable outer diametermm Cable unit weightkg/m Cable weight on reelT38,24639,32944,77550,32550,30250,70253,62855,97956,995 Cable length on reelm6,1875,2964,1873,6282,9342,4652,2782,0861,888 Rings on reelNumber Flakes on reelNumber Reel hub ODmm Reel external widthm2.4 Reel Flange ODm4.2 At 150 tape limit can achieve 1.8GW At 316 tape limit can achieve 3.6GW At 450 tape limit can achieve 5GW At 5GW, reel length falls to 2km At 5GW, reel weight is high at 56.5t