QU-IRB 31 March,2015. Outline 1.Introduction to Research Ethics 2.Requirements of Research Ethics 3.Institutional Review Board (IRB) 4.Systematic Review.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

University Research Ethics Committee Workshop on procedure and data protection issues 30th May 2008.
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
Human Subjects & Research Understanding the protection of human subjects, HSRC, and the nature of the process.
DO NO HARM IRRB Presentation Purposes Responsibilities Processes NLU IRRB Home page.
 Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D Barry Gribbons, Ph.D RP Conference: April 2, 2013.
Exempt Research Mary Banks BS, BSN IRB Director CRC IRB and BUMC IRB.
IRB 101: Introduction to Human Subject Research
Protecting Human Participants in Research syr
 Federal regulations specify “engagement” at the institutional level  Cornell has a Federalwide Assurance specifying its commitment to comply with regulations.
IRB Basics Helen Panageas New York University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board Portion of slides courtesy of Suzanne M. Smith, University.
Human Subjects Research Dr. John S. Irvine Chairperson, NMSU Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects Research
1 Wheaton College INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB)
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
Avoiding the Pitfalls of an IRB Submission Chris Ayres Chair, Institutional Review Board Social & Behavioral Science & Chair, Department of Kinesiology,
April 2011 Conducting Research at SPC Approval Process and Procedures Center of Excellence for Teaching and Learning.
The IRB Approval Process Michael Bingham, JD Assistant Director, University of Wisconsin-Madison Education IRB
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HISTORY AND ETHICS. 2 Ethical History : Holocaust : Nuremburg Trials 1964: Declaration of Helsinki :
The Human Subjects Institutional Review Board Workshop Part 1: An Introduction to Human Subjects Research Ethics and the IRB Process Presented by Alena.
Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research: Does Your Research Need One? Merle Rosenzweig Michael Unsworth.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
The Linguistics Department Institutional Review Board Committee Silvina Montrul, chair Fred Davidson Irene Koshik Ryan Shosted September 22, 2008.
Ethics Ethics Applied to Research. Ethics in Nursing Research Scientific Misconduct – a fabrication, falsification, plagiarism or other practice that.
A step-by-step guide to help you determine if your research protocol is required to be reviewed by the Lindenwood University IRB INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Dustin Yocum, MA Institutional Review Board University of Illinois HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Ethics Ethics Applied to Research Back to Class 2.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) School of Professional Studies April 18, 2013
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
 Epidemiology -- Research – or Not Research? Medical Research Summit March Tom Puglisi, PhD.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
Human Subjects Research at Mines Colorado School of Mines New Faculty Orientation November 20, 2015.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Human Research Protection Program 101 March 20, 2007 Cincinnati, OH.
 What is an IRB and why do we need one at Western?  Who needs to submit proposals to the IRB?  If approved, how long is your proposal good for?  Is.
0 Ethics Lecture Research. ACADEMY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY Disclosures  The speaker has no financial interest in the subject matter of this.
Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research: Does Your Research Need One? Merle Rosenzweig Michael Unsworth.
Created by Steve Martin, PA-C IRB Application Received Exempt Complete Yes No Mississippi College IRB Application Process Determine Review Category Expedited.
Protecting Human Subjects Overview of the Issues Applications to Educational Research The IRB Process.
Research ethics.
Investigator Initiated Research Best Practices for IRB: SBER Corey Zolondek, Ph.D. IRB Operations Manager Wayne State University.
CSBS Faculty Workshop: The IRB – Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human Subjects PRESENTED BY: FRANCES SOLANO WITH SPECIAL GUEST: DR. DANIEL.
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
Chapter 3: Ethical guidelines for psychological research.
COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
Conducting Human Subjects Research
SOU Institutional Review Board
The Institutional Review Board: Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How
Protection of Human Subjects In Research
Conducting Human Subjects Research
Introduction to the Institutional Review Board
This takes approximately 5 minutes or less from start to finish
Conducting Human Subjects Research
Intro to Projects – Research with Human Subjects
What types of research are exempt and ohrp guidance on exemptions
Greg Nezat CRNA, PhD CDR/NC/USN Chairman, IRB II
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP)
Common Rule Update: Exempt categories UT IRB
Human Participants Research
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

QU-IRB 31 March,2015

Outline 1.Introduction to Research Ethics 2.Requirements of Research Ethics 3.Institutional Review Board (IRB) 4.Systematic Review of Research Proposal 5.Case reviews QU-IRB 31 March,2015

Research Ethics Concepts of research ethics: Support and remind researchers to protect human subjects. Provide us with a structure for analysis and decision- making. Provide workable definitions of benefits and risks, along with guidelines for evaluating and balancing the benefits and risks of our studies. QU-IRB 31 March,2015

What is Research? Definition of Research: a systematic investigation designed to develop or contribute to general knowledge. Definition of Human Subject: A living individual about whom an investigator conducting research obtains  data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or  identifiable private information (e.g. record review) QU-IRB 31 March,2015

Why Research Ethics? QU-IRB 31 March,2015 Misconduct Ethical Codes and Guidelines

In 2004 and 2005, Dr. Hwang Woo-Suk, published two papers in the journal Science that claimed his team had succeeded in creating human embryonic stem cells through cloning. Allegations later followed from a co-worker that these paper was based on fabricated data. The papers were editorially retracted, Dr. Hwang lost his position at Seoul National University, and the South Korean government ended its financial and legal support of his research. Famous Misconduct Cases Stem Cell Case ( ) QU-IRB 31 March,2015

Examples of Codes & Guidelines Nuremberg Code (1949) Declaration Of Helsinki ( ) The Belmont Report (1979) CIOMS/WHO International Guidelines (1993, 2002) QU_IRB (2011) SCH (2010) QU-IRB 31 March,2015

The Belmont Report  In 1979 the National Commission published the Belmont Report.  The Belmont Report identifies three basic ethical principles that underlie all human subject research. These principles are commonly called the Belmont Principles. The Belmont Principles are:  Respect for persons, Beneficence, and Justice. QU-IRB 31 March,2015

The Belmont Principles Respect for persons include: The requirement to obtain informed consent. The requirement to respect the privacy of research subjects. Beneficence Include: The requirement to use the best possible research design to maximize benefits and minimize harms. The requirements to make sure the researchers are able to perform the procedures and handle the risks. The prohibition of research that is without a favorable risk- benefit ratio. QU-IRB 31 March,2015

The Belmont Principles Con. The principle of justice include: The requirement to select subjects equitably. The requirement to avoid exploitation of vulnerable populations or populations of convenience. It was the Commission's intention that each of the three principles should have equal moral force. Researchers required to consider each case separately and on its own merits in light of all three principles. QU-IRB 31 March,2015

Requirements of Research Ethics 1.Community Partnership (Respect of culture) 2.Social value (valuable to research subject & community) 3.Scientific validity (use of accepted scientific methods) 4.Fair subject selection (inclusion & exclusion criteria) (vulnerable groups) 5.Favorable risk-benefit ratio (Risk could be physical, psychological, social, economical or legal ) 6.Independent review (To avoid conflicts of interests) 7.Informed consent 8.Respect for human subjects QU-IRB 31 March,2015

Levels of risks QU-IRB 31 March,2015 Minimal Aboveminimal Toorisky

7-Informed Consent Process (cont) Contents: 1.Purpose of the research 2.Procedures (duration) 3.Risks 4.Benefits 5.Alternatives 6.Confidentiality 7.Withdrawal 8.Compensation 9.Who will contact QU-IRB 31 March,2015 Voluntary Decision No pressure No undue- encouragement

Samples QU-IRB 31 March,2015

Institutional Review Board (IRB) IRB is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects. Regulations require IRB review and approval for research involving human subjects. Most research institutions, professional organizations, and scholarly journals apply the same requirements to all human research. Although federal regulations refer to IRBs, an institution may have chosen a different name for the committee (Ethics Review Committee). QU-IRB 31 March,2015

IRB protects: 1- The research subjects 2- The researchers 3- The institutes 4-The community QU-IRB 31 March,2015 The primary function of an Institutional Review Board (IRB) is protection of human subjects involved in research.

The Composition of the IRB SCH regulations dictate that the IRB membership will include: At least five members. Members of both sexes. Members that come from varied professions. At least one member whose primary concerns are in nonscientific areas. At least one member whose primary concerns are in scientific areas. At least one member who is not otherwise affiliated with the institution. QU-IRB 31 March,2015

The Authority of the IRB SCH regulations stipulate that an IRB can: Approve research. Disapprove research. Modify research. Conduct continuing reviews. Observe/verify changes. Suspend or terminate approval. Observe the consent process and the research procedures. QU-IRB 31 March,2015

Consequences of Not Following IRB Regulations If IRB regulations are not followed, consequences could include: Suspension of research project. Suspension of all of a PI's research projects. Inability to use data or publish results. Notification of sponsors, regulatory agencies and funding agencies of noncompliance. Inability to receive funding from federal grants. Additional monitoring and oversight by the IRB and/or third party monitoring of research activities. Termination of employment. Loss of licenses. Immediate shut-down of ALL research at an organization. QU-IRB 31 March,2015

QU-IRB (Qatar University – Institutional Review Board) QU-IRB 31 March,2015

QU-IRB QU-IRB 31 March,2015 Qatar University’s Institutional Review Board (QU-IRB), under the directives of Supreme Council of Health (SCH) was formed as an independent committee under research compliance in September All research that is to be conducted on human subjects must be submitted to QU-IRB for ethical acceptability

General Procedures Outline Part 1. (from Applicant) Filled in forms (Application, Checklist and other supporting documents) should be sent to QU-IRB at the address QU- (All forms are available in the Required Forms list)QU- If both English and Arabic languages are to be used, supporting documents such as surveys, questionnaires, consents/ascents, etc…, should be provided in both languages. If exemption from Full Ethics Review is requested, it should be specified in the with reasons for such request. Exemption criteria is stated in the Research Ethics Detailed Manual which can be accessed through QU-IRB Web Site QU-IRB 31 March,2015

General Procedures Outline Cont. Step 1: Application received undergo initial screening to make sure the forms are complete and filled in properly. Step 2: Once step 1 is complete, the proposals are reviewed by the chairperson for possible exemption or expedited. If ok, the exemption letter is issued without sending the application for a full ethics review. Step 3: If the application does not meet the exemption requirements, it undergoes a full ethics review. Once approval is granted, approval letter is issued. QU-IRB 31 March,2015

Forms Required for QU-IRB: QU-IRB 31 March, Application 2. Checklist 3. Surveys / Questionnaires 4. Consents / Ascents (if applicable) 5. Supervisor Letter for student graduate projects 6. QU-IBC approval (if applicable) 6. Collaborating Institute’s IRB Approval (if applicable) 7. Any other relevant supporting documents (Dept. Approval) In case of a renewal request, only a renewal request is needed.

If you are seeking an exemption from the full ethical review (expedited review), please state that in your with a justification for such request. Please note that for student UG projects, all communication to IRB should be done by the Supervisor. Sample documents can be accessed through ts.php ts.php We recommend to check the IRB website for queries Please send all documents to Once received, these documents will undergo an initial screening and thereafter the routine process for IRB review. The committee may ask further clarifications/information during the course of the review. Once the review is complete, IRB decision letter will be issued accordingly. QU-IRB 31 March,2015

Systematic Review of Research Proposal What Qualifies as Research Involving Human Subjects? QU-IRB 31 March,2015

First Questions to Ask: Is the project considered research? Does the study involve Human Subjects? QU-IRB 31 March,2015

Human Subject Research QU-IRB 31 March,2015 A research Involving living individuals about whom the researcher obtains: Data through intervention or interaction Identifiable private information OR Non-human subjects Exempt research

Types of IRB Review Review by IRB chair or his/her designee Is it considered research? Does not involve human subjects? Can be exempt from Review? Full Board Review QU-IRB 31 March,2015

Exempt Research QU-IRB 31 March,2015 Research is exempt from full board review and future review by the IRB The decision may be made ONLY by the chair or designee The decision must be done in advance of the research There must be clear determinants of what qualifies for exempt research

Limitations for Exempt Research Not involving vulnerable subjects Prisoners Children Pregnant women Not more than minimal risk QU-IRB 31 March,2015

Categories of Exemption #1 Research conducted in commonly accepted educational settings, involving normal educational practices, such as: Research on special education instructional strategies, (Lectures,Seminars, etc..). Research on the effectiveness of or the comparison among instructional techniques, curricula, or classroom management methods. QU-IRB 31 March,2015

Categories of Exemption #2 Research involving the use of Survey Procedures, Interview procedures or Observation of public behavior UNLESS information is obtained and recorded by the investigator in such a way that the subject can be identified, AND disclosure could reasonably place the subject at risk of criminal or civil liability or be damaging to the subject ’ s financial standing, employability, or reputation. QU-IRB 31 March,2015

Categories of Exemption #3 Research involving the collection or study of existing data, documents, records, pathological specimens, or diagnostic specimens If these sources are publicly available OR The information is recorded in a way that the subject can not be identified directly Or through identifiers linked to the subject QU-IRB 31 March,2015

Involves Human Subject ? Qualify for Exempt Status? IRB Review No need for IRB review Research Activity ? Yes No Yes Decision Chart for Review QU-IRB 31 March,2015

Thank You