The Adversary System
To provide a procedure for disputing parties to present and resolve their cases in as fair a manner as possible Controlled by strict rules of evidence and procedure Role of the Adversary System
Major features of the adversary system Role of the parties Role of the judge Standard and burden of proof Need for legal representation Need for rules of evidence and procedure Features of the Adversary System
Party Control - Each party controls their own case (within the rules of evidence and procedure) Parties are responsible for: Instigating the proceedings – the person who believes they have been wronged (plaintiff is civil, prosecution in criminal) brings the case to court Investigating the facts Role of the parties
Parties are also responsible for: Deciding which facts to bring to court – each side decides which evidence they wish to present to court (although prosecution must disclose all evidence even if it is not beneficial) Investigating the law that is relevant to the case Role of the parties
Parties are also responsible for: Deciding whether to have a jury in a civil case Choosing whether to have legal representation Role of the parties
Party control allows the parties to feel that they are in control of the situation and are responsible for the outcome Satisfies the competitive spirit Gives people the opportunity to fight to win their case – leads to a sense of satisfaction Role of the parties
In civil cases – it means that cases can be resolved But it makes the process expensive – which means that not everyone has effective access to mechanisms to resolve disputes The elements
Impartial umpire - Ensures the court processes and procedures are carried out according to the rules of evidence and procedure May only ask questions to clarify matters Minimises unfairness to either party Role of the Judge
Decides: Admissibility of evidence Questions of law Directs the jury whether there is one Decides the outcome of a case where there is no jury Role of the judge
For the adversary system to work effectively the judge must be impartial Essential that the decision maker (judge or jury) is independent from the case Judge has no prior knowledge of the case before hearing the evidence presented Role of the Judge
The impartial, independent judge ensures a fair and unbiased hearing The elements
Burden of proof lies with the party bringing the case to court Criminal – prosecution Civil – plaintiff Person who brings the case must prove the other party was in the wrong Burden and Standard of Proof
Standard of proof – the strength of evidence needed to prove the case Criminal – beyond reasonable doubt Civil – on the balance of probabilities Burden and Standard of Proof
Essential elements of the adversary system Burden of proof indicates who must begin the battle Standard of proof indicates the strength of proof required to decide the winner Burden and Standard of Proof
Burden and standard of proof ensure a fair and unbiased hearing The elements
Legal representatives – prepare the case on behalf of the parties Legal representatives are experts – are familiar with rules of evidence and procedure Help to ensure that the parties are able to present their best possible case Assists in achieving a just outcome Need for legal representation
Bringing out the truth and showing your case in the best light depends on being legally represented – with the best possible lawyer Presenting a case without legal representation is very difficult and can result in an unjust outcome Need for legal representation
For the adversary system to work effectively there needs to be equal representation Parties should have an equal opportunity to present their cases Truth should be brought out through both sides bringing their evidence and cross examination by the other side Need for legal representation
If one party is better represented than the other, this could lead to an unfair advantage and possibly an incorrect result – so it will not be a fair and unbiased hearing The elements
A person who can afford a more competent barrister is more likely to win than a person represented by a less experienced barrister this means that there is not effective access for everyone The elements
Evidence is concerned with proof of facts Rules of evidence aim to ensure fair and equal treatment Need for rules of evidence and procedure
Evidence can be Oral – given by witnesses Sworn statements (called an affidavit) Objects – murder weapons, photos diagrams, tape-recording Circumstances and facts (called circumstantial evidence) Need for rules of evidence and procedure
Adversary system relies more heavily on oral evidence given by witnesses than documentary evidence Need for rules of evidence and procedure
Rules of evidence are primarily for the protection of the parties Ensure that Parties are treated fairly Jury is not distracted by irrelevant material Unreliable or illegally obtained evidence is not heard by the court Evidence is not unduly prejudicial to the defence Prior convictions are not admissible Need for rules of evidence and procedure
Rules of procedure provide a framework in which court cases take place Provide the way in which the court will try to bring about a resolution Procedures are aimed at treating both sides fairly Create at atmosphere of formality so that the decision is followed Need for rules of evidence and procedure
Assist the parties in achieving a just outcome Rule of evidence keep the contest fair Rules of procedure should assist the truth to emerge Need for rules of evidence and procedure
Hearsay evidence Prior convictions (unless used as propensity evidence) Irrelevant evidence Opinion Evidence obtained illegally Privileged information Evidence not admissible
Only allow certain types of evidence to ensure a fair and unbiased hearing Rules of procedure help assist timely resolution of disputes The elements
The jury system is NOT a feature of the adversary system – it is an entirely different system! Juries