LHC Accelerator Prospects Mike Lamont for the LHC team “LHC: the status, the projections for this year, and the possibilities for the near and far future..

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expected performance in the injectors at 25 ns without and with LINAC4 Giovanni Rumolo, Hannes Bartosik and Adrian Oeftiger Acknowledgements: G. Arduini,
Advertisements

LHC Beam Operations Past, Present and Future Maria Kuhn on behalf of the LHC team Moriond QCD 2013.
Beam commissioning strategy Global machine checkout Essential 450 GeV commissioning System/beam commissioning Machine protection commissioning.
(n)QPS LHC status and plans LHC Status and Plans Mike Lamont for the LHC team 1.
(n)QPS LHC status LHC: past, present and future Mike Lamont for the LHC team
Status of the LHC Mike Lamont for the LHC team. The LHC Very big Very cold Very high energy 2.
LHCC 3rd June 2015 Mike Lamont for the LHC team
(n)QPS LHC status and plans LHC status and plans for 2011 Mike Lamont for the LHC team 1.
LHC beam operation past, present, future Mike Lamont for the LHC team.
LHC machine status Mike Lamont for the LHC team. 75 ns50 ns 2011 – recap Increase number of bunches Reduce beam size from injectors Squeeze further Increase.
Lot’s of time lost due to cryo problem in IR8. Major impact, therefore review of MD program… Start discussion here, please let us know your input. Will.
LHC Machine Upgrades L. Ponce On behalf of the LHC Operation Team 1.
Summary and outcome of the 1st LIU-HL-LHC brainstorming meeting (24 th June 2011) Mike Lamont This event is jointly organized by the HL-LHC and LIU projects.
1 Luminosity monitor and LHC operation H. Burkhardt AB/ABP, TAN integration workshop, 10/3/2006 Thanks for discussions and input from Enrico Bravin, Ralph.
WLCG Collaboration Workshop, “Gotham City”, May 2012 Introduction WLCG Collaboration Workshop, “Gotham City”, May 2012 Introduction.
07-JUL-2003LEADE / JW1 Satellite bunches in the LHC Satellite “definition” Satellite luminosity Satellite detection & tolerances J. Wenninger AB/OP.
CONTENT: Beam characteristics and parameters Filling schemes Operational settings OP procedure and COLL setting Planning Shift breakdown To define the.
Stefano Redaelli Beam Department - Operations Group Operational Aspects of the Phase II Crab Cavity System LHC-CC09 3 rd LHC Crab Cavity Workshop European.
HL-LHC/LIU Joint workshop Goal: Progressing towards an agreed set of 450 GeV beam parameters for High Luminosity operation in LHC after LS2 & LS3. Slides.
Update of achievable beam characteristics at injection in LHC H.Bartosik, C.Bracco, O.Brüning, C.Carli, K.Cornelis, H.Damerau, R.Garoby, S.Gilardoni, B.Goddard,
LHC progress Report LHCC Wednesday 23 rd March 2011.
0 1 Alternative Options in the Injectors – Preliminary Summary H. Damerau LIU-TM#8 18 October 2013 Many thanks for discussions and input to T. Argyropoulos,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Evian 2014 historical perspective run 1: 2010: L peak >10 32 cm -2 s -1  2x10 32 cm -2 s : produce >1 fb -1  delivered.
Machine development - results and plans – critical results, what’s to be done? R. Assmann 15/07/2011 R. Assmann for the LHC MD coordination team (R. Assmann,
Tuesday 17 th April 04:00 Prepare second fill for v/d Meer scans. 06:22 Stable beams, v/d Meer scans for Alice and LHCb. 13:20 End v/d Meer scans.Dump.
Status of the LHC Mike Lamont for the LHC team. LS1 - descent into the underworld again.
Status of the LHC: Past, Present and Future 24th Rencontres de Blois May 27, 2012 Sergio Bertolucci CERN LHC.
Some ideas for/from the SPS LIU-SPS team. Scrubbing (only) for ecloud in SPS? aC coating remains baseline..... –but scrubbing has many potential advantages.
LHC-CC Validity Requirements & Tests LHC Crab Cavity Mini Workshop at CERN; 21. August Remarks on using the LHC as a test bed for R&D equipment.
09:25 Operator dump fill #2178, integrated lumi 107/108/18 nb-1. Trip of RQ4.R6 (fire heaters discharged) just after the beam dump but the QPS gave no.
LHC Injectors Upgrade Project 1/12/2010 R. Garoby.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Criteria for dynamic aperture limits and impact of the multipolar errors: summary of the simulations with beam-beam for levelling scenarios at 5 and 7.5x10.
Cryo back at 17:30 Beam back at 19:00 IR2 aperture until ~03:00 Since then no beam from the SPS:  Connector problem on MKD  Connector eroded, needs to.
Machine Progress Towards Higher Luminosity Frank Zimmermann CMS Upgrade Meeting FNAL, Chicago, 7 November 2011 (via EVO) Thanks to Martin Aleksa, Gianluigi.
LHC Machine Operational Status and Plans LHCC, 22nd September 2010 Steve Myers (On behalf of the LHC team and international collaborators)
Progress with Beam Report to LMC, Machine Coordination W10: Mike Lamont – Ralph Assmann Thanks to other machine coordinators, EIC’s, operators,
Summary Session 5 Chamonix 2011, 24. – Session 5: “High Intensity: Present and Future” R. Assmann & S. Redaelli Thanks to Frank Z. for his notes…
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
LHC Injectors Upgrade Project 11/11/2010 R. Garoby.
Tue 23/8 – Wed 24/8 09:00 Start 90 m optics run – Preparation and verification of the collimation functions – Re-generation of functions for Transverse.
Mike Lamont An attempt at synthesis Acknowledgements all round
Luminosity monitor and LHC operation
Operating IP8 at high luminosity in the HL-LHC era
Mike Lamont for the LHC team
Ralph Assmann, Giulia Papotti, Frank Zimmermann 25 August 2011
The CERN Physics Programme
MD Planning Fri – Sat (26. – 27.8.)
Cryo Problem MD Planning Tue (1.11.) C B Day Time MD MP Tue 01:00
Plans for ions in the injector complex D
LHC Machine Status report
Machine Coordinators: G. Arduini, J. Wenninger
Update on the HiLumi/LIU parameters and performance ramp up after LS2
Acknowledgments: LIU-PT members and deputies, H. Bartosik
LHC status Benoit Salvant (Beams department, Accelerator and Beam Physics group) for the LHC complex teams With many thanks for their inputs to J. Boyd,
Machine Progress Towards Higher Luminosity
Week 46 Week 46: Machine coordinators: Roger Bailey – Gianluigi Arduini Main aims of the week: Stable beams with ions Scheduled stop for ion source refill.
Summary of Week 16 G. Arduini, J. Wenninger
CSP Meeting CERN CERN Accelerators in th November 2010
J. Uythoven, W. Venturini Delsolaro, CERN, Geneva
Collimation after LS1: cleaning and β* reach
LHC Beam Operations Past, Present and Future
Collimation margins and *
Summary Thursday h21: Stable beams fill #1303.
Summary of week 19 Machine Coordinators: G. Arduini, M. Lamont Main aim: Luminosity production.
Collimators: Operations - Baseline Assumptions
Luminosity and time estimates
Monday :15 fill 3523 dumped by BPMs IP6
Another Immortal Fill….
Presentation transcript:

LHC Accelerator Prospects Mike Lamont for the LHC team “LHC: the status, the projections for this year, and the possibilities for the near and far future.. ” Acknowledgements: Brennan Goddard, Heiko Damerau, Frank Zimmermann, Werner Herr

2011 – A QUICK LOOK BACK

2011 Successfully wrestled with: – Total intensity – Bunch spacing – Bunch intensity – Emittance – Beta* & aperture Good performance from working on all available parameters Definitely exploring the effects of high intensity beams: – SEUs, beam induced heating, vacuum instabilities… – Operational efficiency suffering as a result 3

Of note Operational robustness – Precycle, injection, 450 GeV, ramp & squeeze & collisions routine Machine protection – Unpinned by superb performance of machine protection and associated systems – Rigorous machine protection follow-up, qualification and monitoring Routine collimation of 110 MJ LHC beams without a single quench from stored beams

Beam from injectors Excellent performance – years in the preparation Best in 2011 with 50 ns: ~1.45 x ppb ~2.3 microns into collision Design with 25 ns: 1.15 x ppb Normalized emittance 3.75 microns 5

IR1 and IR5 aperture at 3.5 TeV 2011’s “platinum mine” We got 4-6 sigmas more than the expected 14 sigma Triplet aperture compatible with a well-aligned machine, a well centred orbit and a ~ design mechanical aperture Stefano Redaelli ~600 m ~3 cm CMS Additional margin allowed squeeze to beta* = 60 cm in 2012 – big success – 6e33 cm -2 s -1 6

2011 to 2012 Well organized, productive Xmas technical stop – Lot of R2E related work – Plus consolidation and improvements of many systems Vacuum consolidation to address successfully diagnosed causes of instabilities in 2011 Injection collimators issues diagnosed and understood - spare in preparation - fingers crossed in the meantime Cool-down of machine exactly on schedule Very smooth hardware commissioning including careful quench-less commissioning of main circuits to 4 TeV Well oiled Machine checkout final tests and preparation for beam

2012 run configuration Energy – 4 TeV – Low number of quenches (as in 2011) assumed Bunch spacing - 50 ns Tight collimator settings – Now proven operationally Atlas and CMS beta* - 60 cm Alice and LHCb beta* - 3 m – Natural satellites versus main bunches in Alice – Tilted crossing in LHCb

Bunch spacing Performance from injectors Bunch spacing From Booster Protons per bunch (ppb) Emittance H&V [mm.mrad] 150 Single batch 1.1 x Single batch 1.2 x Single batch 1.45 x Double batch 1.6 x Double batch 1.2 x

Collimator settings 2012 Collimation hierarchy has to be respected in order to achieve satisfactory protection and cleaning. Aperture plus tight settings allows us to squeeze to 60 cm σ TCP 74.3 TCSG 76.3 TCLA 78.3 TCSG 67.1 TCDQ 67.6 TCT9.0 Aperture : tight settings Roderik Bruce 11

How tight? Intermediate settings (2011): ~3.1 mm gap at primary collimator Tight settings (2012): ~2.2 mm gap at primary collimator Norway Iberian peninsula Roderik Bruce 12

2012 – canonical (long) year Days Machine check-out2 Commissioning with beam21 Machine development22 Technical stops20 Scrubbing (25 ns)3 Technical stop recovery6 Initial intensity ramp-up~21 Proton running~126 Special runs~8 Ion setup4 Ion run24 ~150 days 14

50 ns performance estimate 4 TeV, 50 ns, 1380 bunches, 1.6e11, 2.5 microns 150 days of proton physics (assuming similar efficiencies to 2011) Beta* [cm] CollimatorsPeak Lumi [cm- 2 s -1 ] Int. Lumi [fb -1 ] Pile-upIncrease in peak 90Intermediate5.1e – Tight6.2e – % 60Tight6.8e – % from Moriond

2012 so far DateMilestone Thu 15.03Both beams captured, orbit and Q adjusted Fri 16.03Both beams at 4 TeV Sun 18.03Both beams squeezed to 0.6 m Thu 5 th AprilFirst stable beams – 3 bunches Wed 18 th April1380 bunches per beam - peak luminosity ~5.5e33 cm -2 s AprilMachine development AprilTechnical stop to 10 MayStruggled back up to 1380 ~4.3e33 cm -2 s -1 Last weekend~6e33 cm -2 s -1 and ~190 fb -1 in one fill… production running 16

2012 so far Smooth re-commissioning Tight collimator setting operational Squeeze to 60 cm OK Excellent peak performance – Peak/delivery rates Luminosity production hampered by – Injector beam quality (some foot shooting) – Machine availability – in particular cryogenics issues – Some fun with beam-beam instabilities, LHCb’s tilted crossing angle…. – Now settling down

Production running Over last 11 days: ~1.45 fb -1 or 0.13 fb -1 /day 110 days proton physics left in schedule: ~14 fb -1

Recent operational efficiency

This year

Lessons for the future Head-on beam-beam is not a limitation Long range has to be taken seriously – Need separation (otherwise bad lifetime and beam loss) – Small as possible emittances are good – Require separation established (10 to 12 sigma) and thus the crossing angle (important because our F is going to bite at lower beta) beta* reach (aperture, collimation, optics) established Levelling tested – it works in LHCb! Availability issues (SEUs, vacuum, cryogenics…) – vigorous follow-up and consolidation

50 versus 25 ns 50-ns beam: smaller emittance from the PS – less splittings in the PS; i.e. less charge in the PSB – ~2 vs ~3.5 micron at LHC injection 25-ns beam: emittance growth due to e-cloud in the SPS and LHC – to be improved by scrubbing in the LHC, and a-C coating in the SPS 25-ns has more long-range collisions Total current limit (by vacuum; RF) → limit # bunches Bunch train current limits in SPS & LHC → limit # bunches UFO rate seems to greatly increase for 25-ns spacing Ultimately we will (try to) transit to 25-ns spacing because of pile up

TOWARDS EXPLOITING THE ‘NOMINAL’ AND ‘ULTIMATE’ PARAMETER SET OF THE LHC

NB: not yet approved 10 year plan LS1 LS2 LS3 PHYSICS AT 6.5/7 TeV “ULTIMATE” PHYSICS HL-LHC

LSs – 2014: Long Shutdown 1 (LS1) consolidate for 6.5 / 7TeV  Measure all splices and repair the defective  Consolidate interconnects with new design (clamp, shunt)  Finish installation of pressure release valves (DN200)  Magnet consolidation  Measures to further reduce SEE (R2E): relocation, redesign, …  Install collimators with integrated button BPMs (tertiary collimators and a few secondary collimators)  Experiments consolidation/upgrades 2018: LS2 to prepare for ‘ultimate LHC’ parameter set:  Phase II collimation upgrade  Major injectors upgrade (LINAC4, 2GeV PS Booster, SPS coating, …)  Prepare for crab cavities (for HL-LHC)

Future performance What can the injectors deliver? What can the LHC take? – RF, cryo, MP, e-cloud… What can the LHC do with it? – Squeeze, pile-up… Scheduled time Machine availability & operational robustness

INJECTORS

Requirements from HL-LHC Target: fb -1 per year at LHC collision O.Brüning, HI-LUMI event November 2011 MOTIVATION

2011 to post-LS was excellent: 1.5e11 with 2.5 um for 50 ns (at LHC flat-top) – Around 1.1 e11 with 2.8 um for 25 ns, extracted from SPS Large improvement is required for either 25 or 50 ns beam! Brennan Goddard

Injector timeline Linac 4 ready PSB-PS transfer 1.4 GeV  2 GeV PSB H - injection could be available Chamonix 2012 SPS aC coating, 200 MHz power upgrade completed LS1 for injectors LS2 for injectors 2019 Injectors commissioned Length of LS2: minimum 12months 2019 commissioning: several months LS1.5?

Injector plans - summary Situation at the end of ‘injector LS1’ (03/2014) – Linac4 being commissioned, proton operation possible from 2014 – PSB injection for H- not yet available (baseline: Q4/2015) – PSB  PS transfer energy: 1.4 GeV Some potential improvements after LS1 – Low emittance beams – to be tested Q3/2012 – SPS improvements (optics, RF, impedance) LINAC4 connection baseline is now LS2 – (with a weakening option for LS1.5) – Injectors unable to exploit LINAC4 before LS2 anyway Major upgrades within LIU project, including increase of PSB-PS transfer energy only during LS2 After LS2 towards HL-LHC beam available from injectors – LHC will only be able partially exploit this beam

AFTER LS

Operational production scheme25 ns ~nominal50 ns (CBI-limit) PS injection Bunch intensity,  p/b 1612 Emittance,  2.4  m1.8  m Vert. tune spread,  Q y PS ejection Bunch intensity,  p/b Emittance,  2.5  m1.9  m Bunches per batch7236 Brightness limit PSBXX Space charge limit PSXX Coupled-bunch limit PSX SPS ejection: expected (achieved) Bunch intensity,  p/b Emittance,  2.8  m2.1  m Relative beam quality factor, q ib Beam from injectors 1/2 H. Damerau – Chamonix2012 Potential for nominal luminosity in LHC…

First PS studies in ns low  x /  y 25 ns ultra- bright PS injectionBunch intensity 0.8  ppb0.65  ppb Emittance,  1.2  m1.0  m Vert. tune spread,  Q y -0.24/ PS ejectionBunch intensity 1.27  ppb1.54  ppb Emittance,  1.3  m1.1  m Bunches per batch36/4832 Brightness limit PSBX/-X Space charge limit PS-/XX Coupled-bunch limit PS SPS ejectionBunch intensity 1.15  ppb Beyond SPS reach Emittance,  1.4  m Relative beam quality factor, q ib 2.2 Potential for ~twice the nominal luminosity in LHC… Beam from injectors 2/ H. Damerau – Chamonix2012

LHC after LS1 Energy 6.5 TeV (in 2015) Aperture not worse than now Bunch spacing 25 ns or 50 ns Understand (and control) emittance increase Pile-up – assume acceptable mean mu of ~40 – This will constrain the utility of 50 ns Beta* ~0.5 m – of limited utility to squeeze further

Potential limitations Radiation to electronics – SEU’s UFOs at higher energy & with 25 ns Electron cloud & high energy & at 25 ns Emittance growth in physics Total beam intensity limits in the LHC… Performance could be impacted by: 36

Potential performance Beta* [cm] Ib SPS Emit SPS [um] Peak Lumi [cm- 2 s -1 ] ~Pile- up Int. Lumi [fb -1 ] 25 ns501.2e e ns low emit 501.2e e ns level 501.7e e34 level 0.9e34 76 level – 50* 150 days proton physics 5% beam loss, 10% emittance blow-up in LHC 10 sigma separation 70 mb visible cross-section * different operational model - caveat All numbers approximate! 37

AFTER LS2 HL-LHC like beams available

25 ns after LIU upgrade 39 Fundamental limit: space charge in PS Limit is 2.3e11 p+/b in 3.6 um at SPS extraction (1.6e11 in 2.3 um) Brennan Goddard

50 ns after LIU upgrade 40 Limited by longitudinal instabilities in PS and SPS, and by brightness in SPS Limit is 2.7e11 p+/b in 2.7 um at SPS extraction (closer to HL-LHC requirement) Brennan Goddard

LHC limits Encyclopedic run through by Ralph Assmann at Chamonix Potential limits from – RF, Vacuum, e-cloud, Cryo, Magnets, Injection and Protection, Collimation, SEUs, Radiation Protection Ultimate intensity seems a reasonable assumption – 1.7e11 x

LHC limits

Performance estimate 7 TeV 150 days of proton physics Hübner Factor = 0.2 for 25 ns Different OP model for 50 ns levelled Beta* [cm] Ib (SPS) Emit (SPS) um Peak Lumi [cm -2 s -1 ] Pile-up Int. Lumi [fb -1 ] 25 ns501.6e e3456~65 50 ns502.7e e34 level 0.9e level 40 ~ Neglecting low emittance option All numbers approximate! 43

Projection ns Low emittance option viable between LS1 & LS2 Usual warnings apply

Conclusions 2012 performance, after some more experience, is looking encouraging, goals for year credible Injector planning stabilizing – LINAC4 connection, LIU upgrades not until LS2 – Interesting improvement possible before – Towards HL-LHC beams after 25 ns is baseline with potential to reach ultimate luminosity certainly after, possibly before, LS1 Levelled 50 ns is an interesting option, particularly if there are total intensity limitations – Certainly not yet given

SPARE

2012 LHC schedule Q1/Q2 Commissioning MD & TS Ramp-up Scrubbing (postponed) Scrubbing (postponed)

2012 LHC schedule Q3/Q4 Special runs Proton-lead High beta* runs for ALFA and TOTEM Van der Meer scans 48