JWST NIRSpec Dithering Strategies (and a Cross-SI View) Jason Tumlinson JIM / TIPS Oct 15, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
JWST IFUs and Data Tool Development Plans Tracy Beck JWST NIRSpec Instrument Scientist.
Advertisements

FMOS Observations and Data 14 January 2004 FMOS Science Workshop.
Impact of Cost Savings Ideas on NGAO Instrumentation December 19, 2008 Sean Adkins.
PSF Reconstruction: Part I The PSF “Core” Primary Goal: Derive PSFs for point source detection and PSF fitting photometry. Secondary Goal: Derive PSFs.
A Preliminary Cycle 1 Calibration Plan for the JWST Science Instruments James Muzerolle.
Filtering Approaches for Real-Time Anti-Aliasing /
Memorandam of the discussion on FMOS observations and data kicked off by Ian Lewis Masayuki Akiyama 14 January 2004 FMOS Science Workshop.
Image Resampling ASTR 3010 Lecture 21 Textbook 9.4.
JWST calibration requirements Harald Kuntschner. JWST - an overview NIRCam –0.6-5 microns –FoV: 2.16x4.4 arcmin (0.0317” for short band and ” for.
6e-1 Science Data Products Daryl Swade DMS Systems Engineer S&OC System Design Review #1.
Science Impact of Sensor Effects or How well do we need to understand our CCDs? Tony Tyson.
STIS Closeout Plan Paul Goudfrooij 2005 HST Calibration Workshop, 10/26/2005.
5-1 DMS Data Products Nov. 6, 2013 S&OC Data Management System Design Review 3.
Array Configuration Divya Oberoi MIT Haystack Observatory.
IVC : a simulation and model-fitting tool for optical-IR interferometry Abstract I present a new software tool, called “Interferometry Visibility Computations”
14 October Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPY and spectrometers Kitchin, pp
NIRSpec Operations Concept Michael Regan(STScI), Jeff Valenti (STScI) Wolfram Freduling(ECF), Harald Kuntschner(ECF), Robert Fosbury (ECF)
MIRI Optical System CDR, 6 th & 7 th December 2006 Mid InfraRed Instrument 07-1 Optical System Critical Design Review (CDR) TIPS Presentation: Margaret.
Coding the JWST Calibration Pipeline(s) 2010 Calibration Workshop Robert Jedrzejewski/STScI.
JWST Calibration Error Budget Jerry Kriss. 15 March 20072/14 JWST Flux & Wavelength Calibration Requirements SR-20: JWST shall be capable of achieving.
Aldo Dell'Oro INAF- Observatory of Turin Detailed analysis of the signal from asteroids by GAIA and their size estimation Besançon November 6-7, 2003.
KMOS Instrument Overview & Data Processing Richard Davies Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics  What does KMOS do?  When will it do it?
Two-Gyro Science Impact and Observer Information Ken Sembach STUC Meeting 18-November November-2004.
STScI MSR template Page 1 Space Telescope Science Institute Guide Star Discussion August 27, 2007.
Spectroscopy with PACS M82 PACS line imaging from the SHINING team (Contursi et al First Results workshop talk) Phil Appleton and Dario Fadda for.
MIRI Dither Patterns Christine H Chen. Dithering Goals 1.Mitigate the effect of bad pixels 2.Obtain sub-pixel sampling 3.Self-calibrate data if changing.
Modeling and Correcting the Time- Dependent ACS PSF for Weak Lensing Jason Rhodes, JPL With: Justin Albert (Caltech) Richard Massey (Caltech) HST Calibration.
Science Concept for Additional Functionality in the Mosaic Planning Tool Jeff Valenti.
Two-Gyro All-sky Scheduling Study TIPS April 15, 2004
Astronomical Observational Techniques and Instrumentation
APT Overview for Transiting Exoplanet Proposals Chris Moriarty – APT Developer.
NIRISS NRM bad pixel tolerance analysis David Lafrenière 2012 February 21.
NIC3 FOM Dithered Observations of the Orion Nebula Eddie Bergeron, STScI.
Optimization Strategies for the NIRSpec MSA Planning Tool James Muzerolle.
RAW DATA BIAS & DARK SUBTRACTION PIXEL-TO-PIXEL DQE CORR. LOCATE EXTR. WINDOW THROUGHPUT CORRECTION (incl. L-flat, blaze function, transmission of optics,
- page 1 July NHSC Mini-workshop PACS NASA Herschel Science Center PACS Spectrometer AORs Phil Appleton 1Roberta Paladini.
F. Pepe Observatoire de Genève Optical astronomical spectroscopy at the VLT (Part 2)
In conclusion the intensity level of the CCD is linear up to the saturation limit, but there is a spilling of charges well before the saturation if.
NIRSpec - the JWST Multi-Object Spectrograph P. Ferruit (ESA), S. Arribas (CSIS), S. Birkmann (ESA), T. Böker (ESA), A. Bunker (Oxford), S. Charlot (IAP),
A. Ealet Berkeley, december Spectrograph calibration Determination of specifications Calibration strategy Note in
Single Object Spectroscopy and Time Series Observations with NIRSpec
Alex Fullerton STScI / NIRISS Team Lead
Single Object Slitless Spectroscopy Simulations
A.Zanichelli, B.Garilli, M.Scodeggio, D.Rizzo
NIRSpec Time Series Observations
Observing Strategies and Constraints
Imaging with the James Webb Space Telescope
Diane Karakla JWST Community Lecture Series Feb 28, 2017
The JWST Coronagraphic Visibility Tool: Overview and Demo
JWST Pipeline Overview
Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy with JWST NIRCam
NIRSpec pipeline concept Guido De Marchi, Tracy Beck, Torsten Böker
JWST NIRCam Time Series Observations
Bill Blair JWST Project Scientist for User Support STScI/JHU
Diane Karakla ESAC “On Your Mark” Workshop Madrid, Sept
The JWST Exposure Time Calculator
NIRSpec simulation data-package
VIRTIS Operations at Lutetia
Observing Modes Available for Cycle 1
JWST Overheads Jeff Valenti S&OC Mission Scientist
Chris Willott, Loic Albert, René Doyon, and the FGS/NIRISS Team
ESAC 2017 JWST Workshop JWST User Documentation Hands on experience
Summary Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy Jeff Valenti JWST Mission Scientist Space Telescope Science Institute.
The Medium Resolution Spectrometer on behalf of the MRS team
ESAC 2017 JWST Workshop NIRSpec MSA Planning Tool (MPT)
Motivation for a 95% Guide Star Acquisition Probability with JWST
Detector Parameters Marco Sirianni - ESA.
How to implement coordinated parallels
MIRI Observing Templates
MIRI Low Resolution Spectroscopy
Presentation transcript:

JWST NIRSpec Dithering Strategies (and a Cross-SI View) Jason Tumlinson JIM / TIPS Oct 15, 2009

NIRSpec Refresher

JWST SI Dithering Principles Dithering is needed generically for: 1. mitigating detector flaws and pixel-to-pixel response variations, and for 2. improving the pixel-space sampling of the point- or line-spread function. 3. increasing coverage of the sky. In keeping with the JWST project “template” approach to ops, we are trying to “pre-define” the SI dither patterns, which will: 1. provide the user with a simple set of optimal choices that are still flexible enough to adapt to a range of science needs. 2. simplify the on-board scripts that implement dithers 3. limit the possibilities for user or software errors (patterns are less handmade than for HST). 4. simplify things still further by sharing and reusing components (planning tools, on-board script code) that applies to multiple SIs. Generally in JWST-land, a visit = one guide star = maximum angular extent of pointings in a visit limited to ~20” by availability of GS within 2.2’ FGS field.

“Primary Pattern” : generally large in scale, >> pixel, designed to mitigate pixel-to-pixel response variations and/or improve spatial coverage by moving to different parts of the detector. Can also apply to large-scale “tiling” of the FOV for large fields. “Secondary Pattern” : generally small scale, ~ pixel, designed to improve pixel-space sampling of the PSF or LSF. Generally allowed to nest, so execute a secondary pattern at each of the primary positions. Primary vs. Secondary Dithers

NIRSpec Fixed Slits Primary Pattern: Step down the slit in 1, 2, 3, or 5 positions separated by ~ 0.5”, user choice. Secondary pattern: 0.5 pixel offsets in spatial, spectral dimensions, or both as a user choice.

4 NIRSpec IFU Primary Pattern: “Tiling” Primary Pattern: Define a set of “tiles” on the sky to cover an extended source with the 3”x3” FOV. (Using a NIRSpec-specific tool resembling the MIRI mosaic tool in APT). Secondary pattern: slitlets (next page)

NIRSpec IFU: Secondary Patterns The 30 “slitlets” are interlaced such that adjoining slitlets fall on very different detector regions; moving over mas (1 - 5 slitlets) can move the spectrum vertically by > 1000 pixels. Very good for avoiding detector artifacts. Simultaneous with these moves, 1.5 pixels shifts in the spatial, spectral dimensions can resample the PSF and LSF in pixel space. So at each primary position (“tile”), there are two positions observed with small offsets in the dispersion direction, cross-dispersion, or both, depending on user choice.

NIRSpec MSA Strategy 1: “Slitlets” Place target in each of 3 shutters in a 3x1 slitlet, use the other two for measuring sky background. Places each target in the “sweet spot” within each microshutter where slit transmission is maximized (60%) and relatively flat. This strategy works well if 3x1 shutter slitlets are pre-assigned to each target during the planning of the MSA configuration. This strategy (and its close relatives) is the ONLY “dither pattern” for the MSA that can be done deterministically - because we will fly a non-ideal MSA.

NIRSpec MSA Strategy 1I: “Subshutter” However, this strategy requires multiple configurations that can only be derived at planning time - there is no “canned” dither pattern that can accomplish this pattern in the general case of any astronomical scene and a non-ideal MSA. This strategy can be implemented in the tool, with the offsets and the corresponding MSA configurations passed downstream to a script that doesn’t know about the strategy itself. This strategy does not force every target into the shutter “sweet spot”. Rather, it allows them to fall where they may and averages out uncertainties in the shutter transmission curve by observing at, e.g. 16 positions distributed symmetrically around the shutter.

NIRSpec MSA Strategy III: “Generic” The great appeal of the MSA, and therefore of NIRSpec, lies in its ability to observe an arbitrary pattern of sources on the sky. This large degree of complexity, coupled to a non-ideal MSA, means that “canned” dithering patterns cannot exist outside the narrow range of strategies that can be fully planned in advance. Therefore: MSA patterns will be defined generically at planning time in the MSA planning tool (already well advanced). We envision that the user will be provided with planning “shortcuts” that help implement simple patterns like the slitlet or subshutter strategies and iteratively arrive at optimal coverage of a given target set. Operationally, MSA dithers are just a list of MSA configurations and center positions on the sky.

Instrument Mode (Report #) PrimarySecondarySpecial PurposeComments NIRSpec Fixed Slits (1678) Downslit [N = 1,2,3,5 positions] Subpixel (1) spectral [yes/no] AND/OR (2) spatial [yes/no] A_200_1 to A_200_2 “l-gap-filling” [yes/no] (1) no dithers for “large square” (2) A_200_2 repeats the pattern in A_200_1 IFU (1749) regular grid for >3” field [Nx, Ny, Dx, Dy intervals, rotation, etc.] (1) Slitlet [N = 0,1,3,5 steps] AND/OR Subpixel (2) spatial [yes/no] (3) spectral [yes/no]... “tiling” uses tool like “MIRI Mosaic” to construct the pattern MSA (1769) all, defined by MSA planning tool... shortcuts in tool will create simple patterns deterministically MIRI LRS (1634) Extended Source / Mapping [Nx, Ny, Dx, Dy intervals, etc.] OR Point Source/Staring (2 positions within slit)... MRS (TBD) regular grid for >3” field [Nx, Ny, Dx, Dy intervals, rotation, etc.] 2 pt or 4 pt (details TBD) [channel, N = 2 or 4 pt]... report pending Imaging (1657) 12-pt Reuleaux [S/M/L] OR 311-pt Cycling [S/M/L, N + start] 4 pt box (subpixel)... MIRI imaging mosaics are not dithers NIRCam Imaging (1738) Full-field [3 tight, 3, 6, or 9 tile] OR N-point intra-module [N = ] OR N-point intra-SCA [LW vs. SW, N = , S, M, L] N-position subpixel [N = 1 - 9] OR “General” 64-pt subpixel [N = ] NIRSpec Pre-imaging Use [3-tight or 3,6,9-tile] (4 GS acqs) OR “NIRSpec Minimal” fixed pattern (2 GS acqs, does not cover SCA gaps) NIRSpec Pre-imaging can also combine with standard secondary patterns large-scale tiling in separate visits has been omitted report is still under review JWST Science Instrument Dithering Strategies Summary Can nest or combine [user options]

Executable within a single visit Regular, Deterministic (“Canned”) with simple parameters YES NO YES NOYES NIRSpec FS Downslit ALL SECONDARY PATTERNS NIRSpec FS l-gap NIRSpec IFU Extended SourceNIRSpec MSA generic MIRI LRS Extended Source / Mapping MIRI LRS Point Source/Staring MIRI Imaging 311-pt Cycling MIRI Imaging 12-pt Reuleaux NIRCam Imaging Full- field NIRCam N-point intra-module NIRCam N-point intra-SCA MIRI MRS Extended Source / Mapping (TBD)