/ASEEBOK Stuart G. Walesh, PhD, PE, Consultant NSPE’s Pan – Engineering Body of Knowledge ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Indianapolis,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
Advertisements

Program Goals Just Arent Enough: Strategies for Putting Learning Outcomes into Words Dr. Jill L. Lane Research Associate/Program Manager Schreyer Institute.
Note: Lists provided by the Conference Board of Canada
Educating for a Sustainable Future – Environmental Engineering Body of Knowledge The EE BOK Working Group Debbie Reinhart, PhD, PE, BCEE University of.
National Academic Reference Standards
As presented to the Global Colloquium on Engineering Education Deborah Wolfe, P.Eng. October 2008 The Canadian Process for Incorporating Outcomes Assessment.
For AS 229 (Environmental Technology). 1. A competent environmental technologist with strong understanding of fundamental scientific and technological.
Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Jeffrey S. Russell, P.E., Ph.D., F.ASCE Chair, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin - Madison Preparing the Professional.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
ABET 1 SAYS - Your Senior Design Course Should Include Engineering design is the process of devising a system, component, or process to meet desired needs.
The Engineering Body of Knowledge Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes Required for Practice as a Professional Engineer First Edition Craig N. Musselman, P.E.,
Mohammad Alshayeb 19 May Agenda Update on Computer Science Program Assessment/Accreditation Work Update on Software Engineering Program Assessment/Accreditation.
ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 To maintain ABET accreditation, Engineering Departments must demonstrate that all of their graduates have the following.
Program Improvement Committee Report Larry Caretto College Faculty Meeting December 3, 2004.
DIPOL Quality Practice in Training at İstanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty Dr.Banu Tansel.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology - is a non governmental organization that accredits post secondary educational organizations in : 1)
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingJanuary 24, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
ABET Accreditation (Based on the presentations by Dr. Raman Unnikrishnan and W. J. Wilson) Assoc. Prof. Zeki BAYRAM EMU Computer Engineering Dept. 14 January.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
A Decade of Experience On Outcome Based Accreditation: Still a Long Way To Go A. Erbil PAYZIN Bülent E. PLATIN Chair, MÜDEK Executive Board Member, MÜDEK.
OUTCOME BASED LEARNING- CONTINUES IMPROVEMENT. Motivation  PEC??  Continues Improvement.
Trends in Engineering Licensure Blaine D. Leonard, P.E., D.GE, Pres.10.ASCE Montana JEC Meeting November 7, 2014 – Helena, MT.
OBE Briefing.
Be Part of Something BIG Volunteer Opportunities American Society of Safety Engineers.
ABET’s coming to Rose! Your involvement Monday, Nov 5, 2012.
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting May 21, 2013.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
Environmental Engineering Curriculum Evolution and Future Directions James Kilduff and Sim Komisar Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Colloquium.
NAVIGATING THE PROCESS OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES: DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND IMPROVEMENT Shannon M. Sexton, Julia M. Williams, & Timothy Chow Rose-Hulman.
The Engineering Body of Knowledge Joint Engineers Conference 07 November 2014 Helena, MT Robert A. Green, P.E., F. NSPE President National Society.
GLOBAL ACCREDITATION TRENDS Russel C. Jones. Ph.D., P.E. World Expertise LLC USA and UAE.
Michael A. Mackey, Ph.D. Dept. of Biomedical Engineering University of Iowa 51:085/51:178 BME Senior Design Class.
1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering MDR (18 th -27 th November 2013) -MDR Deliverables clearly defined? -Individual team member MDR deliverables.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.
EENG 4910/4990 Engineering Design Murali Varanasi September 02, 2009.
PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Curriculum and Programme Objectives: Mapping of Learning Outcomes Oleg V. Boev, Accreditation Centre, Russian.
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering MDR Report.
B - 1 October 2004 Eric Guilbeau, PhD  Department Chair, ASU, has overseen 4 visits to ASU (2 BME, 1 ChE, 1 Mat’ls Eng)  Lead 1 PEV visit (Bioengineering)
Copyright © 2011 by ABET, Inc. and TMS 1 December 2, 2008 ABET Update UMC Meeting April 6, 2015 San Francisco, CA Chester J. Van Tyne
NSPE EBOK Competency Model Where Does It Fit? What Does It Take to Be an Engineer Paul Schmidt, P.E., F.NSPE Chair NSPE Licensure and Qualifications for.
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
/ASEEBOK Stuart G. Walesh, PhD, PE, Consultant Engineering Body of Knowledge: Tomorrow’s Engineer Indiana Society of Professional.
Part I Educational Technology1 INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT (Educational Technology) Performance Indicator Progression Scope and Sequence Instructional.
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Background on ABET Overview of ABET EC 2000 Structure Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 – Part I.
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
Presenters Only: Presentation Overview and Goals The following presentation provides sample slides and talking points for individuals to use as a guide.
University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION (O.B.E) (For Students) by: OBE Sector Committee 2016, FKMP, UTHM With Wisdom We Explore Faculty of Mechanical and.
Slide 1 ANSI Annual Conference 2002 Breaking Down Border: Business, Standards and Trade Engineering Overview presented by William E. Kelly Professor Catholic.
Accreditation of study programs at the Faculty of information technologies Tempus SMGR BE ESABIH EU standards for accreditation of study.
Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have the following: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) ETP 2005.
ABET ACREDITATION By: Elizabeth Rivera Oficina de Acreditación.
Funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do.
ABET Accreditation College of IT and Computer Engineering
Robert P. King Department of Applied Economics April 14, 2017
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION
2012 Capstone Design Conference Amin Karim, DeVry University
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Information Technology (IT)
Assessment and Accreditation
CE 220 Professionalism A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Introduction to Engineering Design II (IE 202)
Presentation transcript:

/ASEEBOK Stuart G. Walesh, PhD, PE, Consultant NSPE’s Pan – Engineering Body of Knowledge ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Indianapolis, IN, June

/ASEEBOK Purpose Describe the EBOK 2 Indicate similarities and differences between the EBOK and the CEBOK Suggest ways educators and others might use the EBOK

/ASEEBOK 3 NSPE’s Definition of BOK The depth and breadth of knowledge, skills, and attitudes appropriate to enter practice as a professional engineer in responsible charge of engineering activities that potentially impact public health, safety, and welfare Similar to the CEBOK definition

Respond to NAE “take charge” challenge to the engineering profession Support NSPE’s mission, vision, and values Build on discipline- specific BOK efforts Need for a pan-engineering BOK Why develop an EBOK? /ASEEBOK 4

5 EBOK Structure The EBOK KSAs are defined by 30 Capabilities Similar to the CEBOK’s outcomes Each capability is further defined with a list (not all inclusive) of representative specific Abilities Each ability begins with an active verb

/ASEEBOK 6 Example of capability-abilities format 5. Design Description Design, whether used as a verb to represent a process or interpreted as a noun to refer to the result of the process, is a core capability in engineering. As a process, design may be defined as…… The goal of design is quality; that is, meeting all requirements such as functional needs and staying within a budget. The ultimate result of the design process is an optimal solution consisting of a structure, facility, system, product, or process. More specifically, design leads to highly varied results such as automobiles, airports, chemical processes, computers and other electronic devices, nuclear power plants, prosthetic devices, skyscraper, ships, and spacecraft.

/ASEEBOK 7 Example abilities As examples of design capability, an engineer entering practice at the professional level should be able to: Identify, or work collaboratively to identify, the pertinent technical, environmental, economic, regulatory, and other project requirements and constraints; Contribute to the development of alternatives and prepare design details for complex projects; Analyze the pros and cons of some alternative design options and assist in the selection of an optimized design alternative; Etc.

/ASEEBOK 8 3 categories of capabilities Basic or Foundational (3) Technical (16) Professional Practice (11)

/ASEEBOK 9 Basic or foundational 1. Mathematics 2. Natural Sciences 3. Humanities and Social Sciences Technical 4. Manuf./Const.12. Risk, Reliab., Uncert. 5. Design13. Safety 6. Engr. Econ.14. Societal Impact 7. Engr. Science15. Systems Engr. 8. Engr. Tools16. Oper. & Maint. 9. Experiments17. Sustain. & Environ. Impact 10. Prob. Recog. & Solving18. Tech. Breadth 11. QCQA19. Tech. Depth Just the names— see report for detailed description

/ASEEBOK 10 Professional practice 20. Business Aspect of Engr. 21. Communication 22. Ethical Responsibility 23. Global Knowledge & Awareness 24. Leadership 25. Legal Aspects of Engr. 26. Lifelong Learning 27. Professional Attitudes 28. Project Management 29. Public Policy & Engr. 30. Teamwork

/ASEEBOK 11 Specificity of the EBOK compared to the CEBOK Much less—by design CEBOK: “What?” and “How?” EBOK: “What?”

/ASEEBOK 12 So, how Do we use the EBOK ?

Prospective engineering students Parents Teachers/ advisors General public Engineering and other faculty/ administrators Current engineering students Accreditation leaders Employers Engineer interns Mentors and supervisors Licensing boards Certification boards Engineering society members EBOK /ASEEBOK 13

/ASEEBOK 14 Stakeholders Prospective engineering students, parents, teachers, advisors, general public Possible Uses Understand importance of engineering Appreciate range of knowledge, skills, and attitudes Engineering and other faculty and administrators Design curricula/programs Create/improve courses

/ASEEBOK 15 Current engineering students Provide context for their education Accreditation leadersRevise criteria EmployersPartner with personnel Engineer InternsDirect their experience Mentors and supervisorsAssist interns

/ASEEBOK 16 Licensing boardsSet expectations for licensure Certification boardsDefine desired mastery level Engineering society members Use as resource for committee, subcommittee, and task force work

/ASEEBOK 17 The CEBOK and EBOK: Similarities and Differences Similar Aspirational Entry into professional practice Outcomes/Capabilities

/ASEEBOK 18 Different Discipline-specific vs. pan-engineering CEBOK assigns levels of achievement to B, M/30, and E EBOK does just “What?,” not “How?”

/ASEEBOK 19 EBOK has 6 additional capabilities (all technical): Manufacturing/Construction Engineering Economics QCQA Safety Systems Engineering Operations and Maintenance Consider some for CEBOK3?

/ASEEBOK 20 NSPE is sharing the EBOK As of end of June 2014: 5 presentations at state and national conferences 4 planned presentations at state, national, and international conferences 5 articles/papers published 70 executive directors/presidents of professional societies notified and referred to the complimentary pdf Engineering Body of Knowledge report

/ASEEBOK 21 Want to help? Read Engineering Body of Knowledge (free pdf at Speak and write about the EBOK (Sample abstracts, articles, PowerPoints are available. Contact Stu Walesh at Suggest improvements to the EBOK (send to Art Schwartz, NSPE, Use the EBOK in your organization/work

/ASEEBOK 22