Www.bioregionalassessments.gov.au Figure 1: Location of the bioregions being assessed Objectives The objectives of the bioregional assessments are to:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Coal Seam Gas VPELA Forum 16 April 2013 Pierre Andipatin Earth Resources Development Division.
Advertisements

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Figure 1: High-level workflow for the assessment of potential interaction of CO 2 geological storage with other basin resources,
Meeting with stakeholders 2 May Ms Mary Lack (Chair), Director, Shellack Pty Ltd Dr Catherine Bulman, Research Scientist, CSIRO Marine & Atmospheric.
Eng.monash.edu.au/enveng Dr Gavin M. Mudd Environmental Engineering What the ‘Frack’? Coal Seam Gas, Fracking & Groundwater DCQ-RAPAD.
Water Management Challenges and Trends Facing the Coal Seam Gas and Mining Industries in Queensland Lindsay Delzoppo General Manager, Operations Environment.
CSG Net - A New Approach to Monitoring Impacts of the Coal Seam Gas Industry on Groundwater Ross Carruthers Coal Seam Gas Compliance Unit.
UK-Russia Climate Change Collaboration: Project Overview Sarah Winne Mark Allington.
Climate Ready Support Service Dr Molly Anderson Research Expert, Climate Change Environment Agency.
A2 Unit 4A Geography fieldwork investigation Candidates taking Unit 4A have, in section A, the opportunity to extend an area of the subject content into.
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE, MINING AND COMMODITIES TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION PHARMACEUTICALS AND LIFE SCIENCES Coal Seam Gas.
MINING ACCESS TO WATER RESOURCES – TRADITIONS AND DEVELOPING PRINCIPLES MINING ACCESS TO WATER RESOURCES – TRADITIONS AND DEVELOPING PRINCIPLES ALEX GARDNER.
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
Cost Benefit Analysis of proposed reforms to water access for Petroleum & Gas Projects Qwater Conference 7-8 November 2014.
Peru c o n s u l t i n g Peru Programme Assurance Method.
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
Parameterising Bayesian Networks: A Case Study in Ecological Risk Assessment Carmel A. Pollino Water Studies Centre Monash University Owen Woodberry, Ann.
INTRODUCTION Like many fluvial ecosystems of the United States the Willamette Valley has undergone numerous environmental changes since the introduction.
What is Big Data? “… a blanket term for any collection of data sets so large and complex that it becomes difficult to process using on-hand database management.
Sustainable Planning for Managing the Impacts of Mining at Moranbah and the Bowen Basin.
6-1 Copyright © 2013 McGraw-Hill Education (Australia) Pty Ltd Pearson, Larson, Gray, Project Management in Practice, 1e CHAPTER 6 Estimating Project,
First Nations-Focused Scientific Reviews of Environmental Assessments MSESMSES Prepared by Sarah Hechtenthal, M.Sc., P. Biol.
Guidance Note 12 – Monitoring, Reporting and Evaluation Information for Lead Partners 21 September 2011 Sarah Reid Managing Authority.
UNFC–2009 – Purpose of Resource Classification David MacDonald Houston 21 November 2013.
JOHN ILIMA MSCIV (Candidate) College of Engineering, Design, Art and Technology MAKERERE UNIVERSITY- KAMPALA.
Common framework Guidelines for Pilot Actions Debrecen 2013 Municipality of Debrecen Department of Sociology University of Debrecen External expert.
CP methodology adapted to UNFCCC Swedish International Development Agency S ESSION 9.A United Nations Environment Program Division of Technology Industry.
John Brumley & Tamara Boyd School of Civil and Chemical Engineering
Characterization Report Module 2: Water Budget, Pressures and Impacts, Significant Water Management Issues, Monitoring, Characterization Report Characterization.
Screen | 1 EPA - Drivers for Regionalisation Max Harvey Director Operations Environment Protection Authority Presentation, reference, author, date.
Agricultural and Horticultural Science 3.2 Research and report on the impact of factors on the profitability of a New Zealand primary product.
Management & Development of Complex Projects Course Code MS Project Management Perform Qualitative Risk Analysis Lecture # 25.
Age-specific Exposure Assessment for Children Johan Bierkens, Christa Cornelis, Mirja Van Holderbeke, Rudi Torfs INTRODUCTION Recognition.
Integrated Risk Management Charles Yoe, PhD Institute for Water Resources 2009.
Aligning Institutional Strategic and SEM Plans: Indiana State University November 12, 2012 Tom Green, Ph.D. Senior Consultant.
CHEDS Experiment Title…… o Experimental Staff and contact information: Example:  Principal Investigator (PI)  Co-PI  Staff Scientist  Post Doc  Graduate.
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1 Understanding and Measuring Uncertainty Associated with the Mid-Year Population Estimates Joanne Clements Ruth Fulton Alison Whitworth.
Using EoH tools to identify values and threats to those values (tools 1 and 2)
IMPACT 3-5th November 20044th IMPACT Project Workshop Zaragoza 1 Investigation of extreme flood Processes and uncertainty IMPACT Investigation of Extreme.
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
Date CA Question Learning Objectives: 1.To understand the requirements of the CA question.
IMPACT 3-5th November 20044th IMPACT Project Workshop Zaragoza 1 Investigation of extreme flood Processes and uncertainty IMPACT Investigation of Extreme.
THE MANAGEMENT PLAN IN PRACTICE Case study. RBMP Detailed publication process in the directive...  art. 13: general rules  annex VII: detailed contents.
WFD Reporting, Copenhagen, 4th Feb 2010 Schema overview WFD reporting training Copenhagen, 4 February 2010 Jorge Rodriguez-Romero DG Env, European Commission.
© WRc plc 2010 Agenda item 3b: Summary of WISE electronic delivery: presentation of an example.
Llwyneinion Acid Tar Lagoon
Kettle River Watershed Management Plan Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting #3 – July 19, 2012.
MINE SAFETY MANAGEMENT PLAN. DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF MINES SAFETY DGMS n It is recommended that mines be required to put in place Mine Safety Management.
RESERVE DETERMINATION STUDIES FOR SELECTED SURFACE WATER, GROUNDWATER, ESTUARIES AND WETLANDS IN THE GOURITZ WMA – PSC MEETING NO 1 OVERVIEW OF THE RESERVE.
Example Generating hydrocarbons from coal in- situ (Coal Seam Methane, Underground Coal Gassification)
1 Is Europe Making a difference: Assessing Impact in Information Society Technologies Isabelle Collins Technopolis Ltd.
CLRTAP/EMEP/TFIAM Oslo, May 2002 INERIS/Guy Landrieu Remarks about Uncertainty Treatment _________________________________________________________.
Update from Australia A Land of Droughts and Flooding Rains David Lemon| Research Stream Leader: Water Informatics 20 March 2012 WATER FOR A HEALTHY COUNTRY.
Groundwater related research Dr Shafick Adams 21 July 2010.
The ESA call for the 9 th Earth Explorer mission (EE9)
Abstract No. M02 1. Introduction Many of Australia’s water management areas are over-allocated or highly developed, particularly in the Murray-Darling.
Managing CSG Groundwater Impacts Randall Cox Office of Groundwater Impact Assessment AgForce CSG Water Field Day – Roma / Miles 9-10 October 2013.
ExpertSelect Belgium S.A. – Chaussée des Collines 54 – B-1300 Wavre – BELGIUM – +32 (0) – Optivalue.
Automatically Calculating the Adherence to License Requirements
Summary Introduction The Problem Methodology Joseph Stroud PhD Thesis
The NAS Report: Where to from here?
ENV 333 Innovative Education- -snaptutorial.com
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds BRIDGE Project Presentation Contract N° (SSPI) Co-ordinator: BRGM (Fr)
Word Wall experiment inference sample observation predict data
Impacts of coal seam gas extraction on water resources in Australia
LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT.
Groundwater related aspects of the 2018 drought in Ireland Dr
CIS WG GW Work Programme
Water Quality – Bacteria Dashboard
Presentation transcript:

Figure 1: Location of the bioregions being assessed Objectives The objectives of the bioregional assessments are to: understand the hydrogeologic and flow regimes of a bioregion prior to future CSG and coal mining development understand the state and natural variation of key water-dependent assets located in the bioregion undergoing CSG and coal mining development understand the characteristics of the target CSG and coal resources and hence the likely techniques, and associated water volumes, involved in their extraction. Extraction of coal seam gas may impact on water resources and water related assets through changes in the quality and/or quantity of surface water and/or groundwater. A $43 m program of research titled Bioregional Assessments has been set up to examine these possible impacts in Australia. Impacts of coal seam gas extraction on water resources in Australia David Post CSIRO, Canberra, Australia FURTHER INFORMATION David Post Senior Principal Research Scientist, CSIRO p Progress The Bioregional Assessment Programme commenced in July Work to date has focused on: creating an overall methodology setting out the key steps involved in carrying out a bioregional assessment 1 gathering key datasets and writing context statements summarising current conditions and previous research in the bioregions creating water-dependent asset registers containing important ecological, economic and social assets deriving a methodology for attaching measurable receptors to assets creating a development pathway containing the most likely development of coal mining and coal seam gas development developing a conceptual model of causal pathways linking the impact of the stressor to the water-dependent asset. Figure 2: Flow chart summarising the Bioregional Assessment methodology REFERENCES 1 Barrett DJ, Couch CA, Metcalfe DJ, Lytton L, Adhikary DP and Schmidt RK (2013) Methodology for bioregional assessments of the impacts of coal seam gas and coal mining development on water resources. A report prepared for the Independent Expert Scientific Committee on Coal Seam Gas and Large Coal Mining Development. Department of the Environment, Australia. Next steps Work from here will focus on: developing and running numerical surface water and groundwater models to explicitly represent the impacts of depressurisation and disposal of co-produced water determining the impacts of CSG and coal mining on water-dependent assets as measured through the identified receptors. In doing this, we will: Explicitly assess direct, indirect and cumulative impacts Identify all sources of model and parameter uncertainty and quantify the propagation of uncertainty through the programme Carry out the entire study through the lens of risk analysis in order to be able to quantify the associated risks and uncertainties.