REAL WORLD RESEARCH THIRD EDITION Chapter 8: Designs for Particular Purposes: Evaluation, Action and Change 1©2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Focusing an Evaluation Ben Silliman, Youth Development Specialist NC 4-H Youth Development.
Advertisements

Project Appraisal Module 5 Session 6.
Key Steps to running a survey. Aims and Objectives Have clear aims and objectives for the project. Ensure you know what you want to get out of the survey.
Higher Int 2 NAB Questions. Question (higher only) Explain, in detail, how you used the knowledge you gained from studying both Key concepts/Key Features.
Workshop Purpose To provide opportunities to enable you to acquire the knowledge and skills to design and develop learning programmes to satisfy organisational.
The Aged Care Standards and Accreditation Agency Ltd Continuous Improvement in Residential Aged Care.
Team 6 Lesson 3 Gary J Brumbelow Matt DeMonbrun Elias Lopez Rita Martin.
A2 Unit 4A Geography fieldwork investigation Candidates taking Unit 4A have, in section A, the opportunity to extend an area of the subject content into.
What You Will Learn From These Sessions
Chapter 1: An Overview of Program Evaluation Presenter: Stephanie Peterson.
In Europe, When you ask the VET stakeholders : What does Quality Assurance mean for VET system? You can get the following answer: Quality is not an absolute.
Clinical Supervision Foundations Module Six Performance Evaluation.
CHAPTER 2 THE RESEARCH PROCESS. 1. Selection of topic  2. Reviewing the literature  3. Development of theoretical and conceptual frameworks  4.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation
Monash University, SIMS, Semester One, DATA GATHERING FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CSE Information Systems 1 CSE Information Systems.
Analytical methods for Information Systems Professionals Week 13 Lecture 1 CONCLUSION.
Business research methods: data sources
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
1 Lecture 6 The Systems Analyst (Role and activities) Systems Analysis & Design Academic Year 2008/9.
Purpose of the Standards
Chapter Three Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Problem Definition and the Research Process Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter Three.
Measuring Learning Outcomes Evaluation
School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools” Self-Evaluation of Learning and Teaching Self-Evaluation of Learning and.
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 7 Slide 1 Requirements Engineering Processes 1.
Simple brief By: Ayat Farhat
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events
ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.
Influencing the Research Agenda Findings from an independent evaluation of a Cancer Network Consumer Research Panel Cindy Cooper, Julia Moore, Rosemary.
9 Closing the Project Teaching Strategies
Literature Review and Parts of Proposal
Impact assessment framework
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
Strategic Planning Session David Rudder, Ph.D. Rudder Consultants, LLC. May 17, 2006.
Requirements Engineering
CP methodology adapted to UNFCCC Swedish International Development Agency S ESSION 9.A United Nations Environment Program Division of Technology Industry.
Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended.
Support the spread of “good practice” in generating, managing, analysing and communicating spatial information Training Needs Assessment (TNA) By: Rainer.
Citizens’ contributions to the public agenda on animal cloning: project manager Ida-Elisabeth Andersen Structure of the presentation: 1.What is the Danish.
THE RESEARCH PROCESS AN OUTLINE. Broad Phases of a Project The Conceptual phase is the thinking phase. An idea is developed into a research question The.
Introduction to Evaluation Odette Parry & Sally-Ann Baker
INITIATING THE PLANNING PROCESS. CONTENT Outputs from this stage Stage general description Obtaining government commitment Raising awareness Establishing.
Monitoring & Evaluation Presentation for Technical Assistance Unit, National Treasury 19 August 2004 Fia van Rensburg.
Technical Skills and Tactics in Sport
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 2c – Process Evaluation.
Systems Life Cycle. Know why it is necessary to evaluate a new system Understand the need to evaluate in terms of ease-of- use, appropriateness and efficiency.
Copyright  2005 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Australian Human Resources Management by Jeremy Seward and Tim Dein Slides prepared by Michelle.
Introducing Unit Specifications and Unit Assessment Support Packs National 1 and 2.
12/10/15.  It is a Cross Life Cycle Activity (CLCA) that may be performed at any stage ◦ In fact, some part of it (e.g. risk analysis and management)
Evaluating Ongoing Programs: A Chronological Perspective to Include Performance Measurement Summarized from Berk & Rossi’s Thinking About Program Evaluation,
Information System Project Management Lecture three Chapter one
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas A Framework for Program Evaluation.
Critical Appraisal using the Parahoo model
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
DEVELOPING THE WORK PLAN
Guidelines Recommandations. Role Ideal mediator for bridging between research findings and actual clinical practice Ideal tool for professionals, managers,
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
1 Performance Auditing ICAS & IRAS Officers NAAA 21 Jan 2016.
A. Strategies The general approach taken into an enquiry.
National PE Cycle of Analysis. Fitness Assessment + Gathering Data Why do we need to asses our fitness levels?? * Strengths + Weeknesses -> Develop Performance.
Systems Analysis Lecture 5 Requirements Investigation and Analysis 1 BTEC HNC Systems Support Castle College 2007/8.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Provide instruction.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 9. Periodic data collection methods.
Right-sized Evaluation
System Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
IB Environmental Systems and Societies
Module 5 The Climate Expert and your role as a consultant
Criteria for prioritizing health-related problems for research
Presentation transcript:

REAL WORLD RESEARCH THIRD EDITION Chapter 8: Designs for Particular Purposes: Evaluation, Action and Change 1©2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Some purposes of evaluation: 1 To find out if client needs are met likely questions: What should be the focus of a new programme? Are we reaching the target group? Is what we provide actually what they need? continued… 2©2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Some purposes of evaluation: - continued 2 To improve the programme likely questions: How can we make the programme better (e.g. in meeting needs; or in its effectiveness; or in its efficiency)? continued… 3©2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Some purposes of evaluation: - continued 3 To assess the outcomes of a programme likely questions: Is the programme effective (e.g. in reaching planned goals)? What happens to clients as a result of following the programme? Is it worth continuing (or expanding)? continued… 4©2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Some purposes of evaluation: - continued 4 To assess the outcomes of a programme likely questions: How do the costs of running the programme compare with the benefits it provides? Is it more (or less) efficient than other programmes? continued… 5©2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Some purposes of evaluation: - continued 5 Assessing relative costs and benefits likely questions: How do the costs of running the programme compare with the benefits it provides? Is it more (or less) efficient than other programmes? (from Robson, 2000, Table 1.1, p. 10) 6©2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Features of evaluation Any evaluation should meet the following criteria: 1 Utility 2 Feasibility 3 Propriety 4 Technical adequacy 7©2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Checklist for planning an evaluation 1 Reasons, purposes and motivations 2 Value 3 Interpretation 4 Subject 5 Evaluator(s) 6 Methods 7 Time 8 Permissions and control 9 Use (adapted from Robson et al., 1988, p. 85) 8©2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Skills needed to carry out evaluations writing a proposal clarifying purposes of the evaluation identifying, organizing and working with an evaluation team choice of design and data collection techniques interviewing questionnaire construction and use continued… 9©2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Skills needed to carry out evaluations - continued management of complex information systems data analysis report writing, including making of recommendations fostering utilization of findings sensitivity to political concerns 10©2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Needs assessment checklist 1 Identify key individuals to be involved in a steering group 2 Define the target population for the needs assessment 3 Ensure their needs are the focus of the needs assessment 4 Communicate the aims of the needs assessment to service providers 5 Decide who will carry out the needs assessment 6 Consider whether additional assistance may be needed continued … 11©2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Needs assessment checklist - continued 7 Estimate the cost and identify the source of funding for the needs assessment 8 Identify the appropriate overall approach to your needs assessment 9 Gather existing sources of information about the needs of your target population 10 Identify existing services in your area that are already available to meet the need continued … 12©2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Needs assessment checklist - continued 11 Consider the ways in which you will obtain the views of your target population about their needs, and whether ethical approval is needed 12 Consider the ways in which you will obtain the views of service providers about the needs of the target population 13 Ensure that information is analysed and interpreted, and that conclusions are drawn 14 Consider how those who gathered the information can be involved in the analysis, and how the results can be relayed back to all those who contributed to the process continued … 13©2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Needs assessment checklist - continued 15 Once you have identified the needs of your target population, prioritize them, consider all the options for meeting them, and develop an implementation plan 16 Once agreement is reached on the changes to make, consider how to monitor and evaluate them 17 Consider the most appropriate methodology for the evaluation (adapted and abridged from Griesbach et al., 2004, p. 37 ) 14©2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Stages of action research 1 Define the inquiry 2 Describe the situation 3 Collect evaluative data and analyse it 4Review the data and look for contradictions continued … 15©2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Stages of action research - continued 5 Tackle a contradiction by introducing change 6 Monitor the change 7 Analyse evaluative data about the change 8 Review the change and decide what to do next (adapted from Bassey, 1998, pp. 94–5 ) 16©2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Assumptions for those wishing to initiate change 1Don’t assume that your version of what the change should be is the one that could or should be implemented 2Change involves ambiguity, ambivalence and uncertainty 3Some conflict and disagreement are not only inevitable but fundamental to change. 4People need pressure to change 5Effective change takes time continued … 17©2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Assumptions for those wishing to initiate change - continued 6Lack of implementation isn’t necessarily because of rejection or resistance 7Don’t expect all, or even most, people or groups to change 8You need a plan based on these assumptions and underpinned by a knowledge of the change process 9Change is a frustrating, discouraging business - if you are not in a position to make the above assumptions don’t expect significant change, as far as implementation is concerned. (adapted and abridged from Fullan, 1982, p. 91) 18©2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.