Overview A project funded by the US Department of Education Coordinated by the Council of Chief State School Officers An overview of NEDM The National.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Making a Difference Improving the Quality of Life of Individuals with Developmental Disabilities and their families.
Advertisements

The Role of the Principal Going Forward. What Leon School District is Required to Do Florida Department of Educations Supports that might impact you What.
What is CEDS? voluntarycommon A national collaborative effort to develop voluntary, common data standards for a key set of education data elements Voluntary.
P20 State Core Logical Data Model September, 2010.
Common Education Data Standards 2 standard communication A language is a standard form of communication. certain.
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL May 17, 2010 Informational Meeting on the President’s Directive on Open Government - Federal Spending Transparency.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health
Future of Financial Management Transparency and Intelligent DataTM
NCES Update Summer Forum Meeting July 11, 2012 Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics.
Planning a measurement program What is a metrics plan? A metrics plan must describe the who, what, where, when, how, and why of metrics. It begins with.
IT Governance and Management
1. PBIS Team: Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation – PBIS requires some.
Medicaid Information Technology Architecture (MITA) Where Louisiana Medicaid is Today and Where it Will To Be in the Future April 17, 2012.
Community Information Data Set Overview – Supplier Forum Netta Hollings - The NHS Information Centre.
Queensland Public Service Capability and Leadership Framework (CLF) 1.
Information and Communication Technologies in the field of general education in Armenia NATIONAL CENTER OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES.
SIF Association Membership – what does it mean for your district?
Why CEDS? 201 What are Common Education Data Standards? What is CEDS? Why do we need it? Development: Who & How? What.
IT 244 Database Management System Data Modeling 1 Ref: A First Course in Database System Jeffrey D Ullman & Jennifer Widom.
Supporting Data Access for Researchers: An LEA Perspective Christina Tyedeman Hawaii Department of Education Sheri Ballman Princeton City School District.
NCES Forum July 2010 Kathy Gosa Kansas State Department of Education Using Forum Products to Establish a Solid SLDS Framework.
1 Northern Ontario e-Health Information and Communication Technology Tactical Plan October 25, 2007.
Margaret Heritage, CRESST Raymond Yeagley, NWEA. National Forum on Education Statistics  Mission: improve the quality, usefulness, timeliness, and comparability.
Presented by: Kathy Gosa Andrea Hall Kansas State Department of Education 26 th Annual Management Information Systems (MIS) Conference February 14, 2013.
Implementation Opening Activity Implementation Considerations Implementation Activity.
CEDS Standard Update.
2012 MIS Conference: The Return on Investment From Implementing Common Data Standards Kathy Gosa Shawn Bay Adam Miller Photos are stock, release for web.
1 Working Group on Archives and Records Management WGARM.
Outline of Presentation 1.Mission, Vision and Values for Task Force 2.Definition of Engagement 3.Explanation of Research-Informed Framework 4.Characteristics.
Prepared by Opinion Dynamics Corporation May 2004.
FY RACE TO THE TOP
Larry L. Johnson Federal Transition Framework.
Hans P. L’Orange State Higher Education Executive Officers October 20, 2009.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
March 2007 Conducted for the California Foundation for Commerce and Education Selected Survey Results: Business Executives’ Attitudes on California Education.
Higher Education Policy Conference Common Data Standards: tsup? Higher Education Policy Conference August 12, 2010 John Blegen, State Higher Education.
Enterprise Architecture, Enterprise Data Management, and Data Standardization Efforts at the U.S. Department of Education May 2006 Joe Rose, Chief Architect.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
ADVISORY COUNCILS Department of Education Bureau of Career and Technical Education.
P-20 Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS) Update Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI)
Why CEDS? 201 What are Common Education Data Standards? What is CEDS? Why do we need it? Development: Who & How? What does CEDS provide?
CEDS Update What is CEDS? Who and How? Version 2 Update and Scope Public Comments Version 3.
Writing Policy for SBDM Councils. Goals of this Session provide an overview of Senate Bill 1 requirements related to writing provide guidance in reviewing.
Transforming Patient Experience: The essential guide
What is a data model?. National Education Data Model Mission Statement Create an open framework for education data systems based on current standards.
BEA Orientation November 13, 2007
Common Education Data Standards (CEDS) and ED Facts …What’s Next Jack Buckley, Commissioner – NCES Ross Santy, Director – ED Fact s U.S. Department of.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Building an Interim Assessment System: A Workbook for School Districts CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment Detroit, MI June 22, 2010.
CEDS: Why? What is CEDS? voluntarycommon A national collaborative effort to develop voluntary, common data standards for a key set of education data.
SIX PLUS ONE COLUMBUS CITY SCHOOLS IMPLEMENTATION MODEL OF PARENT ENGAGEMENT = 7.
Presented by: Shadd Schutte, WISE Project Manager, Wyoming Department of Education And Alex Jackl, Chief Architect, ESP Solutions Group 1+1=3 How Wyoming.
Next Generation Iowa Assessments.  Overview of the Iowa Assessments ◦ Purpose of Forms E/F and Alignment Considerations ◦ Next Generation Iowa Assessments.
Common Education Data Standards: Version 2 Update Tate Gould, NCES Beth Young, QIP.
1 KM Track Overview & Gaining Value from Knowledge -- Knowledge Management (KM) and the Contracting Professional Breakout Session # 119 Name: Gaining.
Development Account: 6th Tranche Strengthening the capacity of National Statistical Offices (NSOs) in the Caribbean Small Island Developing States to fulfill.
Kansas Education Longitudinal Data System Update to Kansas Commission on Graduation and Dropout Prevention and Recovery December 2010 Kathy Gosa Director,
Federal Programs Department: Plan4Learning
Information for New Members of Crown Entity Boards
Family Engagement Coordinator Meeting July 25, 2018
Updates on U.S. Spending Transparency Improvements
Kansas Educational Data Users Consortium
Reproductive Health and Safety Education: Making It Stick in NC
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
2018 Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference
Capacity building on the use of Geospatial Data and Technologies
LIHEAP Virtual Library
1 Envision 3 Outline 4 Design
New Hampshire Department of Transportation
Presentation transcript:

Overview A project funded by the US Department of Education Coordinated by the Council of Chief State School Officers An overview of NEDM The National Education Data Model Hugh Walkup Beth Young Shadd Schutte , NCES Conference

The National Education Data Model is a P-20 data resource and a catalog of standardized core education data sets What does that mean? – NEDM aims to create a catalog of commonly used data sets and describe the relationship between each data set – NEDM aims to create an open framework based on current standards to build education data systems NEDM Provides: – Standard data definitions – Coding strategies – Data element standards – Relationships – Best practices What is NEDM? “Every well built house started in the form of a definite purpose plus a definite plan in the nature of a set of blueprints”-Napoleon Hill

A blueprint of data available for current and future collection and reporting A framework providing Districts and States to decide with the capability to individually decide what data to collect and maintain A set of consistent data definitions and an architecture that will allow improved data quality as well as interoperability A framework for local/state/federal RFP generation NEDM Priorities

 The National Education Data Model, designed to understand the information required for teaching, learning, and administrative systems can be used by – Educators Use the Data Model to identify requirements Perform gap analysis – Vendors Use the Data Model to identify requirements Extract a software-specific conceptual model Build logical and physical models – Researchers Prepare a research design What Does NEDM Do?

Educators/Administrators/Policymakers – Provides a research capability for educators to comprehend mass amounts of data with relative ease – Utilizing data within the core data set enables them to verify areas of need and areas of strength – Have a vested interest in creating uniform policies but would not directly use NEDM Researchers – Having an easily navigable core data set allows researchers to create viewable data that can aid in the improvement of the education system Data Managers – They can act as valuable points of contact that can provide insight into which information is vital to include System Developers – So they can provide interoperable systems that can integrate data and work with NEDM to create value Who NEDM?

1.So everyone doesn’t have to start from scratch. 2.So databases can talk to each other. 3.So we can decide what data we need and how to use it. 4.So we can align with existing definitions, data sets, and reporting requirements. 5.So our data systems support our processes and inform their improvement. Why NEDM?

Significant investments are being made in education that are tied to outcomes Without robust education data systems that can evaluate and track outcomes we cannot measurably improve educational outcomes The time is now to break down silos – Common definitions (Classifications, entities, attributes) Let’s determine what we have that works and institutionalize it. Elevate and implement best practices – Relevant data sets (SIFA, PESC, SCROM) Determination of what data points really matter and to whom – Teachers, students, staff, parents – Relationships Building the bridges that between data silos that have formed in our education eco systems Why Now?

Responsible for telling districts or states how they should be administering their schools and education systems A model that dictates what physical design districts and state should be using for housing data NEDM is NOT…

NEDM: What is new since the release in March 2010 Forum Questions Common Attributes Expanded NEDM Views

National Level – Improves research – Informs policy makers – Connects data dots State Level – Provides decision makers with quality data – Enables better evaluation for policy makers School Level – Makes local decision making easier – Provides reliable information that makes determining what is needed for a school to succeed Uses

NEDM: Forum Questions Forum Task Force developed Version 1.0 of NEDM Began by collecting “data questions” of task force members and their organizations These questions were categorized and helped build the areas of the NEDM we see today Coming full circle be mapping these original questions with specific NEDM items

NEDM Common Attributes Some NEDM items are common across entities Examples ID Codes, Address information, Basic demographic information Created a “pull-out” list of these common attributes in technical view Can use these common attributes to list out differences

NEDM Expanded Views NEDM has worked to include as many of the authoritative sources as possible. NEDM contains within its core: SIF specification mapping PESC data mappings DQC mappings NCES handbook mappings ARRA element mappings NEDM will also include the CDS elements And other data sources as we continue to expand the project.

NEDM appeals to education as electronic health records appeals to the healthcare industry By digitizing education information and making it viewable in a consistent manner it is a high performance way for education officials to spend their ARRA dollars State use of the $4.35B Race to the top fund will be a primary method of funding improved data systems Applicability

For More Information For up to date information of the model, and feedback: View the official website at: