The University of SydneyPage 1 Remote laboratories and mediated interactions: The real opportunity for enhancing learning Professor David Lowe Faculty.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Diversity in Management Research
Advertisements

CONCEPTUAL WEB-BASED FRAMEWORK IN AN INTERACTIVE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT FOR DISTANCE LEARNING Amal Oraifige, Graham Oakes, Anthony Felton, David Heesom, Kevin.
Thinking Skills and Personal Capabilities Unit 1
The Cost of Authoring with a Knowledge Layer Judy Kay and Lichao Li School of Information Technologies The University of Sydney, Australia.
Cognitive-metacognitive and content-technical aspects of constructivist Internet-based learning environments: a LISREL analysis 指導教授:張菽萱 報告人:沈永祺.
Mobile learning with a mobile game Design and motivational effects.
Iñaki Merino Albaina MSc Program: Media & Knowledge Engineering Daily supervisors: drs. L.H.T.E. Yamane dr. ir. M.H. Vastenburg SCID group Faculty of Industrial.
The virtual past for future archaeologists Hannah Cobb and Melanie Giles University of Manchester.
From Computer Based Simulations to 3D Virtual Learning Building Bridges to Collaborative Learning Spaces Diane D. Chapman, Sophia J. Stone, Dede Nelson.
Kalervo Järvelin – Issues in Context Modeling – ESF IRiX Workshop - Glasgow THEORETICAL ISSUES IN CONTEXT MODELLING Kalervo Järvelin
Virtual and Distance Experiments: Pedagogical Alternatives, not Logistical Alternatives Dr Euan Lindsay Dept Mechanical Engineering Curtin University of.
Postgraduate Engineering Education in the Arab World: What is Really Needed? Muhammad Taher Abuema’atti King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals.
Integrating the ECE Service Course with the ME Curriculum Richard A. Layton Dept of Mechanical Engineering Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology 29 February.
Assessment: Engineering Laboratories Jim Henry, Ph.D., P.E. University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Southeastern Section ASEE, 2002 Gainesville, FL.
E-learning at the University of Qatar Experience and the Future By: Adil Yousif, Ph D. Department of Mathematics and Physics, College of Arts and Science,
Meaningful Learning in an Information Age
Thinking, reasoning and working mathematically
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
P INNOVATION IN TEACHING AND LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION WITH 3D VIRTUAL TECHNOLOGIES Fernando Maciel Barbosa M. Travassos Valdez 1, C. Machado.
Online Learning Pedagogies at UEL June A holistic approach to designing courses for delivery online Dr Panos Vlachopoulos, CLIPP
Student Centered Learning
Professor David Lowe Associate Dean (Education) / Professor of Software Eng. Faculty of Engineering and Information Technologies The University.
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT. Process Centre receives Scenario Group Work Scenario on website in October Assessment Window Individual Work.
The use of ‘exploratory learning’ for supporting immersive learning in virtual environments Freitas, S. d. & Neumann, T. (2009). The use of ‘ exploratory.
ICEE 2005GLIWICE, POLAND JULY 2005 FEDERAL CENTER OF TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATION – CEFET-RJ – BRAZIL PRODUCTION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CSCW: A FORMATION.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Overall Teacher Judgements
Ciarán O’Leary Wednesday, 23 rd September Ciarán O’Leary School of Computing, Dublin Institute of Technology, Kevin St Research Interests Distributed.
MIT iLabs: Laboratories Without Frontiers Jesύs A. del Alamo MIT 4th Annual MIT LINC International Symposium: Technology-Enabled Education: A Catalyst.
Lecture 1 What is Modeling? What is Modeling? Creating a simplified version of reality Working with this version to understand or control some.
Applied Educational Systems ( or ) Explorations and Foundations in Technology tech center 21 Explorations and Foundations in Technology.
The Inquiry Method By Tina Waddy.
ELearning Design After your analysis, prepare for delivery.
A MULTIMEDIA APPLICATION FOR THE TEACHING OF THE MODULE "WATER" Anna Thysiadou 1, Sofoklis Christoforidis 2, Panagiotis Jannakoudakis 1 1 Aristotle University.
Enhancing problem-based learning designs with a single e-learning scaffolding tool:Two case studies using challenge FRAP Advisor : Min-Puu Chen Presenter.
 The College Board has joined the American Chemical Society and the National Science Teachers Association in objecting to simulated lab software (e.g.
ELearning 2008 Day 1 Julie Collareda. TAFE NSW – Sydney Institute.
© 2005 Franz J. Kurfess Introduction 1 Cal Poly’s Learning Commons and Internet2 Dr. Franz J. Kurfess I2 Champions Cal Poly.
Connecting Teachers Can there be models of effective practice for teachers with ICT? Chair: Christine Vincent, Becta Presenter: Margaret Cox King’s College.
Dr. Kevin F. Downing DePaul University (Chicago) Contact:
Curriculum planning Proposed Collaborative working modules.
Education 6714 Gayla Fisher.  “ The central practical premise of UDL is that a curriculum should include alternatives to make it accessible and appropriate.
Guiding Students through the Thesis/Dissertation Process Ralph C. Gomes, Professor Department of Sociology and Anthropology March 12, 2008.
VIRTUAL WORLDS IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH © LOUIS COHEN, LAWRENCE MANION & KEITH MORRISON.
1 Introduction to Software Engineering Lecture 1.
Methodology Matters: Doing Research in the Behavioral and Social Sciences ICS 205 Ha Nguyen Chad Ata.
The Evolution of ICT-Based Learning Environments: Which Perspectives for School of the Future? Reporter: Lee Chun-Yi Advisor: Chen Ming-Puu Bottino, R.
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events Statistics Unit Assessment at Advanced Higher.
Assessment Practices in Digital Learning Environments Geoffrey Crisp Dean Learning and Teaching, RMIT.
Using games and simulations for supporting learning Presenter: Hsiao-lan Lee Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: 03 / 09 / 2009 de Freitas, S. I. (2006). Using.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Problem-based Learning in an Online IT Professional Practice Course Goold, A. (2004). Problem-based learning in an online IT professional practice course.
Massachusetts Recommended Standards for PreK – 12 Information Literacy Skills Valerie Diggs Standards Committee Chair.
Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning Presenter: Jenny Tseng Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: April 12, 2008 Liaw, S., Huang, H.,
WERST – Methodology Group
Independent Enquirers Learners process and evaluate information in their investigations, planning what to do and how to go about it. They take informed.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Constructing a Syllabus and Writing Good Learning Outcomes.
Alan R. White Phillip E. McClean Brian M. Slator North Dakota State University An Interactive, Virtual Environment for Cell Biology.
Accreditation of study programs at the Faculty of information technologies Tempus SMGR BE ESABIH EU standards for accreditation of study.
What does it take to teach clinical lab-based skills online? Prof Isabelle Skinner Assoc Dean Research and Research Training EHSE Creative Digital Learning.
BUSINESS FRAMEWORK AND APPLICATION SCENARIOS
What Is This Intentional Learning Thing?
Course Director’s Strategy Day
Branko Koprivica, Alenka Milovanović, Đorđe Damnjanović
An assessment framework for Intrusion Prevention System (IPS)
VIRTUAL/REMOTE LABS By Dr. Sandip Kumar Raut Lecturer in Tabla
Smart Learning concepts to enhance SMART Universities in Africa
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT
Presentation transcript:

The University of SydneyPage 1 Remote laboratories and mediated interactions: The real opportunity for enhancing learning Professor David Lowe Faculty of Engineering and IT The University of Sydney

Page 2 Introduction –David Lowe –Associate Dean (Education) –Professor of Software Engineering –The University of Sydney –Founded 1850 –55,000 students, 16 Faculties –16,326km from Munich

The University of SydneyPage 3 How well can you answer these: –Q: Why do you get your students to undertake laboratory experimentation? –Q: How are the experiments that your students undertaken different from those that might have been carried out 100 years ago?

The University of SydneyPage 4 How is University teaching changing? c1350 class (Laurentius de Voltolina) c2010 class MOOCs?

The University of SydneyPage 5 But have we seen similar changes in laboratories? c1900 Laboratory Cavendish laboratory camphy/museum/area8/display1.htm camphy/museum/area8/display1.htm c2010 Laboratory Typical undergraduate facilities

The University of SydneyPage 6 But have we seen similar changes in laboratories? c1900 Laboratory Cavendish laboratory camphy/museum/area8/display1.htm camphy/museum/area8/display1.htm c2010 Laboratory Typical undergraduate facilities

The University of SydneyPage 7 But have we seen similar changes in laboratories? –Lab pedagogy ? –Limited research: ABET taxonomy Objective 2: Models. Identify the strengths and limitations of theoretical models as predictors of real-world behaviors. … Objective 3: Experiment. Devise an experimental approach, specify appropriate equipment and procedures, implement these procedures, and interpret the resulting data … Objective 13: Sensory Awareness. Use the human senses to gather information and to make sound engineering judgments in formulating conclusions about real-world problems. from (Feisel and Rosa, 2005) –Lab development ? –Physical labs: tools, data-logging, Usyd xLabs –Simulations –Remote labs

The University of SydneyPage 8 Physical Labs –University of Sydney – CPC XLab

The University of SydneyPage 9 Simulations – (from 2:00)

The University of SydneyPage 10 Simulations – (from 2:10)

The University of SydneyPage 11 Simulations –Virtual worlds (0:50)

The University of SydneyPage 12 Are simulations a golden bullet? –Sometimes, but only sometimes? –Consider the “ball race”…. –Which ball will reach the end first? –Experiment vs Simulation –Different learning outcomes! –But why? Engagement? Belief? –Sometimes real experimentation is important! –Even further - differences between: –Proximal vs Remote vs Simulations

The University of SydneyPage 13 Remote laboratories –Remote labs allow students to use the internet to remotely access, in real-time, physical laboratory equipment. –The interaction is supported by using sensors and cameras so that the student can monitor the laboratory equipment and actuators so that the equipment can be controlled. –Background –Mid-1990’s – mid-2000’s : Technical challenges –Mid-2000’s – mid-2010’s : Logistical management –Mid-2010’s – … : Educational design –Do they work? –Different modalities suit different learning outcomes

The University of SydneyPage 14 Remote laboratories - examples –

The University of SydneyPage 15 Remote laboratories - examples –

The University of SydneyPage 16 Remote laboratories - examples

The University of SydneyPage 17 Remote laboratories - variations –Interaction timing –Batch vs Interactive –User Access –Direct Access vs Queuing vs Booking –Interaction Type –Monitoring vs Control –Lab Purpose –Teaching vs Research vs Industry –Experiment Location –Lab-based vs Embedded into Industry –Lab Interface –Standalone Client vs Web vs Virtual World vs …

The University of SydneyPage 18 What benefits do the labs provide? –Generation 1: flexible access –Opportunity for better experiences –Improved 'time-on-experiment', more exploration,... –Generation 2: shared access –Opportunity for better labs e.g. MRI at USyd –MIT and Africa --> some success –Labshare --> almost no success Hurdles are still too high? –Generation 3: ???

The University of SydneyPage 19 Generation 3: ??? –Consider existing remote labs! –Almost all are duplicates of existing facilities –And often constrained versions of them!

The University of SydneyPage 20 Generation 3 : Pedagogic Innovation –Remote laboratories inherently have a mediated interface –Seeing the lab through a lens –How do we use this interface? –Change/extend students' perception of the lab –Doing things that we can't do in conventional labs –Three domains to explore –Augmentation –Adaptation and Access –Collaboration and Gamification

The University of SydneyPage 21 Augmentation: Possibilities –What can we augment?

The University of SydneyPage 22 Augmentation: Possibilities –What can we augment? –Providing a context –Ausubel’s “Advanced Organisers”; Novak’s “Cognitive Bridges”; Barab’s “Formalism-Context” relationships, …

The University of SydneyPage 23 Augmentation: Possibilities –What can we augment? –Providing a context –Making the invisible visible

The University of SydneyPage 24 Augmentation: Possibilities –What can we augment? –Providing a context –Making the invisible visible –Making the visible evident

The University of SydneyPage 25 Augmentation: Possibilities –What can we augment? –Providing a context –Making the invisible visible –Making the visible evident –Making the evident obvious

The University of SydneyPage 26 Augmentation: Possibilities –What can we augment? –Providing a context –Making the invisible visible –Making the visible evident –Making the evident obvious –Testing the obvious L 1 (s) = 3.4s s + 3u(s)

The University of SydneyPage 27 Augmentation: Research questions –Does the level of awareness and/or control of the lab 'environment' affect student engagement and hence learning outcomes? –Can augmenting a lab interface result in improved student engagement or learning outcomes? –Can providing students with information on the lab behaviour of other students assist in their learning? –Can outcomes be improved by allowing a student to directly compare their prediction of lab behaviour with actual lab behaviour? –What are the affects on student engagement when they have some control over the nature and extent of augmentation?

The University of SydneyPage 28 Adaptation and Access: Possibilities –What can we adapt?

The University of SydneyPage 29 Adaptation and Access: Possibilities –What can we adapt? –Student guidance:

The University of SydneyPage 30 Adaptation and Access: Possibilities –What can we adapt? –Student guidance: –Group formation

The University of SydneyPage 31 Adaptation and Access: Possibilities –What can we adapt? –Student guidance: –Group formation –Automated assessment

The University of SydneyPage 32 Adaptation and Access: Possibilities –What can we adapt? –Student guidance: –Group formation –Automated assessment –Real-world-embedded labs

The University of SydneyPage 33 Adaptation and access: Research questions –What forms of lab adaptation are feasible for remote laboratories? –How might we undertake automated assessment? –Can we adapt in ways that push students out of their comfort zone? Encourage “making mistakes”? –What level and type of tutor support is appropriate, necessary or helpful in remote labs? –Does adaptation reduce the sense of control, and hence engagement or the reality of the experiment? –Can we develop Industry process monitoring labs? What are the issues associated with remote “lab” access to live data from industrial processes?

The University of SydneyPage 34 Collaboration and Gamification: Possibilities –Support for multi-users –Variable perspectives or roles –Challenges: e.g. Comparison of predictions –MOOLs?

The University of SydneyPage 35 Collaboration and Gamification: Research questions –What is the pedagogic significance of collaboration in labs? In remote labs? –What level of remote interaction is necessary to achieve effective collaborative learning outcomes? –Is immersion counter-productive? –How can we support active engagement from multiple parallel users?

The University of SydneyPage 36 Conclusions –How do we understand experimentation? –We need to rethink the role of experimentation within learning –And where and how it can be carried out –Can we move from: Labs as proxies for the real world? –To: labs as embedded in the real-world? –Can we move from “for this experiment, what learning be achieved” –To: “for these learning outcomes, what are the best labs?” –Are there learning outcomes which were previously not possible in proximal labs, but which are possible in remote labs? –Is there a difference in the relevance of remote labs to Engineering vs Science education?