Kant 1724 - 1804 What Gives An Act Moral Worth? Consequences: No. Why? 1.Control 2.Persons have intrinsic value, not instrumental value Motives: Yes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Non-Consequentialism
Advertisements

What is deontology?.
Kant Are there absolute moral laws that we have to follow regardless of consequences? First we want to know what Kant has to say about what moral rule.
Kant’s Ethical Theory.
KANTIAN ETHICS IN FIVE EASY (?) STEPS. Sandel’s Classification of Normative Ethical Theories 1.Core concept: maximizing happiness – Utilitarianism (morality,
Immanuel Kant The Good Will and Autonomy. Context for Kant Groundwork for Metaphysics of Morals after American Revolution and Before French- rights.
Deontology: the Ethics of Duty
categorical imperative
Kant’s Categorical Imperative and Euthanasia
Ethics : an overview by William Scarff, UWBS Key concepts in ethics.
How Actions Can Be Morally Evaluated l Teleological Ethics: morality is defined in terms of the consequences of actions l Deontological Ethics: morality.
How Actions Can Be Morally Evaluated l Teleological Ethics: morality is the means to achieve what is identified as good or valuable l Deontological Ethics:
How Actions Can Be Morally Evaluated l Teleological Ethics: morality is the means to achieve what is identified as good or valuable l Deontological Ethics:
Kantian Ethics Exam Questions
Kant’s deontological ethics
© Michael Lacewing Three theories of ethics Michael Lacewing
Kant’s Ethics of Duty 3 insights form the basis for his theory  An action has moral worth if it is done for the sake of duty. (DUTY)  An action is morally.
Deontological & Consequential Ethics
Kantian Ethics Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
Deontological Ethics Is saving someone from drowning a morally praiseworthy act? Do motives play any role in whether an act is morally praiseworthy?
Kantianism/Deontology: Non-Consequentialism
Kantian ethics (& suicide): Kantian ethics (& suicide): Immanuel Kant ( ). A German philosopher. Ought implies Can Maxims Categorical Imperative.
Kant and Moral Duties.  We don’t require moral theory(ies) to tell us that lying and homicide are wrong, and helping those in need is a good thing.
Consequentialism Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? What if it is a small amount of pain to prevent a.
Kant Good Will –Morally praiseworthy actions are done from a sense of duty. Our duty is to follow the right moral rules.
Immanuel Kant. Two worlds Reason is part of the intelligible world Sensible (Lesser faculty) Part of the world of nature (empirical)
Categorical and Practical Imperative
Immanuel Kant Duty Ethics The moral worth of an action depends on motive (do the right thing for the right reason)
DEONTOLOGY “DUTY” ETHICS IMMANUEL KANT
Duties, Rights, and Kant Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang.
Kant’s Ethics Kant’s quotes are from FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSICS OF MORALS.
The Categorical Imperative Kantian Ethics. Learning Intentions and Outcomes You will: Investigate the three formulations of the Categorical Imperative.
Objectives: SWBAT  Identify Immanuel Kant  Analyze Kantian Rationality  Identify and discuss the Categorical Imperative.
Lecture 6 Kantian ethics Immanuel Kant ( )
Immanuel Kant Deontological Ethics.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 12 Kant By David Kelsey.
Kant Deontology Categorical Imperative. Immanuel Kant Profile: Dead German Time of Berkley, Rousseau, Hume, Bentham Not a fan of music or arts.
Setting the state for Kant --Are there any acts that are wrong, regardless of the consequences? (Are consequences all that matter?) --Case: Bombing Hiroshima.
Aristotle Human beings have a function
© Michael Lacewing Kant’s Categorical Imperative Michael Lacewing
Ethics and Morality Theory Part 3 30 January 2008.
The Moral Philosophy of Immanuel Kant The Ethics of Duty and Reason
Ethics AIO 2015 LECTURE 2.
The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals Immanuel Kant.
The Journey toward Moral Certainty.  Immanuel Kant,
Standard Form ► 1. State your position ► 2. 1 st Premise (Fact 1: State fact and source) ► 3. 2 nd Premise (Fact 2: State fact and source) ► 4. 3 rd Premise.
Chapter 5: Kant’s Moral Theory Historical Background ◦ Immanuel Kant ( ) ◦ “What ought I do?” What Gives an Act Moral Worth? - The Consequences.
Kant. The Good Will and Duty Kant did not believe that any outcome was inherently good. Pleasure or happiness could result out of the most evil acts.
Lesson Objective Key Words Lesson outcomes Hypothetical Categorical Imperatives Freedom To evaluate the differences between the Hypothetical and Categorical.
Immanuel Kant and the Enlightenment Immanuel Kant: German ( ) Enlightenment: 1700's (18th Century) Applies the new rational scientific method of.
Kantian Ethics Good actions have intrinsic value; actions are good if and only if they follow from a moral law that can be universalized.
Lecture 13 Kantian ethics Immanuel Kant ( )
Immanuel Kant The Categorical Imperative. Part I. The Ethics of Duty More than any other philosopher, Kant emphasized the way in which the moral life.
The Categorical imperative
Theory of Formalism.
Kant’s Categorical Imperative
Kant: the good will, duty and the Categorical Imperative
Immanuel Kant.
Kant’s Categorical Imperative
Kantian principles Starter – 1) Keywords from last lesson
Noddy’s Guide to Kant.
The Categorical Imperative
“DUTY” ETHICS IMMANUEL KANT
Kant’s Categorical Imperative - revision
Kant’s Moral Theory.
Deontology Morality Depends on the Motives
Kantian Ethics.
The Categorical Imperative
Intro to Philosophy Ethical Systems.
Presentation transcript:

Kant What Gives An Act Moral Worth? Consequences: No. Why? 1.Control 2.Persons have intrinsic value, not instrumental value Motives: Yes

What Is The Right Motive? An act has moral worth only it if is done with the right intention or motive: done in accordance with a “good will.” Good will makes an act good. Good will: good unconditionally

The Shopkeeper What Is Her Motive? 3 Possible Motives 1. Good Business 2. Sympathy

3. It’s The Right Thing To Do (good will)/A Sense of Duty Only when an act is motivated by this concern for morality/moral law, does it have moral worth.

Why Will & Motive?

What Is The Right Thing To Do? Right Motive + Right Act

Hypothetical/Categorial Imperatives To understand what is right to do: hypothetical imperative & categorical imperative

Hypothetical Imperative Not Moral Contingent: contingent or dependent on what individuals want/desire Individual: arise from individual goals/plans Moral Imperatives: not contingent and are universal

Categorical Imperative Unconditional and universally binding Basic Moral Principle by which we determine what we ought and ought not to do.

The First Form “Act only on that maxim that you can will as a universal law.” My act must be something that I can will others do (I can accept others doing). Given I’m a rational being, I can only will what is noncontradictory.

The Second Form “Always treat humanity, whether in your own person or that of another, never simply as a means but always at the same time as an end.” 1. How we ought to treat ourselves as well as others. 2. Treat ourselves & others as ends rather than as means.

Universality & Rationality of Morality Moral Law: we’re subject to it & author of it: it flows from our own nature as rational beings “Kingdom of Ends”: community of rational persons Do our actions further or promote such a community?