The OVA1 Test Improves the Preoperative Assessment of Ovarian Tumors Frederick Ueland, Chris Desimone, Leigh Seamon, Rachel Ware, Scott Goodrich, Iwona.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regulation of Consumer Tests in California AAAS Meeting June 1-2, 2009 Beatrice OKeefe Acting Chief, Laboratory Field Services California Department of.
Advertisements

CRITICAL APPRAISAL ON AN ARTICLE ABOUT PROGNOSIS
Audit of Impact of NICE guidelines for Ovarian Cancer Helen Losty Royal United Hospital Bath 17th November 2011.
C- 1 A New Test for Assessing the Risk of Ovarian Cancer in Women with Adnexal Mass Presenter Place Date.
“International Conference on Clinical PET and Molecular Nuclear Medicine” IAEA - IPET 2007 Bangkok, Thailand 10 to 14 November 2007 C. Suarez, R. Pruzzo,
Use of intra-operative frozen section in surgery for potential early stage ovarian malignancy September 2011 Dr Paul Cross Consultant Cellular Pathologist.
National Mammography Database
Frederick R. Ueland, M.D. Associate Professor Gynecologic Oncology University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center.
Statistics for Health Care
Ji Young Lee, MD, PhD, David Marchetti, MD, M Steven Piver, MD Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Sisters of Charity Hospital, Buffalo, NY The Clinical.
Clinical Utility of Combidex in Various Cancers
Background The 2 week wait referral system was designed to expedite the referral of patients, suspected to have cancer, from Primary to Secondary care.
Ovarian cysts in Primary Care. When to refer? Physiological/pathological Benign/malignant Surgical approach? Open or keyhole? Do I need to do anything?
12/10/02Harry Bushar1 Computerized Thermal Imaging Breast Cancer System 2100 (CTI BCS2100) Radiological Devices Advisory Panel December 10, 2002 Statistical.
1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2012.
Eleni Galani Medical Oncologist
Identifying Ovarian Tumors at High Risk for Ovarian Cancer Frederick R. Ueland, M.D. Associate Professor Gynecologic Oncology Vice Chairman, Department.
TIRADS III nodules on ultrasound of thyroid
Comparison of Serum Human Epididymis Protein 4 with Cancer Antigen 125 as a Tumor Marker in Patients with Malignant and Nonmalignant Diseases J.M. Escudero,
UOG Journal Club: January 2013
Pretreatment malnutrition and quality of life - association with prolonged length of hospital stay among patients with gynecological cancer: a cohort study.
Fallopian Tube and Ovarian Malignancy Schwartz's Principles of Surgery Chapter 41. Gynecology.
AGO-OVAR DESKTOP III (Protocol AGO - OVAR OP.4)
4% of all female cancers 25% of all gynecologic cancers life time risk: 1/70 ¾ advanced stage most lethal Epithelial Ovarian Cancer:
Management of ovarian cysts
A prospective U.S. ovarian cancer screening study using the risk of ovarian cancer algorithm (ROCA) K. H. Lu, S. J. Skates, T. B. Bevers, W. Newland, R.
Lymphadenectomy in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Statistics for Health Care Biostatistics. Phases of a Full Clinical Trial Phase I – the trial takes place after the development of a therapy and is designed.
Ovarian Cancer Tumour Markers Brig Dilshad Ahmed Khan MBBS, MCPS, FCPS, FRC Path, PhD Head of Chem Pathology & Endocrinology dept AFIP, Rawalpindi.
Chondrosarcoma of the chest wall: primary diagnostics is decisive for outcome Björn Widhe and Henrik Bauer.
1 Differential Diagnosis of Neoplastic Pancreatic Cysts: The Role of EUS with Guided FNA Erwin M. Santo, MD Head, Invasive Endoscopy Unit Dep. of Gastroenterology.
11th Biennial Meeting of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society 11th Biennial Meeting of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society Semih Gorgulu,
EVIDENCE ABOUT DIAGNOSTIC TESTS Min H. Huang, PT, PhD, NCS.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
EMBC2001 Using Artificial Neural Networks to Predict Malignancy of Ovarian Tumors C. Lu 1, J. De Brabanter 1, S. Van Huffel 1, I. Vergote 2, D. Timmerman.
A Novel Score to Estimate the Risk of Pneumonia After Cardiac Surgery
Symptom control in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer Measuring the benefit of palliative chemotherapy in women with platinum refractory/ resistant.
CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY III: JOURNAL APPRAISAL Group 3 February 11, 2010.
Screening.  “...the identification of unrecognized disease or defect by the application of tests, examinations or other procedures...”  “...sort out.
Ki-67 index cutoff value of 1% is a valuable prognostic biomarker for pulmonary carcinoids based on this large cohort. Our data also provide strong evidence.
14 th Annual Meeting of the Connective Tissue Oncology Society November 13-15, 2008, London, UK Oliver Zivanovic, Mario M. Leitao, Alexia Iasonos, Lindsay.
Diagnosis Examination(MMSE) in detecting dementia among elderly patients living in the community. Excel.
M ETHODS Median dose was 22Gy (range: ) in 1 to 5 fractions Median treatment volume was 12.6 cc (range: ). Assessed for eligibility.
Using SEER-Medicare Data to Enhance Registry Data to Assess Quality of Care Joan Warren Applied Research Program National Cancer Institute NAACCR June.
Mark Browning, M.D. IUSME.  22,000 Cases  14,000 Deaths  Overall Survival Rate is 35%  Survival Rate Depends on Stage.
Consultant Obstetrician & Gynaecologist
Descriptive Features and Incidence Trends in California Cyllene Morris, DVM, PhD California Cancer Registry.
HE-4 TRIAL Prospective phase II trial on the prognostic and predictive value of HE-4 regression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian, Fallopian.
Biomarkers of ovarian cancer and cysts Reproductive Block 1 Lecture Dr. Usman Ghani.
D2 Lymphadenectomy Alone or with Para-aortic Nodal Dissection for Gastric Cancer NEJM July vol 359 R2 임규성.
Evaluating the Clinical Outcomes of Sixty-Three Patients Treated with Gamma Knife as Salvage Therapy for Glioblastoma Multiforme Erik W Larson, Halloran.
Critical Appraisal Course for Emergency Medicine Trainees Module 5 Evaluation of a Diagnostic Test.
Screening for Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian tumor markers Associate Professor Fariba Behnamfar
Prostate Cancer Screening in the fit Chilean Elderly: a head to head comparison of total serum PSA versus age adjusted PSA versus primary circulating prostate.
CORRELATION OF PHYSICAL EVALUATION AND MRI OF CERVICAL LYMPH NODE WITH HISTOPATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS IN ORAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA: AN AMBIDIRECTIONAL STUDY.
COMPARISON OF RISK OF MALIGNANCY INDICES AND ASSESSMENT OF DIFFERENT NEOPLASIAS IN THE ADNEXA (ADNEX) MODEL AS PREOPERATIVE MALİGNANCY EVALUATION METHODS.
Subjective assessment by ultrasound is superior to the risk of malignancy index (RMI) or the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) in discriminating.
Screening for Ovarian Cancer
Patient no 45 (Recent Updates)
Prognosis of younger patients in non-small cell lung cancer
Performance Comparison of CA125 and the Combination of the Other Serum Biomarkers for the Early Detection of the Ovarian Cancer Hye-Jeong Song1,3,
Ultrasonographic Imaging of Ovarian Masses
Tertiary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer:
Apollo Gleneagles Hospitals,
Dr T P E Wells 13 July 2018 Breast SSG Bath
Ovarian Cancer-Route to Diagnosis
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
Identifying Low-Risk Patients with Pulmonary Embolism Suitable For Outpatient Treatment A VERITY Registry Pilot Study N Scriven, T Farren, S Bacon, T.
The two-step Fagan's nomogram.
Presentation transcript:

The OVA1 Test Improves the Preoperative Assessment of Ovarian Tumors Frederick Ueland, Chris Desimone, Leigh Seamon, Rachel Ware, Scott Goodrich, Iwona Podzielinski, Lori Sokoll, Alan Smith, Joseph Santoso, John R. van Nagell Jr., Zhen Zhang.

NIH Consensus Statement 1994 “Women with ovarian masses who have been identified preoperatively as having a significant risk of ovarian cancer should be given the option of having their surgery performed by a gynecologic oncologist”

The OVA1 Test Biomarker panel –CA125, transthyretin (prealbumin), apolipoprotein A1 beta 2 microglobulin, transferrin OvaCalc software algorithm OVA1 risk index, range 0-10 PremenopausalPostmenopausal Low Risk < 5.0< 4.4 High Risk ≥ 5.0≥ 4.4

Objectives Evaluate the performance of the OVA1 test alone, and in conjunction with current clinical parameters, in estimating the risk of malignancy in women scheduled for surgery with an ovarian mass.

Eligibility Female subjects age 18 years or older Agreeable to phlebotomy Documented ovarian tumor on imaging Planned surgical intervention within 3 months of imaging Signed informed consent

Methods 27 primary care and specialty sites throughout U.S. Preoperative evaluation –imaging to confirm ovarian tumor –serum collection for CA125 –physician assessment (cancer? “yes or no”) Centralized assay at Quest Diagnostics Validation assays –Johns Hopkins –Specialty Laboratories Independent data analysis –Applied Clinical Intelligence

Study Population All Subjects Non-GO Physicians GO Physicians Patients Mean age, yr (SD)52 (14)50 (14)55 (14) Median age, yr Range (min, max)18 to 9219 to 9018 to 92 Menopausal Status, n (%) Pre235 (46%)144 (54%)91 (37%) Post281 (54%)125 (46%)156 (63%) Pathology Diagnosis, n (%) Benign ovarian condition355 (69%)197 (73%)158 (64%) Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC)96 (19%)45 (17%)51 (21%) Other primary ovarian malignancy9 (2%)5 (2%)4 (2%) Low malignant potential (borderline)28 (5%)12 (4%)16 (6%) Non-primary ovarian malignancy with involvement of the ovaries 18 (4%)5 (2%)13 (5%) Non-primary ovarian malignancies with no involvement of ovaries 10 (2%)5 (2%)

OVA1 Test Alone Receiving-operator-characteristic Curve Sensitivity92% Specificity43% PPV42% NPV93%

PremenopausalPostmenopausal Performance Preoperative assessment Preoperative assessment plus OVA1 Preoperative assessment Preoperative assessment plus OVA1 Sensitivity, % % CI46 to 7376 to 9573 to 8794 to 100 Specificity, % % CI77 to 8834 to 4867 to 8122 to 35 PPV, % % CI34 to 5820 to 3461 to 7643 to 55 NPV, % % CI84 to 9386 to 9778 to 9086 to 99 Negative Likelihood Ratio % CI0.33 to to to to 0.25 Prevalence19% (45/235)41% (116/281)

non-GO physiciansGO physicians Performance Preoperative assessment Preoperative assessment plus OVA1 Preoperative assessment Preoperative assessment plus OVA1 Sensitivity, % % CI61 to 8183 to 9668 to 8594 to 100 Specificity, % % CI77 to 8735 to 4967 to 8120 to 33 PPV, % % CI50 to 7030 to 4454 to 7236 to 50 NPV, % % CI84 to 9386 to 9779 to 9088 to 100 Negative Likelihood Ratio % CI0.23 to to to to 0.31 Prevalence27% (72/269)36% (89/247)

OVA1 Sensitivity Tumor subtypeCancer stage StageSensitivity I90% II100% III100% IV100% Epithelial OC99% Non EOC78% LMP75% Metastases94%

Conclusions 1.The OVA1 test successfully classifies patients into high or low probability of malignancy. 2.OVA1 has high sensitivity in premenopausal women and all stages of epithelial ovarian cancers. These results are independent of physician specialty. 3.When combined with other clinical information, the OVA1 test can help determine the risk of malignancy for an ovarian tumor before surgery, and facilitate decisions about referral to a gynecologic oncologist.