The Formation and Evolution of Galaxies What were the first sources of light in the Universe? How were luminous parts of galaxies assembled? How did the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Astrophysics with TPF-C David Spergel Princeton.
Advertisements

Luminous Infrared Galaxies with the Submillimeter Array: Probing the Extremes of Star Formation Chris Wilson (McMaster), Glen Petitpas, Alison Peck, Melanie.
JWST Science 4-chart version follows. End of the dark ages: first light and reionization What are the first galaxies? When did reionization occur? –Once.
The Highest-Redshift Quasars and the End of Cosmic Dark Ages Xiaohui Fan Collaborators: Strauss,Schneider,Richards, Hennawi,Gunn,Becker,White,Rix,Pentericci,
The Galaxy Evolution Science Case for a Large Ground-based Telescope Betsy Gillespie December 4, 2002 Grateful acknowledgements to: Arjun Dey’s “Galaxy.
Chapter 15 The Milky Way Galaxy.
Extragalactic AO Science James Larkin AOWG Strategic Planning Meeting September 19, 2004.
Optimal Photometry of Faint Galaxies Kenneth M. Lanzetta Stony Brook University.
Star formation and submm/far- IR luminous galaxies Andrew Blain Caltech 26 th May 2005 Kyoto COSMOS meeting.
A Bolometric Approach To Galaxy And AGN Evolution. L. L. Cowie Venice 2006 (primarily from Wang, Cowie and Barger 2006, Cowie and Barger 2006 and Wang.
Integral field spectroscopy in the IR: Gemini-CIRPASS observations and the star-formation history in the nucleus of M83 While HST offers excellent spatial.
The Milky Way PHYS390 Astrophysics Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 19.
Stars science questions Origin of the Elements Mass Loss, Enrichment High Mass Stars Binary Stars.
Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.
SFR and COSMOS Bahram Mobasher + the COSMOS Team.
Quasar & Black Hole Science for GSMT Central question: Why do quasars evolve?
A Window on Cosmic Birth: Exploring our Origins with the SIRTF and NGST Space Missions Judith L. Pipher University of Rochester.
Dusty star formation at high redshift Chris Willott, HIA/NRC 1. Introductory cosmology 2. Obscured galaxy formation: the view with current facilities,
Astrophysics from Space Lecture 8: Dusty starburst galaxies Prof. Dr. M. Baes (UGent) Prof. Dr. C. Waelkens (KUL) Academic year
Gamma-ray Bursts in the E-ELT era Rhaana Starling University of Leicester.
1 BDRv3 - November 26, Markus Kissler-Patig E-ELT Programme 1 E-ELT Science Case Markus Kissler-Patig.
Luminosity and Mass functions in spectroscopically-selected groups at z~0.5 George Hau, Durham University Dave Wilman (MPE) Mike Balogh (Waterloo) Richard.
Molecular Gas and Dust in SMGs in COSMOS Left panel is the COSMOS field with overlays of single-dish mm surveys. Right panel is a 0.3 sq degree map at.
The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.
Wide Field Imagers in Space and the Cluster Forbidden Zone Megan Donahue Space Telescope Science Institute Acknowledgements to: Greg Aldering (LBL) and.
Past, Present and Future Star Formation in High Redshift Radio Galaxies Nick Seymour (MSSL/UCL) 22 nd Nov Powerful Radio Galaxies.
Unravelling the formation and evolutionary histories of the most massive galaxies Ilani Loubser (Univ. of the Western Cape)
Stellar Populations Science Knut Olsen. The Star Formation Histories of Disk Galaxies Context – Hierarchical structure formation does an excellent job.
The Extremely Red Objects in the CLASH Fields The Extremely Red Galaxies in CLASH Fields Xinwen Shu (CEA, Saclay and USTC) CLASH 2013 Team meeting – September.
1 VVDS: Towards a complete census of star formation at 1.4
Surveying the Universe with SNAP Tim McKay University of Michigan Department of Physics Seattle AAS Meeting: 1/03 For the SNAP collaboration.
TMT-India Science Interests and Project Update G.C. Anupama & R. Srianand (On behalf of the TMT-India)‏ TMT-SAC Meeting: November 2010, Pasadena,
CELT Science Case. CELT Science Justification Process Put together a Science Working Group –Bolte, Chuck Steidel, Andrea Ghez, Mike Brown, Judy Cohen,
Expected progress and break-throughs in ground-based extragalactic astronomy Ralf Bender ESO Council FORS Deep Field.
The European Extremely Large Telescope Studying the first galaxies at z>7 Ross McLure Institute for Astronomy, Edinburgh University.
Elizabeth Stanway - Obergurgl, December 2009 Lyman Break Galaxies as Markers for Large Scale Structure at z=5 Elizabeth Stanway University of Bristol With.
Structure Formation in the Universe Concentrate on: the origin of structure in the Universe How do we make progress?How do we make progress? What are the.
ALMA Science Examples Min S. Yun (UMass/ANASAC). ALMA Science Requirements  High Fidelity Imaging  Precise Imaging at 0.1” Resolution  Routine Sub-mJy.
Probing the Reionization Epoch in the GMT Era Xiaohui Fan (University of Arizona) Seoul/GMT Meeting Oct 5, 2010.
ALMA and the Formation of Galaxies Pierre Cox IAS, Orsay, France.
Forming High Mass Stars Probing the Formation Epoch.
UNIT 1 The Milky Way Galaxy.
July 25th, 2000WFC3 Critical Science Review1 WFC3 Science Themes The WFC3 White Paper highlights a few science projects where one may expects the contribution.
Submm galaxies and EROs: Expectations for FMOS in the light of OHS observations Chris Simpson (University of Durham)
David R. Law Hubble Fellow, UCLA The Physical Structure of Galaxies at z ~ John McDonald, CFHT Galaxies in the Distant Universe: Ringberg Castle.
The Black Hole-Galaxy Evolution Connection Ezequiel Treister Einstein Fellow IfA, Hawaii IfA, Hawaii Credit: ESO/NASA, the AVO project and Paolo Padovani.
FIRST LIGHT A selection of future facilities relevant to the formation and evolution of galaxies Wavelength Sensitivity Spatial resolution.
AGN / Starbursts in the very dusty systems in Bootes Kate Brand + the Bootes team NOAO Lijiang, August 2005.
The Formation and Evolution of Galaxies Michael Balogh University of Waterloo.
Milky Way: Galactic Structure and Dynamics Milky Way has spiral structure Galactic Bulge surrounds the Center Powerful radio source Sagittarius A at Center.
KASI Galaxy Evolution Journal Club A Massive Protocluster of Galaxies at a Redshift of z ~ P. L. Capak et al. 2011, Nature, in press (arXive: )
Quasar Surveys -- From Sloan to SNAP
Star Forming Proto-Elliptical z>2 ? N.Arimoto (NAOJ) Subaru/Sup-Cam C.Ikuta (NAOJ) X.Kong (NAOJ) M.Onodera (Tokyo) K.Ohta (Kyoto) N.Tamura (Durham)
Competitive Science with the WHT for Nearby Unresolved Galaxies Reynier Peletier Kapteyn Astronomical Institute Groningen.
What is EVLA? Giant steps to the SKA-high ParameterVLAEVLAFactor Point Source Sensitivity (1- , 12 hr.)10  Jy1  Jy 10 Maximum BW in each polarization0.1.
Cosmic Dust Enrichment and Dust Properties Investigated by ALMA Hiroyuki Hirashita ( 平下 博之 ) (ASIAA, Taiwan)
Sample expanded template for one theme: Physics of Galaxy Evolution Mark Dickinson.
Galaxy formation and evolution with a GSMT: The z=0 fossil record 17 March, 2003.
July 25th, 2000WFC3 Critical Science Review1 Performance Summary in Key Science Areas Verify that WFC3 as designed is capable of carrying out the WFC3.
Nature of Broad Line Region in AGNs Xinwen Shu Department of Astronomy University of Science and Technology of China Collaborators: Junxian Wang (USTC)
Epoch of Reionization  Cosmic Reionization: Neutral IGM ionized by the first luminous objects at 6 < z < 15 Evidence: CMB polarization (Komatsu+2009)
AGN in the VVDS (Bongiorno, Gavignaud, Zamorani et al.) 1.What has been done: main results on Type 1 AGN evolution and accretion properties of faint AGN.
Galaxy Evolution and WFMOS
GRB A: A short GRB associated with recent star-formation?
Stellar Populations Science Knut Olsen. The Star Formation Histories of Disk Galaxies Context – Hierarchical structure formation does an excellent job.
The Science Case Hubble Space Telescope CELT+AO HDF.
Xiaohui Fan University of Arizona June 21, 2004
Galaxies With Active Nuclei
Galaxies With Active Nuclei
Looking forward to new telescopes and back to the dark ages
Presentation transcript:

The Formation and Evolution of Galaxies What were the first sources of light in the Universe? How were luminous parts of galaxies assembled? How did the Hubble sequence of galaxy morphologies form? How do galaxies interact with their environment? What are the global histories of star- formation, metal enrichment, and gas consumption? What is the relationship between active galactic nuclei and their host galaxies? z = 1000 z = 0 When? … and what are the baryons doing?

Key NGST capabilities for high z galaxies Follow hot (“young”) stellar light ( > 1200 Å) to very high redshifts z ~ 30 Trace cool (“old”) stellar populations ( > 4000 Å) to z ~ 10 Observe diagnostic emission (and absorption) features 3700 – 6600 Å at 1.5 < z < 6.5 … all this at kpc-scale resolution at all z Thermal dust emission and mid-IR diagnostic features (e.g. 3.3  m and 7.7  m PAH) of far-IR energy sources Stellar features (H-, CO) at 2 < z < 3 that are immune to dust obscuration and present in stars of age 10 7 <  < yr Ly  at z ~ 4 and 2000 Å at z ~ 2 3 x resolution and 9 x sensitivity of HST 5 – 10  m 10 – 30  m 0.5 – 1  m Dressler core 1 – 5  m

Extending the frontier: Ultra-Deep Imaging 0.5–10  m Extreme depths: AB ~ 34 in 10 6 s Extreme redshifts: Lyman  to z = 40 (?) 4000 Å to z = 10 4 x 4 arcmin 2 NGST should detect 1 M O yr -1 for 10 6 yrs to z  20 and 10 8 M O at 1 Gyr to z  10 (assuming most pessimistic  = 0.2) 5000 galaxies to AB ~ 28, x 10 to AB ~ 34? photometry, morphology and redshift estimates

The physics of galaxy evolution: Diagnostic 1-5  m Spectroscopy Key emission-line diagnostic features in 3727 – 7000 Å range are within 1 – 5  m for 1.7 < z < 6.6, (c.f. ultraviolet “desert” at shorter  ) Star-formation rate from H  Metallicity from R 23 = [OII]+[OIII]/H  Reddening from H  /H  AGN/stellar from [OIII]. [NII], [SII], [OI], S[III] Ages from continuum features A: Physical conditions (R ~ 1000) B: Kinematics  masses (R ~ 3000–10000) Spatially resolved  rotation curves in gaseous line emission, e.g. H  within 1–5  m for 0.5 < z < 6.6 Spatially unresolved velocity dispersions in stellar absorption lines, e.g. Mg 5175, Ca triplet, and CO bands at 2.3  m (at AB ~ 24) Diagnostics not only give physical conditions but also enable associations to be made between members of the population at different epochs.

Inside the galaxies: Spatially Resolved Photometry and Spectroscopy Photometric and spectroscopic analysis of components within galaxies shows nature of star-formation, possible importance of merging, and the emergence of present-day morphological components HDF analyses limited to small number of bright objects at lesser resolution

Unveiling the hidden Universe: The mid-infrared We know from COBE that 50% of the luminous energy in Universe emerges in far-IR – apparently an important contribution from ULIRGs at high z NGST may be required to identify sources at 1–5  m, and at 30  m is potentially the most sensitive detector of thermal dust at z ~ 2 Spectroscopy of the 3.3  m and 7  m PAH features can characterize the energy source as starburst or AGN … for the complete observational picture

New windows on galaxy evolution: Supernovae as probes of chemical evolution and star-formation NGST can detect supernovae to very high redshifts Expect 5–15 SN II yr -1 per 4’  4’ field at z > 2, and 1–10 yr -1 at z > 4, I.e. of order 1 on every deep image. SN II give measure of star-formation rate. The effects of the time lag between SN II and SN Ia in the early Universe is seen today in  -enrichment and r- and s-process metallicity effects in Galactic halo HST z = 0.5

The DRM programs in “The Formation and Evolution of Galaxies” 1. Deep Imaging Survey: 0.6–10  m imaging of 1 x UltraDeep Field 16 x Deep Fields 2. Deep Spectroscopy Survey: 1–5  m spectroscopy of 100 galaxies R=100 for deep identifications; 2500 galaxies R=1000 diagnostic spectroscopy 200? galaxies R=5000 kinematics (incl.10  m) spatially-resolved 2-d integral field spectroscopy 3. Clusters: Imaging and spectroscopy of high z clusters for direct comparison with field galaxies 4. AGN–galaxy connection: Imaging and spectroscopy on high z AGN hosts (esp. Type I) 5. Obscured objects: Extension of deep imaging to 30  m with low R spectroscopic follow-up for diagnostic features 6. Supernovae: Spectroscopic follow-up of SN discovered in imaging surveys

Summary: NGST capabilities NGST will extend the redshift domain and should detect the “first light” † in the Universe NGST will provide a wealth of diagnostic information on high redshift galaxies, 1 < z < 5, when most stars in the Universe likely formed, that would be extremely hard to obtain in any other way. NGST’s wavelength extension down to 0.6  m gives maximum spatial resolution and the use of Lyman features at 4 < z < 9 and 2000 Å at z ~ 2. Extension longwards to 10  m gives NIR stellar features to z ~ 3–5 and extension to 30  m gives detection of thermal dust emission and diagnostic 3.3/7.7  m PAH features. NGST capable of yielding large numbers of systematically studied galaxies over very wide redshift range allowing full interpretation of individual objects within the population. † first light = star-clusters or significant AGN accretion (e.g L O at 1200 Å at z ~ 20  =0.2)

The Dressler Report “HST & Beyond” “7.2 Fundamental questions in high redshift astrophysics” 1. What was sequence of mass accumulation in central regions of galaxies 2. What was the sequence of disk formation? 3. When and where were the first heavy elements formed? 4. What was the role of AGN in galaxy formation? 5. How do the above depend on environment mass, state of the primordial gas and dynamics? 6. What were the conditions in the dark ages 1000 < z < 5? 7. Were there precursor events that preceded full-blown galaxy formation? “7.3 Generic capabilities required” 1. Wide wavelength coverage (ideally 0.5  m to 1 mm) 2. Deep imaging at high spatial resolution 3. Spectroscopy at R > 10 3, with spatial resolution 4. Large samples to be studied in survey mode Detection – identification – characterization – placement in context NGST

Will the NGST high-z science be done before 2008? (1) Progress since The The HDF and morphologies and sizes at high redshift 4. Measures of metallicity in the Lyman  forest and DLA systems 5. Detection of far-IR background and preliminary identification of ultra-luminous sub-mm sources at high redshift 3. The ultraviolet luminosity density L (z) relation 0 < z < 5 0. Large redshift surveys at 0 < z < 1  (a) earliest activity must be at z >> 5 and likely distributed amongst small units (b) importance of “small and faint” galaxies at high z (c) need for physical understanding rather than just “phenomenology” (d) our present view is very biased towards (1) active star-formation and (2) the unobscured objects These continue to strengthen the case for NGST !

Will the NGST high-z science be done before 2008? (2) Progress to –2008 will see: (a) a vast increase in number of 8m nights (x 17) (b) introduction of near-IR spectrographs in 1–2  m waveband, including MOS (c) continued implementation of AO in the near-IR (d) Impact of NICMOS data and ACS (+WF3) on HST (e) SIRTF By 2008, it is reasonable to expect: (a) 0 < z < 1 will be thoroughly “done” with samples of 10 5 galaxies (but this is not where galaxies are assembled!) – this provides ideal complement to NGST programs at higher redshifts (b) Ground-based IR imaging/spectroscopy + SIRTF will yield produce large samples with redshifts 1 < z < 4 (for luminous galaxies) and we will know when large mature galaxies first appeared. Will probably not know “how” since diagnostics and masses will be difficult with spectroscopy from ground. Bias towards star-formation will remain at highest redshifts. (c) Highest redshift will creep up despite redder wavelengths and fainter fluxes. Unlikely we will reach the limit, and even if we do, it is very unlikely that we would know that we have!

The outlook for NGST It is reasonable to be pessimistic about ground- based observations for: (a) all deep observations at > 2.2  m (b) systematic multi-line spectroscopy at 1 < < 2  m (OH emission and H 2 0 absorption) (c) anything requiring diffraction limited imaging at  < 1  m or (wide-field) imaging at 1 < < 2  m (c.f. AO) i.e. modest progress in programs involving: (d) the very highest redshifts (e) systematic diagnostic spectroscopy (f) stellar (CO-bandhead) masses at high z (g) the energy sources in all except the most luminous high z ULIRGs (c.f. SIRTF) These are the central goals of NGST program on the formation and evolution of galaxies, which are therefore likely to remain current IR astronomy from the ground