1 R.W. Callis DCLL Workshop November, 2014 Conceptual Design of a Multi-effect DCLL Test Stand 2 nd EU–US DCLL Workshop November 14-15, 2014 UCLA Presented.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TASD R&D IDS-NF Mumbai. 2 Alan Bross IDS Plenary Meeting – Mumbai October 12-14, 2009 Detector R&D There are 3 components to this detector and their respective.
Advertisements

Zian Zhu Superconducting Solenoid Magnet BESIII Workshop Zian Zhu Beijing, Oct.13,2001.
Coupling Coil Test Facility Update Ruben Carcagno Fermilab September 20, 2012.
PLANS JINR PARTICIPATION for JINR PARTICIPATION FAIR PROJECT: in the FAIR PROJECT: - ACCELERATOR TECHNOLOGY A.Kovalenko 103 session of the JINR Scientific.
MUTAC Review, 9 April MuCOOL and MICE Coupling Magnet Status Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley CA
IR Magnets for SuperKEKB KEK, Norihito Ohuchi 1.IR Magnets (ES, QCS, QC1) 2.Interference between Magnet-Cryostats and Belle 3.Summary SuperB.WS05.Hawaii.
The 23 rd MICE Collaboration Meeting -1- ICST/HIT Jan.13 to 17, Harbin/China Large Prototype Coil Test and Plan Fengyu Xu Institute of Cryogenics.
1 Update on Focus Coil Design and Configuration M. A. Green, G. Barr, W. Lau, R. S. Senanayake, and S. Q. Yang University of Oxford Department of Physics.
9 June 2006MICE CM-15 Fermilab1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel and Tracker Magnets since CM-14 Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
A design for the DCLL inboard blanket S. Smolentsev, M. Abdou, M. Dagher - UCLA S. Malang – Consultant, Germany 2d EU-US DCLL Workshop University of California,
Update Hardware for conductive cooling of the quench resistors has been fabricated at LBNL. Preparation for installation to start this week. Installation.
Front End Technologies Harold Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory February 19, 2014.
Superconducting Magnet R&D for COMET Makoto Yoshida (KEK) NuFact Aug, 2011.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
Muons, Inc. AAC Feb. 4, 2009 V. Kashikhin 1 Fermilab AAC  V. Kashikhin for Superconducting Magnet Team Superconducting Helical Solenoids.
MCTF Alexander Zlobin MUTAC Meeting 8-10 April MCTF Magnet and HTS Conductor R&D.
CASIPP Design of Cryogenic Distribution System for CFETR CS model coil Division of Cryogenic Engineering and Technical Institute of Plasma Physics Chinese.
Status of CEPC Detector magnet
MTA Cryogenics: Where We Are The Work of Fermilab AD/Cryo Barry Norris, Christine Darve and a host of wonderfully talented Cryogenic Personnel John Thompson,
LCWS14 Benoit CURE - CERN/PH Dept.1 International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders October 2014 Organized by the Vinca Institute of Nuclear.
SIS 100 main magnets G. Moritz, GSI Darmstadt (for E. Fischer, MT-20 4V07)) Cryogenic Expert Meeting, GSI, September 19/
WBS1 SBS Basic: Magnet and Infrastructure Robin Wines 11/4/ SBS DOE Review.
24 January 2014 LARP VTF Follow-up Meeting P. Kovach VTF 1 LARP Vertical Test Facility Vertical Dewar Design, Magnet Prep And Installation Paul Kovach.
Forced two-phase helium cooling scheme for Mu2e Transport Solenoid Greg TatkowskiSergey ChebanNandhini Dhanaraj Daniel EvbotaMauricio LopesThomas Nicol.
11 T Nb3Sn Demonstrator Dipole R&D Strategy and Status
MICE CC Test Status Ruben Carcagno 11/06/13 1. Cooldown Coil Temperature (calculated average in each of 8 coil segments) SC Transition (voltages across.
LARP CM15 Magnet Testing Working Group SLAC, November 2 nd 2010.
/18 Cryogenic thermometry for refrigerant distribution system of JT-60SA Kyohei NATSUME, Haruyuki MURAKAMI, Kaname KIZU, Kiyoshi YOSHIDA, Yoshihiko KOIDE.
KEK Hiroshi Yamaoka Task list for Magnet/Iron yoke Solenoid magnet Iron yoke Experimental hall and other facilities May 11, ’05.
Mu2e Magnet Design Changes Michael Lamm for the Mu2e Collaboration and TD/Magnet Systems Dept. March 26, 2012 All Experimenters Meeting 1 Contributors.
Zian Zhu Magnet parameters Coil/Cryostat/Support design Magnetic field analysis Cryogenics Iron yoke structure Mechanical Integration Superconducting Magnet.
Big Magnet Design II: a) solenoid and cable concept b) short section test V.V. Kashikhin and A.V. Zlobin.
HT-7U CASIPP 1 The Engineering Design of the Poloidal Field System of HT-7U Tokamak PF Group of HT-7U Team Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plasma.
February 13, 2012 Mu2e Production Solenoid Design V.V. Kashikhin Workshop on Radiation Effects in Superconducting Magnet Materials (RESMM'12)
CEA DSM Irfu - F. KIRCHER - [Seoul Workshop, Feb 16-18, 2009] 1 ILD detector magnet: LoI version F. Kircher, O. Delferrière CEA Saclay, DSM/Irfu/SACM.
MCTF 8/17/06 A. Bross MTA Activities and Plans MCTF August 17, 2006 A. Bross.
Superconducting Quadrupoles inside the HERA Experiments M. Bieler, DESY, LHC LUMI 05 Workshop, Arcidosso, September The HERA Interaction Region.
EDMEDM EDM Collaboration Meeting 3-06 Jan Boissevain, P-25 March 2, 2006 NCSU EDM Experiment Design Status.
Conceptual Design of COMET and Radiation Hardness Makoto YOSHIDA (KEK) RESMM12 FNAL Feb. 13th, 2012.
Beam line Experiment area SC magnet Pion production target
MICE Coupling Coil Testing at Fermilab All Experimenters Meeting Ruben Carcagno March 19, R. Carcagno - MICE CC Testing at Fermilab3/19/2012.
Design and construction of Nuclotron-based Ion Collider fAcility (NICA) and Mixed Phase Detector (MPD) Design and construction of Nuclotron-based Ion Collider.
Superconducting Magnet Development for Ex-Situ NMR FY04 Plan G. Sabbi, 3/31/03.
1 V. Kashikhin for ILC ALCPG 2007, FNAL Meeting October 23, 2007 Ring to Main Linac Magnets.
EDMEDM LANL Review of EDM Cost and Schedule Jan Boissevain, P-25 February 11, 2005, Los Alamos National Laboratory EDM Reference Design Tour of the Reference.
Restoring Komag Yasuhiro Makida Consideration of restoring and modifying Komag for a stand alone operation without the refrigerator. Contents 1.Magnet.
EDMEDM EDM Collaboration Meeting 6-05 Jan Boissevain, P-25 June 20, 2005, Los Alamos National Laboratory EDM Reference Design.
5 K Shield Study of STF Cryomodule (up-dated) Norihito Ohuchi KEK 2008/4/21-251FNAL-SCRF-Meeting.
Super Fragment Separator (Super-FRS) Machine and Magnets H. Leibrock, GSI Darmstadt Review on Cryogenics, February 27th, 2012, GSI Darmstadt.
Magnet R&D for Large Volume Magnetization A.V. Zlobin Fermilab Fifth IDS-NF Plenary Meeting 8-10 April 2010 at Fermilab.
MICE Coupling Coil Test Proposal Ruben Carcagno Fermilab July 9, MICE CC Test Proposal7/11/2011.
FNAL Workshop, July 19, 2007 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V.Kashikhin 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole (ILC HGQ1) V. Kashikhin.
September 27, 2007 ILC Main Linac - KOF 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V. Kashikhin for Magnet group.
Thermal Analysis of the Cold Mass of the 2 T Solenoid for the PANDA Detector at FAIR G. Rolando 1, H. H. J. ten Kate 1, A. Dudarev 1 A. Vodopyanov 2, L.
Status of the PANDA Solenoid Magnet Production in BINP
Some General Guidelines for the US TBM Costing
Yury Ivanyushenkov for the UK heLiCal Collaboration
EPFL-SPC, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
DCLL TBM Reference Design
Superconducting Helical Solenoids
LARP Vertical Test Facility
Hollow e- lens, Cryogenic aspects
Integrated Design: APEX-Solid Wall FW-Blanket
Superconducting Magnet Development for me Conversion Experiments
SHMS Cryogenics and Q2(Q3Dipole) Cool Down
SoLID Magnet - Engineering and Cost
BESIII Collaboration Meeting, June 5~6, 2002, Zian Zhu
A Cold SCU Phase-Shifter
Hall D Cryogenic requirements
as a prototype for Super c-tau factory
Presentation transcript:

1 R.W. Callis DCLL Workshop November, 2014 Conceptual Design of a Multi-effect DCLL Test Stand 2 nd EU–US DCLL Workshop November 14-15, 2014 UCLA Presented by Richard W. Callis

2 R.W. Callis DCLL Workshop November, 2014 Creating a multi-affect Blanket test stand from the ground up maybe costly and thus less likely to be supported by DOE in the present budget constrained environment To bring the cost down utilization of existing support systems and designs – More than half the cost of superconducting magnets resides in the engineering design and tooling – The LHe refrigerator and power supplies may be of equal value to the magnet fabrication costs. – In high performance magnets the cost of the SC cable dominates the fabrication costs How Does One Create a Cost Affective DCLL Test Stand Magnet should be copy of an existing design, which uses less exotic SC conductor, and site magnet at an existing magnet test facility

3 R.W. Callis DCLL Workshop November, 2014 Performance Requirements Helium Temp/Flow Rate/Pressure per blanket module 500°C, 1.5 kg/s, 8MPa PbLi Temp/Flow Rate/Pressure per blanket module 700°C, 30 kg/s, 1MPa Surface Heating, module area0.5 to 2.0 MW/m 2, 2 m 2 Tritium extraction rate0.002 g/hr Fraction Tritium recovered99.9% Magnetic Field2-5 T Volumetric heated, volumeSim. w/heaters, 2 m 3 Availability70% Duty factor (annual)50% Pulse Length w/integrated conditionsweeks Performance Parameters of a DCLL Test Stand (from Zinkle FESAC Report 2012)

4 R.W. Callis DCLL Workshop November, 2014 In addition to the performance goals, a Blanket Test Facility should provide – easy access to install and remove blanket modules, – provide a simple means to change the field gradients, – and reduce the amount of stray magnet field, by using an iron return yoke. The US is presently fabricating two superconducting magnets which could be used in a DCLL Test Stand – Fermilab Muon-to-Electron high conversion experiment – ITER Central Solenoid Magnet modules GA is Evaluating Two Configurations for the DCLL Test Stand

5 R.W. Callis DCLL Workshop November, 2014 Two of the Muon Production Solenoids Can be Used Production SolenoidDetector Solenoid The Mu2e Production Solenoid has three nested solenoids ­ produces 4.5 T in its bore and tapers to1.5 T at its exit ­ has a1.7m bore ­ Incased in its own cryostat

6 R.W. Callis DCLL Workshop November, 2014 DCLL TS based on Mu2e production solenoid – 2.5 T test field – Solenoids canted 20° to simulated reactor field gradients – Can support a blanket module 0.66m wide by 1.5 m tall – Easy blanket access – Iron yoke return – Solenoids can be pivoted to adjust field gradients Two Production Solenoids can be Used to Form the Basis of a DCLL Test Stand

7 R.W. Callis DCLL Workshop November, 2014 Field B y in Plane z=0 Unit: T 2.40 T

8 R.W. Callis DCLL Workshop November, 2014 Field B y in Plane y=0 Unit: T 2.53 T

9 R.W. Callis DCLL Workshop November, T DCLL TS Magnet System Costs These costs do not include The liquid PbLi loops, The He cooling loops, The surface and bulk heating hardware Data acquisition & control Other blanket testing infrastructure

10 R.W. Callis DCLL Workshop November, 2014 If 5T is Required then a Helmholtz Coil based on the ITER Central Solenoid Design Would be Needed

11 R.W. Callis DCLL Workshop November, 2014 An ITER CS Magnet can be Modified as a Helmholtz Magnet ITER CS Magnet BT 3 F using 4 hexa-pancake A Helmhotz coil pair can be made using 4 CS magnet 6 layer (hexa-pancake) sections ­5T test area ­Routing of Lhe cooling lines needs modification ­Since entire coil set is inside a cryo dewar, blanket module will have to have its own vacuum jacket and cryo insulation ­No iron yoke is needed

12 R.W. Callis DCLL Workshop November, 2014 More Than $12M of Test System Infrastructure Can be Utilized in Operating the DCLL TS

13 R.W. Callis DCLL Workshop November, 2014 The Size of the ITER CS Coil Heat Reaction Oven Illustrates That a 5T DCLL TS will not be a Small Facility

14 R.W. Callis DCLL Workshop November, 2014 A cost analysis of a Helmholtz coil based on the ITER CS Coil fabrication tooling has not been performed. What is known – Conductor cost $5M per hexa-pancake ($20M) – Fabrication cost of 1 CS Magnet ~$6M What needs to be estimated – Rerouting of Lhe piping – Support structure for the upper Helmholtz coil Is adjustability needed? 5 T DCLL TS Magnet System Costs