The FLUKA high energy cosmic ray generator: predictions for the charge ratio of muons detected underground G. Battistoni, A. Margiotta, S. Muraro, M. Sioli.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TIERRAS: an AIRES package to simulate high energy cosmic ray showers underground and underwater Matías Tueros Instituto de Física La Plata – Universidad.
Advertisements

Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Preliminary studies for T2 primary target for the NA61 fragmentation beam run 11 th October 2010 – NA61 Collaboration Meeting M. Calviani on behalf of.
Ultra Peripheral Collisions at RHIC Coherent Coupling Coherent Coupling to both nuclei: photon~Z 2, Pomeron~A 4/3 Small transverse momentum p t ~ 2h 
EAS EXPERIMENT ON BOARD OF THE AIRBUS A380 J. N. Capdevielle, F. Cohen, PCC, College de France K. Jedrzejczak, B. Szabelska, J. Szabelski, T. Wibig The.
ATLAS LHCf Detector 140m away from the interaction point LHCf: calibration of hadron interaction models for high energy cosmic-ray physics at the LHC energy.
LHCf: a LHC Detector for Astroparticle Physics LHCf: a LHC Detector for Astroparticle Physics Lorenzo Bonechi on behalf of the LHCf Collaboration * University.
March 13thXXXXth RENCONTRES DE MORIOND 1 The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station Carmen Palomares CIEMAT (Madrid) On behalf.
Pion yield studies for proton drive beams of 2-8 GeV kinetic energy for stopped muon and low-energy muon decay experiments Sergei Striganov Fermilab Workshop.
An accelerator beam of muon neutrinos is manufactured at the Fermi Laboratory in Illinois, USA. The neutrino beam spectrum is sampled by two detectors:
Presented by Steve Kliewer Muon Lifetime Experiment: A Model.
Neutron Monitor Detection Efficiency John Clem University of Delaware 2004 Annual CRONUS Collaboration Meeting.
The LHCf experiment Hiroaki MENJO INFN Firenze on behalf for the LHCf collaboration at 29 March 2010, MC4LHC.
Status of Atlas Tile Calorimeter and Study of Muon Interactions L. Price for TileCal community Short Overview of the TileCal Project mechanics instrumentation.
Size and Energy Spectra of incident cosmic radiation obtained by the MAKET - ANI surface array on mountain Aragats. (Final results from MAKET-ANI detector)‏
March 13thXXXXth RENCONTRES DE MORIOND 1 The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station Carmen Palomares CIEMAT (Madrid) On behalf.
Omega meson in nucleus, experimental study K. Ozawa (Univ. of Tokyo)
TAUP Conference, Sendai September The primary spectrum in the transition region between direct and indirect measurements (10 TeV – 10 PeV)
Extending the Bertini Cascade Model to Kaons Dennis H. Wright (SLAC) Monte Carlo April 2005.
The FLUKA high energy cosmic ray generator: predictions for the charge ratio of muons detected underground G. Battistoni, A. Margiotta, S. Muraro, M. Sioli.
“(Come in under the shadow of this red rock), And I will show you something different from either Your shadow at morning striding behind you Or your shadow.
FLUKA as a new high energy cosmic ray generator G. Battistoni 2, A. Margiotta 1, S. Muraro 2, M. Sioli 1 University and INFN of 1) Bologna and 2) Milano.
FLUKA as a new high energy cosmic ray generator G. Battistoni, A. Margiotta, S. Muraro, M. Sioli (University and INFN of Bologna and Milano) for the FLUKA.
XXXI International Cosmic Ray Conference, ICRC 2009 Lodz, Poland, July 7-15, 2009 Time structure of the Extensive Air Shower front with the ARGO-YBJ experiment.
The muon component in extensive air showers and its relation to hadronic multiparticle production Christine Meurer Johannes Blümer Ralph Engel Andreas.
Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.
Charged Kaon Production Yield Studies with Stretcher Sergei Striganov Fermilab Future of Kaon Physics at Fermilab August 21, Fermilab.
Hadronic interaction studies with the ARGO-YBJ experiment (5,800 m 2 ) 10 Pads (56 x 62 cm 2 ) for each RPC 8 Strips (6.5 x 62 cm 2 ) for each Pad ( 
Study of the Atmospheric Muon and Neutrinos for the IceCube Observatory Ryan Birdsall Paolo Desiati, Patrick Berghaus,
Nucleon Decay Search in the Detector on the Earth’s Surface. Background Estimation. J.Stepaniak Institute for Nuclear Studies Warsaw, Poland FLARE Workshop.
Study of hadron interactions in OPERA-like bricks Aim: background study of   h, hhh decays 4 th September 2012 H. Shibuya, H. Ishida, T. Matsuo, T. Fukuda,
Hybrid measurement of CR light component spectrum by using ARGO-YBJ and WFCTA Shoushan Zhang on behalf of LHAASO collaboration and ARGO-YBJ collaboration.
“The Cosmic Ray composition in the knee region and the hadronic interaction models” G. Navarra INFN and University, Torino, Italy For the EAS-TOP Collaboration.
Bartol Flux Calculation presented by Giles Barr, Oxford ICRR-Kashiwa December 2004.
Muons from  /K CSC samples vs generator predictions: preliminary comparisons.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
School of Cosmic-ray Astrophysics, Erice, July 4, 2004 Thomas K. Gaisser Role of particle interactions in high-energy astrophysics Uncorrelated fluxes.
The objective of the CRONUS-Earth Project is to simultaneously address the various uncertainties affecting the production and accumulation of in-situ cosmogenic.
Measurement of the Charge Ratio of Cosmic Muons using CMS Data M. Aldaya, P. García-Abia (CIEMAT-Madrid) On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Sector 10 Sector.
Cosmic ray physics in ALICE Katherin Shtejer Díaz For the ALICE Collaboration LatinoAmerican Workshop on High Energy Physics: Particles and Strings, Havana,
Accelerator-based Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Kam-Biu Luk University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Cosmic Rays from to eV. Open Problem and Experimental Results. (KASCADE-Grande view) Very High Energy Phenomena in the Universe XLIV th Rencontres.
What we do know about cosmic rays at energies above eV? A.A.Petrukhin Contents 4 th Round Table, December , Introduction. 2. How these.
The objective of the CRONUS-Earth Project is to simultaneously address the various uncertainties affecting the production and accumulation of in-situ cosmogenic.
Congresso del Dipartimento di Fisica Highlights in Physics –14 October 2005, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano Icarus: a multipurpose.
Radiation study of the TPC electronics Georgios Tsiledakis, GSI.
Workshop on AstroParticle Physics, WAPP 2009 Bose Institute, Darjeeling, December 2009 Extensive Air Showers and Astroparticle Physics Observations and.
January 13, 2004A. Cherlin1 Preliminary results from the 2000 run of CERES on low-mass e + e - pair production in Pb-Au collisions at 158 A GeV A. Cherlin.
Marina Golubeva, Alexander Ivashkin Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow AGeV simulations with Geant4 and Shield Geant4 with Dpmjet-2.5 interface.
OUTGOING NEUTRONS IN CALET CALET AIMS AT DETECTING UHE CR ELECTRONS HIGH REJECTION FACTOR FOR PROTONS/NUCLEI NEEDED POSSIBLE IMPROVEMENT RESPECT ‘STANDARD’
NEVOD-DECOR experiment: results and future A.A.Petrukhin for Russian-Italian Collaboration Contents MSU, May 16, New method of EAS investigations.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
Atmospheric Neutrino Fluxes Giles Barr XXIst International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics Neutrino 2004 Paris.
Muon-induced neutron background at Boulby mine Vitaly A. Kudryavtsev University of Sheffield UKDMC meeting, ICSTM, London, 27 June 2002.
Physics whit ACORDE (ALICE Cosmic ray detector) Arturo Fernández for ACORDE-ALICE group.
Measurement of the Muon Charge Ratio in Cosmic Ray Events with the CMS Experiment at the LHC S. Marcellini, INFN Bologna – Italy on behalf of the CMS collaboration.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
Muons in IceCube PRELIMINARY
High Energy and Prompt Neutrino Production in the Atmosphere
Direct Measurement of the Atmospheric Muon Spectrum with IceCube
Systematic uncertainties in MonteCarlo simulations of the atmospheric muon flux in the 5-lines ANTARES detector VLVnT08 - Toulon April 2008 Annarita.
Report to Delta Review: Hadronic Validation
of secondary light ion beams
Monte Carlo studies of the configuration of the charge identifier
Comparison Of High Energy Hadronic Interaction Models
Comparison Of High Energy Hadronic Interaction Models
Hadronic Interaction Model Analysis Air Shower Development
Performed experiments Nuclotron – set up ENERGY PLUS TRANSMUTATION
The np -> d p0 reaction measured with g11 data
The birth of the idea Luis Alvarez* invented muon tomography in 1960’s to study the 2nd Pyramid of Chephren L.W. Alvarez, et al, Search for Hidden Chambers.
Presentation transcript:

The FLUKA high energy cosmic ray generator: predictions for the charge ratio of muons detected underground G. Battistoni, A. Margiotta, S. Muraro, M. Sioli FLUKA Meeting 28 th April 2009

2 The generator for high energy cosmic rays that is under development, has the aim of extend the existing FLUKA cosmic rays library to include the TeV region. Work under way within the ICARUS (Milano) and OPERA (Bologna) collaborations at Gran Sasso. Generator dedicated to: physics of high energy underground muons exploiting the full integration in the calculation of both air shower development and muons transport in the rock. Aim: predict multiple muon rates for different primary masses and energy within the framework of a unique simulation model.

3 First application: Analyze the predictions for the charge ratio of underground muons. Compare the results with data from an ongoing experiment (MINOS).

4 The underground muons generator: main features Geometry setup Earth: sphere of radius R = km Atmospheric geometry & profile: 100 concentric spherical shells whose density and composition is varied according to the U.S. Standard Atmospheric Model. Gran Sasso mountain: spherical body whose radius is dynamically changed, according to the primary direction and to the Gran Sasso mountain map. LNGS laboratory: experimental underground halls ICARUS and OPERA detectors volumes rock box where muon–induced secondary are activated (e.m. & hadronic showers from photo-nuclear interaction).

5 Primary spectrum Sampled from a primary mass composition model (a description of the relative abundances of cosmic rays and their energy spectra), derived from the Hörandel composition model [Astrop. Phys. 19 (2003) ]. For each primary nucleus and for each amount of rock to be crossed, we compute the minimum energy required to produce at least one muon underground (probability < to survive).

6 First application: prediction for the charge ratio of underground muons Muons that reach the Earth come from mesons with enough energy: to reflect the forward fragmentation region of the primary initiated interaction and to “remember” the nature of the projectile (there are more protons than neutrons in the primary spectrum)  The muon charge ratio reflects the excess of π + over π - and K + over K −. NOTE: π and K hadronic production are affected by uncertainties up to 20%

7 The muons result from pions and kaons that decay before they interact in the atmosphere. ↓ N(K + )/N(K − ) is larger than N(π + )/N(π − ). Because of their strangeness (S = +1), K + and K 0 can be yielded in association with a leading barion Λ o Σ. On the other hand, the production of K −,K 0 requires the creation of a sea-quark pair s − s together with the leading nucleon and this is a superior order process. For this region K + yield is greater than K − yield, differently from π + and π − yields because of their isospin symmetry.

8 critical energy ε : beyond this energy interaction process dominates on decay. As energy increases, the fraction of muons from kaon decays also increases: the longer-lived pions (π ± : cτ 0 = 780 cm, ε = 115 GeV) start to interact more before decaying than the shorter-lived kaons (K ± : cτ 0 = 371 cm, ε = 850 GeV).

9 As energy increases, kaon decays became a more important contribution to the muon charge ratio. Since Nμ + /Nμ- (from K ) > Nμ + /Nμ− (from π ) the total muons charge ratio is expected to increase with energy

10 MINOS Charge Ratio at the Surface = 1.371± hep-ex R FLUKA μ + /μ − = ± L3 + COSMIC ( (hep-ex/ ). R FLUKA =  R exp = 1.28  0.48 Agreement between FLUKA simulation and MINOS data within 0.7%

11 Muon charge ratio VS muon bundle multiplicity Muon bundle high multiplicity ↕ High primary energy and High primary mass number In the primary heavy elements the ratio of primary protons to neutrons decreases with respect to primary protons ↓ the muon charge ratio is expected to decrease with growing primary mass number.

12 Primary mass groups distribution mean value grows with underground muon multiplicity

13 Muon charge ratio VS muon bundle multiplicity Muon charge ratio decreases with growing multiplicity PRELIMINARY

14 This work has been presented at the 44 th Rencontres de Moriond (Very High Energy Phenomena in the Universe) and has been accepted for the 31 st ICRC conference. Work in progress: Comparison between FLUKA and DPMJET II.5 interaction models.

15 MINOS Charge Ratio at the Surface = 1.371± hep-ex R DPMJET II μ + /μ − = 1.27 ± 0.01 DPMJET II.5 L3 + COSMIC ( (hep-ex/ ). R FLUKA =  R exp = 1.28  0.48 ? ? VERY PRELIMINARY WORK IN PROGRESS R FLUKA μ + /μ − = ± 0.012

16 from K from π μ + / μ - FLUKA ± μ + / μ - FLUKA from π 1.26 ± 0.01 μ + / μ - FLUKA from K 1.98 ± 0.04 μ + / μ - DPMJET II 1.27 ± 0.01 μ + / μ - DPMJET II from π 1.22 ± 0.01 μ + / μ - DPMJET II from K 1.46 ± 0.03 VERY PRELIMINARY WORK IN PROGRESS

17 DPMJET II.5 & FLUKA p + N → K ± + X E p = 10 TeV DPMJET II.5 standalone & by means of FLUKA FLUKA

18 p + N → K ± + X E p = 10 TeV DPMJET II.5 & DPMJET III DPMJET II.5 & DPMJET II.5 with rejection of strange sea-quark pairs

19 p + Be => K + + X p + Be => K - + X Benchmark for the CNGS beam construction. Limited phase space for cosmic rays physics. E lab = 450 GeV Nucl. Instr. Meth. A449, 609 (2000) SPY experiment (CERN North Area)

20 The end

Volcano’s radiography with cosmic ray muons (MU-RAY) This idea has a long history: –measurement of muon intensity attenuation to detect heterogeneities in large matter volumes (e.g. snow layers, Georg, 1955) –1970: Alvarez (search for hidden chambers in the Chefren pyramid) Since 2003: muon radiography of volcano’s structures with quasi- horizontal muons –spatial resolution ~ some tens of m –“quasi” online monitoring Interest for Vesuvio, Stromboli etc –MU-RAY project, use of scintillation counters along the mountain profile (P. Strolin et al.) FLUKA: full simulation of cosmic ray muon flux starting from primary interactions and using detailed volcano’s topography map (use of  -TeV library) Muon radiography below the Asama volcano’s crater. It can be noted an high-density region around the caldera, and a cavity below.

Status of the work As soon as FLUKA was chosen as the official simulation tool, much work has been done in collaboration with INFN-Naples: –Translation of the Vesuvius’s DEM into a FLUKA-voxel geometry –Each voxel is a cube of 20 m side (granularity high enough for the moment) 3 organs: air, rock, “detector” (two boxes on the volcano’s lateral surface) –Embedding of voxel geometry into muTeV geometry –Adaptation and optimization for the code for this new site Thresholds changed according to volcano’s profile Extension of the primary spectrum in the low energy region –First test with ad-hoc geometries with air holes into the caldera Good resolution for bodies 1.5 km away from the detector site

Detector site Fake air box (100 m side)

Result of the test (simulated ~250 days)

Plans and perspectives The code is ready to be used All the main changes can be performed at data-card level (thresholds, directions, spectra and so on…) Practical problem: the nature of this work, requires a full control of the code by Naples group (detector location, setting of the exposure time, performances and so on), under our supervision: how to proceed?

26 x lab = E j /E i ratio of the total energies of the secondary particle j over the primary particle i dN ij /dx lab differential multiplicity distributions of secondary j as produced by primary i in collisions with air nuclei as a function of x lab ”spectrum weighted moments” Z ij : the multiplicity of secondary particles j as produced by primary particles i in interaction, weighted for the primary spectrum. Strictly bound to inclusive cross sections. γ = 2.7 approximate spectral index of the differential cosmic ray spectrum.

27 For isospin symmetry: On the other hand: where N is a nucleon. So the K + /K − ratio is larger than the π + /π − ratio. Spectrum weighted moments (γ = 2.7) for secondary particles produced in p-air collisions as a function of the projectile kinetic energy in the FLUKA code. K + and 0 (S = +1), can be produced in association with a leading Λ or Σ barion, whereas production of K requires production of a strange-antistrange pair from the sea in addition to the leading nucleon

28 Validation of the DPMJET-III hadronic models: Comparison with the NA49 experiment Data from the NA49 experiment at CERN SPS particle production by p beams on p, C targets: 158 GeV/c beam momentum First published results: Eur. Phys. J. 45 (2006), 343 hep-ex/ hep-ex/  +,  - production p + p p + C  +,  - production as a function of Feynman-x

29 p + Be => π + + X p + Be => π - + X Nucl. Instr. Meth. A449, 609 (2000) SPY experiment (CERN North Area) E cm = 450 GeV

30 FLUKA for Cosmic Rays validation (E μ < 1 TeV) R FLUKA =  R exp =  Vertical < cosθ < 1. Black points: exp. Data Open symb: FLUKA At large angle < cosθ < 0.6 charge ratio L3 + COSMIC experiment ( FLUKA simulations comparison with the experimental data of atmospheric muons charge ratio from L3 + COSMIC experiment (hep-ex/ ). (S.Muraro PhD Thesis)

31 Primary energy distributions for different underground muon multiplicities

32 Muon bundle from primary iron nuclei (E ≈ 10 5 TeV) in the ICARUS T600 detector