Kant’s Ethics Kant’s quotes are from FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSICS OF MORALS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 27, 2012 Kantian Deontology. Act Utilitarianism An action is morally wrong if and only if there is an alternative action that produces a greater.
Advertisements

Non-Consequentialism
What is deontology?.
Kant Are there absolute moral laws that we have to follow regardless of consequences? First we want to know what Kant has to say about what moral rule.
Kant’s Ethical Theory.
Categorical Imperative
Immanuel Kant The Good Will and Autonomy. Context for Kant Groundwork for Metaphysics of Morals after American Revolution and Before French- rights.
Deontology: the Ethics of Duty
categorical imperative
Kant. Kant desire Kant desire impulse Kant desire impulse incentive.
Phil 160 Kant.
Kant’s Categorical Imperative and Euthanasia
Kant on Duty. Introduction Kant will be the culmination of two themes traced over the ages Kant will be the culmination of two themes traced over the.
Deontological Ethics Deontological theory—Asserts that the rightness of actions is determined partly or entirely by their intrinsic value Consequentialist.
Ethics A Very Brief Primer Ethics of Duty or Deontological Ethics.
Kantian Ethics Exam Questions
Kant’s deontological ethics
Kantian Ethics Leadership & Ethics (NAV 4402) 06 FEB 07 SSgt Thomas Buettner.
Kant’s Ethics of Duty 3 insights form the basis for his theory  An action has moral worth if it is done for the sake of duty. (DUTY)  An action is morally.
Deontological & Consequential Ethics
Kant’s Deontological Ethics. The Plan  What is Deontology?  Good Wills and Right Actions  The Categorical Imperative  Examples and Applications.
Deontological Ethics Is saving someone from drowning a morally praiseworthy act? Do motives play any role in whether an act is morally praiseworthy?
Consequentialism Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? What if it is a small amount of pain to prevent a.
Kant What Gives An Act Moral Worth? Consequences: No. Why? 1.Control 2.Persons have intrinsic value, not instrumental value Motives: Yes.
Immanuel Kant. Two worlds Reason is part of the intelligible world Sensible (Lesser faculty) Part of the world of nature (empirical)
Categorical and Practical Imperative
Immanuel Kant Duty Ethics The moral worth of an action depends on motive (do the right thing for the right reason)
DEONTOLOGY “DUTY” ETHICS IMMANUEL KANT
Duties, Rights, and Kant Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang.
The Categorical Imperative Kantian Ethics. Learning Intentions and Outcomes You will: Investigate the three formulations of the Categorical Imperative.
Deontological Morality IMMANUEL KANT. ARGUMENT 1 VS. HAPPINESS (395) 1) Telic Principle: In an organized being suitably adapted to the purpose of life,
Objectives: SWBAT  Identify Immanuel Kant  Analyze Kantian Rationality  Identify and discuss the Categorical Imperative.
Lecture 6 Kantian ethics Immanuel Kant ( )
Immanuel Kant Deontological Ethics.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 12 Kant By David Kelsey.
Kant (5) Humanity as an end in itself. 3 formulations of the CI Universal law formulation: Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same.
Setting the state for Kant --Are there any acts that are wrong, regardless of the consequences? (Are consequences all that matter?) --Case: Bombing Hiroshima.
Aristotle Human beings have a function
AREA 1 GUIDING PRINCIPLES SECTION 3 Consequences (Utilitarian Ethics) Duty and Reason (Kantian Ethics)
Class 6 Kant. Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) From Königsberg, Germany.
© Michael Lacewing Kant’s Categorical Imperative Michael Lacewing
AIT, Comp. Sci. & Info. Mgmt AT02.98 Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues in Computing September Term, Objectives of these slides: l to describe an.
The Moral Philosophy of Immanuel Kant The Ethics of Duty and Reason
Utilitarianism Utilitarians focus on the consequences of actions.
The Journey toward Moral Certainty.  Immanuel Kant,
Kant and Kantian Ethics: Is it possible for “reason” to supply the absolute principles of morality?
Standard Form ► 1. State your position ► 2. 1 st Premise (Fact 1: State fact and source) ► 3. 2 nd Premise (Fact 2: State fact and source) ► 4. 3 rd Premise.
A Study of Ethical Thinking You get to decide what works for You.
Chapter 7: Ethics Morality and Practical Reason: Kant
Chapter 5: Kant’s Moral Theory Historical Background ◦ Immanuel Kant ( ) ◦ “What ought I do?” What Gives an Act Moral Worth? - The Consequences.
Lesson Objective Key Words Lesson outcomes Hypothetical Categorical Imperatives Freedom To evaluate the differences between the Hypothetical and Categorical.
Immanuel Kant (1724 – 1804) Influenced Secular Moral Thought. Raised in a Protestant Household. No formal Church Structure. Morality ground in reason,
Immanuel Kant and the Enlightenment Immanuel Kant: German ( ) Enlightenment: 1700's (18th Century) Applies the new rational scientific method of.
Kantian Ethics Good actions have intrinsic value; actions are good if and only if they follow from a moral law that can be universalized.
Lecture 13 Kantian ethics Immanuel Kant ( )
Social Ethics continued Immanuel Kant John Rawls.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 12 Kant
Theory of Formalism.
Kant’s Categorical Imperative
Kant: the good will, duty and the Categorical Imperative
Immanuel Kant.
Kant’s Categorical Imperative
Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
“DUTY” ETHICS IMMANUEL KANT
Kant and Kantian Ethics:
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 14 Immanuel Kant
Kant’s Moral Theory.
Deontology Morality Depends on the Motives
Kantian Ethics.
Presentation transcript:

Kant’s Ethics Kant’s quotes are from FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSICS OF MORALS

Kant offers A Deontological Approach to Ethics Actions have intrinsic moral worth regardless of consequences. Duty based. Good actions derive their value from adherence to moral laws, rules or principles.

Kant’s Ethics For Kant it is not so much a matter of following rules just because they are rules, but It is important that the moral rules are rationally justifiable.

Check this out (a treat from the web)

The Will Kant starts with the notion of a will that is free. The object is to create a good will.

Good Will “Nothing in the world‑indeed nothing even beyond the world‑‑can possibly be conceived which could be called good without qualification except a GOOD WILL. “ from FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSICS OF MORALS

“Duty is the necessity to do an action from respect for law” FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSICS OF MORALS

“Moral Worth Depends on Principle That Guides The Will Not On The Consequences” “Its moral value, therefore, does not depend upon the realization of the object of the action but merely on the principle of the volition by which the action is done irrespective of the objects of the faculty of desire.” FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSICS OF MORALS

Where Do We Find The Principle? Through Reason Utilizing The Categorical Imperative

Imperatives Reason commands the Will The Will is Practical Reason Formulas For Commands of Reason are called Imperatives They take one of two forms: Hypothetical -- If … then….. Categorical …. Universal …. Must DO

Which would be the imperative of morality? Not the Hypothetical ` an action is good to some purpose…’ Categorical `… declares the action to be itself objectively necessary without making any reference to any end in view…’ FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSICS OF MORALS

One Categorical Imperative `Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.’

Duty to Obey, regardless of consequences Who is bound by this duty? `…Duty is the practical unconditional necessity of action: it must, therefore, hold for all rational beings (to which alone an imperative can apply), and only for that reason can it be a law for all human wills.’ FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSICS OF MORALS

Huh???? One must be able to rationally establish that all other rational beings must always do this sort of action as a matter of moral course. Regardless of the consequences. If one breaks a moral law, one owns the consequences. If one obeys a moral law, and negative consequences result, it is not her fault.

Do the right thing You must do the right thing for the right reason. You recognize it as a moral law. It is your duty to obey the law out of reverence, deep respect for it.

Let us try it out We need a maxim Can we rationally establish that all other rational beings must always do this sort of action as a matter of moral course? If so, It is a moral law It is our duty to obey out of reverence for the moral law.

What counts??? Rational beings Ends in themselves Kant offers his Practical Imperative: `Act so that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in that of another, always as an end and never as a means only.” FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSICS OF MORALS

The Practical Imperative Kant thinks that this is another way to express the Categorical Imperative. Because humans are rational and can choose and take responsibility, it is unethical to ignore their rational autonomy and just treat them like a tool for our own satisfaction. We must respect their ability to make their own decisions and reap whatever benefits or punishments that follow.